User talk:Amalthea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Feel free to insult me!

RfA overview[edit]

Hi. Recently, User:cyberbot I was blocked because it is malfunctioning. As a result, can I suggest that you replace the contents of User:Cyberpower678/RfX Report (Cyberpower678 is offline) with User:Amalthea/RfX/Overview so that the report is still updated? --DannyS712 (talk) 00:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

DannyS712, I have set to use User:Amalthea (bot) data, no need more action Hhkohh (talk) 00:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
@Hhkohh: Thanks. I would have done it myself, but I'm not that WP:BOLD yet. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Bot down?[edit]

It seems that your bot have not edited about 12 hours Hhkohh (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Today's Main page history?[edit]

Wikipedia:Main Page history/2019 February 12 is red right now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt, bot down now. Hhkohh (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Malamanteau[edit]

Why ful protection if:

  1. last vandalism from 2013
  2. The only vandalism from IP's?

83.31.85.72 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi 83.31.85.72!
The problem wasn't any vandalism, but repeated recreations after a community consensus to not have a separate article on that topic (WP:Articles for deletion/Malamanteau). The redirect was thus protected per WP:Protection policy#Creation protection.
Do you think that this topic has now risen to encyclopedic notability and the previous consensus is outdated?
Kind regards, Amalthea 20:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular[edit]

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)[edit]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago[edit]

Awesome
Cscr-featured.svg
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)