User talk:BlueMoonset

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This editor is an Auspicious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix.

Template:Did you know nominations/Atsushi Fujiwara[edit]

Hi, I haven't reverted you, but your edit summary on Template:Did you know nominations/Atsushi Fujiwara was not correct. The original review was for Atsushi Fujiwara; Kaijin Akashi was added later and was the subject of the secondary review. ♠PMC(talk) 00:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

PMC, Cwmhiraeth wrote, in her review, I am relying on Patrickneil's review of Kaijin Akashi. So what she says is that she reviewed Atsushi Fujiwara, and was relying on Patrickneil's review of other article, but Patrickneil had reviewed Atsushi Fujiwara at a point where Kaijin Akashi had yet to be added to the nomination. It could be that she wrote it down wrong, but I have to go with what she wrote. Given that, it appears that we have two reviews for the originally nominated article, and no reviews for the subsequently added one. Please don't do any reversions until we have achieved clarity on this. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
After the original review, I pinged Patrickneil and asked for a review of Kaijin Akashi as well. He provided that review in this diff. That is the review that Cwmhiraeth was talking about. ♠PMC(talk) 00:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
PMC, Cwmhiraeth, my most profound apologies, and to Yoninah, who correctly promoted it. I completely missed that—what I saw was Yoninah's addition of the DYK nom pages field and DYKmake templates for Kaijin Akashi on August 22, and didn't notice that it was after-the-fact bookkeeping. I'll clean up my mess right away, restoring the hook to prep and reclosing the nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No problem :) ♠PMC(talk) 00:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Qarhan Playa[edit]

Hi, I made the mistake of trying to promote this editor's nomination and got myself an earful. Would you mind commenting here? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Yoninah, when there's a two-article nomination, we typically go with the hook that offers both articles whenever possible, so I can see why the nominator would prefer it. As far as I can tell from checking various articles, latitude 37 degrees north is just about the northern border of Algiers (see Chetaïbi) on the Mediterranean, and is about even with Hampton, Virginia, and with Kalamata in southern Greece. The thing about the essay WP:BLUE is that I'm not sure it plays with what are not commonly known facts, especially given DYK's requirement for the citing of hook facts. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. When I said "here", I meant on the nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Yoninah, since Cwmhiraeth has reticked it, I think the best thing is to let it ride and see whether the folks at ERRORS agree with them or with you. I would have been just as happy to add sourcing, though it is easy enough to find confirmation of the latitudes. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Fine, but I won't be the one to promote it. I dislike editors who act like nominators, reviewers, and promoters all in one. Yoninah (talk) 18:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

GAR of Bengal famine of 1943[edit]

Hello. This is spam, forgive me. I'm gonna go through various GAR pages and look for people who appear active. All I'm asking for is a review, not asking for any specific outcome (i.e., not begging for a KEEP). The GAR is Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Bengal famine of 1943/1. If you review and Delist, that's OK, so long as it gets a meaningful review...

The article is big, detailed and has a terrible history in various Content Review forums. In fact, it has been residing in Content Review Hell for a couple years now... In return for a review (not a specific outcome) I'll do any kinda gnomish or research work you wish. Forex, I love converting inconsistent referencing into {{{sfn}}}, regardless of article size. I also help with all the errors that show up as described User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck. And so on. Thank you for reading this; forgive the intrusion. Cheers ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 04:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Lingzhi2, as you will have seen by now, I am not prepared to participate in the review of this article. I have, however, restored its GA status on the article talk page, and updated the Article history there, and posted a comment to the review page describing what needs to happen next. Best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
The offer still stands: need any gnomish work or research or whatever done, esp. w. respect to standardizing inconsistent refs to {{{sfn}}} or fixing refs, just ping me. I am at your service. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Much appreciated, but I'm one to take care of my own gnomish work, so I'm unlikely to ping. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Sounds good. Good luck in all things. Cheers. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE drive bling[edit]

Minor Barnstar.png The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to BlueMoonset for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

History of anarchism[edit]

I dont have any experience with GAN procedures and this time I am very busy with real life events, so I don't know how we can proceed with the review. Thanks for caring though. Cinadon36 19:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

North Korean Embassy in Madrid raid[edit]

There's still a few problems with the article; I added a {{cn}} template in Background and noted a sentence fragment in Reactions. Also in Reactions, some of the material from  Andrei Lankov could be merged into a 2-3 paragraph block but I couldn't quite find an elegant way to merge them. Otherwise, I think it's closer to the GA criterion for "well-written" prose. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Many thanks, Baffle gab1978, for taking this one on. I'm relieved that the article is much closer to the GA criterion in question; I'll drop a note to the original GA nominator to let them know that the copyedit is completed and there are a couple of tags to deal with. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)