Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens
This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens|
|Argued January 9, 1990|
Decided June 4, 1990
|Full case name||Board of Education of the Westside Community Schools, etc., et al., Petitioners v. Bridget C. Mergens, by and through her next friend, Daniel N. Mergens, et al.|
|Citations||496 U.S. 226 (more)|
|Prior||867 F.2d 1076 (8th Cir. 1989); cert. granted, 492 U.S. 917 (1989).|
|School districts may not prohibit Bible study groups from meeting on school premises if they allow other groups to meet on school premises.|
|Majority||O'Connor (parts I, II-A, II-B, II-C), joined by Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, Scalia, Kennedy|
|Plurality||O'Connor (part III), joined by Rehnquist, White, Blackmun|
|Concurrence||Kennedy, joined by Scalia|
|Concurrence||Marshall, joined by Brennan|
|U.S. Const. amend. I; Equal Access Act|
Westside High School, in District 66, located in Omaha, Nebraska, refused to let a group of students wishing to form a Christian Bible Study Club within their school. Bridget Mergens is the name of the student who initiated the process to start the club. She was a senior at the time. It was decided that the club could not take place because they would not allow a staff member to sponsor it (staff sponsoring was required or the club meetings could not take place at the school). The students argued that the district's decision was in violation of the federal Equal Access Act requiring that groups seeking to express messages containing “religious, political, philosophical, or other content” not be denied the ability to form clubs.
Opinion of the Court
In an 8-1 decision, the Court held that the club could hold their meetings, but that their sponsor could not be paid, as this would constitute an endorsement of religion prohibited by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The school's situation was placed under the Equal Access Act because it allowed other ‘limited open forums’. In Part III of Justice O'Connor's opinion, which did not reach a majority of the Court, she applied the Lemon Test to find that the Equal Access Act is constitutional as applied in this case. Justice Kennedy, meanwhile, analyzed the application of the Act under different Court precedents, focusing more upon "coercion".
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 496
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court