User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Deletions from talk pages[edit]

Please do not delete material from my (or anybody else's) talk page. --RoySmith 21:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Of course if you want to retract a statement then deleting is OKish but striking it through is even better. I dson't know why RoySmith would waste time restoring a comment you made on his talk page when it was clear you were trying to retract the statement and then go on to undo your strikeout when you when you tried that.Very strange. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 21:57, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Sigh. I really don't like people deleting stuff from my talk page, whether it's their own stuff or not. I guess I'm OK with the strikeout, but when you struck your stuff out the first time, you put the <s> markup around the section head too, which messed up the table of contents and made it look like you had deleted it again. By the time I figured out what had gone wrong, I was starting to get annoyed at the whole mess. This whole thing is strange. I notice that somebody deleted a whole bunch of comments from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoYouDo as well. Deleting text from talk/vote/discussion pages, even if it's completely innocent, tends to get people suspicious about what is going on. Even more so when it's being done by anonymous users. --RoySmith 03:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


Please do not add multiple to your own private websites to unrelated articles in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
brenneman(t)(c) 03:20, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Goucher College[edit]

Hi, this is the second time you've added that admission to Goucher College is "highly selective". School spirit is cool, but unfortunately, your statement is POV, and with an admission rate of nearly 70%, it is also very untrue. Both factors make the statement unencyclopedic. -Taco325i 15:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Jauerback 19:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheerleading, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. See talk page and hidden text comments before deleting "sport" from this article, as per consensus iridescent (talk to me!) 18:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at NASCAR. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Clubjuggle T/C 20:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2007[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to ExxonMobil. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Anastrophe 16:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


User:Anastrophe, User:, User: - you are all sailing close to the Three Revert Rule over the presence or absence of one word in ExxonMobil. Please try to conduct a discussion on Talk:ExxonMobil rather than carrying it out via edit summaries. --Stormie 01:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

refrain from personal attacks[edit]

your speculation in your edit summary - "undo bias editing by possible exxon employee. without citation to prove the opposite, statement stands" - is a thinly veiled personal attack. please refrain from such uncivil behavior. Please make the effort to read the talk page for ExxonMobil where I have attempted to engage in dialogue with you and the other editors. thank you. Anastrophe 16:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I Apologize[edit]

You have my sincerest apologies for the edits on the waterboarding article. It was my opinion, I was just using a work computer when conveying it. I feel like a complete asshole for bypassing the Discussion section and will refrain from doing so in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Waterboarding. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

- Alison 20:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry, but it had to happen. Comments like "I can do this all day" are just not on - Alison 20:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

December 2007[edit]

Stop hand.svg

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Guayabera, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Erotic Torture Chamber[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Erotic Torture Chamber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable anime, unreferenced for two years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Erotic Torture Chamber[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Erotic Torture Chamber, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erotic Torture Chamber. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Treaties[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Treaties, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Treaties (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Treaties during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 09:40, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of World Constitution and Parliament Association for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Constitution and Parliament Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Constitution and Parliament Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)