User talk:Salvidrim!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

 Archives

 2011 - Q3 & Q4  2012 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4   2013 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4   2014 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4   2015 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4   2016 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4   2017 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4   2018 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4   2019 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 

Intentionally not archived older threads[edit]

Paralympic project[edit]

Since you are bilingual, I was wondering if you would be interested in translating a couple of small articles in French for me? Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Sure! I won't commit to any ETA because my I'm a gold medalist in lazy procrastination but toss me what you need and I'll get it done eventually! :D  · Salvidrim! ·  22:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
    No deadline! Thank you! Take your time. The articles are small: Maude Jacques and Cindy Ouellet. I sometimes forget that not all Canadians can speak English very well. But these two can. In fact, Maude was translating for me in Beijing. I tried auto-translating one once, but they delete unless the French is perfect, and mine's terrible. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
    I'll be honoured to work on the articles! The most complicated thing will be to figure out the frwiki versions of the various templates used. ;)  · Salvidrim! ·  14:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
    Hawkeye7 - Haven't had time to delve into this but I'm keeping this thread unarchived as a reminder. :)  · Salvidrim! ·  17:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

YIIK: A Postmodern RPG[edit]

Hey Salv. Just letting you know that the article you requested on the Requests boards was made. Don't know if it'll be expanded beyond its current condition but its made now. GamerPro64 21:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You wanted a Vita RPG article to be made and you didn't come to me?! ;) Sergecross73 msg me 21:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Yay!! Do either of you want me to send you a scan of the article in Nintendo Force?  · Salvidrim! ·  21:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Game hint lines[edit]

I came across an article in GamePro about live game counselors and 900 hint lines which has one or two useful pieces of info. The trouble is, I can't seem to find an article on Wikipedia where such information might appropriately go. Any suggestions?--Martin IIIa (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

There's probably enough coverage to convert Nintendo Power Line into a broader concept of Video Game hint lines, of which the most famous was the Nintendo Power Line: Kotaku, A.V. Club, the line was revived for the NES Mini launch (Engadget, CNet, Polygon), Wikia (unusable as a source but can be used as a base for research), featured in The Wizard, that time when one number was bought by an sex company (N4G, NBC, Wired), Gamasutra, Felicia Day biography, Geek.com, Sierra Hint Line (this is an archive of 1989 Sierra Magazine), Sega, Konami also had their own Hint Lines.  · Salvidrim! ·  20:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Martin IIIa do you have a link to the GamePro article?  · Salvidrim! ·  13:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Bumping thread for 60 days.  · Salvidrim! ·  16:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Agh, sorry it took me so unbelievably long to notice this post! To add insult to injury, no, I don't have a link, just a physical copy of the issue. It's issue 92, cover-dated May 1996, and the articles is on pages 14-15, if that helps at all.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Ans you wouldn't happen to have a scan? ;D Ben—Salvidrim!  04:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
[1] —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 20:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Moved from WT:VG: Ben · Salvidrim!  01:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Still something I'm interested in working on. Ben · Salvidrim!  01:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quebec articles[edit]

You're most welcome! Funnily enough, you caught me right in the middle of wrestling with trying to find adequate sources to get a long-overdue article about the actor and writer Marcel Sabourin done!

I'm one of those editors who, while I don't write French well enough to actually be a contributor on FR as such, I can read it well enough to pull out the important facts from a newspaper or magazine article — and since we do have a problem with a lot of Quebec topics getting inadequately addressed on the English side, I do make an effort to help fill in some of the gaps when I can.

Unfortunately, I don't have access to a database of older French-language newspaper content the way I do for the major English dailies, so I'm mostly stuck with what I can find on Google — which (as with Sabourin right now) isn't always very solid or reliable for people whose peak notability and sourceability was 30 or 40 years ago instead of within the past few years. But I try to do the best I can with what I've got. Thanks again. Bearcat (talk) 20:52, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Well, if you ever need some help with French translations I'm your guy. I do whatever cleanup and wikifying I can but I'm not that good at creating brand new articles indeed! BAnQ has thousands of archived newspapers. Some source ideas for Marcel Sabourin that are not about specific works (these are too many to list but often not in-depth):

Ben · Salvidrim!  21:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)



Flooded with them hundreds' user scripts[edit]

Dear all. Recently, our community lost a dedicated user, Flooded with them hundreds (talk). Among their projects were a number of user scripts that were deleted when they left. I (DannyS712) have asked that they be undeleted, and have taken over maintaining them. You currently import Flooded's (deleted) script, and I thought that you might want to import a working version. Links to each script are provided below.

Page Mover Closure

Section Remover

Section Mover

If you have any questions, please reach out and talk to me. --DannyS712 (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Sergio Calderón[edit]

Hi Salvidrim! I have declined the speedy nomination you placed on Sergio Calderón becuase the new article was not "substantially identical" to the deleted version. Also, although the previous discussion was closed as a delete, the only participant was the nominator, meaning per WP:NOQUORUM it should be treated as a soft delete. I went ahead and restored the article history, because that version cited a source, which I re-added to the article. However, I have concerns that Sergio Calderón may not meet WP:NACTOR, and a (admittedly quick and superficial) search did not turn up any additional sources. I wanted to let you know that if you want to proceed with an AFD I have absolutely no problem with that. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I agree the first AfD should have been closed as WP:SOFTDEL; in any case the article being ineligible for PROD, and now with the source the article is no longer eligible for BLPPROD as well, perhaps you might be right that an AfD would be justified. I don't care much about the subject but perhaps Rubbish computer will enough to list it at AfD. Ben · Salvidrim!  19:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
ONUnicorn I'll refresh my memory of WP:NACTOR later and decide whether it should be listed at AfD. Cheers, Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Doug DeMuro[edit]

I don't understand. A previous incarnation of this article was sent to AfD and deleted. How does that prevent me from applying a PROD to this version? John from Idegon (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

@John from Idegon: Jeez, read at least the lede of WP:PROD. "It must not be used for pages PRODed before or previously discussed at AfD or FfD." If the recreation is substantially similar, then G4 it. If it is not substantially similar, send to AfD if you believe the article topic does not meet our inclusion criteria. Ben · Salvidrim!  23:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
I read it. You have a unique interpretation of "article" apparently. This is a new article. This article has never been prodded or deleted. A previous article on the same subject was. Unlike AfC, PROD is not a referendum on the notability of the subject. It's stricktly about the article at hand. Example A guy writes an article on the non existent kingdom of Foo. He has a source (a blog he wrote), so there is a claim to notability and speedy is out. Its prodded and deleted. A year later, he creates the exact same article. G4 does not apply as it was not deleted via discussion. So in order to delete that, we have to waste the community's time with an AfD? Sorry....makes no sense. Although many of our policies are obscure, nit-picky, etc, I've seen few that are outright nonsensical. I'll start a discussion on the policy talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
You're welcome to discuss changes to deletion policy. Unless you contend that the content at the title Doug DeMuro today is about a different article subject (different person) than the subject which was examined in the previous AfD, the policy is crystal-clear that a PROD (aka discussionless deletion) cannot be used when there has already been a previous AfD (aka discussion about deletion). If the recreation is substantially similar to the AfD'ed version, then G4 it. If it is not substantially similar, send to AfD if you believe the article topic does not meet our inclusion criteria. Ben · Salvidrim!  17:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Question about paid editing[edit]

Re Special:Permalink/881027757#Managing a conflict of interest: what is the basis for this belief? I have no evidence to the contrary, I'm only here because they asked me about it off-wiki. I didn't know what to tell them. MusikAnimal talk 01:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

MusikAnimal: See Talk:Glovibes for details. You saw the same e-mails as me and you even responded, I'm not sure how there is any confusion that this user is the manager of the artist. If you wanna tell them anything, instruct them on how to contribute with a COI/paid editing situation. :) Ben · Salvidrim!  02:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Aha! There was one critical word, the "my" in "my artist", that gives it away. I also see now their real name from the email, which lines up with other accounts in the revision history... Obviously my focus was on the false positive report. The edit appeared to be constructive, so I did my part of saving it on their behalf. Anyway, I've informed them of relevant policies and guidelines, etc. Thanks MusikAnimal talk 04:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
I figured the "Manager to Glovibes" in the signature was pretty explicit. And it's okay that you only responded to the falsepos, that's the point of the mailing list, that's why I tagged the article and provided on-wiki guidance via the welcome. As you say, the edit wasn't necessarily problematic so it wasn't a big deal either way. :) Ben · Salvidrim!  04:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Indeed, the signature says it all! My client hides those by default, so I missed it entirely. Maybe I should change that. Thanks again MusikAnimal talk 06:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Leaving a link to posterity to where some discussion is occurring: User talk:HouseLuv 20#Managing a conflict of interest. Ben · Salvidrim!  20:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

My WP:ARCA request...[edit]

... doesn't mean I'm even considering a new RfA yet. Thoughts on the topic always welcome but I don't envision RfA2 being a thing in 2019 at this point. Ben · Salvidrim!  21:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Notice of motion[edit]

The Arbitration Committee is currently considering a motion which affects you. It can be viewed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Motion: Conduct of Mister Wiki editors. Bradv🍁 15:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Motion: Conduct of Mister Wiki editors[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Remedy 2.1 of the Conduct of Mister Wiki editors arbitration case (t) (ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) (Salvidrim's prohibition from reviewing articles for creation drafts) is rescinded. He may apply for use of the AfC helper script as usual at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants.

For the Arbitration Committee --Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Motion: Conduct of Mister Wiki editors
Considering my vote, i'm glad to see this gone. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
🙏 Ben · Salvidrim!  13:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

VG MoS - Covers proposal[edit]

Hey Ben, I started a proposal for updating the VG MoS in regards to covers and seeing as you've been active in the area I thought you may be interested CrimsonFox talk 12:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

John Adrain[edit]

Hi Ben. I'm curious at what drew your attention back to this article, created by an undisclosed paid editor and deleted as promotional years ago? In the recent ARCA we decided not to formally restrict you from paid editing, but the lift of your topic ban was on the understanding that you would not be returning to it, and I'll be honest this is a bit of a red flag. – Joe (talk) 09:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Anwsered on article talk. I intended to leave a summary of the situation there anyways, you just happened to get to my talk page first since restoration happened while I was asleep. :p Ben · Salvidrim!  10:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Stephen J. Blackwood - proposed deletion[edit]

Forgive my ignorance in not knowing how these things work-- you undid my revision (which was in itself an undoing of a revision) re-adding the proposed deletion notice. I only added the notice back as the grounds for its removal seemed flimsy in the first place, and I believe it should remain given that the consensus was to delete the page. I'm obviously going about this in the wrong way, but I certainly don't want to take such drastic action as deleting the page myself... if you've any advice to give on what action should be taken, I would be glad to hear it.

Forgive & bless.

--Victareon (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Hi, first of all PRODs can be removed/contested for basically any reason. However anyways, as mentioned WP:PRODs (discussionless deletion) can only be used when there hasn't already been a PROD or discussion. In this case, if the new article is substantially similar to the version deleted at AfD, then WP:CSD#G4 might apply. If the current article is not substantially similar and you believe it fails to meet the threshold of Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, you can file a new AfD. Ben · Salvidrim!  02:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Underground Gamer[edit]

Ambox warning orange.svg Talk:Underground Gamer, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Underground Gamer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Underground Gamer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 07:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Question[edit]

After creating Lâcher prise, I tried to add it to List of programs broadcast by Ici Radio-Canada Télé, only to find that article deeply out of date — it literally hasn't had a serious update in over 11 years, and still features charts for the prime time schedule as of 2008. (Yes, I know Tout le monde en parle and Le Téléjournal haven't changed, but I'm sure almost everything else has.) If you're living in Montreal, I have to assume you'd have at least somewhat more knowledge about its programming than this Trawna boy over here does, so I wanted to ask if you'd be willing to assist in getting it updated. Obviously if we're going to be this incapable of keeping it updated consistently in the future, then we should just blow the schedule chart out and convert it to a straight list, sorted either strictly alphabetically or by genre — but I need a cheat sheet just to keep Global vs. CTV vs. Citytv shows straight even though I get those channels, so I'm not the right guy to tackle it. Any chance you'd be willing to help out with repairing it? Bearcat (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

I do believe the task is daunting and not feasible to keep updated. Straight list, sorted by year of debut and with airing years in parenthesis (sectioned by decade if too large) does appear more workable. Ben · Salvidrim!  05:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I also don't think we would need to overthink it — we probably don't need to undertake a massive project of trying to compile a complete list of every show the network ever aired all at once, it's mostly just a matter of reorganizing what's already there, adding what else we know off the top of our heads, and just letting anything else we've still missed get added over time as people identify it. My concern is mostly around not knowing very much — obviously the odd Radio-Canada or TVA show still gets onto my radar sometimes, but the majority of it just floats right past me without denting my awareness at all. I can realphabetize the existing list pretty easily, I just need help with the expansion part. Bearcat (talk) 21:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/tele/emissions is probably the best option. Ben · Salvidrim!  21:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Although do we really need a list when we have Category:Ici Radio-Canada Télé network shows? Ben · Salvidrim!  21:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
The difference is that the category only includes shows for which Radio-Canada was the originating broadcaster, while the list permits the inclusion of any show they verifiably aired at all, even if it was purchased from another network and/or dubbed from another language and thus can't be categorized as one of that network's original shows. That's why lists aren't considered redundant with categories when it comes to "TV shows by network" content. Bearcat (talk) 17:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

ANEWSicon.png

Administrator changes

removed AndonicConsumed CrustaceanEnigmamanEuryalusEWS23HereToHelpNv8200paPeripitusStringTheory11Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Translation help[edit]

Hi again! I've managed to finish transcribing the automated speech-to-text output from the Runaway: A Road Adventure behind the scenes video I mentioned on WPVG's talk page. Most of it makes enough sense to me, but there are a few key parts that got too garbled to reliably use. If you have time, I'd really appreciate it if you could clarify some of these for me! Luckily I only need a French transcription—Google Translate is more than powerful enough these days to handle the conversion of the French to English.

The first one starts at this timestamp and runs until 9:39 (I've had to put a space in the URL to get around Wikipedia's blacklist):

This is what my transcription turned out:

Automatic transcription
au debut pour renouer ont pense un produit vie on s'est un peu inspires de films comme arizona junior ou pulp fiction qui ne sont pas vraiment mais films le culte

j'ai quand meme reussi a placer de petites references aux films et aux auteurs que j'aime beaucoup.

Woody Allen, par example, ou Billy WIlder pour L'Appartement, mais aussi John Ford pour L'Homme tranquille.

Bien que les films que j'aime ne correspondent pas a la tomate 1 TV nous et j'ai profite du jeu pour faire des clins d'oeil a mes realisateurs preferes

Il y en a beaucoup toute personne qui aime le cinéma qui dit beaucoup de films se rendra compte de la plupart des clins d'oeil.

Il ya des references a pas mal de films comme La Grande Evasion, Priscilla reine du desert, Perdite Durango, etc.

Si tu te mets à réaliser le jeu tu trouveras des scènes ou des noms de personnages qui viennent d'autres films

celui qui en parlera le mieux c'est ramon et a profit le script et qui a les plus travaille sur le scenario qui a mis la plupart de references.

dans le film Meurte à Manhattan les protagonistes l'appelle au téléphone de marque qui a priori a assassiné sa femme il enregistre sa voie la la trafic lui ten un piege il avoue

dans la wii on a fait la meme chose a la fin du jeu et on assume completement. en fait les personnages sont cinema, suis dit qu'elle a aime meurtre a manhattan en l'evoquant elle se souvient du film et se dit qu'elle pourrait faire la meme chose

pardon j'etais quoi j'avais la tete ailleurs je les references cinematographiques mise a part vous avez glisse d'autres references peut-etre plus personnel dans votre jeu?

non, je ne l'ait pas. fait en fait je me rappelle que dans une partie qui n'a pas une grande importance dans le jeu, fuji fait references aux groupes qui sont deus filles aquese et qui prennent la tete a tout le monde. je leur ai donne les prenoms de medias albanais je les ai mises la pour qu'elle soit contente de mon jeu. mais autrement non.
Ben's better transcription

au début pour renouer, on pensait à un "road movie", et on s'est un peu inspirés de films comme Arizona Junior ou Pulp Fiction, qui ne sont pas vraiment mes films cultes. Mais j'ai quand même réussi à placer des petites références aux films et aux auteurs que j'aime beaucoup: Woody Allen, par exemple, ou Billy Walder pour l'Apartement, mais aussi John Ford pour l'Homme Tranquille. Bien que les films que j'aime ne correspondent pas à la thématique de Runaway, j'ai profité du jeu pour faire des clins d'oeil à mes réalisateurs préférés.

Il y en a beaucoup... toute personne qui aime le cinéma, qui ait vu beaucoup de films, se rendra compte de la plupart des clins d'oeil. Il y a des références à pas mal de films, comme La Grande Évasion, Priscilla Reine du Désert, Perdita Durango, et cetera. Vraiment, si tu te mets à analyser le jeu, tu trouveras des scènes ou des noms de personnages qui viennent d'autres films. Mais celui-ci qui t'en parleras le mieux c'est Ramon qui a profilé le script, et qui a le plus travaillé sur le scénario. C'est lui qui a mis la plupart des références.

Dans le film Meutre à Manhattan, les réceptionnistes appellent au téléphone le mari qui a priori a assasinné sa femme. Ils enregistrent sa voix, la trafique, lui tendent un piège, et il avoue. Dans Runaway on a fait la même chose à la fin du jeu, et on assume complètement. En fait les personnages sont en train de parler de cinéma: Suzie dit qu'elle a aimé Meutre à Manhattan; en l'évoquant, elle se souvient du film et se dit qu'elle pourrait bien faire la même chose.

Euh pardon j'étais qu- euh j'avais la tête ailleurs, je je, les références cinématographiques mises à part, vous avez glissé d'autres références, peut-être plus personnelles, dans votre jeu?

Non consciemment, non je ne l'ai pas fait. En fait je me rappelle que dans une partie qui n'a pas une grande importance dans le jeu, Suzie fait référence au groupe A, qui sont deux filles aqueuse qui prennent la tête à tout le monde. Je leur ai donné les prénoms de mes nièces Alva et Arana, er je les ai mises là pour qu'elles soient contentes quand elles joueront au jeu, mais autrement non.

I can grasp part of what's being said but I can tell there are important subtleties being lost, alongside certain passages (like the "tomate 1 TV" and "medias albanais" parts) that appear to be gibberish.

The second part is from this timestamp to 14:56:

Here's my transcription:

Automatic transcription
Pour Gina, nous voulions qu'elle soit tres belle et surtout, exuberante. On avait plusieurs filles en tete mais la candidate ideale etait une presentatrice et actrice espagnole qui s'appelle Natalia Strada. Pensez aussi au visage de Jennifer Connely que l'on trouvait tres beau. elle ressentait on voulait qu'elle a une chevelure epaisse est longue et surtout qu'elle soit vraiment tres sexy.

ca a ete beaucoup plus difficile de dessiner Gina car aucun des modeles que l'on avait ne nous paraissait totalement parfait. c'est un chat noir. on avait envie de changer un truc, on voulait changer les cheveux, le corps ca a ete beaucoup plus difficile pour l aie on a ete plus exigeant pour chinalco pour Bryan.

A Gina, Gina pourquoi -- pourquoi c'est elle qui fait bouger l'histoire? les femmes ce sont elles qui vont le pouvoir?

bah tiens c'est nouveau ca les femmes ont le pouvoir.

non mais il est fou qui co encore. nuit bien sur c'est surtout, les jeux sont en general tres politiquement correct alors les protagonistes sont bien entendu heterosexuels. bonjour j'ai dit a une fille et on peut dire. que c'est en fait tres conventionnel chez mail ou font manger introduisant les brines mais on a envie d'aller encore plus a la possibilite que brian decouvre dans le deuxieme opus qu'il etait homosexuel. on voudrait le consulter un desordre sexuelle telle qu'il ne s'agit plus vraiment qu'il est.
Ben's better transcription

Pour Gina, nous voulions qu'elle soit très belle, et surtout exubérante. On avait plusieurs filles en tête, mais la candidate idéale était une présentatrice et actrice espagnole qui s'appelle Natalia Estrada. On pensait aussi au visage de Jennifer Connoly, que l'on trouvait très beau. On voulait qu'elle ait une chevelure épaisse et longue, et surtout, qu'elle soit vraiment très sexy.

Ça a été beaucoup plus difficile de dessiner Gina, car aucun des modèles qu'on avait ne nous paraissait totalement parfait. À chaque fois, on avait envie de changer un truc: on voulait changer les cheveux, le corps... ça a été beaucoup plus difficile pour elle. On a été plus exigeant pour Gina que pour Brian.

Ah Gina..... pourquoi Gina, pourquoi..... pourquoi.... parce qu'au fond c'est elle qui fait bouger l'histoire. Les femmes, se sont elles qui ont le pouvoir

Bin tiens, c'est nouveau ça, les femmes qui ont le pouvoir. Non mais il est fou, et quoi encore?

Mais oui bien sûr, c'est sûr tous les jeux sont en général très politiquement corrects, alors les protagonistes sont bien entendus hétérosexuels. Y'a une fille, bon, on peut dire, que tout est en fait très conventionnel. Mais nous, on a envie de changer un peu cela. Avec Runaway on a ouvert une porte en introduisant les drag queens, mais on a envie d'aller encore plus loin. On a pensé à la possibilité que Brian découvre dans le deuxième opus qu'il est homosexuel, on voudrait le confronter à un désordre sexuel tel qu'il ne sache plus vraiment qui il est.

Again, it's a mixture of lost subtlety and pure nonsense that makes me uneasy to use some of this as a source.

The third starts at this timestamp and ends at 19:01:

My transcription:

Automatic transcription
oui, pour tous les decors du jeu nous nous sommes documentes. quand nous avions quelques photos j'ai ramene. je venais de faire un voyage en arizona dans le desert et au nouveau-mexique et j'avais des dizaines de photos, des centaines de photos. s'est beaucoup inspire des couleurs de ses photos pour le jeu.

il est très important de faire en sorte que les objets avec lesquels le protagoniste c'est interagir soit parfaitement integres au decor et que l'on utilise pour le fond ce que nous disent ces realites.

on utilise deux fonds avec l'objet et l'autre sans. par la meme personne avec la meme technique ne reste plus que le decor l'un des crachats sur le fond le etre aussi parfaite que l'integration de n'importe quel autre element faut qu'il y ait une reelle unite visuelle

c'etait clair des le debut on ne voulait pas que ca ressemble le trois de je crois qu'on y est arrive.

on avait envie d'un style plus proche -- de mon pere adore la bd, a la maison il y avait plein de revues comme Totem, Cimoc, El Víbora qui sont prives des populaires

ce fut difficile 2011 jusqu'a ce que l'on fera la le moyen de deguiser la 3d en 2d. quand on a trouve le truc elle est la fille culte et a disparu le reste reellement ne fut plus qu'un travail faire du client.
Ben's better transcription
Oui pour tous les décors du jeu, nous nous sommes documentés. Nous avions quelques photos que j'ai ramenées. Moi, je venais de faire un voyage en Arizona, dans le désert, et au Nouveau-Mexique, et j'avait des dizaines de photos, des centaines de photos! On s'est beaucoup inspirés des couleurs de ces photos pour le jeu.

Il est très important de faire en sorte que les objets avec lesquels le protagoniste va interagir soient parfaitement intégrés au décor. Ce que l'on utilise pour le fond, ce qu'on utilise... enfin bon, en réalité on utilise deux fonds: un avec l'objet, et l'autre sans. Pas par la même personne, avec la même technique. Au moment où le personnage prend l'objet, il ne reste plus que le décor. L'intégration des objets sur le fond doit être aussi parfaite que l'intégration de n'importe quel autre élément pour qu'il y ait une réelle unité visuelle.

C'était clair dès le début: on ne voulait pas que ça ressemble à de la 3D. Je crois qu'on y est arrivés. On avait envie d'un style plus proche de la BD. Mon père adore la BD, à la maison il y avait plein de revues, comme Totem, Cimoc, ou Vibora, qui sont des BD populaires en Espagne. On y voyait le travail de Richard Corben ou Adam Hughes.

Au début, ce fut difficle de mélanger les deux techniques, jusqu'à ce qu'on trouve le moyen de déguiser la 3D en 2D. Quand on a trouvé le truc, la difficulté a disparu. Le reste réellement ne fut plus qu'un travail de production.

On top of the usual problems, whole sentences were missing from the speech-to-text output here.

And here's the final one, which is thankfully smaller. It starts here and ends at 21:36:

My transcription:

Automatic transcription
ç'était vraiment dépendant du moment du la production parce que tres peu de gens ont travaille durant tout le developpement. la majeure partie a travaille un temps decale et ce en fonction de leur specialite. en fait durant presque tout le processus n'etait neuf personnes avec quatre ou cinq coureurs qui ont travaille moins longtemps pour par exemple faire des taches bien determines. comme la modelisation de certains personnages ou pour ecrire la musique du jeu

et vous ne vous preneze jamais la tete a trois? parce que moi deja tout seul c'est pas toujours facile alors.

probablement plus d'une fois par jour... oui. mais on a de la chance car malgre nos differences on s'entend quand meme tres bien. travaille ensemble depuis dix ans nous trois et je crois que cela peut durer ainsi. a tenu dix ans tiendra encore le temps ensemble.
Ben's better transcription
C'était vraiment dépendant du moment de la production, parce que très peu de gens ont travaillé pendant tout le développement. La majeure partie a travaillé un temps déterminé, et ce en fonction de leur spécialité. En fait, durant presque tout le processus, on était neuf personnes, avec quatre ou cinq autres qui ont travaillé moins longtemps; trois mois pour, par exemple, faire des tâches bien déterminées comme la modélisation de certains personnages, ou pour écrire la musique du jeu.

Et vous ne vous prenezz jamais la tête à trois? Parce que moi déjà tout seul, c'est pas toujours facile, alors...

Probablement plus d'une fois par jour... oui. Mais on a de la chance car malgré nos différences on s'entend quand même très bien. On travaille ensemble depuis dix ans nous trois et je crois que cela peut durer ainsi. Si on a tenu dix ans, on tiendra encore longtemps ensemble.

Thank you for any help you can provide here! I realize this is a lot to ask, so if you're busy, please feel free to take your time with this. I'm working on Runaway alongside a few other Pendulo articles right now and can just delegate my time to those if this will require a week or two worth of waiting. Thanks again. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 08:30, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

  • Yea link shortners are blacklisted including youtu.be but using full links is fine. I replaced them above for convenience and will post my updated transcriptions shortly. Ben · Salvidrim!  10:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • JimmyBlackwing see inline above my retranscriptions. Let me know if you need any help matching the French titles of the referenced movies to their English titles or if any word/sentence doesn't translate well. (also, wow, transcribing at x0.25 speed to avoid pausing/rewinding sounds so weird :p) Ben · Salvidrim!  10:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks so much! These are perfect, and I never expected them to be ready this soon. I'll get to work adding these to my full transcript and using them to fill out the article. Massively appreciated—have a good one! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

ANEWSicon.png

Administrator changes

removed 28bytesAd OrientemAnsh666BeeblebroxBoing! said ZebedeeBU Rob13Dennis BrownDeorDoRDFloquenbeam1Flyguy649Fram2GadfiumGB fanJonathunderKusmaLectonarMoinkMSGJNickOd MishehuRamaSpartazSyrthissTheDJWJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Star Wars titles[edit]

Bonjour

Je sais pas si tu te rappelles, tu m'avais aidé sur des traductions (notamment)....

Bref, je voudrais savoir si tu peux me renseigner sur les pratiques ici concernant les titres, les barrières de langage étant moins importante en français (pour moi!).

Sur Wiki en français, on applique les règles typographiques anglaise sur les titre anglais. Je me pose la question des titres Star Wars :

Sur wiki en anglais il y a "Star Wars Jedi Knight": Dark Forces II mais aussi "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" – Jedi Alliance
Pour le premier, "Jedi Knight" est inclus dans le titre avec "Star Wars", sans deux-points, alors que "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" conserve les deux-points et rajoute un second sous-titre et un tiret.

Pourquoi la page n'est-elle pas titrée "Star Wars The Clone Wars": Jedi Alliance

j'ai résumé le problème sur ma pdd sur Wikipédia en français : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Archim%C3%ABa#Titres_Star_Wars

Un truc étrange également, c'est qu'il y a Star Wars: Battlefront et pas Star Wars Battlefront..; mais il y a Star Wars Battlefront: Renegade Squadron

En espérant que tu puisses m'éclairer.... Très cordialement. --Archimëa (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

  • Règle génrale, la typographie d'un titre d'article de jeu vidéo est simplement déterminée par la personne qui crée la page; ça reste tel quel tant que personne d'objecte et souvent pour une question d'un deux-points ou tiret y'a pas vraiment de raison de s'obstiner alors le status quo maintient simplement le titre choisi par le créateur de l'article. En cas de dispute, on se fie généralement à la manière dont les reviewers écrivent le titre dans leurs articles. Souvent c'est en relation directe avec la typographie sur les matériaux officiels (cover art, posters, etc.) et la taille des lettres de chaque élément respectif. MOS:TITLEPUNCT spécifie seulement qu'on préfère en général (pas juste pour les jeux) un deux-points à un tiret, à moins qu'il y ait deux sous-titres. Ben · Salvidrim!  23:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Salut! ha bon, ca m'arrange pas, je croyais apprendre des règles complexes mais écrites, je vais voir ce manual of style, pour voir ce qu'il y a dedans... Ca a l'air plus simple que chez nous, si tu regardes le débat pour un seul espace avant deux points [2]. Il y a pas grand chose, c'est un peu maigre.
    Je viens de trouver Wikipedia:Article titles et Wikipedia:Naming conventions (video games) - mais il n'y a pas les réponses à mes questions.
    Merci pour ton aide. --Archimëa (talk) 07:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
  • En théorie, si c'est ce que les reviewers utilisent et que y'a pas déjà eu de discussion sur le sujet, y'a probablement pas de grand problème à faire le changement, mais faut aussi se demander pourquoi changer quelque chose qui n'est pas "brisé", t'as toujours quelques bornés qui tiennent au status quo "à moins d'une bonne raison". Ben · Salvidrim!  20:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Ok. le problème réside dans les règles typo françaises pour des titres d'œuvres, qui imposent de suivre les règles de la langue du titre. Ainsi, en résulte des problèmes d'uniformisation et de cohérence des titres sur cette franchise, sur Wiki en français (ce sur quoi on est pê un peu plus à cheval)... C'était là le problème/but de mes questionnements, afin de comprendre comment sont choisis les titres ici, et pas de renommer à tout prix dans un projet dans un langage n'étant pas ma langue natale ^^.
    Mes recherches sont les deux seules que j'ai effectué en prenant deux titres totalement au hasard dans ma liste que j'ai dressé de titres "non-uniformisés"... Fort à parier que je dois pouvoir renommer la plupart des autres titres de cette liste (je peux pas croire qu'en prenant deux titres au hasard, je tombe sur les deux seuls à renommer, il doit y en avoir une majorité, c’est obligé, question de statistiques...).
    Bref, ce n'est pas vraiment important.
    En théorie, je dois pouvoir renommer uniquement sur wikipédia en français, suivant les besoins... (certes, que wikipédia en anglais utilise le même titre aurait pu aider à confirmer le choix des graphies, mais c'est pas bien grave....)
    En tout cas, merci pour tes éclaircissements. --Archimëa (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

And the madness ends![edit]

Hi. I've finished adding all the missing Olympic cross-country biographies. Hopefully your Echo notifications have not melted! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

  • Ah, I'll miss having 50+ every morning. Did you know "mark all as read" only marks 35 at a time? :p Ben · Salvidrim!  17:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

????[edit]

Did you really thank me yesterday for an edit I made in 2014? Confused-tpvgames.png JamesBWatson (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

(This.... this is actually related to the thread just above, but good luck to anyone trying to figure out how!! My train of thought was meanderingly sinuous af on this one :p) Ben · Salvidrim!  15:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019[edit]

Gamepad.svg

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Fairytale left.png Previous issue | Index | Next issue Fairytale right.png

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2019, the project has:


Content


To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

ANEWSicon.png

Administrator changes

added BradvChetsfordIzno
readded FloquenbeamLectonar
removed DESiegelJake WartenbergRjanagTopbanana

CheckUser changes

removed CallaneccLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed CallaneccFoxHJ MitchellLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)