- 1 Please comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson
- 2 WP:THREE best sources that establish notability
- 3 Orphaned non-free image File:Livewire Badge.jpg
- 4 Draft:Racelle Kooy
- 5 Request on 19:59:48, 9 August 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Jschalow
- 6 Thoughts on History of Mechanical Engineering?
- 7 WP:THREE best sources
- 8 Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation
- 9 Thank you for taking the time
Please comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson
WP:THREE best sources that establish notability
Dear Kvng, This is just to let you know I've posted three sources in the article talk page Draft:Anita_Andreis as suggested. Thank you for your time! Sincerely, Supraphonic (talk) 11:39, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Livewire Badge.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Livewire Badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Kvng. Please review the changes I have made to the notability list and references on Racelle Kooy`s page and let me know what else I can do to speed up the review process. Thanks! --[[User:|CLStarlet]] (talk)
- @Ekejija destiny: Thanks for making the improvements. I do not rereview submissions. If you think the issues have been resolved, please resubmit and another reviewer will take another look in due course. ~Kvng (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Good day, I appreciate the time you took to review my article on Joerg Hasford and I reread guidelines for notability and authoritative references. You stated: "No WP:INDEPENDENT sources cited. It is possible the subject is notable based exclusively on his publications but we would like to see an independent assessment of that and I don't find it for this subject on PubMed or Google Scholar."
It seemed to me I covered this with the citations for his awards and his induction as a fellow into the Society of Clinical Trials. The statement on the Society for Clinical Trials page is quite strong: "He has been a leader in the field of cancer leukemia clinical trial research. Together with his coworkers, he developed and validated a prognostic model for chronic myeloid leukemia that is named for him by pooling individual patient data of many trials and prospective studies from around the world. He has contributed significantly to the standards of clinical trials in CML and AML in the German and European Leukemia Networks. He has been very influential in the study of safety of drugs and pharmacoepidemiology. He was one of the first biostatisticians to look at reliably compiled drug dosing history data in light of pharmacometric consequences. He developed new quantitative indices and tailored interventions to improve adherence in RCTs." http://www.sctweb.org/fellow.cfm?id=32
If I just go ahead and quote from the society and award pages, is this enough to strengthen the article or do you think we need more evidence of how well he is regarded in his field? I appreciate your help in improving the article and thank you. -John Schalow
- @Jschalow: please have a look at WP:NPROF#Criteria and let me know which item(s) apply to this subject and what evidence supports this. ~Kvng (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
I have edited and resubmitted the Hasford article. Thank you for pointing me to the criteria list for academics and I think criteria 1, 3 and 8 are met. He has written highly cited works. The significance of his impact on his field is confirmed by his awards and that he was selected to be a Fellow of the Society for Clinical Trials, a prestigious society. He serves on editorial boards, study groups, and commissions. He is quoted in prestigious publications such as Science (AAAS) and gives expert testimony as part of the process of creating legislation for the German government. (Do I need to document these activities in the article?) He served seven years as editor for Europe of the pretigious journal Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley. Hasford currently is having an impact outside of academia as he leads efforts to create and enforce governmental regulations in Germany and Europe in the area of medical ethics. Wikipedia needs to deepen its coverage of the health fields and I think an article on Hasford helps achieve this. Someone someday can add an article about CML scores such as the Hasford factor which will complement this article., I hope I have addressed your concerns and please let me know if there is anything else I can do to improve the article. Thank you for your work. -John Schalow — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jschalow (talk • contribs) 20:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Thoughts on History of Mechanical Engineering?
You approved the article for creation through the process and I believe there was a consensus. Another editor User talk:Polyamorph an hour later reviewed it, promptly destroyed the article, without consulting the talk page and redirected it.
WP:THREE best sources
Dear Kvng, as you requested I published the WP:THREE best English sources for the article Draft:Andrea_Marinelli. Hope it may help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 15:57, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Kvng, I chose those WP:THREE because mostly all other sources are in Italian. I'm afraid it's not enough. Thanks anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 15:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Foreign language sources are acceptable. Though I don't speak italian, I'm often able to evaluate them using Google translations. ~Kvng (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time
I recently saw that you had taken your time to review and publish one of my articles, thank you for doing that. I do have several article draft on similar topics which have got stuck in "very-old-draft" category still awaiting reviews and publications. If you feel like it and have the time, feel free to take a look at them. If not, that is just as fine by me and in that case I wish you to have a nice day! :) Best regards!
The articles are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tarzan:_The_Complete_Russ_Manning_Newspaper_Strips https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:For_Better_or_For_Worse:_The_Complete_Library https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Complete_Steve_Canyon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rip_Kirby:_The_Complete_Comic_Strips https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Complete_Little_Orphan_Annie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Phantom:_The_Complete_Comic_Strips — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 10:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)