User talk:KaintheScion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hello, KaintheScion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! . Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. . Kingturtle 01:43, 7 May 2005 (UTC)


Kain, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Saudi Arabia. If you revert again, you may be blocked for 24 hours. Please take your concerns to talk. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:23, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

Also, please don't leave abusive edit summaries. See Wikipedia:No personal attacks. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:28, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for breaking the 3RR for 24 hours. Saudi Arabia has been protected, please verify the accuracy of your edits on the talk page, sources for the information you have included on religious police in Africa would be appreciated. Also please note the Wikipedia policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks. --nixie 02:31, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

I've unblocked him as he made no further edits after the warning and the page is now protected. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:41, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
I intend to file an RFC against him, he has made way too many personal attacks and has used abusive language.Yuber(talk) 02:59, 9 May 2005 (UTC)


I share your frustration, however being a newbie I'm still learning how to be effective. Evidentally the "wholesale laundrylist" approach is viewed as confrontational. What seems to be most effective is to have such solid research & evidence that someone would be afraid to challenge it. Perhaps we can work together on this. Have you studied this source on dhimmitude? [1] The author has numerous articles on the subject. Nobs 21:33, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

I am looking for some help for creating 2 articles related to Saudi Arabia. Specifically, someone deleted both articles on Tommy Boggs and Patton Boggs LLC, the lobbying firm under criminal investigation for acting as an unregistered agent for Saudi Arabia [2]. Tommy Boggs is Cokie Roberts of ABC and NPR's brother. See both thier references here [3]. Someone deleted all references to Tommy Boggs & Patton Boggs from Wikipedia. Would you be interested? Nobs 02:28, 12 May 2005 (UTC)


Kain, you're in danger of violating 3RR at Dhimmi. Just a friendly note to make sure you're aware of it. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:53, May 11, 2005 (UTC)


Do not accuse other users of "vandalism" for making edits you disagree with. This is considered a personal attack. It is also a misuse of WP:VIP, which is an important policy page. It makes it more difficult for administrators to block actual vandals when dealing with frivolous reports like the one you submitted against User:Yuber. Firebug 04:40, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Hello, KaintheScion. I removed your entry from Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress, as it does not appear the user in question has actually engaged in vandalism. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Vandalism to see what Wikipedia considers vandalism. If the user has vandalized in this manner, feel free to re-add the entry, and provide diffs to point us to examples of the vandalism. Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker 05:02, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. You do bring up a good point. I personally would not consider this sneaky vandalism, as I don't think the intent is to mislead and I don't believe the issue is as clear-cut as sneaky vandalism normally is. Nevertheless, if you wish to re-add the entry, I will not remove it again. — Knowledge Seeker 05:28, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
I see. I do not believe User:Firebug is an administrator, and in any case I don't think it's very nice to call someone a "rogue admin". Especially in the absence of any misuse of administrative powers, this could be considered a personal attack. — Knowledge Seeker 05:36, 12 May 2005 (UTC)


I have opened an RFC against you due to your repeated use of personal attacks after being requested to stop. Firebug 05:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

  • I voted to support you in this RfC. I agree with you about Yuber. Klonimus 16:19, 12 May 2005 (UTC)


I am opening a request for arbitration against you due to your persistent use of personal attacks and sockpuppets. Firebug 16:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee case opening[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al. has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al./Evidence. Thank you. -- sannse (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC)