User talk:ViperSnake151

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

About Mascot 2018 Asian Games[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Andreas Evando P. I just knew that you reverted one of my recent contributions —the one I made with this edit to 2018 Asian Games— I'm telling you it's not fake. It's Official! Ika is now changed to Kaka. You can see it in their offical website. So please, you reverted my edit back. Thanks.

Countdown template and MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED.[edit]

It looks like you believe that the Countdown template should not be used in articles per MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED. At least it is whet you added in the Template:Countdown template.

I do not understand the rational of this addition, and I did not see your explanation. MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED are not involved in the same way:

  • MOS:TIME says "Context determines whether the 12- or 24-hour clock is used" this is for time and not for delays.
  • MOS:DATED does not ban the usage of Template:Countdown neither explicitly not implicitly.

Also, the template provide seconds accuracy: Brexit has started. (refresh)

Would it be possible to have a lower accuracy, for instance only the one or two more significant numbers such as 320 days and 1 hour or 45 weeks and 5 days?

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube[edit]

Research Project[edit]

Hi Vipersnake151

I'm an anthropology student doing an online research project on wikipedians and their motivations and ideals for writing and editing wikipedia pages. I was wondering if you would be interested in answering a few questions I have - sort of like a small online interview.

Best Karoline Husbond (Student at University of Texas Austin) -

Disambiguation link notification for September 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Little Late with Lilly Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Television ratings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia articles for improvement[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia articles for improvement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Samsung Galaxy Note 3[edit]

Why did you remove my comments about the Note 3 IR blaster? The Note 3 does have an IR blaster and everything I said in my edit is true. Do you even own a Note 3, I do and have used it to control my TV and other devices via the IR blaster many times. So please restore my comments. Thank you. N2iph (talk) 09:44, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ambush marketing[edit]

The article Ambush marketing you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Ambush marketing for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lingzhi2 -- Lingzhi2 (talk) 16:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DAZN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Freeform (TV channel)[edit]

Hello ViperSnake151. User:Bankster has reverted my good edit into User:Bankster's version with the "Pay television" phrase again without an explanation and the edit is misleading. In the Freeform (TV channel), I change to the cable television with my good edit and Bankster revert my good edit and giving me a warning message no. 2. I am 100% positive my edit is good. So could you talk to User:Bankster to stop reverting to pay television because the article is misleading. So you review all American cable channel articles with the misleading "pay television" phrase and change it to "cable television channel". I hope all American articles with the cable television channel phrase is solved. I will be happy to help you. Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:44E7:2C9E:2E87:C408 (talk) 10:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

ViperSnake151, User:Bankster has revert you own edit to "subscription television" and Bankster's edits are misleading again. Could you revert Bakster's edit in your version. Talk to User:Bankster that "subscription television" did not count and it's misleading. Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:1562:6118:8514:72E3 (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Viper, User:Bankster has continously revert your edits without Bankster's explanation. To avoid edit wars or disrputive edits myself keep on revert Bankster's edits and Bankster might lead for a possible block. Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:1562:6118:8514:72E3 (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Viper hold on, User: is not belong to Bankster it was from two separate countries. User:Bankster is from Peru and User: is from Canada. Bankster is giving warning to multiple IPs in an angry message. The IP Canada is checking the Pay TV edit to disappear The IP User: did not follow Bankster's edit it was just an edit test to make the pay TV disappear. I investigate Bankster's contributions. Then Bankster revert your edits. So Bankster have violated the edit warring as the culprit. 2001:569:7C07:2600:1562:6118:8514:72E3 (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
I explain on Freeform's edit summary and revert Bankster's edits into your version. If Bankster continues to revert into Bankster's version. It's blocking time for Bankster. To avoid edit warring myself. I will watch the Freeform article myself and the ANEW myself. I am positive that Bankster will be blocked from editing. Good luck and I hope Bankster will be blocked from editing by an administrator. I salute you. 2001:569:7C07:2600:1562:6118:8514:72E3 (talk) 01:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Edit war again at Freeform (TV channel)[edit]

Hello ViperSnake151, User:Bankster was unblocked and continously edit war the Freeform (TV channel) without an explanation. There is no term form for subscription television channel. I found a user and it was indefinitely block. The user's name is User:Goliathmob and it was belong to User:Bankster. Could you talk to User:EdJohnston to extend the block longer because User:Bankster has continously edit war without an explanation after the user was unblocked and the user was blocked named User:Goliathmob did belong to User:Bankster. This is an urgent message. Please talk to User:EdJohnston ask for an extended block to User:Bankster. I will be happy to assist you. I know you report it at the edit war noticeboard and User:Bankster was successfully blocked. Anyways, this is an urgent message and please reply be back very soon. Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:C12:8928:449B:6FF (talk) 22:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Bankster, So I will not be involved at the ANI disacussion you're on your own to discuss with other admins against Bankster's edits. I will wish you good luck and I hope you will win and save the Wikipedia universe. Talk to you soon. Bye bye. 2001:569:7C07:2600:C12:8928:449B:6FF (talk) 22:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wxia11alive.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wxia11alive.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Bankster wants to unblock by request[edit]

Hello ViperSnake151, User:Bankster wants to unblock by the user's request. Remember the "pay television" controversy? Could you talk to User:Bankster for the user's request to be unblocked? Talk to User:Bankster to promise the user is to never put "pay television" on Canadian and American channels and tell Bankster to promise to never edit war the good edits. Everyone has the right to edit on any cable channel articles whether its Canadian or American. Please talk to User:Bankster on the promise not to edit war and do not put "pay television" right now. Thank You. 2001:569:7C07:2600:E197:2A4:F9A3:12E1 (talk) 23:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)