A land mine is an explosive device concealed under or on the ground and designed to destroy or disable enemy targets, ranging from combatants to vehicles and tanks, as they pass over or near it. Such a device is typically detonated automatically by way of pressure when a target steps on it or drives over it, although other detonation mechanisms are also sometimes used. A land mine may cause damage by direct blast effect, by fragments that are thrown by the blast, or by both.
The name originates from the ancient practice of military mining, where tunnels were dug under enemy fortifications or troop formations. These killing tunnels ("mines") were at first collapsed to destroy targets located above, but they were later filled with explosives and detonated in order to cause even greater devastation.
Nowadays, in common parlance, "land mine" generally refers to devices specifically manufactured as anti-personnel or anti-vehicle weapons. Though some types of improvised explosive devices ("IEDs") are mistakenly classified as land mines, the term land mine is typically reserved for manufactured devices designed to be used by recognized military services, whereas IED is used for makeshift "devices placed or fabricated in an improvised manner incorporating explosive material, destructive, lethal, noxious, incendiary, pyrotechnic materials or chemicals designed to destroy, disfigure, distract or harass. They may incorporate military stores, but are normally devised from non-military components".
The use of land mines is controversial because of their potential as indiscriminate weapons. They can remain dangerous many years after a conflict has ended, harming civilians and the economy. 78 countries are contaminated with land mines and 15,000–20,000 people are killed every year while countless more are maimed. Approximately 80% of land mine casualties are civilian, with children as the most affected age group. Most killings occur in times of peace. With pressure from a number of campaign groups organised through the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, a global movement to prohibit their use led to the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, also known as the Ottawa Treaty. To date, 164 nations have signed the treaty.
- 1 Use
- 2 History
- 3 Characteristics and function
- 4 Anti-tank mines
- 5 Anti-personnel mines
- 6 Warfare
- 7 Demining
- 8 Anti-personnel mine ban
- 9 Manufacturers
- 10 Effects within the environment
- 11 See also
- 12 Notes
- 13 References
- 14 External links
Land mines were designed for two main uses:
- To create defensive tactical barriers, channelling attacking forces into predetermined fire zones or slowing an invading force's progress to allow reinforcements to arrive.
- To act as passive area-denial weapons (to deny the enemy use of valuable terrain, resources or facilities when active defense of the area is not desirable or possible).
Land mines are currently used in large quantities mostly for this first purpose, thus their widespread use in the demilitarized zones (DMZs) of likely flashpoints such as Cyprus, Afghanistan and Korea. As of 2013, the only governments that still laid land mines were Myanmar in its internal conflict, and Syria in its civil war.
Land mines continue to kill or injure at least 4,300 people every year, even decades after the ends of the conflicts for which they were placed.
The history of land mines can be divided up into three main phases: In the ancient world, buried spikes provided many of the same functions as modern mines. Mines using gunpowder as the explosive were used from the Ming Dynasty to the American Civil War. Finally, in the 20th century, high explosives were developed and used in land mines.
Some fortifications in the Roman Empire were surrounded by a series of hazards buried in the ground. These included goads, foot-long pieces of wood with iron hooks on their ends; lilia (lilies, so named after their appearance), which were pits in which sharpened logs were arranged in a five-point pattern; and abatis, fallen trees with sharpened branches facing outwards. As with modern land mines, they were "victim-operated", often concealed, and formed zones that were wide enough so that the enemy could not do much harm from outside, but were under fire (from spear throws, in this case) if they attempted to remove the obstacles. A notable use of these defenses was by Julius Caesar in the Battle of Alesia. His forces were besieging Vercingetorix, the leader of the Gauls, but Vercingetorix managed to send for reinforcements. To maintain the siege and defend against the reinforcements, Caesar formed a line of fortifications on both sides, and they played an important role in his victory. Lilies were also used by Scots against the English at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314, and by Germans at the Battle of Passchendaele in the First World War.
A defensive measure used by the Romans that was much easier to implement was the caltrop, a weapon about 12–15 cm across with four sharp spikes that are oriented so that when it is thrown on the ground, one spike always points up. As with modern antipersonnel mines, caltrops are designed to disable soldiers rather than kill them, and they also stop mounted forces. They were used by the Jin Dynasty in China at the Battle of Zhongdu to slow down the advance of Genghis Khan's army; Joan of Arc was wounded by one in the Siege of Orléans; in Japan they are known as tetsu-bishu and were used by ninjas from the fourteenth century onwards. Caltrops are still strung together and used as roadblocks in some modern conflicts.
Explosive land mines were used in 1277 by the Chinese during the Song dynasty against an assault of the Mongols, who were besieging a city in southern China. The invention of this detonated "enormous bomb" was credited to one Lou Qianxia of the 13th century. A 14th-century military treatise, the Huolongjing (Fire Dragon Manual), was the first to describe hollow cast iron cannonball shells filled with gunpowder. The wad of the mine was made of hard wood, carrying three different fuses in case of defective connection to the touch hole. These fuses were long and lit by hand, so they required carefully timed calculation of enemy movements.
The Huolongjing also describes land mines that were set off by enemy movement. A nine-foot length of bamboo was waterproofed by wrapping it in cowhide and covering it with oil. It was filled with compressed gunpowder and lead or iron pellets, sealed with wax and concealed in a trench. The triggering mechanism was not fully described until the early 17th century. When the enemy stepped onto hidden boards, they dislodge a pin, causing a weight to fall. A cord attached to the weight was wrapped around a drum attached to two steel wheels; when the weight fell, the wheels struck sparks against flint, igniting a set of fuses to multiple mines. A similar mechanism was used in the first wheellock musket in Europe as sketched by Leonardo da Vinci around 1500 AD.
Besides the use of steel wheels providing sparks for the fuses, there were other methods used as well, such as the "underground sky-soaring thunder". The Ming Dynasty (1368–1644) text of the Wubei Zhi (Treatise on Armament Technology), written by Mao Yuanyi in 1628, outlined the use of land mines that were triggered by the heat of a slow-burning incandescent material in an underground bowl placed directly above the train of fuses leading to the mines buried 3 ft beneath. The booby trap of this mine system had a mound where weapons of halberds, pikes, and lances were dug in, meant to entice the enemy to walk up the small mound and claim their stolen prize of war booty.
When the weapons were removed from the mound, this movement disturbed the bowl beneath them where the butt ends of the staffs were, which in turn ignited the fuses. According to the Wubei Huolongjing volume of the 17th century, the formula for this slow-burning incandescent material allowed it to burn continuously for 20 to 30 days without going out. This formula included 1 lb (0.45 kg) of white sandal wood powder, 3 oz (85 g) of iron rust (ferric oxide), 5 oz (140 g) of "white" charcoal powder (from quicklime), 2 oz (57 g) of willow charcoal powder, 6 oz (170 g) of dried, ground, and powdered red dates, and 3 oz (85 g) of bran.
Europe and the United States
At Augsburg in 1573, a German military engineer by the name of Samuel Zimmermann invented an extremely effective mine known as the Fladdermine. It consisted of a fougasse (or later, sometimes a shell fougasse, that is, a fougasse loaded not with stones but with early black powder mortar shells, similar to large black powder hand grenades) activated by a snaphance or flintlock mechanism connected to a tripwire on the surface. Combining the effects of a tripwire activated bounding fragmentation mine with a cluster bomb, it was devastating to massed attackers but required high maintenance due to the susceptibility of black powder to dampness. Consequently, it was mainly employed in the defenses of major fortifications, in which role it continued to be used until the 1870s.
In Europe in the early eighteenth century, improvised land mines or booby traps were constructed in the form of bombs buried in shallow wells in the earth and covered with scrap metal and/or gravel to serve as shrapnel. Known in French as fougasse, the term is sometimes still used in the present day to describe such devices. This technique was used in several European wars of the eighteenth century, the American Revolution, and the American Civil War.
The first modern mechanically fuzed high explosive anti-personnel land mines were created by Confederate troops of Brigadier General Gabriel J. Rains during the Battle of Yorktown in 1862. As a Captain, Rains had earlier employed explosive booby traps during the Seminole Wars in Florida in 1840. Both mechanically and electrically fused "land torpedoes" were employed, although by the end of the war mechanical fuses had been found to be generally more reliable. Many of these designs were improvised in the field, especially from explosive shells, but by the end of the war nearly 2,000 standard pattern "Rains mines" had been deployed.
Improved designs of mines were created in Imperial Germany, circa 1912, and were copied and manufactured by all major participants in the First World War. Both sides employed land mines (defensively) and tunnel mines (offensively). Well before the war was over, the British were manufacturing land mines that contained poison gas instead of explosives. Poison gas mines were manufactured at least until the 1980s in the Soviet Union. The United States was known to have at least experimented with the concept in the 1950s.
Characteristics and function
A typical land mine includes the following components:
- firing mechanism or other device (including anti-handling devices)
- detonator or igniter (sets off the booster charge)
- booster charge (may be attached to the fuse, or the igniter, or be part of the main charge)
- main charge (in a container, usually forms the body of the mine)
- casing (contains all of the above parts)
Firing mechanisms and initiating actions
A land mine can be triggered by a number of things including pressure, movement, sound, magnetism and vibration. Anti-personnel mines commonly use the pressure of a person's foot as a trigger, but tripwires are also frequently employed. Most modern anti-vehicle mines use a magnetic trigger to enable it to detonate even if the tires or tracks did not touch it. Advanced mines are able to sense the difference between friendly and enemy types of vehicles by way of a built-in signature catalog. This will theoretically enable friendly forces to use the mined area while denying the enemy access.
Many mines combine the main trigger with a touch or tilt trigger to prevent enemy engineers from defusing it. Land mine designs tend to use as little metal as possible to make searching with a metal detector more difficult; land mines made mostly of plastic have the added advantage of being very inexpensive.
Some types of modern mines are designed to self-destruct, or chemically render themselves inert after a period of weeks or months to reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties at the conflict's end. These self-destruct mechanisms are not absolutely reliable, and most land mines laid historically are not equipped in this manner.
There is a common misperception that a landmine is armed by stepping on it and only triggered by stepping off, providing tension in movies. In fact the initial pressure trigger will detonate the mine, as they are designed to kill or maim, not to make someone stand very still until it can be disarmed.
Anti-handling devices detonate the mine if someone attempts to lift, shift or disarm it. The intention is to hinder deminers by discouraging any attempts to clear minefields. There is a degree of overlap between the function of a boobytrap and an anti-handling device insofar as some mines have optional fuze pockets into which standard pull or pressure-release boobytrap firing devices can be screwed. Alternatively, some mines may mimic a standard design, but actually be specifically intended to kill deminers, such as the MC-3 and PMN-3 variants of the PMN mine. Anti-handling devices can be found on both anti-personnel mines and anti-tank mines, either as an integral part of their design or as improvised add-ons. For this reason, the standard render safe procedure for mines is often to destroy them on site without attempting to lift them.
Anti-tank mines were created not long after the invention of the tank in the First World War. At first improvised, purpose-built designs were developed. Set off when a tank passes, they attack the tank at one of its weaker areas — the tracks. They are designed to immobilize or destroy vehicles and their occupants. In U.S. military terminology destroying the vehicles is referred to as a catastrophic kill while only disabling its movement is referred to as a mobility kill.
Anti-tank mines are typically larger than anti-personnel mines and require more pressure to detonate. The high trigger pressure, normally requiring 100 kilograms (220 lb) prevents them from being set off by infantry or smaller vehicles of lesser importance. More modern anti-tank mines use shaped charges to focus and increase the armor penetration of the explosives.
Anti-personnel mines are designed primarily to kill or injure people, as opposed to vehicles. They are often designed to injure rather than kill in order to increase the logistical support (evacuation, medical) burden on the opposing force. Some types of anti-personnel mines can also damage the tracks or wheels of armored vehicles.
Under the Ottawa Treaty, the Parties undertake not to use, produce, stockpile or transfer anti-personnel mines and ensure their destruction.
As of early 2016, 162 countries have joined the Treaty. Thirty-six countries, including the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation and the United States, which together may hold tens of millions of stockpiled antipersonnel mines, are not party to the Convention.
In the asymmetric warfare conflicts and civil wars of the 21st century, improvised explosives, known as IEDs, have partially supplanted conventional landmines as the source of injury to dismounted (pedestrian) soldiers and civilians. IEDs are used mainly by insurgents and terrorists against regular armed forces and civilians. The injuries from the anti-personnel IED were recently reported in BMJ Open to be far worse than with landmines resulting in multiple limb amputations and lower body mutilation.
In military science, minefields are considered a defensive or harassing weapon, used to slow the enemy down, to help deny certain terrain to the enemy, to focus enemy movement into kill zones, or to reduce morale by randomly attacking material and personnel. In some engagements during World War II, anti-tank mines accounted for half of all vehicles disabled.
Since combat engineers with mine-clearing equipment can clear a path through a minefield relatively quickly, mines are usually considered effective only if covered by fire.
The extents of minefields are often marked with warning signs and cloth tape, to prevent friendly troops and non-combatants from entering them. Of course, sometimes terrain can be denied using dummy minefields. Most forces carefully record the location and disposition of their own minefields, because warning signs can be destroyed or removed, and minefields should eventually be cleared. Minefields may also have marked or unmarked safe routes to allow friendly movement through them.
Placing minefields without marking and recording them for later removal is considered a war crime under Protocol II of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which is itself an annex to the Geneva Conventions.
Artillery and aircraft scatterable mines allow minefields to be placed in front of moving formations of enemy units, including the reinforcement of minefields or other obstacles that have been breached by enemy engineers. They can also be used to cover the retreat of forces disengaging from the enemy, or for interdiction of supporting units to isolate front line units from resupply. In most cases these minefields consist of a combination of anti-tank and anti-personnel mines, with the anti-personnel mines making removal of the anti-tank mines more difficult. Mines of this type used by the United States are designed to self-destruct after a preset period of time, reducing the requirement for mine clearing to only those mines whose self-destruct system did not function. Some designs of these scatterable mines require an electrical charge (capacitor or battery) to detonate. After a certain period of time, either the charge dissipates, leaving them effectively inert or the circuitry is designed such that upon reaching a low level, the device is triggered, thus destroying the mine.
None of the conventional tactics and norms of mine warfare applies when they are employed in a guerrilla role:
- The mines are not used in a defensive role (for specific position or area).
- Mined areas are not marked.
- Mines are usually placed singly and not in groups covering an area.
- Mines are often left unattended (not covered by fire).
Land mines were commonly deployed by insurgents during the South African Border War, leading directly to the development of the first dedicated mine-protected armoured vehicles in South Africa. Namibian insurgents used anti-tank mines to throw South African military convoys into disarray before attacking them. To discourage detection and removal efforts, they also laid anti-personnel mines directly parallel to the anti-tank mines. This initially resulted in heavy South African military and police casualties, as the vast distances of road network vulnerable to insurgent sappers every day made comprehensive detection and clearance efforts impractical. The only other viable option was the adoption of mine-protected vehicles which could remain mobile on the roads with little risk to their passengers even if a mine was detonated. South Africa is widely credited with inventing the v-hull, a vee-shaped hull for armoured vehicles which deflects mine blasts away from the passenger compartment.
Minefields may be laid by several means. The preferred, but most labour-intensive, way is to have engineers bury the mines, since this will make the mines practically invisible and reduce the number of mines needed to deny the enemy an area. Mines can be laid by specialized mine-laying vehicles. Mine-scattering shells may be fired by artillery from a distance of several tens of kilometers.
Anti-tank minefields can be scattered with anti-personnel mines to make clearing them manually more time-consuming; and anti-personnel minefields are scattered with anti-tank mines to prevent the use of armored vehicles to clear them quickly. Some anti-tank mine types are also able to be triggered by infantry, giving them a dual purpose even though their main and official intention is to work as anti-tank weapons.
Some minefields are specifically booby-trapped to make clearing them more dangerous. Mixed anti-personnel and anti-tank minefields, anti-personnel mines under anti-tank mines, and fuses separated from mines have all been used for this purpose. Often, single mines are backed by a secondary device, designed to kill or maim personnel tasked with clearing the mine.
Multiple anti-tank mines have been buried in stacks of two or three with the bottom mine fuzed, in order to multiply the penetrating power. Since the mines are buried, the ground directs the energy of the blast in a single direction—through the bottom of the target vehicle or on the track.
Another specific use is to mine an aircraft runway immediately after it has been bombed in order to delay or discourage repair. Some cluster bombs combine these functions. One example was the British JP233 cluster bomb which includes munitions to damage (crater) the runway as well as anti-personnel mines in the same cluster bomb. As a result of the anti-personnel mine ban it was withdrawn from British Royal Air Force service, and the last stockpiles of the mine were destroyed on 19 October 1999.
Metal detectors were first used for demining, after their invention by the Polish officer Józef Kosacki. His invention, known as the Polish mine detector, was used by the Allies alongside mechanical methods, to clear the German mine fields during the Second Battle of El Alamein when 500 units were shipped to Field Marshal Montgomery's Eighth Army.
The Nazis used captured civilians who were chased across minefields to detonate the explosives. According to Laurence Rees "Curt von Gottberg, the SS-Obergruppenführer who, during 1943, conducted another huge anti-partisan action called Operation Kottbus on the eastern border of Belarus, reported that 'approximately two to three thousand local people were blown up in the clearing of the minefields'."
Whereas the placing and arming of mines is relatively inexpensive and simple, the process of detecting and removing them is typically expensive, slow, and dangerous. This is especially true of irregular warfare where mines were used on an ad hoc basis in unmarked areas. Anti-personnel mines are most difficult to find, due to their small size and the fact that many are made almost entirely of non-metallic materials specifically to escape detection.
Manual clearing remains the most effective technique for clearing mine fields, although hybrid techniques involving the use of animals and robots are being developed. Animals are desirable due to their strong sense of smell, which is more than capable of detecting a land mine. Animals like rats and dogs can also differentiate between other metal objects and land mines because they can be trained to detect the explosive agent itself.
Other techniques involve the use of geo-location technologies. A joint team of researchers at the University of New South Wales and Ohio State University is working to develop a system based on multi-sensor integration.
The laying of land mines has inadvertently led to a positive development in the Falkland Islands. Mine fields laid near the sea during the Falklands War have become favorite places for penguins, which do not weigh enough to detonate the mines. Therefore, they can breed safely, free of human intrusion. These odd sanctuaries have proven so popular and lucrative for ecotourism that efforts exist to prevent removal of the mines.
Anti-personnel mine ban
The use of land mines is controversial because they are indiscriminate weapons, harming soldier and civilian alike. They remain dangerous after the conflict in which they were deployed has ended, killing and injuring civilians and rendering land impassable and unusable for decades. To make matters worse, many factions have not kept accurate records (or any at all) of the exact locations of their minefields, making removal efforts painstakingly slow. These facts pose serious difficulties in many developing nations where the presence of mines hampers resettlement, agriculture, and tourism. The International Campaign to Ban Landmines campaigned successfully to prohibit their use, culminating in the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, known informally as the Ottawa Treaty.
The Treaty came into force on 1 March 1999. The treaty was the result of the leadership of the Governments of Canada, Norway, South Africa and Mozambique working with the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, launched in 1992. The campaign and its leader, Jody Williams, won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1997 for its efforts.
The treaty does not include anti-tank mines, cluster bombs or claymore-type mines operated in command mode and focuses specifically on anti-personnel mines, because these pose the greatest long term (post-conflict) risk to humans and animals since they are typically designed to be triggered by any movement or pressure of only a few kilograms, whereas anti-tank mines require much more weight (or a combination of factors that would exclude humans). Existing stocks must be destroyed within four years of signing the treaty.
Signatories of the Ottawa Treaty agree that they will not use, produce, stockpile or trade in anti-personnel land mines. In 1997, there were 122 signatories; the Treaty has now been signed by 162 countries. Another 34 have yet to sign on. The United States is not one of the signatories, based on lacking an exception for the DMZ of Korea.
There is a clause in the treaty, Article 3, which permits countries to retain land mines for use in training or development of countermeasures. Sixty-four countries have taken this option.
As an alternative to an outright ban, 10 countries follow regulations that are contained in a 1996 amendment of Protocol II of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW). The countries are China, Finland, India, Israel, Morocco, Pakistan, South Korea and the United States. Sri Lanka, which had adhered to this regulation announced in 2016, that it would join the Ottawa Treaty.
- People's Republic of China
- Iraq (although production had presumably ceased with the 2003 invasion)
- North Korea
- Russian Federation
- Singapore(production ceased in 2015.)
- The United States is still manufacturing "non-persistent" anti-personnel and anti-tank landmines.
Of other states which are thought to have manufactured mines recently:
- Egypt has unofficially stated that production ceased in 1988.
- South Korea has stated that no mines have been produced since 2000.
- An official from China stated in September 2003 that production has ceased there, since they have an ample stockpile.
- In March 2004, a Libyan official stated that the country has never produced anti-personnel mines, but is known to have laid land mines in the 1970s and 1980s. More recently, during the civil war in March 2011, Gaddafi's forces had sown mines around rebel-controlled areas.
- In 2015, the CEO of Singapore Technologies Engineering announced that the company "is now no longer in the business of designing, producing and selling of anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions or any related key components".
Effects within the environment
Tackling the issue of land mines involves attempting to prevent the planting of landmines in the first place, removing those in place and finding viable approaches to deal with the negative implications that have already occurred.
The purpose of mines are often placed, and succeed in, “decreasing access to fresh water, increasing the rates of water-born diseases and malnutrition, and decreasing the access of livestock to water sources”. 
Throughout the world (specifically in Europe, North Africa and Asia, etc.), there are millions of hectares that are contaminated with land mines.
Although mines that cost only a few dollars to plant may be viewed as cheap military weapons, they require hundreds or thousands of dollars to remove, and perpetrate huge costs in both humanitarian and environmental damages.
When comparing the number of deaths caused by weapons of mass destruction, which mines are rarely classified under, nuclear and chemical combined have not killed nearly as many compared to land mines.
When mines explode, other than causing severe cases of injury and death to humans and wildlife, they destroy soil, plant and water systems which, in turn, accelerate ecosystem disruption.
In addition, natural disasters can have a significant impact on the process of de-mining areas of land. For example, the floods that occurred in Mozambique in 1999 and 2000, possibly displaced hundreds of thousands of land mines left from the war, which caused concern about their locations and thereby delayed recovery efforts.
The effect that landmines on environmental degradation can be observed on a number of different scales.
From a recent study by Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, the environmental aftermath of a land mine explosion depends on: “(i) the objectives and methodological approaches of the investigation; (ii) concentration of mines in a unit area; (iii) chemical composition and toxicity of the mines; (iv) previous uses of the land and (v) alternatives that are available for the affected populations.” 
According to Berhe, the ways in which land degradation is caused by land mines “can be classified into five groups: access denial, loss of biodiversity, micro-relief disruption, chemical composition, and loss of productivity”.
- Access denial
- The most prominent ecological issue associated with landmines (or fear of) is access denial to vital resources. In this context, ‘access’ refers to the ability to use resources, compared to ‘property’ which refers to the right to use resources.
- The presence and fear of presence of even a single landmine can deny people access to land that they need for agricultural practices, water supplies and possibly conservation measures.
- Contrastingly, access denial has been observed to have ‘positive’ effects when the mined areas become ‘no-man’s land’.
- As research and experiments have shown in the past, during limited human interference plants and vegetation, get a chance to grow and recover.
- For example, formerly arable lands in Nicaragua were turned into forests and remained undisturbed after the establishment of landmines. However, these benefits can only last as long as animals, tree limbs, etc. do not detonate the mines. In addition, long idle periods could “potentially end up creating or exacerbating loss of productivity”, particularly within land of low quality.
Similarly, the Penguins of the Falkland Islands have benefited. 
- Loss of biodiversity
- Biodiversity can be threatened by landmines in a certain region by wiping out vegetation and possible wildlife, during explosion or de-mining.
- Landmines can also pose an extra burden for threatened and endangered species, possibly pushing species to extinction. They have been known to be used to target endangered species by poachers.
- Displaced people and refugees can “further contribute to the loss of biodiversity when they hunt animals for food or destroy their habitat in order to make shelters for themselves”, after being forced to do so, as they learn and are directly affected by the presence of landmines.
- Shrapnel or abrasions of their bark or roots caused by detonated mines, can cause the slow death of trees and provide entry sites for wood-rotting fungi.
- Those areas where the land is no longer able to be used for farming practices, because of landmines, make residents resort to the forests to meet all of their survival needs. This makes for many forested areas to become exploited by affected populations, furthering the loss of biodiversity.
- Chemical contamination
- Contaminated soils, particularly with heavy metals, is a very common observance in areas close by to mines after they explode or decay. Products produced from the explosives, both organic and inorganic substances, are most likely to be “long lasting, water-soluble and toxic even in small amounts”. They can be implemented either “directly or indirectly into soil, water bodies, microorganisms and plants with drinking water, food products or during respiration”.
- Toxic compounds can also find its way into important water areas and cause bioaccumulation within land animals, fish and plants. Their effects could be deadly to some animals and other organisms “by acting as a nerve poison to hamper growth”.
“One study in Central Vietnam found that nearly 7,000 hectares of land-enough to support 12,000 families continued to remain unproductive because of land mines.”
The presence of land mines in previously inhabited areas may also cause population shifts, resulting in overcrowding in urban areas with a subsequently increased risk of infectious disease transmission.
Land mine presence may also cause populations to shift to urban areas where overcrowding and risk of spreading diseases are likely to occur.
Reconstruction and development efforts of important structures, including schools and hospitals, are also likely to be delayed by the presence of land mines.
- "Land mine". Merriam-Webster. 2019. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- Finaud, Marc; Finckh, Elena; Hardy, Giezendanner. "Addressing Improvised Explosive Devices" (PDF). United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. Retrieved 20 March 2019.
- "Demining". United Nations. Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "States parties to the convention". The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Landmines in Myanmar: Politically explosive". The Economist. 13 July 2013. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Landmine Monitor 2012". November 2012. p. 1. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- Croll 2008, Introduction
- Croll 2008, Chapter 1
- Needham 1987, pp. 192–193
- Needham 1987, p. 264
- Needham 1987, p. 199
- Needham 1987, p. 204
- Needham 1987, p. 203
- Schneck, William C. (July 1998). "The origins of military mines: part I". Engineer: 49–55. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
- Roy, Roger L; Friesen, Shaye K (October 1999). "Historical Uses Of Anti-Personnel Landmines: Impact On Land Force Operations" (PDF). Department of National Defence (Canada). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-06-26.
- "Ensuring universal adherence". The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- Smith, S.; Devine, Melissa; Taddeo, Joseph; McAlister, Vivian Charles (2017). "Injury profile suffered by targets of antipersonnel improvised explosive devices: prospective cohort study". BMJ Open. 7 (7): e014697. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014697. PMC 5691184. PMID 28835410.
- Bello, Rasaq (2013). "Literature Review on Landmines and Detection Methods". Frontiers in Science. 3 (1): 27–42. doi:10.5923/j.fs.20130301.05.
- Camp, Steve; Helmoed-Römer, Heitman (November 2014). Surviving the Ride: A pictorial history of South African Manufactured Mine-Protected vehicles. Pinetown: 30 Degrees South. pp. 19–34. ISBN 978-1-928211-17-4.
- "Namibia". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- Mines Advisory Group (11 January 2017). "New landmine emergency threatens communities in Iraq and Syria". reliefweb.int. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Islamic State is losing land but leaving mines behind". The Economist. 30 March 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- Cousins, Sophie (20 February 2015). "The treacherous battle to free Iraq of landmines". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Yemen: Houthi-Saleh Forces Using Landmines". Human Rights Watch. 20 April 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 25 Oct 1999 (pt 12)".
- Croll, Mike (1998). The history of landmines. Leo Cooper. ISBN 9780850526288.
- Tadeusz Modelski The Polish Contribution to The Ultimate Allied Victory in The Second World War, Worthing, England 1986, Page 221
- Modelski, Tadeusz (1986). The Polish contribution to the ultimate Allied victory in the Second World War. T. Modelski. p. 221. ISBN 9780951117101.
- Laurence Rees (1999). War of the century: when Hitler fought Stalin. BBC Books. p.118. ISBN 0-563-38477-8
- APOPO Landmine Removal Rats Archived 2010-01-31 at the Wayback Machine
- Mott, Maryann (10 February 2004). "Bees, Giant African Rats Used to Sniff Landmines". National Geographic News. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- Grad, Paul (17 December 2008). "Detecting Land Mines: New Technology". Asian Surveying and Mapping. Archived from the original on 13 February 2009.
- Milliken, Mary (28 September 2005). "Penguins Find Peace in Falklands War Minefields". Environmental News Network. Reuters.
- "Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention". apminebanconvention.org. Archived from the original on 2016-04-12.
- "Major Findings 1999-2004". Landmine Monitor 2004. International Campaign to Ban Landmines. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Burma (Myanmar)". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Cuba". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "India". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Iran". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Iraq". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Nepal". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Democratic People's Republic Of Korea". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Pakistan". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Russian Federation". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Singapore". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Singapore Technologies Engineering stops production of cluster munitions". Retrieved 26 June 2018.
- "New United States Policy on Landmines: Reducing Humanitarian Risk and Saving Lives of United States Soldiers". Archived from the original on 31 December 2014. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
- "Vietnam". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Egypt". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Republic of Korea". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "China". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Libya". Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- MacSwan, Angus (31 March 2011). "Gaddafi forces sow landmines in east Libya". World News. Reuters. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- Newman, Robert D.; Mercer, Mary Anne (July 19, 2013). "Environmental Health Consequences of Land Mines". International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 6 (3): 243–248. doi:10.1179/oeh.2000.6.3.243. ISSN 1077-3525. PMID 10926729.
- Leaning, Jennifer (2000-10-31). "Environment and health: 5. Impact of war". CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 163 (9): 1157–1161. ISSN 0820-3946. PMC 80251. PMID 11079063.
- Berhe, A. A. (August 7, 2006). "The contribution of landmines to land degradation". Land Degradation & Development. 18 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1002/ldr.754. ISSN 1085-3278.
- Ribot, Jesse C.; Peluso, Nancy Lee (2009-10-22). "A Theory of Access". Rural Sociology. 68 (2): 153–181. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x. ISSN 0036-0112.
- "The penguins that would not explode". BBC News. 2017-05-07.
- Croll, Mike (2008). Landmines in War and Peace: From Their Origin to the Present Day (Kindle ed.). Casemate Publishers. ISBN 9781844685011.
- Needham, Joseph (1987). Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 7, Military Technology: The Gunpowder Epic. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521303583.
- Schneck, William C. (November 1998). "The origins of military mines: part II". Engineer: 44–50. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Land mine.|
- ICBL: International Campaign to Ban Landmines
- Landmines and international humanitarian law, ICRC
- Detector Spots Buried Mines 1943, Popular Science article on the "Polish" mine detector.
- "How Axis Land Mines Work", April 1944 detailed article on types of land mines
- E-Mine Electronic Mine Information Network by United Nations Mine Action Services
- Detecting Land Mines: New Technology, by Paul Grad. Published by Asian Surveying and Mapping
- Ken Rutherford, "Landmines: A Survivor’s Tale" – Journal of Mine Action