User talk:Veera Narayana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Pavanjandhyala)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Veera Narayana's talk page
Mother Kali welcomes you on Veera's behalf! She wishes to have a very peaceful environment here with constructive discussions only. Please respect her wish. Have a nice day. Thank you!
NOTE: Though Veera Narayana is my username, calling me Veera would be more appropriate.



Bhakta Prahlada (1967 film)[edit]

Bhakta Prahlada is a tri-lingual film produced by AVM simultaneously in Telugu (12.01.1967), Tamil (24.03.1967) and also in Hindi. I added the Tamil song list (with citation) and the Tamil poster for the Tamil version. In the preamble of the article itself it is said the film was made in Tamil and Hindi also. But you have removed my hard work saying it is not a bilingual film. I think you have not read the article written previously by others. Even then, you should have discussed in the article's talk page before removing a major portion of the article. I have restored the removed content. Please do not make haphazard editing. Thank you for your understanding.--UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 11:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I must agree with Uksharma3 on this. Although Bhakta Prahlada was primarily a Telugu film, the Tamil and Hindi "dubbed" versions are actually partially re-shot versions. When you find the tracklist for the Hindi version, please add it to the soundtrack section. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
@Uksharma3 and Kailash29792: Very sad. Very very sad state of affairs. I am absolutely sorry for what i have done to you, dear gentlemen. Trust me, i never intended to disrupt anyone's work here. Now, i feel as sad as Lord Narasimha himself, who had to kill his beloved Jaya who was in the form of Hiranyakashipu. Narasimha gave Hiranyakashipu moksha then, now i will. Bhaktha Prahlada is entirely yours now, develop it wholeheartedly. I'll focus on some other underdeveloped Telugu film article. My best wishes and Narasimha's blessings are always with you both (if you believe in them). Kind regards, Veera Narayana 21:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I hope this isn't a euphemism for "I'm not taking this to GA anymore". The article looks great IMO, just you need to convert the Tamil tracklist format. Kailash29792 (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes, it is an euphemism. Had to respect WP:CIVIL. They don't read what the sources say, they don't care what WP:NFCC says, and just jump on to do what they think is right. Above all, when i quote a valid reason as to why remove the file, they call my editing haphazard and that i am harming their hardwork. Rather than picking up a row, i am throwing Bhaktha Prahlada to the winds. Why should i care about that article now, when one owns nothing here at Wikipedia. I am done and shall focus on something else. Thank you. Regards, Veera Narayana 06:49, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Bhagat Singh/archive1[edit]

Hello there, Veera. I've nominated this film article about the life of the Indian freedom fighter Bhagat Singh starring Ajay Devgn as the titular character. As always, your comments would be most welcome and beneficial to the overall improvement of the article. Thanks. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Tomorrow Ssven2. Veera Narayana 15:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
I've resolved your comments as best as I can, Veera. Do let me know if there's anything else. Thanks. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

───────────────────────── Responded to your query about Devgn at the FAC. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Gave my support Ssven2. Veera Narayana 14:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

PR request[edit]

Hi VN, hope you are fine. I have opened a peer review for Parinda, an article that I want to take to the FA level hopefully. Please leave your comments if interested. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Veera should be fine Yash. Tomorrow. Veera Narayana 15:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Veera I have nominated this article for FAC. Please leave your comments if interested. Thanks! Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kal Ho Naa Ho/archive2[edit]

Hello there, Veera. I've nominated this film article about a poignant yet funny love triangle starring Shah Rukh Khan in the lead. As always, your comments would be most welcome and beneficial to the overall improvement of the article. Thanks. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Tomorrow, in the early hours maybe. Veera Narayana 09:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mullum Malarum/archive4[edit]

It's up to you if you want to leave comments. I just hope not to fall for the fourth time. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Give me a week. Veera Narayana 21:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
I've addressed most of your comments. Please strike out them. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: Done. BTW, after going through the article, i do strongly feel that Chettiar would make a very entertaining villain if the making of MM were made into a masala film, with Mahendran and Rajinikanth being the misunderstood underdogs. Veera Narayana 05:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
I don't think I can rewrite to portray Chettiar as less villainy. If he were still alive, he would certainly object to Mahendran's comments on him and write a contradictory story akin to what Muktha Srinivasan did. Perhaps we could add "According to Mahendran" before the sentence "Chettiar held up production", that good? What other statement needs rephrasing? --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
@Kailash29792 and Ssven2: You can. Chettiar and Mahendran had contrasting views on the film's treatment; Chettiar not crediting himself as a producer and being puzzled at the less dialogue itself say that they were not on the same page. If that holding up production thing was due to creative differences, mention it. That would reduce the negativity. Sample this: "...and would have shelved the film had he known about Mahendran's filmmaking style" -- Why don't you say that Chettiar was expecting a dialogue heavy film there itself? It would have given a clear stand about both. Thereby Chettiar would not remain as a plain cynic. Rethink and decide what to do. I am willing to wait. Anything to say, Ssven2? Veera Narayana 15:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
I re-checked the source and it reads, "my producer was not happy with the budget of Mullum Malarum and he asked me to release the film without a scene, which must come before the ‘Senthalam Poovil’ song". So here's a suggested wording: According to Mahendran, Chettiar felt the film's budget escalated and he refused to finance a scene set before the song "Senthazham Poovil", demanding to release the film without that scene. Since this appears to be your only remaining FAC comment, I'll wait for Ssven's reply. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Your wording looks good, Kailash29792. As long as the negativity is toned down, it seems fine. You can proceed with it (if you already haven't). Veera also seems to have put up some good pointers in there. See if you can implement them (if they are supported by references).  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 18:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kailash, everything is fine but i personally feel that a copy-edit would improve the article and thereby can help you resolve Fowler's issues. Not necessarily through GOCE, but by someone who is unaware of this subject and has not commented at FAC this time. And, Ssven2, calling me Veera would be more appropriate. Thank you. Veera Narayana 11:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Rangasthalam[edit]

Are the GA plans still on? I hope they are. Additionally, there are two reviews of Pathala Bhairavi here, please add. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

I am yet to complete work on Rangasthalam. Let's see if my interest stands sustained. Veera Narayana 14:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

TFL notification[edit]

Hi, Veera. I'm just posting to let you know that Shruti Haasan filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Nannaku Prematho[edit]

Did the film release on Sankranthi? Is that when 13 January 2016 was? Then this poster should be good to use. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:04, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: Well the film was promoted as a Sankranthi release. That year, Sankranthi came on 14th. If you wish to update the poster, i'm fine with it. Veera Narayana 11:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

A cupcake for you![edit]

Choco-Nut Bake with Meringue Top cropped.jpg The file move you have request has been done. Thank you for tagging it! Breawycker (talk to me!) 02:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@Breawycker: Thanks for the help! :) Veera Narayana 06:07, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandava Vanavasam.jpg[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Pandava Vanavasam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Idiot Telugu DVD.jpg[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Idiot Telugu DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Poovellam Un Vasam[edit]

Dear Veera,

Nice jobs on adding poster to films as you did to Aaro Pranam. Can you kindly add a poster to Ajith's Poovellam Un Vasam . The film was commercially successful and Ajith won the Tamil Nadu State Film Award Special Prize for his work in this film. Thank you for your time.

--DragoMynaa (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the message and appreciation. However, i cannot read and write Tamil, or for that mater any South Indian language other than Telugu. Kailash29792 may help you in this case. He is far more enthusiastic that me when it comes to collecting old film posters for use in Wikipedia. Veera Narayana 10:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Naa Oopiri[edit]

Veera, can you kindly add a poster for Naa Oopiri. The film received a Nandi award. --DragoMynaa