Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive62

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User: Bobby Awasthi reported by User:slatersteven (Result: No violation; Protected)[edit]

Indian Rebellion of 1857 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Bobby Awasthi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 20:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [Revision as of 21:00, 8 December 2007]


  • 1st revert: [Revision as of 15:08, 9 December 2007]
  • 2nd revert: [Revision as of 15:13, 9 December 2007]
  • 3rd revert: [Revision as of 15:14, 9 December 2007]
  • 4th revert: [Revision as of 15:18, 9 December 2007]
  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

A short explanation of the incident.

Booby is aware of the 3RR rules as he has previously entred into a debat about someone else being baned for this (and has asked why others have not been baned). Moreover he edited more then just four times (about 7 in fact). Many of which are rather insultiing in their reasoning.I never intended to do this but will be unable to edit many of his revisions without violating the rule myslelf Slatersteven (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

He has not made a violation. If he makes several edits consecutively (i.e. with no other users in between), those edits only count as one revert. He has thus made only two reverts in the 24-hour period. Because of the dispute, I've protected the page for three days; please discuss the changes with him on the talk page. -- King of ♠ 00:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

User:64.148.1.113 reported by User:Someguy1221 (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Dan Debicella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 64.148.1.113 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 23:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

Very long edit war without discussion over two unsourced versions of the Dan Debicella. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

24 hours. -- King of ♠ 00:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Ratsofftoya reported by User:Someguy1221 (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Dan Debicella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ratsofftoya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 23:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

Very long edit war without discussion over two unsourced versions of the Dan Debicella. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

24 hours. -- King of ♠ 00:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

User:ScienceApologist reported by User:Martinphi (Result: No violation)[edit]

Ghost light (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). ScienceApologist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 01:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [1]

This is not a technical 24 hour 3RR violation, but nevertheless deserves action considering the user's block log (and you would have to go see all his sock puppets to get the real effect here), history, and refusal to stop edit warring even after objections were raised on the talk page.


[2]

[3]

Finally does a mergeto:

[4]

Redirects saying no objections were made:

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

The user continually edit wars on many articles, but is often clever enough to count. I hope a block will caution him to build consensus. I'm making this report per WP:3RR "Editors may still be blocked even if they have made three or fewer reverts in a 24 hour period, if their behavior is clearly disruptive." ——Martinphi Ψ Φ—— 01:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Most of the edits are ancient. There is no WP:3RR violation here. If you have issues with the editor, the correct venue is a Request for Comments. If you suspect sockpuppetry, request a checkuser. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 08:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Plasynins reported by User:Armyguy11 (Result: Stale)[edit]

Parsley Massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Plasynins (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Armyguy11 (talk) 04:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

22:44, 8 December 2007

Sockpuppet used to circumvent 3rr violation. RFCU has been filed. [10]. The result was a possible. [11] removal of infobox that was already in discussion. user is new to article and conensus has not been reached. user has a strong history of reverting and undoing the work of others.

  • First revert is out of time. I am deferring to another admin as to whether the "possible" result on checkuser is enough to block Yemal. Stifle (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Comment: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Plasynins was opened by this same user. It was closed shortly afterwards. See my comment there about this nonsense, I dont think editing the same page as a person once and a "possible" checkuser result is a reason to block anyone. Yemal (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Is there any reason this is still open? The page in question was protected days ago and neither user has been active since then. The sockpuppet report was closed, why has this report not been???? Yemal (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

It was closed with a possible being the reason. Meaning it wasn't denied that you are in fact engaging in edit warring and are not the same person. As a result you could be still be blocked or at least given a warning for 3rr vandalism. User Playasins hasn't been on and took a "wikibreak" most likely as a result of a sockpuppet account being discovered. Armyguy11 (talk) 10:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Closing as stale. Stifle (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

User:222.144.8.172 reported by User:71.250.205.204 (Result: No action)[edit]

List of tributaries of Imperial China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 222.144.8.172 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 06:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Their tit-for-tat edit warrings are keeping so fast, I couldn't give a warning but another editor already did. I also think Clerkwheelzeon violates the rule together.

  • Comment - I'm not sure if this is needed. Both users are either new or ip's and I don't think they were aware of the 3RR. I warned them and there hasn't been any violations since (I would've reported them if there had been). Therefore I'm not sure if it's still necessary to bring this issue here. I'm new to the AN/3RR though, so correct me if I'm wrong so I can learn from my mistakes. Cheers, Spawn Man Review Me! 06:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • They stopped after being warned and appear to be over on the talk page for now. You're right to bring it here, but I'm not going to take any further action for now as the primary purpose of a block (preventing edit-warring) has already been achieved. Stifle (talk) 09:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
    • I didn't bring it here... JSYK Spawn Man Review Me! 10:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
      • Err... yeah, move along, nothing to see here :) Stifle (talk) 12:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Muscovite99 reported by User:Kulikovsky (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Vladimir Putin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Muscovite99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 21:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)



User:Muscovite99 pushes allegations coming from questionable sources into a biography of a living person. This seems to violate WP:BLP. He has done 4 reverts in less than 2 hours being warned twice about 3RR. Kulikovsky (talk) 21:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Done. I would suggest that you don't make so many reverts yourself though. You've made three (just under the limit), but the limit of 3 reverts per 24 hours doesn't mean you should use that limit. -- King of ♠ 00:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Just to explain, it is not that I want to do multiple reverts, but as far as I understand, WP:BLP requires removal of poorly sourced allegations. Whether they are poorly sourced or not I hope we can establish at the discussion page of the article. Thanks again. Kulikovsky (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Just a brief note: the edit war in this case was actually started by User:Kulikovsky whose actions also amount to censorship and WP:Vandalism. The issue was discussed at the discussion page and Belkovsky's opinion did not enjoy any majority. The allegations are presented as such, not as facts. As those have been made in credible publications by a number of well-known persons, they noteworthy and relevant.Muscovite99 (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

User:V-Dash reported by User:MelicansMatkin (Result: No violation)[edit]

User talk:V-Dash (edit | [[Talk:User talk:V-Dash|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). V-Dash (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 01:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [12]


  • Diff of 3RR warning: [18]

User:V-Dash is currently engaged in an edit war with IP 172.216.161.58. I am unsure whether 3RR covers an edit war on a users talk page, but I thought I should report it just in case. They have reverted each other several times in the last couple of hours. As of this report, V-Dash has reverted after I posted a 3RR warning on his talk page (the warning was posted in between the 4th and 5th revert); IP 172.216.161.58 has also violated 3RR on this talk page after the warning, and that report is filed below. I also feel it prudent to note that V-Dash has been warned multiple times about 3RR, and also been blocked for a 3RR violation in the past. He also has a history of attacking other editors, and sockpuppetry. MelicansMatkin (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

User's reverts were on his own talk page, which falls under WP:3RR#Exceptions, "reverts performed by a user within his or her own user page, user subpages, provided that such reverts do not restore copyright violations, libelous material, WP:BLP violations, or other kinds of inappropriate content enumerated in this policy or elsewhere". Dreadstar 05:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

User:172.216.161.58 reported by User:MelicansMatkin (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

User talk:V-Dash (edit | [[Talk:User talk:V-Dash|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 172.216.161.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 01:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [19]


  • Diff of 3RR warning: [25]

IP 172.216.161.58 is currently engaged in an edit war with User:V-Dash. I am unsure whether 3RR covers an edit war on a users talk page, but I thought I should report it just in case. They have reverted each other several times in the last couple of hours. As of this report, IP 172.216.161.58 has reverted after I posted a 3RR warning on their talk page (the warning was posted in between the 4th and 5th revert); User:V-Dash has also violated 3RR on this talk page after the warning, and that report is filed above. I also feel it prudent to mention that the IP 172.216.161.58 has currently only made edits to the talk page in question. MelicansMatkin (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Wikiarrangementeditor reported by User:Daniel J. Leivick (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Nordschleife fastest lap times‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Wikiarrangementeditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 04:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [26]
  • 1st 3RR warning: [32]
  • 2nd 3RR warning [33]
  • 1st Block for 3RR [34]
  • 3rd 3RR warning [35]

User Wikiarrangementeditor has a habit of avoiding discusion in his short time on Wikipedia. Based on his grammer and several comments he has made I believe he does not speak English and edits using a web translator. I have tried to discuss his edits on his talk page, but the best I have received in return are poorly phrased dismissals that show a lack of understanding of the policies I have pointed him towards. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Blocked for 24 hours. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

User:GuTTy-YC reported by User:Seicer (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Panda (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). GuTTy-YC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 19:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

User persistently edit wars by inserting in uncredible sources and original research. This comment left by Gutty-Yc indicates he plans on continuing. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Similar edit war at Disculpa los malos pensamientos:
Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[[User:Zeraeph]] reported by [[Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)]] (Result: 1 month)[edit]

Psychopathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). [[User:Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)|Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)]] ([[User talk:Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)|deleted contribs]] · logs · edit filter log · [[Special:Block/Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)|block user]] · block log): Time reported: 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Zeraeph repeatedly reverts my edits on Psychopathy - at first I did not realize what was happening. I tried to discuss it on the talk page. He reported me to ANI. I essentially cannot edit the page. (This is the first time I have reported here so I hope I am doing it right) Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


  • first revert [36]
  • second revert [37]
  • third revert (plus four more) [38]

[39]

  • fourth revert (plus four more)[40]
  • fifth revert [41]

[42]

  • sixth revert [43]
  • seventh revert (plus one more) [44]
  • eighth revert [45]
  • ninth revert (plus one more) [46]
  • tenth revert [47]
  • eleventh revert (plus more) [48]

At first I did not realize what was happening. I tried to discuss on talk page. The other editor reported me to ANI. There I was told to discuss it with User:Zeraeph. I have lost a lot of work. Mattisse 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Already blocked - 1 month ‎by Mikkalai --slakrtalk / 07:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Sfacets reported by User:Will Beback (Result: 10 days)[edit]

Nirmala Srivastava (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Sfacets (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 02:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Many reverts. Experienced user, who was blocked twice last month for 3RR. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Already blocked - 10 days by Blnguyen. --slakrtalk / 07:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Deadlyfix reported by User:Rocksanddirt (Result:deleted)[edit]

John Candine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Deadlyfix (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 06:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [49]


  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

User Deadlyfix is trying to create a future history section and upset that we don't seem to be getting on board with it. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Note - John Candine is CSD-tagged G3/vandalism and reverts were removals of {{db}} tags. I went ahead and notified the user using {{uw-speedy2}}. User also made a personal attack on User talk:Rocksanddirt for which he's now been warned. If editor continues you might consider reporting him has a vandal instead. --slakrtalk / 07:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I think the user gave up, after the articles were deleted and the warnings posted. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 22:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Seems pointless to block now that the article has been deleted. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

User:80.180.11.90 reported by User:Brian0324 (Result: 24 hour block)[edit]

Christianity in China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 80.180.11.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 22:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [50]


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity_in_China&diff=177514796&oldid=177514397

  • 6th revert:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity_in_China&diff=177526302&oldid=177523488

  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

Edit war. IP user is repeatedly deleting cited material. Brian0324 (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Already blocked --EoL talk 02:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Kuban kazak reported by User:Hillock65[edit]

Zaporozhian Cossacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Kuban kazak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 15:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [55]


  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

  • Diff of 3RR warning: No warnings were issued as this is a seasoned and well known edit warrior with long history of blocks for revert warring [56]

Sterile edit warring in multiple articles. This user is repeatedly deleting cited material and inserting biased and one-sided statements in articles Zaporozhian Cossacks‎, Ukrainians in Russia‎, Kuban People's Republic. --Hillock65 (talk) 15:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm rather disinclined to block only Kuban kazak, as both he and the reporter are edit warring (even if the latter hasn't technically violated 3RR). I'd be inclined to block neither or both (and given that both have a history of blocks, the latter seems preferable to me). Heimstern Läufer (talk) 18:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Funkynusayri reported by User:Zerida (Result:Funkynusayri blocked for 10 days, Hamada2 blocked for 24 hours)[edit]

Talk:Egyptians (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Egyptians|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Funkynusayri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 20:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: 11:59

Started disrupting the article and trolling its talk page with the help of a puppet of a banned user a while back (include trolling my talk page [57]). Has since returned on a regular basis to do the same despite extensive discussion (Archive 2) and lack of consensus for his changes, warnings not to use the article's talk page as a soapbox or engage in repeated tendentious editing [58]. — Zerida 20:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Wikignat reported by User:Jdcaust (Result:24h)[edit]

Alan Keyes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Wikignat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 20:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: 14:17


  • Diff of 3RR warning: 14:13

Back in October, Wikignat blanked a well-sourced, but controversial part of Alan Keyes' article. He was mean-spirited and did not assume good faith on the part of the editors at the time. His points were discussed patiently and a consensus of editors (myself, Dlabtot, and JamesMLane) determined that the information should be inlcluded. Last night, he blanked it again, this time providing sources to "prove" his points. I considered the sources and wrote a compromise. He reverted the compromise. In between, Dlabtot undid his blanking and mentioned that it should be kept. JamesMLane also came by and informed Wikignat he was wrong. Wikignat tried and failed to get the page protected, so he reverted again. I warned him of the 3RR back in October and again today. I also responded to him again on the talk page. Despite this, he reverted for the third time, so I am now reporting him. --20:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Jdcaust (talk)

User:Spylab reported by User:EliasAlucard (Result: No violation)[edit]

Neo-Nazism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Spylab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 23:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Spylab has been fanatically obsessed in changing the lead of the Neo-Nazism article into making it appear that neo-Nazism is an ideology, when in reality, the ideology is Nazism (neo-Nazism is the term). This is supported by the sources I've cited, and the sources User:Spylab cites (for some reason, he interprets them in a different way). So Spylab has been engaging himself in constantly reverting the changes made by me and several other users into his own POV. The article has been locked recently over this, and I think it's time to block Spylab as a warning and hopefully he will get the message not to editwar over this. EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 23:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

No violation. There has to be four reverts within 24 hours to break 3RR. Stifle (talk) 16:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
On top of that, blocks aren't used punitively or to give someone a message, only to prevent disruption. Stifle (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

User:207.195.244.52 reported by User:Lucid6191 (Result: Malformed)[edit]

2003_Fiesta_Bowl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 207.195.244.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 01:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

A user is repeatedly deleting or editing sourced information and replacing it with unsourced, biased statements. It's basically an article about a controversial sports event, and there is an edit war with one side deleting sourced information and replacing it with unsourced hearsay. The user continues to edit after being warned for 3RR. Lucid6191 (talk) 01:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Those are oldids, not diffs. Please report using diffs. Stifle (talk) 16:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

User:ScienceApologist reported by User:Anthon01 (Result: no violation)[edit]

Quackwatch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). ScienceApologist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 18:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Previous version reverted to: [59]


  • Necessary for newer users: A diff of 3RR warning issued before the last reported reversion.

Your report will be ignored if it is not placed properly.

Editor keeps reverting against consensus. Anthon01 (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

No violation, but there will be other sanctions coming. east.718 at 21:50, December 14, 2007

User:Bestiege23 reported by User:Burnte (Result: Stale)[edit]

Also reporting myself for getting into it. I had reverted 3 times before I even realized it, so I'm guilty too.

User:Burnte reported by User:Burnte (Result: )

  • Previous version reverted to: I'm part of the "war", it's not appropriate for me to revert anymore.


4chan's domain registrar account ws hacked. I added info from the 4chan status blog about this and some info about the hack. Reverted. I readded it. Reverted. Another person added it. Reverted. I re-aded it, reverted, etc. The argument is that the OWNER'S BLOG is not a reliable source. I fail to see how anyone could be more authoritative than the owner. burnte (talk) 23:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

User:137.99.117.74 reported by User:Commodore Sloat (Result: No action, user warned by filer)[edit]

Salman Pak facility (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 137.99.117.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 00:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


Anon is inserting disputed text in a blatant attempt to POV-push the article in a completely different direction than the consensus of investigators, journalists, historians, and academics have concluded. He has been asked to stop on the talk page but so far has refused to engage in discussion at all. csloat (talk) 00:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Followup - this anon is also using the userid User:Chudogg; s/he appears to be a new user and has been warned. There is probably no need for a block at this time, although a warning from an admin would be helpful. The editor has posted to the talk page since I wrote the above. csloat (talk) 01:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

User:207.67.148.57 reported by User:Lucid6191 (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

2003 Fiesta Bowl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 207.67.148.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 04:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

A user is repeatedly deleting or editing sourced information and replacing it with unsourced, biased statements. It's basically an article about a controversial sports event, and there is an edit war with one person deleting sourced information and replacing it with unsourced hearsay, and most recently, the edits borderline on vandalism. He has been warned on his talk page multiple times by multiple people about 3RR and Vandalism, and has responded with rude comments and more edits. Lucid6191 (talk) 04:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours --slakrtalk / 13:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

User:U is for Unity reported by User:Snapper2 (Result: already blocked)[edit]

Ino Yamanaka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). U is for Unity (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 05:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

User continues to create article for minor fictional character despite consensus against it. They are uninterested in discussing the matter, feeling the character's importance within the series is enough to warrant an article. ~SnapperTo 05:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Already blocked by Allen3. --slakrtalk / 14:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

User:24.28.6.209 reported by User:Hu12 (Result:Blocked indef.)[edit]

Hyman G. Rickover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 24.28.6.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 22:33 15 December 2007 (UTC)

It's not a 3RR violation if the edits are reverting vandalism. My reverts were merely restoring a link, one since added to the referenced citations, that was lazily being deleted and replaced by a completely irrelevant wikipedia article rather than editing it to be a referenced citation (which I ultimately did). User:Hu12 is being less than honest here. And lazy. --24.28.6.209 (talk) 22:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

You continued edit warring/Disruptive editing, despite the discussions, warnings and opposing consensus from editors and/or administrators on the talk page. You chose to continue reverting in pursuit of a certain WP:POINT, rather than discuss.--Hu12 (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
"...blocks aren't used punitively or to give someone a message, only to prevent disruption." Huh...I didn't know that. Did you know that, User:Hu12? 'Cuz, you seem to want to indulge in some sort of punishment for my reverting of what you know I took to be vandalism and destruction of information. So if blocking is being inappropriately bureucratic, what is an appropriate punishment for repetitively keeping Wikipedia's articles from being vandalized by dilettantes...being invited to Knol? --24.28.6.209 (talk) 23:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
This case seems to be an attempt to impose one's own view of "standards to apply" rather than those of the community. Wikipedia's guidelines are generally accepted among editors, such as WP:3RR and is considered a standard that users should follow. Wikipedia policy is quite clear here: the responsibility for justifying inclusion of any content rests firmly with the editor seeking to include it. You engaged in an Wikipedia:Edit war as a way of attempting to win a content dispute. A contentious fact does not become uncontentious by virtue of repetition.--Hu12 (talk) 23:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
And I made the simple effort to fix the article via a referenced citation, while you -- repetitively -- insisted on using a Wikepedia article for reference that effectively had nothing to do with the content of the article. And...who's at fault here? --24.28.6.209 (talk) 23:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Bksimonb reported by User:Creationcreator (Result:Page Protected)[edit]

BKWSU (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). NAME_OF_USER (