This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (January 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Breton nationalism is the nationalism of the historical province of Brittany in France. Brittany is considered to be one of the six Celtic nations (along with Cornwall, Ireland, the Isle of Man, Scotland and Wales).
The political aspirations of Breton nationalists include the desire to obtain the right to self-rule, whether within France or independently of it, and to acquire more power in the European Union, United Nations and other international institutions.
Breton cultural nationalism includes an important linguistic component, with Breton and Gallo speakers seeking equality with the French language in the region. Cultural nationalists also seek a reinvigoration of Breton music, traditions and symbols, and the forging of strong links with other Celtic nations.
The French position includes a range of views, from allowing Brittany a devolved government to curbing wishes for independence.
- 1 Positioning within the Breton movement
- 2 History
- 2.1 Beginnings in the early 1910s
- 2.2 Dynamism of the 1920s
- 2.3 Marginalization and radicalization in the 1930s
- 2.4 World War II
- 3 Contemporary parties
- 4 Opinion polling
- 5 See also
- 6 References
Positioning within the Breton movement
The academic Michel Nicolas describes this political tendency of the Breton movement as "a doctrine putting forward the nation, in the state and non-state framework". According to him, the people belonging to this tendency can choose to present themselves as separatists or independentists, that is to say claiming the right to "any nation to a state, and if necessary must be able to separate to create one".
He thus opposes it to regionalism which aims at it for a "administrative redeployment granting autonomy at regional level" (that is to say autonomist), and at the Breton federalism which seeks it to set up a federal organization of the territory.
Beginnings in the early 1910s
D'Ar Bobl to the Breton nationalist party
Several authors, cultural groups, or regionalist political groups, use the expression of "Breton nation" as from 19th century but without this one falls under nationalist dimension. It is only at the beginning of the 20th century that a nationalist current in Brittany begins to be constituted. Imitating the French nationalism of the time, they focuses their speech on the defense of Breton language and valorization of the history of Brittany; however, it distinguishes itself by seeking to legitimize its action by comparing theirself with those of other European minorities, "Celts" in particular, like those of Wales and especially of Ireland.
By the end of the 1900s, the journal Ar Bobl of Frañsez Jaffrennou began to spread ideas close to this ideology, but 1911 is a key date for this current. The inauguration of a work by Jean Boucher in a niche of the City Hall of Rennes, appearing the Duchess Anne of Brittany kneeling before the King of France Charles VIII, causes an opposition movement in the regionalist movements. An activist, Camille Le Mercier d'Erm, disrupts the inauguration, and uses her trial as a platform. This is the first public expression of a Breton nationalism. Following this event, a group of students Rennes founded the Breton Nationalist Party, which began with several members of the Regionalist Federation of Brittany, with the aim of to break with the regionalist ideas of this group. Among its first members are Loeiz Napoleon ar Rouz, Aogust Bôcher, Pol Suliac, Joseph du Chauchix, Joseph Le Bras, Job Loyant, but their numbers hardly go beyond the 13 members of the editorial board of Breiz Dishual.
First strategic positioning
The group is at odds with Breton Breton regionalism, which it accuses of ratifying a foreign influence, that of France, in Brittany. Seeking to apply the principle of subsidiarity, that is claiming a decentralization with a redistribution of powers, would be equivalent, according to the nationalists, to legitimizing a French domination. They oppose as much to monarchists (in particular by maintaining controversy with the members of the French Action), than to the Republicans by targeting "black hussars of the republic", accused of pursuing a policy of linguistic repression. In 1912, Breiz Dishual, the newspaper of the BNP, thus formulates for the first time this opposition towards the royalists and the republicans with the expression na ru na gwenn, Breizhad hepken ("neither red nor white, Breton only"), picked up in the following decades by different trends. The nationalists thus refuse to support certain circles such as the landed aristocracy or the urban bourgeoisie, considered to be compromised. It is also within this first group that the first Federalist ideas appear from April 1914 in Breiz Dishual.
This current is also positioned face to face with events and international actors, especially in the Pan-Celtic current. Breiz Dishual, indicates from its first issue of July 1912 to want to take an example of the Irish nationalists methods. This comparison between the Breton and Irish situations of the time is not peculiar to the Breton nationalist movement, and is also found among outside observers, such as Simon Südfeld for the liberal German newspaper Vossische Zeitung in 1913. The Breton Nationalist Party as its newspaper Breiz Dishual, however, have only limited echoes in the Breton movement of the time, and his nationalism can only find a weak resonance. One of its founders, Loeiz-Napoleon Ar Rouz, will play a role later to make the link between Breton nationalist currents and Irish. It is also inspired by other European examples such as Hungary, Catalonia, Norway, Balkan States, and inscribes its reflection on a European scale.
Dynamism of the 1920s
Breton regional group at the Unvaniez Yaouankiz Vreiz
After the World War I, the nationalist current continues its existence, becoming one of the most dynamic components of the Breton movement in the 1920s. The Breton Regionalist Group is the first party created (September 1918) taking up this ideology, mixing elders of the Breton Nationalist Party as Kamil Ar Merser 'Erm, and newcomers like Olier Mordrel, Frañsez Debauvais, Yann Bricler, and Morvan Marchal; it is endowed as soon as January 1919 of a newspaper, Breiz Atao, to spread their ideas. The adjective "regionalist" is preferred to that of "nationalist", on the one hand because the French State of the time tolerates little separatist ideas, and secondly because it makes it possible to forge links with the Breton bourgeoisie of the Regionalist Federation of Brittany.
The ideology of the group is initially and partially in a "maurrasian movement", but is quickly moving in a nationalism more and more affirmed. The Breton Regionalist Group takes the name of Unvaniez Yaouankiz Vreiz in May 1920, whose status indicates that it aims at a "return to national independent life". Its newspaper Breiz Atao also evolves by taking as subtitle "monthly magazine of Breton nationalism" in January 1921, then that of "the Breton nation" in July of the same year.
Attempt, from Breton regionalism, to Alsatian autonomy, to Irish nationalism
The nationalists aim at first not to support the Breton population, but on their economic circles. They intend to become the thinking head in this elitist process. Frañsez Debauvais cites René Johannet in this way in the Breiz Atao of April 1921. They thus come into competition with the regionalism of the Regionalist Federation of Brittany, and the relations between the two groups are therefore strained. Antagonism is reinforced in 1920 when the BRF claims the creation of a large western region encompassing Poitou, Anjou, Maine, Cotentin and Brittany, provoking a unanimous rejection of other regionalist groups, as well as nationalists. From then on, the nationalists' discourse became profoundly anti-regionalist, accusing them of falling into "biniousery" and "bretonnerie".
The nationalists also seek to get out of the French political markers of the time, left and right, and take up the slogan "na ru na gwenn, Breiziz hepken" already used by the first nationalists. This positioning is reinforced by the fact that no French political party pays attention to the demands expressed by the regions. They also seek to emancipate themselves from the Church and the clerical milieus from which the regionalists come, claiming a Celtic heritage, the Catholic religion alienating them the Bretons. The Alsatian affair in 1926, during which the Cartel des Gauches tries to return to the Concordat in Alsace-Moselle, causes an autonomist agitation in this region, and the Breton nationalists taking support on this example decide to form a political party.
The examples also come from abroad. Ireland is the main center of attention since the end of the 1910s: Home Rule movement, then the Irish declaration of independence of 1919, and finally his independence in 1921 strengthens the nationalists in the path of secession. The attempt to establish a certain form of autonomy in Wales in 1922 is another landmark for this trend.
Marginalization and radicalization in the 1930s
Grouping within the Breton National Party
The Breton National Party is created in 1931 and recovers from the name Breiz Atao for its new magazine, after the Breton Autonomist Party chose to rename its publication in La Bretagne Fédérale. Bringing together the nationalist current from the Breton Autonomist Party, it counts at its first congress in Landerneau the December 27 of 1931 only 25 members. It has only limited activity in its early years, although the August 7 of 1932 attacks in Rennes brings it some publicity, even some credibility in the media. Its numbers are however limited, and in 1940 it can only count on about 300 militants.
Politically, it asserts the existence of a Breton nation, and thus claims the independence of this one. Claiming to be apolitical, claiming "the sacred union of all Britons", it nevertheless expresses an anti-communism and an anti-socialism marked. The French political evolution of the time marginalizes this trend. Leftist political groups show great hostility towards it, and no support can be found within the French Popular Front. The French far-right also fights any form of autonomism, and no alliance can be tied. The year 1936 also marks a turning point in the attitude of the French authorities towards the autonomist movements which then become less conciliatory, and Daladier's rise to power in 1938 strengthens the fight against these groups. Daladier's decree-law of May 25 of 1938 which reinstates the offense of opinion regarding national integrity affects several BNP militants, including its director Debauvais who is seven months in prison. On October 20 of 1939, the BNP like other parties is banned and dissolved. Two of its executives, Debeauvais and Mordrel are fleeing in Germany while others activists let themselves be mobilized. At the regional level, it is opposed from its inception to the War Sao party, and federalists of the Breton Federalist League mock the SAGA program published by Mordrel in 1933.
The geopolitical situation of the time offers to the Breton nationalist current an opening with the setting up in 1933 of the Nazi Germany besides Rhine. Betting on a victory of the Germany in case of war with the France, it then develops an interested pacifist propaganda, calling for the neutrality of the Bretons in case of war involving France, or to refuse a "war for the Czechs". They seek to attract the goodwill of the German secret services, while some members of the BNP as Mordrel are already in contact with them.
From Pan-Celticism to racialism
Ideological, the Breton National Party puts the Breton national question before the social question, believing that it would be solved once independence obtained. Reactionary and right-wing in orientation, but capable of attracting left-wing personalities such as Yann Sohier, it is dominated by a militant base from small Breton towns. The "na gwenn na ruz" orientation continues to be used by the nationalist movement, and initially rejects the fascist/anti-fascist divide that is expressed at the time.
Pan-Celticism continues to be used by nationalists, while the federalists abandon this idea. They stand out, however, from the regionalists who are also active in this area via the Goursez Vreizh, but whose nationalists mock the actions. The Irish example continues to be celebrated by the Breton nationalists during the 1930s, notably in 1936 to mark the 20th anniversary of the Easter Rising. It serves as an example for the creation of the armed group Gwenn ha Du, modeled on the Irish Republican Army. In contrast, the actions of the Welsh nationalists led by Saunders Lewis, although welcomed, are considered too non-violent, like those of the Scottish nationalists of the Scottish National Party. However, from 1937 this Pan-Celticism dimension among the nationalists seems to fade against other international issues, and these display orientations more and more pro-Nazi.
An ultranationalist and overtly racist trend is also beginning to gain influence within the nationalist movement during this decade, on the sidelines of the Breton National Party, and sometimes outside it. Olier Mordrel publishes in 1933 the "SAGA program" in the Breiz Atao, advocating strong state and corporate capitalism, as well as exclusion of foreigners of public posts. It publishes, from July 1934, the journal Stur in which it elaborates a doctrine which must serve as an ideological base for the nationalists. it is openly racist, prefiguring a collaboration with the Nazi regime. Mordrel praises the Italian fascist regime in 1935, leases the Nazi Germany regime in 1936, and there advocates the purity of the race of "Nordic Breton type" in 1937. The same year at the congress of Carhaix, the BNP endorses this ideological evolution. In this perspective, Pan-Celticism continues to be used to make the link between "Celts" and "Germans" within the same "Nordic" community. However these ideas do not yet gather at the time of a minority of militants.
World War II
The behavior of each other is the object of a selective omission of war which always feeds polemics more than sixty years later: "In reality, at the Liberation, within the Breton movement, we minimize the collaboration, we create the myth of the wild épuration"
About 15 to 16% of members of the BNP have been brought to court, few are the sympathizers to have been judged. What makes the Épuration an epiphenomenon whose reality is very far from the mythical image of a massive repression, maintained by the traumatized memory of the Breton nationalists.
The behavior of the Breton nationalists, which for some historians, harmed Breton culture:
This culture of foreign hatred and scorn of the people who inhabited the nationalists led them to bring into disrepute for a long time the interest for the Breton language and culture in the region, or even to allow the Bretoners to justify the abandonment of the Breton language. However, in December 1946, at the initiative of the public authorities, Pêr-Jakez Helias launched a new program of radio programs in Breton on Quimerc'h Radio.
- Contemporary political parties or movements holding Breton nationalist views are the Unvaniezh Demokratel Breizh, Breton Party, Emgann, Adsav, Breizh Yaouank and Breizhistance.
According to an opinion poll conducted in 2013, 18% of Bretons support Breton independence. The poll also found that 37% would describe themselves as Breton first, while 48% would describe themselves as French first.
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 33)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 265)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 64)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 266)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 68)
- Mordrel Olier (1973). Breiz Atao - History and news of Breton nationalism. Alain Moreau. OCLC 668861.
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 65)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 267)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 268)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 270)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 67)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 314)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 69)
- (Nicolas 2012, p. 32)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 315)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 70)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 71)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 332)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 261)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 72)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 73)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 319)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 75)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 76)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 77)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 80)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 78)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 79)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 425)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 441)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 88)
- (Nicolas 2007, p. 81)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 422)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 426)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 423)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 424)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 427)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 433)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 427)
- (Cadiou 2013, p. 295)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 431)
- (Chartier 2010, p. 439)
- Michel Nicolas, Histoire du mouvement breton, Syros, 1982, p. 102 ; Alain Déniel, p. 318
- Ronan Calvez, Radio in Breton language: Roparz Hemon and Pierre-Jakez Hélias: two dreams of Brittany, University Press of Rennes, 2000, 330 pages, p. 91 ISBN 2868475345.
- report of the book by Luc Capdevila published in the n° 73 2002/1 of Vingtième Siècle : Revue d'histoire, pp. 211-237
- "One in five Bretons want independence: poll". thelocals.fr.