Template talk:Alt-right footer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Inclusion of The Rebel Media-[edit]

@יניב הורון:, I noticed my edit was removed, so I figured it would best to discuss it to avoid an edit war. The reason I added The Rebel Media to this template was primarily due to its inclusion in the Category:Alt-right as can be seen here. I will admit that I actually cannot find many WP:RS describing The Rebel Media (as an organization) as alt-right since this memo was released. However, at least two of its former hosts, Faith Goldy and Lauren Southern, can certainly be viewed as alt-right. Following that, we have it's unmistakable comparison to Breitbart (which is mentioned in the lead section). No one can really doubt where that news organization fits into the alt-right. The last reason I would support its inclusion in this template is for historical purposes. They used to consider themselves alt-right, and I think that warrants inclusion somewhere in this template. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 23:07, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Inclusion of Pastor Steven L. Anderson/Faithful Word Baptist Church[edit]

As I've already discussed on the page Talk:Faithful Word Baptist Church, that page should be labeled as "alt-right" and the name "Steven L. Anderson" on the alt-right template in the people section. Thank you. Signed Rushwrj13 June 9, 2019 2:10 AM EST — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushwrj13 (talkcontribs) 06:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits[edit]

Hi, regarding recent edits I made. Can I get some thoughts? I believe the groups I deleted are not Alt-right, many pre-date the movement by decades. Bacondrum (talk) 04:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Why does their pre-dating the alt-right movement mean they shouldn't be considered alt-right now? An existing organization can adopt an ideology. If you don't think an organization should be on the navbox, I would suggest getting consensus to remove that org's categorization as alt-right first, on the relevant talk page. Once you can point to that consensus, the removal here (at a much less watchlisted template) should be more or less uncontroversial. VQuakr (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

New ideas[edit]

I think we should added Counter-jihad and Manosphere to related ideas section because of similarity to alt-right. (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC)