Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive553

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

Philadelphia[edit]

Hi there, I wanted to notify you of an incident happening on the Philadelphia page. Since I'm not an administrator, I can't do a lot about it, except revert things. I created the new lead image for the article and replaced the old one with it by a majority of votes (see the talk page). One or more users however keep reverting it to the old lead image. Despite several warnings they still refuse to take part in the discussion on the talk page. I'm willing to restore the old lead image only if a majority of users decides so through this discussion. So I'm asking you, to put a lock on the article or something similar. Thanks in advance, Massimo --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 14:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

I've semiprotected it, to encourage discussion. You should be aware, however, that you're technically violated WP:3RR, as those reverts were not vandalism (consider this your warning), and it'd be best to get the user(s) to discuss on the talk page, perhaps by asking at their talk pages, or perhaps by placing a note on the article's talk page. Cheers. lifebaka++ 15:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll place a note on the article's page to refer to the discussion. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Ah, a comment would be much better. Or something inside an {{ambox}}. Cheers. lifebaka++ 15:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Swamilive rangeblock expired[edit]

Hello. A 1-month range block was placed to stop User:Swamilive in March (seen here). As soon as that expired, he came back to the old things. The block was reset to 3 months in April (seen here. Now, that's expired and he's back at it. See the history of Winnipeg Folk Festival. Also, see these edits to Graham [1] [2] compared to these edits [3] [4] by former sock.

For the more of the history here, see:

Would someone mind resetting the block? Thanks. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 17:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

I blocked the range for six months. If anyone objects, feel free to remove/modify. J.delanoygabsadds 17:52, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Wow, that was quick! Thanks a lot! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 17:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Breast article[edit]

Check my History and see that all of the edits i did make on this page was quickly removed and now im scared to edit again because of getting blocked for a simple reason, how shall i handle it?--Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 13:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

You have not edited the article Breast since February. When you did edit the article, it appears that you added unsourced original research. I would encourage you to read our info on using reliable sources and verifiability. TNXMan 13:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I did make an edit now and got it removed by another user without leaving a note or a reason? --Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Nakon removed your edit, probably for the reasons I stated above. Please do not re-add the material without a reliable source. Wikipedia is based on info that can be verified in independent sources and all of our articles should reflect that. TNXMan 14:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Fine I will not change the article but eh? everyone knows that African woman are known for having large breasts and by adding this information should be pretty normal--Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
That's the point. We can't accept material simply because "everyone knows it". It has be cited in an independent source before we can add it to an article here. TNXMan 14:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Apparently, someone was scarred by the covers of National Geographic when growing up. I know a great number of African women who do not have "large breasts". (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey! That stuff was rarely on the covers of National Geographic. I had to actually look through the magazine (oh wait, too much information.) --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah right, and Jenna Jameson will someday settle down and have kids. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Didn't we go through this nonsense back in February or so? Wasn't Wiikiiwriter seriously chastised then? → ROUX  16:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it was February, the same types of edits, and I believe he was blocked at one point for the same edits. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it's deja vu all over again regarding that stuff about African women. Regarding NG, I recall one black comedian (can't think of his name - might have been Irwin C. Watson) said, "National Geographic was our Playboy!" Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 21:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Ah, yes. I also remember a story from the sixties about a "Native" woman who was shown bare-breasted, be cause it was educational. She was, however, quite pale-skinned, and had to take a trip through PhotoShop under the airbrush before she appeared in the magazine. PhGustaf (talk) 21:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Individuals with an agenda against subject matter pertaining to or related to the noble Barbaro-family[edit]

Resolved

I have been picked on, today, after I edited the Barbaro family recently, only to find out, by a little research on line, that there has been some long-standing agenda against Barbaro-family information on Wikipedia. False cases of sockpuppetry have been made up against users and tons of legitimate information has also been destroyed in the process. I am asking a professional administrator to keep a look out against the several prolematic editors talked about in this link: [[5]]. I have currently been harrassed by user Deor and Edward 321, who are both talked about in the link as problematic. Thank youPagetools (talk) 23:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Our only agenda is removing hoaxes. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mctrain, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mctrain/Archive, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mctrain, Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Societyfinalclubs, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive95#Hoaxer, Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_1#Barbaro_family, and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive370#User:Mctrain. Edward321 (talk) 00:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • I strongly recommend that the problematic administators taked about in the link that I posted above be permanently banned from Wikipedia. What they have said is libelous, and was fueled by a jealous agenda against one of the Barbaro family members, who happened to be an American. They are also liars, who blocked unjustly, and then proceeded to write whatever they wanted in their case files, which are completely bogus. Their libelous and bogus accusations have spilled all across the internet- on what can be deemed as nothing more than a childish, jealous agenda. They have made a mockery out of Wikipedia [[6]].
  • In one case file above, they try to discredit the family's ancient Roman links, yet that point was absolutely accurate and sourced within the original article that they have sought to destroy. Here is a link of the original fully sourced article, and if you back track on Wikipedia, you will find the most excellent sourcing available was used for the topic, such as the Encylcopedia of Italian Nobility by Spretti and works by Zorzi, the finest historain of Venetian subject matter. Here is alink of just some of the information that has since been destroyed by their outrageous actions: [[7]]. Pagetools (talk) 02:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • But this is only the tip of the iceberg, these users went and destroyed anything and everything related to the Albergo branch of the Barbaro family, including an article about a well-known French abstract experssionist by the name of Lucien Ruolle [[8]], Baroness Capace, Countless noble Barbaro family members throughout history, and their nonstop attacks on the Current Head of the Albergo branch, a well known aerospace engineer who has worked on the development of Vision Industries K2, which if you back track you will see the appropriate page- fully sourced and even with links to images.Pagetools (talk) 02:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • You tell me, is honest and good hard work, that is done for free and which allows Wikipedia to keep on existing, deserving of this treatment by individuals like Deor and Edward 321, who appear to be clearly on a power trip to support their jealous agenda. Is good sourced work a hoax? And are individuals with seperate accounts on a public-used terminal sockpuppets? Of course not- this outrageous agenda needs to end- and I strongly recommend that users like Deor and Edward 321 be permanently banned- their 'power-trip' antics have gone on long enough: with unjust blocking, destroying good information, and outrageous hoax and sockpuppet accusations. There unwillingness to listen to reason, is mighty immature- to say the leastPagetools (talk) 02:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
The abuse to users intersted in Barbaro-family subject matter has gone on for years now- at least since 2007- to the point where individuals like Deor and Edward 321 have almost completely removed any information about the Albergo branch of the noble Barbaro family from Wikipedia- and they have completely succeeded in removing any mention of both acting heads from both branches of the noble Barbaro family right out of Wikipedia. They have fully established a strong history of libelous accusations that both members don't exist, or are hoaxes- right up to abuse that even went to freebase encyclopedia. You can not google Barbaro subject matter today without coming accross countless accusations of "hoaxes" from these users. I am livid at my treatment today, and I strongly recommend that these problematic individuals get banned- they are unchecked with their blocking privledges and they are liars and coverup artists who change their case file pages to suit any agenda they are after.Pagetools (talk) 03:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
You need to provide WP:RS reliable sources about this family and about the "Sacred Order of Skull and Crescent". Never mind, I read in one of the links provided by Edward312 above and I found Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pugilist Club and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Sacred_Order_of_Skull_and_Crescent which were closed as obvious hoaxes and as the creator making up sources. I notice that he has not provided any source here apart from old copies of his own hoaxes. I suggest archiving this thread as trolling and blocking this account as another sock of Mctrain. --Enric Naval (talk) 03:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
There is already an open SPI, so just archive the thread. --Enric Naval (talk) 04:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
I have blocked Pagetools as a disruptive account and high probability sockpuppet of Mctrain. Jehochman Talk 04:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
There has been funny business going on here for years, I started once to write about the Barbaro palazzi in Italy, and gave up because of constant rubbish (and dubious unreferenced material) being added - it became virtually impossible to keep even a stub stable if it had any mention of the Barbaro. From what I remember when I looked into it, this trouble seems to come from an "American branch" of the family headed by a "Prince Vitus" - I keep meaning to look them up in the Libro d'oro when I am at home, but always forget, anyway an American citizen cannot be an Italian prince so he would not be there anyway. Giano (talk) 21:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

3-revert rule broken[edit]

Resolved: — Aitias // discussion 22:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Legolas2186 has broken the 3-revert rule on the page The Fame Ball Tour. Please have him blocked. Alex (talk) 16:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

You should report 3-revert issues at WP:AN3. You'll need to list the reverts, and show where the user was warned. Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 16:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Legolas didn't even come close to breaking 3RR on that page. Tan | 39 17:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
True (hadn't spotted that, thanks). Hadn't been warned, either. I figured a link to AN3 and the requirements would be informative to the OP, though. Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 18:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
AlexHG (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log), here, is a fairly blatant sockpuppet of indef-blocked Alexander.hugh.george (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log). Suggest blockage. McJeff (talk) 19:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Indefblocked. Tan | 39 19:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Problematic IP at Earth Song[edit]

80.177.99.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) A very problematic IP is continually removing a quote from Earth Song, mainly because he doesn't like it and apparently can't understand it, although it seems quite clear what the quote means to me. Not once has he used the talk page, continuing on after his final warning. The quote has been removed six times this month: [9][10][11][12][13][14] Pyrrhus16 19:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Left 3RR warning. Stifle (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. :) Pyrrhus16 19:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Request for help from administrator[edit]

Resolved: — Aitias // discussion 22:34, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

I made the editing in Turkish Van cat article, but mixed the signs of references, and I am not able to solve it. Please, help to correct the reference marks. Thanks in advance.--Zara-arush (talk) 22:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Done. Please see my edit to see where you went wrong. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:12, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
PS: I'm not sure that this is the best place to ask for help with editing. Try placing the {{helpme}} tag on your user talk page instead. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

user:Abecedare user:Shreevatsa user:Priyanath at Aryabhata[edit]

Resolved: Stopthenonsense blocked for edit warring--RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 00:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Extended content

There is a violation on WP:Biography, because of the not so conservative style they want to press into the article. They are not interested in WP:NPOV. Abecedere is the most troublesome edit warrior with no interest in talk page discussion. --Stopthenonsense (talk) 22:10, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

A quick run over the page history and talk page suggest that the two editors are anxious to find sources for "everyone knows he comes from Kerala" type of statements. In fact, I note that the current lede of the article states without source that he definitively comes from Kerala, whereas a whole section lower down provides plenty of evidence that he doesn't. Is this the POV pushing you are refering to?--Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Elen of the Roads is correct in pointing out that 'Stopthenonsense' is doing anything but. By "not so conservative style", Stopthenonsense means that user:Abecedare and user:Shreevatsa favor a very liberal use of reliable sources and hold the radical view that the mainstream academic view should be given prominence in the lede. Priyanath talk 22:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Attempting to use ANI as a stick to beat someone because you disagree on sources, seldom comes out well for the complainant.Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

No, the latest research suggest, that he was from Kerala. Hence there is nothing wrong about it to tell it in the lead. The study was from 2007, and since then not disputed. However, this is not the main issue here. The problem is, that these people want to make Aryabhata a man, who's identity is Sanskritian. There is no way, he would have spoken Sanskrit, since this language died long before. Since this is a biography, which has to be handled cautiously, the best way to handle this is to keep any language out. The point in this report is not the content wise issue. It's the identity stealing point, which is not supported by WP:Biography.--Stopthenonsense (talk) 22:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

More eyes at the article are welcome. In my view this is a simple case of POV pushing and edit-warring by Stopthenonsense (talk · contribs) and possible IP socks 91.130.188.40 (talk · contribs), 91.130.91.7 (talk · contribs) and 195.64.23.130 (talk · contribs) who are trying to promote the view that the Indian mathematician Aryabhata unambiguously hailed from the Indian state of Kerala and spoke Malayalam.
The editors have been repeatedly asked to discuss on talk page and cite reliable sources to support their views (see latest request), but have edit-warred instead (diffs: [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]).
Stopthenonsense was give a 3RR warning just yesterday, but has persisted with edit warring since then. Is it time for blocks yet ? Abecedare (talk) 23:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

And the edit-warring by Stopthenonsense (talk · contribs) continues [29]. Admin intervention will be useful at this point. Abecedare (talk) 23:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
There was enough discussion, where YOU did not participate. Somebody should block you indefiniteley from editing in wikipedia.--Stopthenonsense (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: just in case anyone has missed it, this chap died in the 6th century AD. I do not think it is Wikipedia's policy on biographies that is the main driver here. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
That would certainly suggest that WP:BLP would not apply... :D -- Deville (Talk) 23:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
... and even though the original complaint cites WP:BIOGRAPHY, I'd say that notability is not an issue for this historical mathematician and astronomer given that a lunar crater and India's first satellite were named after him. :-) Abecedare (talk) 23:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Glad to see some discussion finally. Just in case it isn't clear from the discussion above, the issue is that User:Stopthenonsense (along with some IPs who might also be the same person) wants to stick into the first sentence of the lead a place of birth and a language, which are in contradiction to what historians actually think (and what the article summarises), and do this with just edit warring and no discussion. Reverting these undue edits and insisting on discussion apparently makes us violate NPOV, in Stopthenonsense's view. Shreevatsa (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Personally, in the long run I don't care what historians think, I care about what historians wrote down and published in a recognized book :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Uh, that's what I meant, modulo including journal papers as well. (How else can we verifiably know what historians think?) Shreevatsa (talk) 15:34, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
This guy is Kalarimaster (talk · contribs) who has a long block log YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 02:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Dopplegangerr at Serial killer[edit]

Unresolved: No admin intervention required (especially as subject has not edited since final warning), suggest WP:WQA or WP:DR. Black Kite 09:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Dopplegangerr (talk · contribs) has made repeated racially motivated POV edits to Serial killer, ignoring notifications on their user page and the article talk page. momoricks 08:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

WADR to Black Kite, I have reviewed Dopplegangerr's edits and he does seem to be a disruptive SPA. His name implies that he is a sock. WP:SOCK explicitly forbids "Good hand, bad hand" accounts and says it "is never acceptable to keep one account "clean", while using another account to engage in disruptive behavior". --B (talk) 16:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
This user's disruptive edits have continued after the final warning and now include Carl Eugene Watts. momoricks 22:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Does seem to have an unfortunate preoccupation with race... seems most every edit deals with it in some way or another. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: I have changed the resolved template to unresolved. --B (talk) 23:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Single purpose editor with dynamic IP causing disruption[edit]

The IP 86.136.34.91 is repeatedly rearranging band members without explanation at 21st Century Breakdown and The Network and has received a final warning. See [30], [31], [32], [33] for their edits. Also personal attack here. Has made these edits after being warned as another IP, under which he made the exact same edits to the same articles. Even before that, he had been doing the same edits under numerous other IPs for weeks. The only edits this person has made under his multiple IPs are to rearrange the band members on Green Day articles regardless of edit notes and attempts to discuss the matter with him. Timmeh 18:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

An area-block seems needed. GoodDay (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
The IP is a BT Broadband dynamic and as such is far too large a range to block; if they start again, I suggest nominating the articles for semi-protection at WP:RFPP. Black Kite 21:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Noted, thanks. Timmeh 00:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Possible sock list[edit]

Posted on OfficerJackBoot's talk page(an idef banned user. Could an admin look in to it? Possible sockfarm.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 23:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: several of these are socks of User:ClaimJumperPete.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Would a checkuser or IP block do any good? This guy is getting annoying.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 23:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Do you need to file a sockpuppet report? --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm on it as I speak.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 23:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Lineup[edit]

Long socklist.
  1. ClaimJumperPete (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  2. ClaimJumperJack (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  3. ClaimJumperBob (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  4. ClaimJumperDan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  5. CIaimJumperJoe (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  6. SnakeBootSamuel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  7. AlamoAaron (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  8. RoundemUpJeff (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  9. CactusDaniel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  10. Tumbleweedjoe (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  11. WhiskeyDave (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  12. QuickdrawEnoch (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  13. BeerBellyBob (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  14. SaloonStan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  15. BuckShotBill (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  16. BeltBuckleBob (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  17. CampFireEthan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  18. ClayDerringer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  19. BuffaloAmos (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  20. CoyoteBill (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  21. FastHandSteve (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  22. HenryStarr (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  23. CherokeeBill (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  24. ShotgunSanches (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  25. BenchmarkBen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  26. StrawHatStewart (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  27. BuckarooTom (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  28. SwiftGus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  29. ClaimJumperBill (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  30. UncleVodka (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  31. PrairieDogDoug (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  32. DaltonGang (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  33. CassidyJones (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  34. AlfredTerry (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  35. LeviStrauss (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  36. JerkyJoe (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  37. FortyFiveSteve (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  38. BroHa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  39. ShootoutSam (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  40. VigilanteVern (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  41. HoldupHoncho (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  42. HorsebackHoss (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  43. LassoClay (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  44. SaddleAdam (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  45. HitchinPostHank (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  46. DylanWayne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  47. FarmerDavid (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
  48. CowpokeBrady (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log ·