- 1 January 2019
- 2 I messed up...
- 3 I was pretty dissapointed that I wasted so much time.
- 4 I was the one who added the part you changed it back to
- 5 Halfire101, you are invited to the Teahouse!
- 6 Wikipedia and copyright
- 7 Thanks for the info
- 8 Your thread has been archived
- 9 Categorization
- 10 An extended welcome
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Marc Yaffee, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I messed up...
Hi there! So... I just realized that instead of only reverting this edit you made to Marc Yaffee, I accidentally reverted all of your changes made there. Please accept my apologies for this; I've modified the article and restored your other edits (minus the small edit in concern linked above). Please let me know if you have questions or concerns and I'll be happy to make sure they're addressed. Thanks, and sorry about that! Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I was pretty dissapointed that I wasted so much time.
I'm glad it wasn't all a waste of time. It really bummed me out so I'm glad you saw that and reverted it.
Also, I just removed the incorrect info that you changed back. Better to have no info than to have the wrong info there. Again I tried to fix this but you changed it back to the wrong thing.
- Halfire10, I'm very sorry for letting that happen! It was by mistake and was not my intent at all. The only concern I had with your edits was where you modified the ethnicity and heritage of the article subject's adoptive parents. They were changed from what was published previously and to something completely different. When other editors see changes like that and without any source being cited in-line, it will cause them concern. I'm happy to see that you were notified of my follow-up message. Please know that my user talk page is always open to you should you run into any questions or need help - you are welcome to message me any time you need or want to. Again, I welcome you to Wikipedia, and I hope you decide to stick around for awhile. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I was the one who added the part you changed it back to
I had found the wrong info and posted it in one of my original edits and then noticed I had posted the wrong ethnicity. It was in reference to a joke he made and not his actual heritage which was what I changed it to after I realized that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halfire101 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- No worries; as long as the information is correct - that's all I care about. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Halfire101, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Halfire101, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Synthwave have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the info
Your thread has been archived
Regarding your question on my talk page, I use HotCat to make categorization easier. Follow the instructions there on how to enable it in your browser. IntoThinAir (talk) 23:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Much appreciated. Will do.
An extended welcome
Hi Halfire101. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.