User talk:Walkersam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative[edit]

Hi Walkersam,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Crystal Castles[edit]

You're very welcome. Just to be clear, editwarring doesn't only apply to situations where discussion about the changes has resulted in a stalemate — it can also apply to situations where a user is persistently reinserting disputed content while refusing to participate in or acknowledge any discussion about it at all. Certainly, the sweet spot that we like to see is conflicting users coming to an agreement about the disputed material one way or the other or somewhere in the middle, but that process can obviously fail, with editwarring taking place, at both ends of the spectrum. And at any rate, a stalemate over disputed changes would normally get escalated to an WP:RFC for outside input — so using temporary page protection to force the uncommunicative user into a discussion is actually quite a common response. Bearcat (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Move review for Damn (Kendrick Lamar album)[edit]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Walkersam. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Heartland Alliance[edit]

Hello, Walkersam,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Heartland Alliance should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartland Alliance .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 01:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)