Ne Temere

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Scale of justice
Part of a series on the
Canon law of the
Catholic Church
046CupolaSPietro.jpg Catholicism portal

Ne Temere was a decree issued in 1907 by the Roman Catholic Congregation of the Council regulating the canon law of the Church regarding marriage for practising Catholics. It is named for its opening words, which literally mean "lest rashly" in Latin.[1]

Issue[edit]

The decree was issued under Pope Pius X, 10 August 1907, and took effect on Easter 19 April 1908. Marriages in Germany were exempted by the subsequent decree Provida.[2]

Differences from Tametsi[edit]

To the clandestinity requirements of the decree Tametsi of the Counter-Reformation Council of Trent, it reiterated the requirements that the marriage be witnessed by a priest and two other witnesses (adding that this requirement was now universal), added requirements that the priest (or bishop) being witness to the marriage must be the pastor of the parish (or the bishop of the diocese), or be the delegate of one of those, the marriage being invalid otherwise, and the marriage of a couple, neither one resident in the parish (or diocese), while valid, was illicit. It also required that marriages be registered.[3]

On the success of a divorce action brought by a non-Catholic spouse, the Catholic spouse was still considered married in the eyes of the Church, and could not remarry to a third party in church.

It explicitly laid out that non-Catholics, including baptized ones, were not bound by Catholic canon law for marriage, and therefore could contract valid and binding marriages without compliance.[3]

Conflicts of laws[edit]

Ne Temere was widely criticised by non-Catholics in the then United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for declaring that the Catholic Church would consider invalid for a Catholic a marriage that he or she entered into in any way other than before the parish priest or a Catholic priest delegated by him, even if in civil law it was valid.[4]

According to Ne Temere, XI, 2, for a Catholic, whether practising or lapsed, to marry someone of another religion in a marriage recognised by the Catholic Church, a dispensation had to be obtained, which was granted only on conditions such as an obligation for any children to be baptised and brought up as Catholics, and for the non-Catholic partners to submit to religious education with the aim of converting them to Catholicism.[3]

The issue of the Roman Catholic Church's canon law declaring invalid marriages that were recognised as valid by the State raised major political and judicial issues in Canada, especially Quebec,[5] and in Australia. In New South Wales in 1924, the legislature came within one vote of criminalising the promulgation of the decree.[6]

In common law jurisdictions the father, by what is called the principle of "paternal supremacy", has the right to decide the religious upbringing of all the children of the marriage.[7] At first, this held also in the Republic of Ireland, even if he had entered into a contrary agreement in writing. The Supreme Court of Ireland still upheld paternal supremacy in 1945 in a judgement that the children, whose father had died, should be kept in a Protestant orphanage rather than be placed in the charge of the Catholic mother. It attributed no force to the signed promises that the father had made before the marriage nor to the argument that the 1937 Constitution of Ireland, adopted eight years earlier, declared that "the State recognises the Family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of Society", and that it "acknowledges that the primary and natural educator of the child is the Family".[8] Largely because this judgement ignored the promises made in the prenuptial agreement, it caused deep resentment in Catholic circles.[9]

In 1951 the Irish Supreme Court made a contrary judgement, upholding on appeal a 1950 High Court decision in a suit brought by a Catholic mother seeking the return of the four children whom their Protestant father had placed in a Protestant home to be raised as Protestants. The High Court ruled that the father was bound by the written undertaking he had given before marriage. The Supreme Court did not endorse the rather pro-Catholic reasoning of the President of the High Court, Judge Gavan Duffy. Its own reasoning was that, "in upholding the contractual validity of the pre-marriage promise given by [the father, it] was rejecting an archaic principle of British law that would be the object of public scorn if it still applied in Ireland today".[10] It ruled that under the Irish Constitution the parents had "a joint power and duty in respect of the religious education of their children" and that neither parent had a right to dissolve an established contract.[11] The 1950−1951 decision was confirmed in a 1957 ruling of the Irish High Court that was not appealed, and corresponds to a New York court's decree upholding the binding character of such a prenuptial undertaking.[12]

In 1972, two years after the abolition of the Ne Temere decree, the New Ulster Movement publication "Two Irelands or one?", commenting also on the related 1957 Fethard-on-Sea boycott, declared:[13]

The removal of the protection of the courts, granted since the Tilson judgement of 1950, to the Ne temere decree of the Roman Catholic Church. This decree which requires the partners in a mixed marriage to promise that all the children of their marriage be brought up as Roman Catholics, is the internal rule of one particular Church. For State organs to support it is, therefore, discriminatory.

In its 2010 documentary Mixing Marriages, BBC Radio Ulster broadcast an account of how in 1908, although the Ne Temere decree did not declare invalid the marriages previously entered into otherwise than before the parish priest of the Catholic spouse, a Catholic father, who in vain demanded that his Presbyterian wife, whom he had married in a Presbyterian church, repeat the ceremony before a Catholic priest and allow their children to be brought up as Catholics, abandoned her and took away their two small children. Ensuing publicity by the local Presbyterian minister was a factor in turning Presbyterians against Irish Home Rule.[14][15]

Matrimonia Mixta (1970)[edit]

Ne Temere was replaced in 1970 with the motu proprio Matrimonia mixta issued by Pope Paul VI. Section 15 revoked the automatic "latae sententiae" excommunication imposed by the 1917 Code of Canon Law for marrying before a non-Catholic minister or for failing to secure the Catholic upbringing of the children.[16][17] The 1970 apostolic letter made the granting of a dispensation by the Ordinary conditional on a promise by the Catholic spouse to remove all danger of defecting from the faith and to do all that he or she can to have all the children baptized and brought up in the Catholic Church. The non-Catholic partner was to be made aware of these promises made by the Catholic spouse (sections 4 and 5).[16][17][18]

This removed the Ne Temere requirement that both the Catholic and non-Catholic spouse must pledge to raise their children as Catholics during the wedding, which was criticized as "legislating for Protestants".[19]

The regulations in Matrimonia mixta have been maintained in the 1983 Code of Canon Law.[20]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ "Ne Temere". Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  2. ^ "Mixed Marriages". Catholic Encyclopedia. 1911. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  3. ^ a b c "On Marriage". www.ewtn.com. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  4. ^ "MARRIAGE LAW—THE "NE TEMERE" DECREE. (Hansard, 28 February 1911)". hansard.millbanksystems.com. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  5. ^ John S. Moir. “Canadian Protestant Reaction to the Ne Temere Decree”, (PDF) CCHA Studv Sessions, 48(1981), 78-90. (Retrieved 2018-07-22.)
  6. ^ Brigid Moore. Sectarianism in NSW: the Ne Temere legislation 1924-1925, Journal of the Australian Catholic Historical Society, 9 (1987), 3-15.(subscription required)
  7. ^ David Jameson. "The Religious Upbringing of Children of Mixed Marriages: The Evolution of Irish Law". New Hibernia Review, 18.2 (summer 2014). pp. 65−83. Retrieved 17 April 2019.
  8. ^ Constitution of Ireland, articles 41 and 42
  9. ^ Jameson (2014), p. 75
  10. ^ Mullen, Rónán (18 January 2006). "How a case can be misinterpreted to put the Church in a bad light". Irish Examiner. Retrieved 17 April 2019.
  11. ^ Jameson (2014), pp. 79−80
  12. ^ Jameson (2014), p. 81
  13. ^ Melaugh, Dr Martin. "CAIN: Issues: Politics: New Ulster Movement (1972) 'Two Irelands or One?', May 1972". cain.ulst.ac.uk. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  14. ^ "How a mother's children were taken away forever". 7 November 2010. Retrieved 25 September 2017 – via www.bbc.co.uk.
  15. ^ D.George Boyce, Alan O'Day, Defenders of the Union: A Survey of British and Irish Unionism Since 1801 (Routledge 2002), p. 166
  16. ^ a b "Matrimonia mixta (March 31, 1970) - Paul VI". w2.vatican.va. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  17. ^ a b "The Sacrament of Marriage in the Catholic Church". www.catholicdoors.com. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  18. ^ "Vatican Asks Talks on Mixed Marriage". New York Times. 1 May 1970. Retrieved 27 April 2018. The new rules eliminate the requirement that the non-Catholic partner promise to raise the children in the Catholic faith. Instead, they require only that the non-Catholic be informed of his spouse's commitment to bring up the children as Catholics.
  19. ^ Mixed marriages and ‘ne temere’, letter to the Irish Times, Dec 19, 2013
  20. ^ "Code of Canon Law – IntraText". Retrieved 7 November 2016.

See also[edit]

External links[edit]