Template talk:Roman Curia sidebar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Vatican City    (Inactive)
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Vatican City, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
 
WikiProject Roman Curia (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the realms of the Roman Curia Taskforce, a joint taskforce of WikiProject Catholicism and WikiProject Vatican City and a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Roman Curia on Wikipedia. Please help us by improving a Roman Curia-related article, or visit the Taskforce Homepage or Talkpage, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

What is the Roman Curia?

"The Roman Curia is the complex of dicasteries and institutes which help the Roman Pontiff in the exercise of his supreme pastoral office for the good and service of the whole Church and of the particular Churches. It thus strengthens the unity of the faith and the communion of the people of God and promotes the mission proper to the Church in the world." - Ap. Const. Pastor Bonus, Art. 1
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Catholicism (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconRoman Curia sidebar is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

bug fix[edit]

In my browser the various categories within the Roman Curia infobox seemed to be displayed in a hierarchial manner, with tribunals and WikiProjects as subheadings under “congregations,” and Pontifical Councils, administrative services, and institutes as subheadings under Tribunals. I have modified the template in an effort to fix this. Can somebody please double-check the Wikicode to make sure that my correction was valid? Thank you. Bwrs (talk) 08:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)