User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


I am not sure who can read this , but be carful what you put on here as they do not believe you. and when you try to do something they close ranks and do not want to know. (talk) 00:42, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Like I said , they close ranks , just for the record I tried to remove "MY WORDS" (talk) 07:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

As I previously replied to you on my talk page when you asked over there: you are blanking content from the talk page of another user who has chosen to archive the conversation. That is their right for their own talk page. Unless you can show that your posts violated some Wikipedia policy, there's no reason and no Wikipedia guideline nor policy that supports your removing them.
Next to the "Save" button on all pages (article and talk pages alike) is the notice: "By clicking the "Save page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL with the understanding that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient for CC BY-SA 3.0 attribution." In other words, once you make a legitimate contribution to any Wikipedia page, you automatically release any rights you had in that material - as such, the fact that you posted the text you are trying to remove is irrelevant. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 17:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Well as I can only write on here I will make my point on here , the person who is complaining knows I am telling the truth, I had no idea he was member of the association concerned until last night , he knows the truth and is suppressing it. He used his advantage of being on wikipedia longer than I have and knows how to twist the rules.

further more by wikepedia rules " A block is not a punishment but a way to prevent disruption." given that you have locked the section that I was undoing and can no longer undo it, I would like to ask why I am blocked. I am in effect being punished for 24 hours (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

There is plenty of slagging me off in the other pages , and I un able to defend my self lmao , " close ranks" lmao (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Rehnn83. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to British American Football Referees' Association because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Rehnn83 Talk 08:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British American Football Referees' Association. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Rehnn83 Talk 10:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Rehnn83 Talk 15:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


There is a discussion about your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing of my archived talk page. You may post there if you wish. MarnetteD|Talk 23:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Rehnn83[edit]

Your comments at User talk:Rehnn83 are bordering on harassment, which can result in another block. The user has clearly indicated they will not continue on that existing discussion - as such, it's time to drop the stick and walk away. The other user also should not have resorted to name calling, and I have notified them to be more careful in their choice of words as well.

If you wish to discuss content of an article, I suggest using the relevant article's own talk page. However, be certain to discuss content, not contributors. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 21:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)