Template talk:Underwater diving

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Water sports (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconUnderwater diving is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Water sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
WikiProject Scuba diving (Rated NA-class)
WikiProject iconThis template is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
 NA  This template does not require a rating on the quality scale.
WikiProject Swimming    (Inactive)
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.


I am starting to get the sense that this is going to be one big template before too long... --Legis (talk - contribs) 16:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

New Catergory?[edit]

I don't think that Hyperbaric medicine is a diving hazard. Maybe a new category in the template should be created with a subject of 'Related' or something like that. UteFan16 (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

After not receiving and any feedback I went ahead and added the categoy. UteFan16 (talk) 22:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Another new category?[edit]

A category for diving procedures would be useful. This could include Decompression (diving), Diver rescue, Underwater searches, Underwater navigation, Underwater search and recovery, Underwater archaeology, Diver communications, Underwater surveys, inspection and testing etc. At a stretch these could go under "Related", but there are enough procedural aspects that a separate category is justifiable, Related should stay, as there will be the odd tenuous connection like Hyperbaric medicine that would fit there best. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

No comment after a month. I will assume no opposition and go ahead. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 10:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)