# Dinic's algorithm

**Dinic's algorithm** or **Dinitz's algorithm** is a strongly polynomial algorithm for computing the maximum flow in a flow network, conceived in 1970 by Israeli (formerly Soviet) computer scientist Yefim (Chaim) A. Dinitz.^{[1]} The algorithm runs in time and is similar to the Edmonds–Karp algorithm, which runs in time, in that it uses shortest augmenting paths. The introduction of the concepts of the *level graph* and *blocking flow* enable Dinic's algorithm to achieve its performance.

## Contents

## History[edit]

Yefim Dinitz invented this algorithm in response to a pre-class exercise in Adelson-Velsky's algorithms class. At the time he was not aware of the basic facts regarding the Ford–Fulkerson algorithm.^{[2]}

Dinitz mentions inventing his algorithm in January 1969, which was published in 1970 in the journal *Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR*. In 1974, Shimon Even and (his then Ph.D. student) Alon Itai at the Technion in Haifa were very curious and intrigued by Dinitz's algorithm as well as Alexander Karzanov's idea of blocking flow. However it was hard for them to decipher these two papers, each being limited to four pages to meet the restrictions of journal *Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR*. Even did not give up, and after three days of effort managed to understand both papers except for the layered network maintenance issue. Over the next couple of years, Even gave lectures on "Dinic's algorithm", mispronouncing the name of the author while popularizing it. Even and Itai also contributed to this algorithm by combining BFS and DFS, which is the current version of the algorithm.^{[3]}

For about 10 years of time after the Ford–Fulkerson algorithm was invented, it was unknown if it could be made to terminate in polynomial time in the general case of irrational edge capacities. This caused a lack of any known polynomial-time algorithm to solve the max flow problem in generic cases. Dinitz's algorithm and the Edmonds–Karp algorithm (published in 1972) both independently showed that in the Ford–Fulkerson algorithm, if each augmenting path is the shortest one, then the length of the augmenting paths is non-decreasing and the algorithm always terminates.

## Definition[edit]

Let be a network with and the capacity and the flow of the edge respectively.

- The
**residual capacity**is a mapping defined as,- if ,
- otherwise.

- if ,

- The
**residual graph**is a unweighted graph , where- .

- An
**augmenting path**is an path in the residual graph .

- Define to be the length of the shortest path from to in . Then the
**level graph**of is the graph , where- .

- A
**blocking flow**is an flow such that the graph with contains no path.^{[4]}^{[5]}

## Algorithm[edit]

**Dinic's Algorithm**

*Input*: A network .*Output*: An flow of maximum value.

- Set for each .
- Construct from of . If , stop and output .
- Find a blocking flow in .
- Add augment flow by and go back to step 2.

## Analysis[edit]

It can be shown that the number of layers in each blocking flow increases by at least 1 each time and thus there are at most blocking flows in the algorithm. For each of them:

- the level graph can be constructed by breadth-first search in time
- a blocking flow in the level graph can be found in time

with total running time for each layer. As a consequence, the running time of Dinic's algorithm is .

Using a data structure called dynamic trees, the running time of finding a blocking flow in each phase can be reduced to and therefore the running time of Dinic's algorithm can be improved to .

### Special cases[edit]

In networks with unit capacities, a much stronger time bound holds. Each blocking flow can be found in time, and it can be shown that the number of phases does not exceed and . Thus the algorithm runs in time.^{[6]}

In networks that arise from the bipartite matching problem, the number of phases is bounded by , therefore leading to the time bound. The resulting algorithm is also known as Hopcroft–Karp algorithm. More generally, this bound holds for any *unit network* — a network in which each vertex, except for source and sink, either has a single entering edge of capacity one, or a single outgoing edge of capacity one, and all other capacities are arbitrary integers.^{[5]}

## Example[edit]

The following is a simulation of Dinic's algorithm. In the level graph , the vertices with labels in red are the values . The paths in blue form a blocking flow.

## See also[edit]

## Notes[edit]

**^**Yefim Dinitz (1970). "Algorithm for solution of a problem of maximum flow in a network with power estimation" (PDF).*Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR*.**11**: 1277–1280.**^**Ilan Kadar; Sivan Albagli (2009-11-27). "Dinitz's algorithm for finding a maximum flow in a network".**^**Yefim Dinitz. "Dinitz's Algorithm: The Original Version and Even's Version" (PDF).**^**This means that the subgraph resulting from removing all saturated edges (i.e. all edges such that ) does not contain any path from to . In other terms, the*blocking flow*is such that every possible path from to contains a saturated edge.- ^
^{a}^{b}Tarjan 1983, p. 102. **^**Even, Shimon; Tarjan, R. Endre (1975). "Network Flow and Testing Graph Connectivity".*SIAM Journal on Computing*.**4**(4): 507–518. doi:10.1137/0204043. ISSN 0097-5397.

## References[edit]

- Yefim Dinitz (2006). "Dinitz' Algorithm: The Original Version and Even's Version" (PDF). In Oded Goldreich; Arnold L. Rosenberg; Alan L. Selman (eds.).
*Theoretical Computer Science: Essays in Memory of Shimon Even*. Springer. pp. 218–240. ISBN 978-3-540-32880-3. - Tarjan, R. E. (1983).
*Data structures and network algorithms*. - B. H. Korte; Jens Vygen (2008). "8.4 Blocking Flows and Fujishige's Algorithm".
*Combinatorial Optimization: Theory and Algorithms (Algorithms and Combinatorics, 21)*. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 174–176. ISBN 978-3-540-71844-4.