Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive172

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:Orartu reported by User:Alborz Fallah (Result: Both blocked 24hr (see tit-for-tat filing below))[edit]

Page: Azarbaijani Kurds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Orartu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [1]

  • 1st revert: [2]
  • 2nd revert: [3]
  • 3rd revert: [4]
  • 4th revert: [5]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [6]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [7]

Comments:

Almost all other edits that I have done is reverted by this user : [8]

User:TechnologyIsPower reported by User:SudoGhost (Result:24 hr block )[edit]

Page: Moore's law (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TechnologyIsPower (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [9]

  • 1st revert: [10] (Somone deleted my work here!!!! Please dont delete my work. Now you are welcome to fix any typo's you see but I like leaving my external links right then and there for all to see and follow. I think its better that way)
  • 2nd revert: [11] (HEY QUIT F*CKING WITH ME!!!! Ok this is an online free encyclopedia and everything I have contributed is true!!! Ok people come one here and I want them to know the truth. Truth is Intel is number one. Ray Kurzweil is a real futurist, highly regarded)
  • 3rd revert: [12] (HEY IT ISN'T COPYRIGHT CAUSE I PROVIDE THE SOURCE RIGHT THERE DAMMIT!!!! JESUS!!! Listen I want people to know the truth!!! The truth is Intel has single handedly changed our world! When it comes to futurology Ray Kurzweil is number one!)
  • 4th revert: [13] (Hey check me out in on the talk page and drop a message for me. I am trying to provide the truth here dammit. Intel is number one in the world. Photonics, 3D transistor, and moores law itself. All thanks to Intel. People need to know the truth)


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [14]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Moore's law#Future trends & Talk:Moore's law#Hey its me TechnologyIsPower listen I know what the hell I'm talking about. At least I provide all the sources for my facts!!!!

Comments:
Copyvio concerns among other things, the information being inserted in the article is being copy-pasted directly from the sources, and the editor has not addressed these copyright violation issues on the talk page or anywhere else. The user's page was created after being notified of 3RR, declaring "May the edit wars commence!!!!!!" His behavior on the talk page and edit summaries also leaves much to be desired, but that perhaps is a subject for another board. - SudoGhost 14:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Although an additional warning was provided, the attitude, WP:NPA, WP:TRUTH violations from the editor are just a little too heavy-handed for me to WP:AGF. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

User:58.7.226.210 reported by User:Dmcq (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 58.7.226.210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [15]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [21]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: No but this is probably the same person who did a load of earlier edits to add rubbish to the page and kept being reverted as ip 124.169.35.204, 58.7.154.150, and 203.206.0.59

Comments:

Dmcq (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

The IP has reverted some more. GoodDay (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
It's the same editor: the edit summaries are similar in tone and style. DrKiernan (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
We've got a major problem on our hands. Editor is back as 124.168.240.132. I guessing a computer & a cellphone is being used. GoodDay (talk) 17:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Again, as 58.7.244.17 - GoodDay (talk) 18:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Page semi-protected for one week. Swarm X11|11|11 19:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

User:109.69.9.10 reported by User:Chzz (Result: 24h block)[edit]

Page: List of amateur radio organizations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 109.69.9.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [22]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [28]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [29]

Comments:

Further information, just for the links: This began on the help-desk [30], there was some subsequent discussion on my user talk page [31]  Chzz  ►  17:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I have blocked User:109.69.9.10 for edit-warring and not engaging in any discussion (block states 3RR violation, but that's just me being bad at math, I clarified on talk page). I do hope removing the ability to edit-war on that page will bring him to discussing the issue on his/her talk page. I'll try to keep an eye open for subsequent developments. I have not rollbacked his latest revert, but it probably needs to be done. Snowolf How can I help? 18:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
If I do the rollback do I risk being blocked, or is my 3RR warning now voided? Roger (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
It would probably better if you avoid doing so, there's enough eyeballs on that page anyway now, I hope. One would imagine a user would react better if it's not always the same guy reverting him over and over. If there are more reverts within 24 hours, that would make it a new ip, and semi-protection or other measures might have to be considered. In any case, I'd say on the balance it's probably better if you don't revert him. Snowolf How can I help? 18:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
OK, I'll just watch. Thanks everyone for helping resolve this - let's hope it stays resolved now. Roger (talk) 19:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Already blocked Adding template for the block. Snowolf How can I help? 18:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Ken McRitchie reported by User:Yobol (Result: blocked 31 hours)[edit]

Page: Astrology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Ken McRitchie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [36]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: See talk page

Comments:

WP:SPA editor on Astrology page edit warring against multiple users. Yobol (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

User: Plot Spoiler reported by User:Truthtellers78 (Result: reporter blocked)[edit]

Page: Operation Red Coalition (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Plot Spoiler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [37]


  • 1st revert: [38]
  • 2nd revert: [39] He claims that the content I want to put up is not valid and because it doesn't fit his POV
  • 3rd revert: [40] I'm pretty sure that "Pristino" is his sockpuppet because they edit exacly at the same times. I hope somebody can examine this.
  • 4th revert: [41]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [42]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [43]

Comments:
I'm very new to Wikipedia but I did notice that the user I'm reporting and what I assume is his socketpuppet prevented other views from being expressed and reverted back any content that did not fit his political point of views. There was virtually no discussion taking place on the talkpage but at least two users wanted to change to name to "Operation Red Coalition" because it was more neutral and better reflected thirld party publication. Truthtellers78 (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't even know how I should respond to these ridiculous claims. First of all the second and fourth revert that truthteller provides are exactly the same edit. Secondly, truthteller has absurdly accused User:Pristino of being a sockpuppet of mine without presenting any sort of evidence. This is definitely untrue and an inflammatory accusation.
The root of the matter here seems to be that truthteller has been unilaterally changing the page title of Adel al-Jubeir assassination plot to Operation Red Coalition without any sort of discussion on the talk page or consensus, while claiming he has. As a result, I have reverted truthteller's title change multiple times, because he refuses to employ the appropriate protocol.
I ultimately tired of this and tried to do the fair thing by warning truthteller here [44] on his talk page that if he did not follow the appropriate Wikipedia guidelines I would be forced to take him to WP:ANEW. Seems like truthteller decided to preempt me with this report while once again unilaterally changing the title of Adel al-Jubeir assassination plot to Operation Red Coalition. Plot Spoiler (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm not an admin, but there doesn't appear to be a 3RR violation here... and those edits happened several days ago (blocks for edit warring are meant to be preventative, not punitive). Also, I see nothing to indicate that User:Pristino is a sockpuppet of Plot Spoiler (and this would be the wrong place to make that accusation anyways; go to WP:SPI). However, it does appear that Truthtellers78 is correct in that he is discussing it on the Talk Page while Plot Spoiler keeps reverting the move without joining the discussion (see Talk:Operation_Red_Coalition#Alternative_naming). I'd recommend that both parties cease fire on flipping the page move back and forth any further with reverts and start discussing the move in earnest on the Talk Page. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 20:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Admittedly, I missed that truthteller commented on the talk page and I have now added my own response. Regardless, truthteller did not have the consensus to make such a key change in the article. He just commented himself in support and then used that as license to change the article to his liking. His WP:Soapboxing views are also evident. Plot Spoiler (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Reporter blocked. WP:EW covers more than just 3RR. I am leaving the article where it is for now and unprotected, but encourage the involved parties to work out what title is best supported by the sources before move-warring about it any more. - 2/0 (cont.) 00:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm very critical of this decision, because both me and my counterpart acted in a similar way, I did not in any way violate the 3PR, but I did one change in a 24 hour period that took 3 saved to accomplish, my counterpart did exactly the same yet I'm the one who got blocked. Why? We should both have been blocked or the application declined.

Truthtellers78 (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Haraldwallin reported by User:JohnBlackburne (Result:Blocked 1 week )[edit]

Page: Galling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Haraldwallin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [49]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: see below

Comments:
This is edit warring across multiple articles not just one, Galling, Wear and Stress (mechanics) as well as Talk:Galling, trying to insert links to a personal thesis then refusing to engage constructively with other editors on the article talk pages as well as his own talk page. It's been going on for a long time judging by his talk page but has recently become much more intensive.

--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments:
I don´t have the skill to navigate through the Wikipedia’s official bureaucracy.
However I think it´s clear that a couple of editors delet the references to waste amounts of text and pictures which I´m the author and original creator to, in the articles Galling, Wear and Stress (mechanics) as well as my helpful discussions with other users in Talk:Galling
I also gave away my copyright to the Wikipedia commons so it´s clear I don´t hide behind aliases or make phony user accounts to get my scientific work public.
For example, It will be impossible to incorporate pictures in Wikipedia if these policies of yours make it impossible to give away your own pictures and hinders you to include your own work as a reference to the same pictures.
The main goal these people have is not to improve Wikipedia, rather miss credit me by using bureaucratic means, ses User talk:Haraldwallin, User talk:Mgnbar, User talk:Johnuniq, User talk:Tournesol and User talk:GameOn.
I suggest they all get a warning and are banned from my deleting my edits.--Haraldwallin (talk) 14:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 1 week I think he could be a good contributor if he is prepared to work within policy, so the block is not any longer. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

User:JohnBlackburne User:Tournesol reported by User:Haraldwallin (Result:Filing editor blocked )[edit]

Page: Galling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Stress (mechanics) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Wear (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: JohnBlackburne (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) / Tournesol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version deleted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

  • 1st revert: [50]
  • 2nd revert: [51]
  • 3rd revert: [Revision as of 18:46, 4 November 2011 (edit)]
  • 4th revert: [Latest revision as of 14:33, 6 November 2011 ]
  • 5th revert: [Revision as of 19:39, 4 November 2011 (edit) (undo)]
  • 6th revert: [52]
  • 7rd revert: [53]
  • 8rd revert: [54]
  • 9rd revert: [55]
  • 10rd revert: [56]
  • 11rd revert: [57]
  • 12rd revert: [58]

And the list goes on and on and on......


I don´t have the skill to navigate through the Wikipedia’s official bureaucracy.
However I think it´s clear that a couple of editors delet the references to waste amounts of text and pictures which I´m the author to, in the articles Galling, Wear and Stress (mechanics) as well as my helpful discussions with other users in Talk:Galling
I also gave away my copyright to the Wikipedia commons so it´s clear I don´t hide behind aliases or make phony user accounts to get my scientific work public.
For example, It will be impossible to incorporate pictures in Wikipedia if these policies of yours make it impossible to give away your own pictures and hinders you to include your own work as a reference to the same pictures.

The main goal these people have is not to improve Wikipedia, rather miss credit me by using bureaucratic means, se User talk:Haraldwallin, User talk:Mgnbar, User talk:Johnuniq, User talk:Tournesol and User talk:GameOn.

I suggest they all get a warning and are banned from deleting my edits.


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: see [59]

Comments:
I don´t have the skill to navigate through the Wikipedia’s official bureaucracy. However I think it´s clear that a couple of editors delet the references to waste amounts of text and pictures which I´m the author to, in the articles Galling, Wear and Stress (mechanics) as well as my helpful discussions with other users in Talk:Galling I also gave away my copyright to the Wikipedia commons so it´s clear I don´t hide behind aliases or make phony user accounts to get my scientific work public. For example, It will be impossible to incorporate pictures in Wikipedia if these policies of yours make it impossible to give away your own pictures and hinders you to include your own work as a reference to the same pictures.

The main goal these people have is not to improve Wikipedia, rather miss credit me by using bureaucratic means, se User talk:Haraldwallin, User talk:Mgnbar, User talk:Johnuniq, User talk:Tournesol and User talk:GameOn. I suggest they all get a warning and are banned from deleting my edits. --Haraldwallin (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 1 week Filing editor blocked. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Stamcose reported by User:Jc3s5h (Result: Warned)[edit]

User: Stamcose has reverted to an unreferenced version of the article that he/she prefers, rather than abide by the results of this AfD which resulted in merging Newcomb's formula into Newcomb's Tables of the Sun. Stamcose was notified of the Afd and in a moment will be notified of this report. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned It was only one revert, but if they start edit warring, please report back here. Swarm X11|11|11 19:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Cyrrk reported by User:Bryonmorrigan (Result: No action)[edit]

Page: Fascism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Cyrrk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [60]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: He did not post to the talk page, but I gave him a Level 1 Warning on his talk page: User talk:Cyrrk

Comments:

It states clearly on the [Talk:Fascism|talk page]:

"Please recall the announcement in June, 2009 that this article is under a one-revert-per-day restriction. Violations of this restriction can be reported at the Edit-warring noticeboard. If you make a change to this article and it gets reverted, open a discussion on the talk page instead of reverting again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)" Bryonmorrigan (talk) 19:58, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

I have reverted my edit, and we can discuss this matter on the fascism talk page. --Cyrrk (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for making the reasonable choice. Swarm X11|11|11 06:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Therequiembellishere reported by User:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (Result:declined )[edit]

Page: Abdurrahim El-Keib (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Therequiembellishere (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

  • Contribution: diff (etc.); 1st revert: diff (removing "Ph.D." from infobox alma mater field and information from its profession field
  • Re-contribution: diff (etc.); 2nd revert: diff (ditto, plus removing info from citizenship field)
  • Re-contribution: diff (etc.); 3rd revert: diff (ditto)
  • Re-contribution: diff (etc.); 4th revert: diff (ditto)
  • Re-contribution: diff (etc.).

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: link

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: discussion

Comments:

Faced with edits filling out the infobox fields under contention, reported editor passes up discussion on talkpage and (tentative?) consensus there, bestirring themself to but proffer terse edit summaries, presumably believing their position obvious (or---[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_dick something else?)--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation Not all of these edits are made by the same username - I can only see the editor complained about remove the information a couple of times in four or five days, and I can't see any consensus on the talkpage. Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:05, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Point was: Lone-wolf editor kept removing (the precise, four deletions listed above) data without engaging on the talk page, with several editors championing its inclusion, either on the discussion page or via their edits.--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Alborz Fallah reported by User:Orartu (Result: Both blocked)[edit]

Page: Azarbaijani Kurds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Alborz Fallah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to:[62]



Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:[66]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [67]

Comments:

Almost all other edits that I have done is reverted by this user : [68]

There appears to be more edit warring related to this. On the page Iranian Kurdistan they are edit warring. It appears Orartu is marking the page as an orphan [69] while also having reverting edits to add links to other related pages [70] previously. The other user appears to be engaging in the edit war also [71]. IRWolfie- (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Laurifindil reported by De728631 (talk) (Result: )[edit]

Page: Quenya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Laurifindil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) keeps removing references to a web page that several editors have been classified as reliable and that is frequently used by WP:WikiProject Middle-earth. While this is not 3RR it is still edit-warring and highly disruptive.

Time reported: 18:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 15:44, 4 November 2011 (edit summary: "Internet is not a reliable source.")
  2. 16:01, 4 November 2011 (edit summary: "Internet is not a reliable source.")
  3. 15:17, 5 November 2011 (edit summary: "Internet is not a reliable source.")
  4. 13:21, 6 November 2011 (edit summary: "Internet is not a reliable source.")


It should also be noted that Laurifindil seems not to be interested in cooperating and discussing consensus. The only time he ever responded to personal communication on his talk page was early this year when I told him how to move pages [75] despite several notices and edit warnings that have been left there. And since a dicussion about another page move in January 2011 he has not participated in any other article talk.

De728631 (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

User hasn't edited since their last warning, so I'd say report back back if they revert again. Obviously disruptive edit warring. Swarm X11|11|11 19:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to let you know that User:Laurifindil is actually Edward Kloczko, which can explain a major part of his attiude and behavior on his edits on en:Wikipedia. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 10:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
What do you mean? How does that explain his edits? I'm going to protect the page so this can be discussed. I've left a note on the talk page. Swarm X11|11|11 17:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
He is well known in France for his tendency to criticize all the websites about Tolkien languages (good or bad, including WP:EN and WP:FR, althought he uses it to self-promotion). On the other hand, he invented a global theory about languages, which includes all the conceptions of Tolkien, earliest like latest, even this conception is in contradiction with Tolkien views. For more about his global theory, see this study. In short, all his contributions, additions like deletions by the way, must be seen with more attention than another contributor, I think. Druth (talk) 21:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
There is consensus at WikiProject Middle-earth that the Encyclopedia of Arda is a standard source in the absence of primary sources: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards. As to Laurifindil and the scholarly fractions regarding Tolkien linguistics, see also JCBradfield's comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle-earth#"neo-language". De728631 (talk) 21:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Wpiki reported by Fat&Happy (talk) (Result: 31 hours)[edit]

Page: Rick Perry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Wpiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 18:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 21:56, 6 November 2011 (compare) (edit summary: ""Revelant" facts as opposed to opinions")
  2. 22:25, 6 November 2011 (compare) (edit summary: "Revision of "Revelant", "terrible writing"")
  3. 14:05, 7 November 2011 (compare) (edit summary: "On "topic" revision")
  4. 16:09, 7 November 2011 (compare) (edit summary: ""Relevant" censored fiscal policy information reposted")
  5. 18:26, 7 November 2011 (compare) (edit summary: "Relisted censored facts pertaining to Perry. Certainly not Bush, Richards, White or Clements...you tell me?")
  6. 18:50, 7 November 2011 (compare) (edit summary: "Unlike his predecessors pay as you go Governors, Perry supported bonds [i.e. debt] could have used his veto power!")
  • Diff of warning: here

Fat&Happy (talk) 18:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 31 hours Swarm X11|11|11 19:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:NoToEurocentist reported by User:Withevenoff (Result: Malformed)[edit]

His edits are POV pushing and he continuously make ethnic racial personal attacks to other people.

--Withevenoff (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Your report does not indicate what article was in dispute. EdJohnston (talk) 00:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Til Eulenspiegel reported by User:Obsidian Soul (Result: declined)[edit]

Page: Genesis creation narrative (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Til Eulenspiegel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Please see the article history instead as this involves multiple users. The disputed content in question is the proposal to suppress the use of the word "myth" in the article, originally proposed by User:Zenkai251 in this edit. User:Til Eulenspiegel has apparently done this before to the same article back in August, as evidenced from his talk page.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [76]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Genesis creation narrative#Change "myth" to "narrative" (initiated by User:Zenkai251)

Comments:
I myself will voluntarily cease reverting the changes again to that article (and probably discussion as well). Freezing the article revision to show their desired changes may have been the intent, however. I'll leave it to the administrator to decide if the latest change should be reverted to the version before the current dispute per our policies on WP:FRINGE, WP:VALID, and WP:DUE.-- Obsidin Soul 13:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Where is the violation? The article intro had a carefully worked out consensus from last time around many months ago. Jesanj upset the balance in late October with his own version, and since then you and he have been reverting to it steadily against at least 5 others. Yet you want to pretend that you and he somehow make up a 'consensus' agains the other 5 because we are "wrong" and therefore only you and he count for purposes of determining that there is consensus. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 13:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Please discuss this in Talk:Genesis creation narrative#Change "myth" to "narrative" and do not misrepresent the fact that there are more editors against your changes than the ones doing the reverting, let the admin decide on the history and the discussion in question. I will not comment on it any further other than you were warned and still reverted four times rather than continue the discussion initiated by User:Zenkai251.-- Obsidin Soul 13:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
And where did I revert four times? Yet another false statement Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 13:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Ooh, good point, I guess I was conflating your reverts with User:PiCo's. Still, taken together they are insistent reverts to a revision not supported by the discussion. I request the page be protected until the dispute is resolved.-- Obsidin Soul 14:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:talknic reported by User:No More Mr Nice Guy (Result: blocked 48 hours)[edit]

Page: 1948 Arab–Israeli War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: talknic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [77]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [80]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:

This article is under a 1RR restriction per ARBPIA active remedies, as can be seen at the top of the talk page. This editor has been blocked for a 1RR violation on this exact article. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 05:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

User:BryonmorriganUser:VoluntarySlave reported by User:Benjamin9832 (Result: malformed report)[edit]

Fascism: