Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:UtherSRG[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Echidna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). UtherSRG (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: — Benzert 17:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Administrator abusing privileges. — Benzert 17:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Please give diff links rather than version edits. I will check this, but please format reports properly. This will enable us to block faster if a violation has happened and is easier for us. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 18:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Reversion of "simple vandalism" is not covered by the 3RR. I can't say with certainty that this is reversion of simple vandalism without expert knowledge about Echidnas, but considering that your edit here is your only edit, I believe you are a sockpuppet account of the users editing that page that got reverted. Sorry, but I'm not convinced by your argument. No block from me. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 18:06, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
    • The platypus is commonly refered to as the "duck-billed platypus."--Benzert 18:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Yes, and that is mentioned in the Platypus article.
  • See WP:MAM#Names and titles for the reasoning for the capitalization. Note the edit histories of both echidna and Platypus. User:Duck-billed platypus, and their original anon IP, was told in various different ways that their edits were vandalism of echidna and Platypus. I subsequently blocked the user, and they proceeded to create another username to circumvent block. I reverted that edit as well. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)



User:Macedonia 2[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Vergina Sun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Macedonia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Telex 22:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • User keeps removing the sourced information that the Vergina Sun is copyrighted by WIPO as a Greek emblem. The registrations are right here [1] [2] [3] . He's been blocked numerous times for violating the 3RR, always pushing the POV of the Republic of Macedonia (hence his username). Telex 22:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
    • This user's not violated the 3RR yet. The first version you gave is clearly not the same as the one the user is reverting to see this, a comparison of the last revert done by the user and the version you said they're reverting to. Next time the user reverts then 3RR will have been violated, but not yet. Not willing to block. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 22:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
    • I don't see a 3RR either, nor any removal of information. I just see him/her inserting the text "however, exclusive rights to Greece were never granted." and replacing it three times. Gamaliel 22:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Well, regardless, next time the user adds the text in they will have violated 3RR. "Reverting, in this context, means undoing the actions of another editor or other editors in whole or part. It does not necessarily mean taking a previous version from history and editing that. A revert may involve as little as adding or deleting a few words or even one word". --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 22:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
My point is, he partially reverted (partial reverts count according to WP:3RR) to the version which didn't have that information. Telex 22:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
That's very thin ice to stand on, especially when concerning addition of information. I'm not willing to block the user on the grounds of that "partial revert" but I will block if the user reverts again. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 22:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
How about the fact that he's waging the same revert war at Portal:Republic of Macedonia/Did you know? Telex 22:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Then list a 3RR report if the user has violated 3RR. 3RR does not apply cross-article. Or list a report on WP:ANI. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 22:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Corrected the "previous version reverted to" link and time above. Ice is solid. The user added FOUR (not three) times in one hour the same phrase and NOT partially reverted. User has been blocked 4 times in the past for 3RR and was just unblocked 2-3 days ago, since the last block was for 36 hours.  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 22:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
That doesn't make sense either. S/he isn't reverting to the May 6 version, s/he added that sentence to the May 6 version. There are no edits by anyone between the May 6 version and the first May 9 revert. Gamaliel 22:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
You're right, we're confused. We'll revert the article back to the sourced version (I got mixed up, he was deleting the info on another page and adding unsourced info on this one - nowhere does it say the request was denied; it was accepted, the registrations prove that). Telex 22:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
The user added (like the word I bolded above) the same sentence to the same previous version FOUR times. This is 3RR by all books.  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 23:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't agree with that. The previous version reverted to was 21:02 9 May 2006, since that is the first time that the text has entered the version. Regardless, the user still violated the 3RR since s/he's reverted six times. 4 day block, for the 5th offense. I may start blocking for even longer soon. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 07:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks and sorry for the debate. (I still haven't understood despite further explanations -since the text did not just miraculously enter the version; it was inserted by him- but nevermind...) Someone should explain me this so that I don't make the same mistake(?) in future. Again, sorry.  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 08:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

This page is only for discussion 3RR violations. This discussion can continue on User talk:Deskana. :-) --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 10:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Amibidhrohi[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Hamas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Amibidhrohi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Jayjg (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • These are straightforward reverts to identical previous versions. The editor has been blocked for 3RR before [4], and was asked to revert himself: [5]. Jayjg (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
    • 72 hour block. I was tempted to block for a week, given that this is this user's fourth time being blocked for 3rr. · Katefan0 (scribble)/poll 15:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

merged duplicate report

3RR violation at Hamas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) by Amibidhrohi (talk · contribs)

And if it's needed, another revert adding the phrase "over 90 per cent of its work is charitable" to the intro

Reported by SlimVirgin (talk) 01:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment

Amibidrohi has been making complex partial reverts in order to add "illegally occupying" or "illegally occupied," inserting them in different places in the intro in an effort to game the system. He has also started reverting over the claim, also in the intro, that over 90 per cent of Hamas's work is charitable. He's been blocked four times before, twice for 3RR. [6] He and User: Tazmaniacs (see report above) have both violated 3RR on this page today. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

He's still reverting:

Blocked for 48 hours by SushiGeek. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 02:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Deepujoseph[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Ajith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Deepujoseph (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Anwar saadat 23:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: This user does not speak Tamil language, nor is he aware of this actor. Yet he reverts to his POV randomly here blanking lines, paragraphs, sections and even links. Anwar saadat 23:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Reply - True, I don't speak Tamil fluently, but I can understand it fairly well. And I don't know how you even came to a conclusion that I don't know Ajith - that, I believe, is strictly something I am allowed to decide for myself. Also, from when on, did removing commercial links become vandalism as you stated here . I request the administrators to please take a look at Talk:Ajith and Wikipedia talk:Notice board for India-related topics#User:Anwar saadat edit summaries. - translation? to get a better grasp of the situation. -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK 05:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Reply - Thank you, Blnguyen. Anyhow, correction of vandalism does not figure under the WP:3RR rule.- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK 05:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Joetkeck[edit]

Three revert rule violation on September 11, 2001 attacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Joetkeck (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: --rehpotsirhc █♣█Talk 23:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User violated 3RR yesterday and was warned on his talk page. --rehpotsirhc █♣█Talk 23:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for 25 hours by SushiGeek, obvious 3rr Jaranda wat's sup 23:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

update[edit]

User is evading block through IP [7], does not appear to comprehend 3RR. The IP editor is signing as Joetkeck and making identical reversions. --Mmx1 19:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Erdogan Cevher 2[edit]

Three revert rule violation on List of unrecognized countries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Erdogan_Cevher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by:  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 09:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • The user immediately re-reverted after being unblocked by the previous violation in the same article. He didn't even wait to complete the 24h interval from his previous reverts for which he had been blocked for 12h. In the middle of the process he used the re-arrange technique in order to conceal his revert.  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 09:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

24h William M. Connolley 09:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 09:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:207.200.116.13[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Criss Angel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 207.200.116.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Sarah Ewart (Talk) 12:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • User is repeatedly violating 3RR. Has been warned on user talk page and article talk page. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 12:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  • User also has a history of vandalism on other articles, and continues to repeat the same act of vandalism, even when warned and informed. - Izzy Galvez 21:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately this is an AOL proxy, so there is not a lot to be done; we're not really allowed to block for long. All I can do is give you carte blanche to revert them as often as you like, and maybe (semi-)protect the page if needed William M. Connolley 22:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Luka_Jačov and User:Ante_Perkovic[edit]

Note that here we have removal/restoring of reference, so it could be a case of vandalism and reverting of vandalism. Dunno, I'm all but NPOV on this thing so somebody else please decide what to do.

User:Luka_Jačov[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Serbs_of_Croatia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Luka_Jačov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Dijxtra 16:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Blocked for 24 hours. --Cyde Weys 16:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Ante_Perkovic[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Serbs_of_Croatia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ante_Perkovic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Dijxtra 16:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Blocked for 24 hours. --Cyde Weys 16:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


User:Rydel (result: 24h)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Minsk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Rydel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Kuban Cossack Flag of the Russian Empire (black-yellow-white).svg 17:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User repeatedly inserts POV material has stalked all of my edits today, has been blocked previously on Belarusian language where he managed to continued an edit war for about four months resulting in that article being locked TWICE.--Kuban Cossack Flag of the Russian Empire (black-yellow-white).svg 17:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

24h William M. Connolley 18:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Ptmccain[edit]

3RR at Martin Luther (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) by Ptmccain (talk · contribs)

Reported by SlimVirgin (talk) 22:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments

The above are straightforward reverts where Ptmccain removes the same second paragraph from the intro each time, the 14th time he has done so without discussion, reverting against at least five editors. He has violated 3RR before on a related article, but was offered the chance to revert himself [8] and was given a 3RR warning by an uninvolved admin. [9] He has also engaged in page blanking and was warned about that too. [10] [11] [12] He removes all warnings from his talk page and continues with the same behavior. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

24h William M. Connolley 22:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, William. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

User:222.1.45.125[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Japanese history textbook controversies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 222.1.45.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Deiaemeth 09:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, thats 4R, by both of you. 12h apiece. William M. Connolley 20:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

User:70.125.129.203 (result: warning)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Realms_of_Kaos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 70.125.129.203 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Sarysa

Comments: Violation of 3RR rule on the said article. This person deletes a selection they disagree with over and over again. He/She thinks that something with extremely close ties with the main article does not deserve a section. Has been writing over other peoples' edits with his/her version since and has not been paying heed to his/her own errors.

Was there some reason that you didn't warn the anon? Sigh. I'll do it. No block unless more reverts William M. Connolley 20:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Jjzeidner[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Web 2.0 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Jjzeidner (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Dhartung | Talk 19:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

Whether the information belongs there or not, the user has failed to engage in Talk and simply reverts. Newbie probably unaware of 3RR. Correction: User registered name in 2004, but rarely edited before. --Dhartung | Talk 19:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

User was not warned, I have warned them now. Above are not diffs, user has several sequential edits and as I see it has reverted three times thus far. Just zis Guy you know? 20:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I think that's appropriate -- this was my first time (I think) using a 3RR notice. --Dhartung | Talk 21:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Hughgr[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Chiropractic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Hughgr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Hughgr, Steth, and AED seem to agree on this version, while I, Jefffire, and others, have tried to get an NPOV version of the fact that Chiropractic has little scientific support into the lead. "5th revert" is not quite identical, but it is a reversion by adding qualifiers. (Note also that User:Steth been blocked for 3RR before.)

In all honesty, I have violated 3RR also if either 0th is is considered a reversion, or my revert/self-revert is included as a reversion:

The last revert was not actually a revert, it was a slight rewording. Also the user was not warned (since you know about 3RR I ghuess I could block you, but that would be churlish). I suggest you all have a nice cup of tea and stop the war. Just zis Guy you know? 20:39, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I think maybe we've got a resolution. We'll see if it lasts. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:24.5.80.41 (result: 12h)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on The Marin School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 24.5.80.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

  • Previous version reverted to: [14]
  • 1st revert: [15]
  • 2nd revert: [16]
  • 3rd revert: [17]
  • 4th revert: [18]

Reported by: Bill 21:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: The version the user is reverting to is copied directly from the site: [19]

Ah, as a copyvio it doesn't need to be listed here. But where? Not sure. By golly, there has been a lot of reverting, you should have come sooner. Anyway, 12h William M. Connolley 22:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


User:KAS[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Sailor Moon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). KAS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Denelson83 22:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

2006-05-11 22:11:55 Denelson83 blocked "KAS (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR violation on article Sailor Moon) William M. Connolley 22:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

User:UberCryxic[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Military_history_of_France (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). UberCryxic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):


Reported by: Duckdid 23:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

He's reverted that article about 20 times today, but luckily for him, the Wikipedia process for reporting someone is so bureaucratic and time-consuming that I'm not going to properly fill out the report. Duckdid 23:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

He was warned in his talk page, but keep on reverting, I was the 172 IP that warned him, too many reverts to be listed. Thanks JAbeach 23:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

But most aren't look closer, he reverted about 40 times, some of them were vandalism but look at the early difs, easy 3rr violation JAbeach 01:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_history_of_France&offset=20060511071712&action=history

Amazingly, it looks like he's going to survive having reverted a page about 20 times in one day (very few of them for vandalism). Duckdid 23:11, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Ackoz[edit]

I violated the 3RR rule on Abortion. ackoz Flag of the Czech Republic.svg 23:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

No one else has reported you for it, so it should be okay. Just make sure you stop reverting now. :-) SlimVirgin (talk) 01:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Michael D. Wolok[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Many-worlds interpretation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Michael_D._Wolok (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: -lethe talk + 00:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: I have already blocked this user for 24 hours. -lethe talk + 00:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Jahat[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Di-dehydroepiandrosterone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Jahat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: Rockpocket (talk) 00:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Editor Jahat and User:67.101.144.52 are the same person [20]. He was warned that further reverting to his OR would result in a 3RR block [21]. Rockpocket (talk) 00:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

As he reverted again after you'd warned him, I'm going to block for 24 hours. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Shez_15[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Rani Mukerji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Shez_15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

  • Previous version reverted to: [22] 23:11, 10 May 2006
  • 1st revert: [23] 23:19, 11 May 2006
  • 2nd revert: [24] 23:45, 11 May 2006
  • 3rd revert: [25] 00:09, 12 May 2006
  • 4th revert: [26] 00:14, 12 May 2006

Reported by: Zora 01:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: One of those reverts is by Shez 15, not logged in -- that's the static IP associated with his account.

We have been having problems with Shez for months. He is obsessed with Rani Mukerji. He feels he "owns" her article; he modifies articles on films like Veer-Zaara to give Rani top billing, even when she's a supporting actress; he attacks other actress articles; for a while, he was modifying the disambiguation page for Rani page so that the Rani (Bollywood actress) entry read #1 Bollywood actress. See discussions on talk pages, talk page for WP:INCINE, the Indian cinema project. We are discussing mediation.

User:Frankman (result: 8h each)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Greater Croatia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Frankman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: serbiana - talk 01:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

User is reverting the Greater Croatia page even though we reached an agreement about the way the page should look on the talk page. He is constantly asking for sources, even though they are given at the External links part of the page. I have nothing else to say, he has been warned about the 3RR, he's not cooperating, just reverting. --serbiana - talk 01:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

  • A small comment: the reporter himself seems to have broken 3RR too and apparently used misleading edit summary in his last revert here. --Elephantus 05:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
I was going to correct you on that... Bormalagurski (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) has also broken 3RR. But it seems its one of those odd-sig things... William M. Connolley 07:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


Oh, I don't know... 8h each William M. Connolley 07:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Deepblue06/User:152.2.10.46/User:24.211.192.250[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Human rights in Turkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Deepblue06 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)/152.2.10.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)/24.211.192.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Reported by: ManiF 03:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Recent CheckUser evidence has confirmed that all these users are the same person, so 152.2.10.46, Deepblue06, and 24.211.192.250 should all be blocked, I believe. Also, they know about the 3RR from here and here. ManiF 03:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
    • I have blocked User:Deepblue06 which should autoblock the IP he is using. As for the other IP, I can't say it's the same person... (and neither can checkuser, all Essjay did was confirm Deepblue06 was one of the above). Sasquatch t|c 06:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Togrol (result: 24h)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Cyrus the Great (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Togrol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: ManiF 13:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Four reverts in less than two hours. The user has been warned and knows the 3RR rule. --ManiF 13:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

24h William M. Connolley 16:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Erdogan Cevher 3[edit]

Three revert rule violation on List of unrecognized countries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Erdogan_Cevher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by:  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 14:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • User's third violation immediately after previous block expiry, in the same article. Also, highly POV edits, WP:POINT violation and repeated irrelevant responses. Kindly check article and talk.  NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 14:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Is there something wrong with this report? Can I have a feedback please? NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 15:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

2006-05-12 14:53:47 Lightdarkness blocked "Erdogan Cevher (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3rr on List of unrecognized countries) William M. Connolley 15:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks to both and sorry for not checking block log. NikoSilver  (T) @ (C) 15:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
I appoligize, while adding a note here that I had blocked, I got the loss of session error, and had to move on to my next class at school, and forgot to repost. --lightdarkness (talk) 18:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Sosomk/User:192.240.93.52[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Bagrationi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Sosomk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)/192.240.93.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: —Khoikhoi 18:06, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • 24h Will (E@) T 18:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Merecat[edit]

Three revert rule violation on User:Merecat (edit | [[Talk:User:Merecat|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Merecat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Reported by: User:RyanFreisling @ 19:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User was found by Checkuser ([28], [29], [30]) to be a 'likely sockpuppet of Rex071404 and Anon Texan', and has violated 3RR deleting the sockpuppet warning from his user page. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 19:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Please note this user is now blocked and this 3RR request can be considered 'dormant', as the only practical recourse to the report (blocking) is already in effect. Thank you. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 19:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Ptmccain 2 (result: 24h)[edit]

3RR on Martin Luther (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) by Ptmccain (talk · contribs)

  • Version revert