Talk:Migration Period sword

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Norse history and culture (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated C-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Spatha, Celtic?[edit]

I was under the impression that it isn't definitively known where the spatha originated except that it was adopted from Auxilia who could be either Germanic or Celtic. Maybe there is some confusion with the Gladius on the authors part, either way I'm changing the article to reflect this lack of certainty. 90.219.166.180 (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Request to merge Blučina burial into this article[edit]

  • Oppose. The Blučina burial contained more than a sword and has implications well beyond this single artifact. :bloodofox: (talk) 14:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose. The article is about a burial site, not about a single artefact. Same reason as above. Krenakarore (talk) 23:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Migration Period sword. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)