Connecticut for Lieberman
|Chairman||John Mertens (2011-13)|
|General Secretary||John Kilian (2011-13)|
|Founder||25 Lieberman supporters|
|Founded||July 10, 2006|
|Split from||Democratic Party (United States)|
0 / 36
0 / 151
0 / 2
|U.S. House of Representatives|
0 / 5
Connecticut for Lieberman was a Connecticut political party created by twenty-five supporters of Senator Joe Lieberman. The party was created to enable Lieberman to run for re-election following his defeat in the 2006 Connecticut Democratic primary. In the succeeding general election, Lieberman received 49.7% of the vote, defeating Democrat Ned Lamont and Republican Alan Schlesinger.
The party was established on July 10, 2006, and began collecting signatures in case Lieberman did not win the Connecticut Democratic primary. On August 8, 2006, Lieberman lost the Democratic primary to Lamont. The next day, over 7,500 signatures were filed with the Secretary of State's office in support of Lieberman's candidacy. On August 23, the Secretary of State announced that the party had filed enough valid signatures and would appear on the ballot in November.
After the election, contention developed between two different groups, one supportive of Lieberman and one critical of him, with each faction asserting that it controlled the party.
On August 9, 2006, the day following the primary, Lieberman supporter Stuart R. Korchin changed his party registration to Connecticut for Lieberman. The change was not entered in the state's electronic voter database, however.
On November 15, 2006, John Orman changed his party registration from Democratic to the Connecticut for Lieberman Party, having been told by the Secretary of the State that there were no registered party members. Orman, a professor of politics at Fairfield University, had briefly challenged Lieberman for the Democratic U.S. Senate nomination in 2006.
Party rules were filed with Connecticut Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz on December 21, 2006, by Orman. According to Ted Bromely, a state elections attorney who works for her office, then said, "If someone wanted to challenge it, they'd have to go to court."
On January 12, 2007, Korchin filed a different set of party rules with the Secretary of the State, which were also accepted. In response to an inquiry, Korchin received a letter from a lawyer in the Secretary of the State's office on January 17, 2007, stating that the state had "very limited jurisdiction" over intraparty battles, and was not taking a position over just who was in charge.
In Milford in January 2007, at what was billed as an "organizational meeting" of the party, Orman and Korchin appeared, each claiming to be the party chairman. Korchin announced the annual party meeting would be held in August and left, after which the Milford gathering elected Orman as chair, by a 5–1 margin.
On July 10, 2007, Orman wrote to Bysiewicz and Jeffrey Garfield, executive director of the Elections Enforcement Commission. He asked them to have the state attorney general's office investigate the petitioning done by Lieberman in 2006. Orman's contention was that Lieberman had violated state law by knowingly circulating false petitions, in that he had no actual intent to join or form a new party.
The next month, Korchin told the Hartford Advocate that he had held another party meeting on August 9, although he refused to say where it had occurred. Orman said he had not been informed of any such meeting. Korchin responded that Orman had been notified but had "declined to attend in an e-mail."
On March 6, 2008, there was a statewide party caucus organized by the faction that had chosen Orman as party chair. With Orman declining to run for re-election, Dr. John Mertens was elected to succeed him.
The two competing factions have differing views of the party's mission in the wake of the 2006 election.
As Orman expressed it in 2007, "What we said was that if the state was going to allow a fake institution to exist, we were going to turn that fake institution into a real party to hold Joe accountable."
Korchin, however, stated: "Connecticut for Lieberman is a new political party that carries on what used to be the ideals of the Democratic Party: A liberal approach to domestic issues coupled with a strong commitment to a robust foreign policy. New members who subscribe to this platform are welcome."
Later activities and demise
Activist John Mertens was nominated as the party's candidate for United States Senate in 2010. Mertens is an ardent critic of Senator Lieberman, and during an interview with Monmouth University's student newspaper, he said: "[In 2012] the party will run a candidate against Joe Lieberman!" Lieberman, however, announced in January 2011 that he would not seek re-election to his Senate seat when his term ends in 2013.
In January 2013, the party lost its minor party status after not fielding any candidates in the elections of November 2012. Mertens, who left the party and became an Independent shortly after the elections, said, "We don't have a ballot line. With Joe retiring, its purpose has been kind of served."
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on August 20, 2006. Retrieved August 9, 2006.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link) CS1 maint: Unfit url (link) of "Many Factors in Play as Senate Primary Nears in Connecticut", from Congressional Quarterly. Retrieved on 2006-12-20.
- Petitioning Parties Archived 2006-08-05 at the Wayback Machine (PDF). Retrieved on 2006-12-20.
- Kornblut, Anne E.; Peters, Jeremy W. (2006-11-07). "Lieberman Prevails Against Lamont in Connecticut". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-12-20.
- Many Factors in Play as Senate Primary Nears in Connecticut Archived August 20, 2006, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 2006-12-20.
- "SECRETARY BYSIEWICZ: SEN. LIEBERMAN COLLECTS ENOUGH VALID SIGNATURES TO GAIN NOVEMBER BALLOT ACCESS" (PDF) (Press release). Susan Bysiewicz. 2006-08-23. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-09-10. Retrieved 2008-03-31.
- Peter Urban (2007-03-28). "2 claim leadership of Lieberman party". Connecticut Post.
- Medina, Jennifer (2007-01-18). "Lieberman's Party, but Someone Else's Fight". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-03-19.
- Hladky, Gregory B. (2006-11-20). "Critic delights in taunting Lieberman". The New Haven Register. Archived from the original on 2006-12-17. Retrieved 2006-12-20.
- Zeller, Shawn (2006-12-01). "Crashing the Lieberman Party". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-12-20.
- "Sen. Lieberman's Party Taken Over By Critic". Associated Press. 2007-01-03. Archived from the original on 2007-01-05.
- Bailey, Melissa (2007-01-19). "'Lieberman Party' Hijackers Win HoJo Skirmish". New Haven Independent. Retrieved 2007-05-03.
- Lockhart, Brian (July 11, 2007). "Critic calls for probe of Lieberman's party". The Advocate (Stamford). Archived from the original on April 5, 2009.
- Bulger, Adam (August 16, 2007). "Whose Party Is It?". Hartford Advocate. Archived from the original on April 6, 2009.
- Korchin, Stuart (August 23, 2007). "It's Not Your Party, Dr. Orman". Hartford Advocate. Archived from the original on April 6, 2009.
- "Election of New Officers". March 10, 2008. Retrieved 2008-05-15.
- MacEachern, Frank (September 18, 2007). "Lieberman registers to vote as a Democrat, wife and daughter unaffiliated" (– Scholar search). The Stamford Times.[dead link]
- "Senators of the 110th Congress". United States Senate. Retrieved 2007-09-20.
- Letters to the Editor (2007-12-28). "This Chairman Disputes 'Facts'". Greenwich Citizen. Archived from the original on 2008-05-10.CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-07-08. Retrieved 2010-01-29.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
- "Official Connecticut for Lieberman Party Website/Blog" (by the party members hostile to Lieberman)