Talk:Sexual abuse scandals in Catholic orders and societies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Abuse by members of Roman Catholic orders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Abuse by members of Roman Catholic orders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abuse by members of Roman Catholic orders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Abuse by members of religious institutes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abuse by members of religious institutes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Copy of category name discussion[edit]

Moved from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy: Fayenatic London 21:44, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thanks for the remark. Chicbyaccident (talk) 21:57, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose, this is fine as a separate category, and can be listed as a subcategory at the abuse by members page. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
    • @Randy Kryn: Are any of the member pages not about Religious institutes, i.e. orders of the Roman Catholic Church? If not, why would two levels of categories be needed?
    • For the record, the main article was moved by the nominator a couple of years ago, without since being disputed, from Abuse by members of Roman Catholic orders to Abuse by members of religious institutes. If this category change is opposed, and there is no need for a split, then I suggest the article name should be moved back; "Roman Catholic orders" is more widely understood than "Religious institute" (since the latter sounds as if it has a wider meaning). – Fayenatic London 09:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 3 August 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


Abuse by members of Roman Catholic ordersAbuse by members of Catholic orders – Per WP:CONSISTENCY with Catholic religious order, upon proposal by Marcocapelle, as seen immediately above. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Support - for me growing up, it was always "Catholic", never "Roman Catholic". The term "Roman Catholic" is used mostly by Protestants. Within the Catholic church, the term "Roman Catholic" might be used to distinguish between different Catholic rites, such as the Lebanese Maronite and Armenian Catholics, but not as an overarching term for the church as a whole. So I'd prefer to change the title from "Roman Catholic orders" to "Catholic orders". MaxBrowne2 (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Support per consistency. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Support. Consistency with the article Catholic Church, where this issue has been discussed repeatedly. "Roman Catholic" reflects the preferences of the Anglican clergy and the British government, not usage by the Catholic Church itself. Nine Zulu queens (talk) 13:51, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 25 June 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no opposition. (non-admin closure) KSFT (t|c) 08:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)



Sexual abuse scandals in Catholic ordersSexual abuse scandals in Catholic orders and societies – Broadening the scope slightly. PPEMES (talk) 15:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Newslinger talk 08:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

1. If you prefer without "religious", sure. 2. I'm afraid all entities may still not be referred to as orders but would then still qualify. PPEMES (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Re (1), see now CFD June 26. – Fayenatic London 07:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.