Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive209

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:174.0.70.87 reported by SpecMode (talk) (Result: No violation)[edit]

Page: Oxford Electric Bell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 174.0.70.87 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 06:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 05:52, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543353738 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  2. 05:56, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543354311 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  3. 05:58, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543354606 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  4. 06:03, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543355345 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  5. 06:06, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "I can keep doing this as long as it takes until you are banned.")
  6. 06:07, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543355931 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  7. 06:09, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543356113 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  8. 06:10, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543356418 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  9. 06:13, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543356528 by 121.127.211.208 (talk)")
  • Diff of warning: here

SpecMode (talk) 06:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation The user was reverting vandalism, which is an exception to the 3RR rule. Also, the page has been semiprotected for a few days. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

User:90.236.208.57 reported by SpecMode (talk) (Result: Block, semi)[edit]

Page: Mafia state (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 90.236.208.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 07:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 06:48, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  2. 06:52, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  3. 06:52, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543361681 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  4. 06:53, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543361758 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  5. 06:53, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  6. 06:57, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543361844 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  7. 06:59, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543362342 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  8. 06:59, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543362556 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  9. 07:00, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  10. 07:02, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  11. 07:03, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543362908 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  12. 07:04, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543363015 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  13. 07:04, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543363153 by 90.236.208.57 (talk)")
  14. 07:10, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543363311 by Denisarona (talk) please do not remove sourced content like that see my edits first before editing")
  15. 07:18, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  16. 07:28, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  • Diff of warning: here

Comment: Possibly two users at the same IP warring with each other? Seems odd.

A second IP in the same network, 90.236.53.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), is now also reverting the same edits on this article. SpecMode (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

SpecMode (talk) 07:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Vickle1777 reported by User:Utcursch (Result: Blocked for 48 hours)[edit]

Page: Operation Blue Star (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Vickle1777 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [1] (diff)


  • 1st revert: [2] (March 7)
  • 2nd revert: [3] (March 8)
  • 3rd revert: [4] (March 8)
  • 4th revert: [5] (March 11)
  • 5th revert: [6] (March 11)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [7]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [8][9]

Comments:

Vickle1777 (talk · contribs) keeps removing {{citation needed}} tags added by other users, and keeps adding a self-published source.

Similar edits on Khalsa.[10]

The user refuses to discuss the topic on the article's talk page inspite of requests to do so. When told about the Wikipedia policies on references and reliable sources, s/he says that one can't "ask for every reference for other details. I might go through the WIKI policies".[11]

The user has been warned about unconstructive edits several times in the past, by multiple users. Instead of resorting to the talk page, s/he keeps on calling others as "vandals". Normally, I'd block the user myself, but I don't want to appear as someone who is abusing administrator privileges. utcursch | talk 12:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Also Khalsa: The user keeps adding back unsourced content. S/he is not ready to even let the {{citation needed}} and {{original research}} tags stay. [12][13] S/he insists that other users who demand citations are vandals, because "Citations demanded for something (which are fact) is as much non-sense as citation required for human beings consuming milk."[14]. utcursch | talk 12:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Ended with "I am stopping responding to you." [15] utcursch | talk 14:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Vitvak reported by User:Ymblanter (Result: Pages protected)[edit]

Page: Bozh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Vitvak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [16]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [23]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [24]

Comments:

Simultaneously, the user was edit-warring at Bus Beloyar, but only managed to reach three reverts there before the page was protected. Did not respond to any attempts to resolve anything.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

I've protected both pages for two weeks in hopes that'll encourage the user to talk. I will continue to monitor the situation.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 11, 2013; 21:02 (UTC)

User:108.41.255.230 reported by User:AngusWOOF (Result: 3 mos)[edit]

Page: List of Sengoku Basara characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 108.41.255.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to:

  • 1st revert: [25] after protection was lifted, IP added unsourced voice actors as he had been doing before
  • 2nd revert: [26]
  • 3rd revert: [27] - tried to add his changes incrementally
  • 4th revert: [28] - unreverted my undo


The trouble first started on January 7 when I removed his unsourced Gakuen Basara additions and he immediately reverted and continued to add more bogus information. [29]

I have requested protection on the article several times. The first time it was granted for a week. The second time it was granted for 1 month. The third time it was declined and referred to this page.[30]

His current adding of information is under "Mini Sengoku Basara" which is a legit title for the mini-series, however, the particular voice actors are still unsourced; he apparently wants to add whatever voice actors he feels like adding for the part.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [31]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [32]

Comments:
IP has also changed other related voice actor pages with the same false information, and that required undoing by other editors.

  • [33] - Maxey Whitehead edit history
  • [34] - List of Negima! Magister Negi Magi characters edit history

IP has also logged on as a user [35] which has been banned to try to revert changes.

I also asked for help on WP:ANIME : [36]

AngusWOOF (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – Three months. See the sock case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/98.116.98.50/Archive. That IP geolocates to West Islip, NY, as does this one. The common element for these IPs is disputing about credits for voice actors. The named account in that SPI has been indefinitely blocked, so I'm assuming this is a case of block evasion. This IP has not joined the talk page discussion where it is claimed by others that false information has been added to the article. After this closure, if more IPs from West Islip join the dispute I suggest 6 months of semiprotection. EdJohnston (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Well, he's doing it again from another IP 96.56.149.220: [37] He's disrupting a new editor who is currently fixing the data properly. -AngusWOOF (talk) 21:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
I've semiprotected the article for six months. Yet another IP from West Islip, NY. EdJohnston (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Oeneki reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page:Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo)
Page:Mamluk
User being reported: Oeneki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [38]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [47]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [48],[49],[50]

Comments:
I first noticed that User:Oeneki had removed Georgian from the article Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo). I checked both sources, of which the first one "The Georgian Mameluks in Egypt", by Alexander Mikaberidze, checked out. "1382-1517 (in fact till 1811, including period of supremacy of Ottoman Empire) - Dynasty of Burji ("Burgites") Mameluks, mostly of Georgian and Circassian origin. Their name has its origins in the Arabic word "burj" which means tower, castle or fortress where the Mameluk garrisons was deployed".
I went further and found 6 more sources quite easily. I provided the titles of the books, authors and links for each. User:Oeneki's response was a demand to "Show a ref for georgian Mamluk Sultan". Which has nothing to do with the article, judging from the sentence in question, "The sultanate's ruling caste was composed of Mamluks, soldiers of predominantly Kipchak/Cuman, Circassian and Georgian slave origin.
Regardless, user:Oeneki has edit warred on both Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo) and Mamluk articles. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Opus88888 reported by McGeddon (talk) (Result: Editor advised)[edit]

Page: Paella (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Opus88888 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 12:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 19:36, 4 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  2. 20:13, 5 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  3. 19:45, 6 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 542396922 by Jotamar (talk)")
  4. 21:23, 7 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 542592939 by Sun Adder (talk)")
  5. 18:51, 8 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  6. 06:51, 12 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543259187 by McGeddon (talk)")

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: here reverted a day later with the edit summary "This user is a clon of another user")

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: here

Comments:

User:Opus88888 has edited the Paella article ten times this year to overemphasise the etymology of the dish's name in the first sentence of the lede, and is ignoring attempts to discuss this on the talk page. The user's single talk page response has been to quote a chunk of "Instead of deleting text, consider..." policy, and they have ignored other editor's replies to this. --McGeddon (talk) 12:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

I also warned User:Opus88888 about edit warring and here Sun Adder (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

In my opinion, McGeddon and Sun Adder are probably the same person. I invite administrators to investigate the IPs. --Opus88888 (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
And your "opinion" is based on what? That they disagree with you? Take such accusations to WP:SPI, but make sure you have something to back it up. In the meantime, I suggest you stop reverting on the article and discuss the issue concretely on the article talk page. The only reason I haven't blocked you is because it's a slow edit-war and there's been no breach of WP:3RR, but continuing down the road you've taken may change my mind.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Ring Cinema reported by User:Winkelvi (Result: Warned)[edit]

Page: Chinatown (1974 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Ring Cinema (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [57]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [58], [59]. I then received this response: [60] and replied with this: [61].

Comments:
This editor has a long history of edit warring without discussion at articles and has been blocked more than once for same. I want to discuss, but he doesn't seem to be interested. In my opinion, most of his changes to my edits were wording that didn't make the article better, it just reverted back to the wording he inserted previously. I'd like to know why my edits were (in his words) wrong or incorrect, not just that they are wrong or incorrect. I reported his edit warring behavior earlier today and received the following response from an administrator: [62]. Because the editor in question returned immediately to edit warring rather than discussion, it seems to me that there is no desire on the part of that editor to discuss, just to revert. I further think the way he has turned the tables on the talk page to make it seem as if I am in the wrong to even make any changes without his permission says "article ownership" in neon letters. Article ownership along with edit warring -- these aren't allowed, are they? I have to admit, his response(s) on the talk page plus the previous administrator response to his obvious edit warring makes me feel as if I'm in the Twilight Zone instead of a place where people are supposed to work together at improving article content. Winkelvi (talk) 05:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Result: Warned Ring Cinema. Since March 9 Ring Cinema only made three reverts, but their actions might be seen as edit warring. Winkelvi was the person on the other side of these reverts. I'm warning Ring Cinema to carefully consider his block log before reverting again. The parties might consider opening an WP:RFC. EdJohnston (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
I've been watching alot of these film articles, and this one in particular. Ever since I first encountered User:RingCinema last year at No Country for Old Men I've found him to have a terribly bad habit of reverting first then discussing later, if at all, and usually with ownership issues as well as testy/obnoxious WP:IDHT attitude, as others have noted. See my talkpage archive [63] as well as the 3RR report I filed on him (incomprenhensibly deemed 'stale') for more context. For some reason, he feels entitled to act the way he does from some apparent enabling behavior by admins and others at the Film Project. Frankly I think his contributions are not worth the incivility and battleground behavior, not least because it scares away other valuable editors and potential contributions. I've avoided interacting with him directly. I would support an RFC/U on him. El duderino (abides) 07:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:ClarenceHouseApts reported by Proper OH (talk) (Result: 24h)[edit]

Page: Ed FitzGerald (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: ClarenceHouseApts (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 01:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest dates are in UTC

  • Diff of warning: here


Comments:
This article is about a living person. The editor reverts to edits that are pejorative, unreferenced, and potentially defamatory.

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Note. I'm going off-wiki and don't have time to review this. It doesn't appear to be an edit-warring problem, but a BLP problem stemming from a WP:SPA. At a minimum the edits are probably WP:UNDUE and WP:COATRACK. I also note that the user name violates policy and may have something to do with the agenda of the editor.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:56, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 24 hours by User:Syrthiss for violation of WP:BLP and edit warring. See the comments left by Syrthiss at User talk:ClarenceHouseApts. EdJohnston (talk) 13:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:93.141.66.201 reported by User:Marcus Qwertyus (Result: Semi-protected)[edit]

Page: Stone of the Pregnant Woman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Users being reported: 93.141.66.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) 2001:470:26:a07:16::1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) 93.136.193.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [67]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [75]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Stone of the Pregnant Woman#Statement that only morons think the stone is Roman

Comments:
No comment. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected. I've semi-protected the article for a week.--Bbb23 (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Ricojellyfro reported by User:Cavann (Result: Warning, semi)[edit]

Page: Genetic history of the Turkish people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Ricojellyfro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) and IP's 93.33.214.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) 151.66.236.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: Complex case stretching couple of months. The user was reported before [76]. Blocked 1 week, with a potential indef block if continuing same behaviour [77]. Continuation of same behaviour after his block expired:


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [81]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Genetic_history_of_the_Turkish_people#User_Ricojellyfro

Comments:

  • Result: Ricojellyfro is warned for edit warring and the article is semiprotected 3 months. This is a case of long-term edit warring and probable sockpuppetry. EdJohnston (talk) 13:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:82.41.107.134 reported by User:Izno (Result: 12h)[edit]

Page: Talk:Sega Genesis (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 82.41.107.134 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [82]

  1. 1st revert: [83]
  2. 2nd revert: [84]
  3. 3rd revert: [85]
  4. 4th revert: [86]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [87]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: No attempt has been made, but the user has been warned that his actions are disruptive at his talk page.

Comments:

  • The IP is trying to take this to the article page also. There is an established consensus for the current name of the article documented at Talk:Sega Genesis/FAQ. --Izno (talk) 12:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked - 12 hours for edit warring, by User:Materialscientist. EdJohnston (talk) 16:40, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:MrOllie reported by User:MesaBoy77 (Result: Both editors blocked for 3 days.)[edit]

Page: Security token (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page: Multi-factor authentication (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: MrOllie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Mr. Ollie is engaged in a "promotion-by-censorship" campaign on Wikipedia. Mr. Ollie is repeatedly editing Wikipedia article Security token (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Multi-factor authentication (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to remove pertinent page content related to another form of security token / multi-factor authentication, while specifically ignoring product content he wishes to promote. This is "promotion by censorship" and violates Wikipedia's edit warring policies.

Mr. Ollie was issued a final warning by User:ItsZippy on March 5 against continuing in this behavior (see this page archive history). Today, he again removed the information.

  1. 1st revert: 22:43, 4 March 2013‎
  2. 2nd revert: 11:59, 5 March 2013‎
  3. 3rd revert: 15:39, 5 March 2013‎
  4. MR OLLIE ISSUED FINAL WARNING TO CEASE BY User:ItsZippy 17:49, 5 March 2013‎
  5. 4th revert: 14:26, 13 March 2013‎

Note: I previously removed all vendor promotion form the above 2 referenced article sections, yet Mr. Ollie continues to remove the information. Mr Ollie's user talk page contains numerous complaints by other Wikipedia content submitters regarding similar malicious editing behavior. Also, Mr. Ollie does not respond to other editor requests on his talk page to cease his malicious censorship, nor for an explanation for his behavior.

In accordance with this page's guidelines, I have placed ANOTHER notice on Mr. Ollie's user talk page. - MesaBoy77 (talk) 15:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

For the reviewing admin, MesaBoy77 (and his IP 70.190.0.52), is a single purpose account devoted to promoting a trademarked product valled 'virtual tokens' by a company called Sestus (an external link he insists on including on the Multi-factor authentication article.) He's been inserting this stuff since November of 2011. - MrOllie (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Response by MesaBoy77. Mr. Ollie's statement is incorrect. The information related to virtual token forms of multifactor does not promote any particular company or product, and it is no more unsourced than the "soft token" and "hardware token" authentication discussed on these pages. Also, I am not a single source editor, having contributed content to several Wikipedia pages. Finally, I did not insert just "this stuff" since November 2011. I am the original author of the majority of this page's content, including the "stuff" related to hardware tokens and software tokens.
These articles do not reference any particular company nor product (In fact, I personally removed all product references from this article, including those related to Sestus, RSA, Vasco, and Safenet). Below is the content Mr. Ollie is attempting to censor related to virtual token forms of authentication. As you can see, contrary to what Mr. Ollie alleges, it does not reference any product or any particular company:
"Virtual token MFA is fundamentally different from "soft" tokens in that soft tokens require the deployment of software to end users, while virtual token MFA does not. Virtual token MFA uses the user's existing Internet device as the possession factor, reducing the costs normally associated with implementation and maintenance of multi-factor solutions. Processing occurs "server-side" and facilitates the retrieval of one-time-use digitally-signed key and other information from a connected device using Internet-standard HTTP/HTTPS delivery methods. The retrieved key is then authenticated against the connecting device's digital fingerprint, the user's account details, and other data. Since the authenticating server is communicating directly with the connected device, the method is not as prone to man-in-the-middle attacks as other methods." ====
There are many different companies promoting virtual token forms of multi-factor authentication, none of which are cited within the body of these articles. Mr. Ollie simply wishes to remove ALL information related to virtual token forms of authentication in order to promote software and hardware token authentication within the online security market. This is "promotion-by-censorship" and is a violation of Wikipedia's policies. If Mr. Ollie can show me any particular company or product name referenced in the product, I will be happy to remove it. - MesaBoy77 (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
I see now the link Mr. Ollie was objecting to. The link to Sestus on the bottom of the page was included simply because they were the first commercial company to introduce the concept of virtual token MFA. it was included as a historical reference. However, I have now removed that link. Please instruct Mr. Ollie to cease his "promotion-by-censorship" activities on wikipedia. - MesaBoy77 (talk) 16:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Both editors blocked – for a period of 3 days JamesBWatson (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Somedifferentstuff reported by User:98.252.50.93 (Result: Page Protected)[edit]

Page: Nicolás Maduro
User being reported: Example User (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)]

Or perhaps when you kept pushing his title to be "Acting President" not Interim and you actually reverted two other editors to push that single idea. Or perhaps this incredible edit by you, where you place a citation for a link in his family life, which when you click on it takes you to a Protuguese BBC page talking about CIA cassette recordings..# [88]

Here is a co-editor of the page who I have respect and a report with, effectively calling you out on what you are doing, which your first edit was to strike the entire Controversy section. (cur | prev) 02:05, 12 March 2013‎ Lguipontes (talk | contribs)‎ . . (18,647 bytes) (+337)‎ . . (The whole paragraph won't make sense if we choose your version. Of course what happened is Chávez being against embalming and being embalmed himself and Maduro supporting, the sources presented are sufficient for it.) (undo)

This is you in your first 25 minutes on Maduro's page.

(cur | prev) 21:56, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (15,792 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (→‎Interim President of Venezuela) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:54, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (15,793 bytes) (+11)‎ . . (→‎Interim President of Venezuela) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:53, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (15,782 bytes) (-16)‎ . . (→‎Interim President of Venezuela: Clarify. Taken from article.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:40, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (15,798 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (undo) (cur | prev) 21:36, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (15,799 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (→‎Personal life) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:34, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (15,800 bytes) (+5)‎ . . (→‎Personal life: Ce.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:32, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (15,795 bytes) (-45)‎ . . (→‎Interim President of Venezuela: Ce.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:31, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (15,840 bytes) (-42)‎ . . (→‎Interim President of Venezuela: Ce. Removed link that is present in lede.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:26, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (15,882 bytes) (+1)‎ . . (→‎Foreign Minister) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:24, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (15,881 bytes) (-2,728)‎ . . (Removed section.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:22, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (18,609 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (Spacing.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:20, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (18,610 bytes) (+16)‎ . . (→‎Vice President of Venezuela: Added date.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:19, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (18,594 bytes) (+2)‎ . . (→‎Early career) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:18, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (18,592 bytes) (-463)‎ . . (→‎Early career: Removed some unsourced material.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:16, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (19,055 bytes) (-9)‎ . . (→‎Early career: Ce.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:15, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (19,064 bytes) (+29)‎ . . (New section. Ce.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:13, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (19,035 bytes) (+7)‎ . . (→‎Early career: Ce.) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:10, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (19,028 bytes) (+340)‎ . . (Added box quote.) (undo) (cur | prev) 20:56, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (18,688 bytes) (-353)‎ . . (→‎Foreign Minister: Removed unsourced material and tag.) (undo) (cur | prev) 20:51, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (19,041 bytes) (+71)‎ . . (Ce.) (undo) (cur | prev) 20:49, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (18,970 bytes) (+56)‎ . . (Order. Added.) (undo) (cur | prev) 20:40, 11 March 2013‎ Somedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)‎ . . (18,914 bytes) (+9)‎ . . (More appropriate pic.) (undo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk)

  • Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected because I don't see any discussion at all on talk. Also, 98.252.*: next time, you could easily just link diffs (as your formatting doesn't actually work at the moment)- Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 03:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

User:75.156.49.121 reported by User:Betty Logan (Result: Blocked for 24hrs)[edit]

Page: The Thing (1982 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 75.156.49.121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [89]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [90]
  2. [91]
  3. [92]
  4. [93]
  5. [94]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [95]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [96]

Comments:

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hoursJake Wartenberg 08:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Burziq10 reported by GB fan (Result: 1 week block)[edit]

Page: David Archuleta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Burziq10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 00:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 00:22, 14 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  2. 20:32, 14 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  3. 22:19, 14 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  4. 23:32, 14 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  • Diff of warning: here

GB fan 00:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I had blocked a user whom I believe is the same person as this user in February for uploading copyrighted images of David Archuleta to Commons and then adding them to the article. This user started out the same way by uploading an image to commons and adding it to the same article. I have also started an SPI. GB fan 00:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 1 week for edit warring. This might be extended to an indef-block, depending on the results of the SPI. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:46, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Brian82027 reported by Fandraltastic (talk) (Result: 3 day block)[edit]

Page: Template:Marvel Cinematic Universe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Brian82027 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 02:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 19:38, 10 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543249751 by TriiipleThreat (talk)")
  2. 19:43, 10 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543267534 by Fandraltastic (talk)")
  3. 20:46, 10 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543274609 by Flax5 (talk)")
  4. 22:39, 11 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543283614 by Fandraltastic (talk)")
  5. 00:36, 13 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543515057 by TriiipleThreat (talk)")
  6. 02:18, 13 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543731827 by Fandraltastic (talk) Seriously you need to understand what's right and what's not and let things go.")
  7. 01:55, 14 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543826774 by TriiipleThreat (talk)")
  8. 23:21, 14 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 543975851 by Flax5 (talk)")
  9. 01:47, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "Undid revision 544221933 by TriiipleThreat (talk)")

User refuses to stop adding non-pages to this template, despite multiple attempts to communicate this and warn about edit warring.

Fandraltastic (talk) 02:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 days for blatant edit warring, and even going to far as to delete this report. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

User:98.252.50.93 reported by User:Somedifferentstuff (Result: Page Protected)[edit]

Page: Nicolás Maduro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 98.252.50.93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [97]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [98]
  2. [99]
  3. [100]
  4. [101]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: First warning[102] Second warning[103]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [104]

Comments: This user is a strong POV editor. With the second Edit Warring Warning to his talk page I placed a comment making it clear that this was his final warning.[105] That didn't work. I just noticed that he has now added material to the lead of the article where he directly copied and pasted from Al Jazeera.[106] from source:[107]
Somedifferentstuff (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


-My Response to SomedifferentStuff - That's why there is a citation, and that citation is already being used in this piece, I tend to actually read all the citations of a page, like all of it ... so I'm really curious. Unless you wanted to cherry pick that he was a union rep (but omit that a leading Venezuelan professor considers him a communist). If you have an issue with the citation, then you clearly have not read the prior citation, not even during your tremendous editing spree which is the direct cause for my own.

You have had a consensus of editors undo your changes, while you are the only one repeatedly editing and injecting alterations. My personal favorites is your use of "comandante" and rewriting the maduro cancer quote, making the sentence without the word cancer. What about your insistence on altering the long standing photo of maduro with your photoshopped/cropped one where he is awkwardly smiling? Or maybe when you posted a long in-line quote from chavez in a side box, and when I removed it, saying that the article already states that chavez wanted Maduro, and for you to use this as a citation, you simply reapplied the edit, no discourse, no writing on the wall.

If you want to write something on the article, then do so. If however you are going to dedicate literally all your time to rip apart my edits, or subtly castrate them like that remarkable edit you made to cloak Maduro's claims about Chavez being infected with cancer. Or perhaps where you tagged Maduro's jewish roots for further information when it had 4 citations in line. You drove the edit warning due to making 25 edits in a single day, and have had about 9 undo's from editors other than myself, in a span of what, 4 days? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

I actually touched base with you personally after your first torrent of edits, which you actually deleted from your own page.# [108]

I'm sorry you also were also warned for a follow up, which you promptly deleted from your talk page. #[109] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk) 03:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

  • (interjected) The admin should've told you that you need to provide evidence for everything you are saying in the first three paragraphs of your response. As of now you've provided none. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 11:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • As an admin you should take the time to look into a case, as I took the time to formulate this complaint. I posted on the talk page of the article which did not elicit a response from this user. Locking a page does not address any of the belligerence demonstrated by this user, an example of which can be seen in his malformed complaint below. I'm very disappointed in how you've handled this. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 04:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
  • It's clear that there needs to be a discussion regarding the picture in question. Since there are issues going on regarding this article (as a whole - not just the reverts between you and him), protection is the better solution. - Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 04:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

You're really arguing with the admin. Penwhale I would like to note that I respect your judgement on this, we can gain perspective. I would mention that Lguipontes, EeuHP, and myself have come to a consensus on the current photo. You may confirm that with them if you like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk) 23:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to update you that Somedifferentstuff has also removed all criticism from Hugo Chavez's wiki page.

  1. [111]

(Scroll down 2/3rds) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk) 23:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Your diff shows that I changed the picture in the article to a more appropriate one. I know you have less than 100 edits but get a clue, in time your belligerence will likely get you blocked. I will not comment here further. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

User:TRGUY reported by User:DeCausa (Result: No action)[edit]

Page: Prophecy of the Popes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TRGUY (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [112]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [113]
  2. [114]
  3. [115]
  4. [116]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [117]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [118]

Comments:

I really thought i was right. Sorry for bothering.TRGUY (talk) 08:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Note. Looks like TRGUY understands they were wrong and the situation has stabilized.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

User:70.56.59.36 reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: Semi-protected)[edit]

Page: Microsoft Office 365 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 70.56.59.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_365&oldid=543698790

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_365&oldid=544261847
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_365&oldid=544287385
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_365&oldid=544289196

This editor is trying to push a POV stating that Microsoft Office 365 is not a software as a service suite for various reasons, among other things, considering it a "buzzword" and "marketing gobbledegook" and supposedly inaccurate. Several IP's in a similar range (which I presume to be the same person) have made multiple reversions and very uncivil remarks on the matter on the talk page, and also went as far as to censor a reference to Office 365 on the SaaS page. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry I don't understand how this reporting form works. I am trying to make honest edits to help readers. But ViperSnake151 is better at throwing Wikipedia rules at me. Please see Talk page below for rational explanations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Microsoft_Office_365

  • Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected. Semi-protected for one week.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

User:JudgementfromGod reported by Dawn Bard (talk) (Result:JudgementfromGod and IP both blocked)[edit]

Page: Harold Demuren (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: JudgementfromGod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 15:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 15:30, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  2. 15:34, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Professional career */")
  3. 15:38, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  4. 15:41, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  5. 15:49, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  6. 15:52, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  7. 15:56, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  8. 16:04, 15 March 2013
  9. 16:01, 15 March 2013
  10. 16:12, 15 March 2013


Likely same user: User being reported: 197.255.163.84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 15:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

  1. 11:37, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Dismissal from FCAA */")
  2. 11:44, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Dismissal from FCAA */")
  3. 11:47, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Dismissal from FCAA */")
  4. 11:55, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  5. 14:05, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  6. 14:07, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  7. 14:13, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  8. 14:14, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  9. 14:22, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  10. 14:27, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  11. 14:36, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  12. 14:40, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  13. 14:56, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  14. 14:58, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* Afrijet */")
  15. 15:15, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "/* End of an Era */")
  16. 15:17, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "Blanked the page")
  17. 15:20, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")
  18. 15:24, 15 March 2013 (edit summary: "")


  • Diff of warning: here


Note that the edits might constitute BLP violations. —Dawn Bard (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I noticed these edits,blanking and reverts aswell, I tried to minimize the damage myself. Just showing some support for Dawn Bard here. Sitethief~talk to me~ 16:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
User:JudgementfromGod has been indefinitely blocked. The IP has been blocked for a week. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Dogmaticeclectic reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: blocked)[edit]

Page: Microsoft Office 2013 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Dogmaticeclectic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_2013&oldid=544448713

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_2013&oldid=544448936
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_2013&oldid=544427308
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_2013&oldid=544178596
  4. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_2013&oldid=544121210

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Microsoft_Office_2013&oldid=544471897

Comments: Frequent uncivil conduct and restoration of unnecessary information, is not assuming good faith, proactively asserts ownership of article by reverting changes made to it by any member for being "inconsistent and confusing", claiming a lack of concensus, has engaged in inappropriate use of reversions on various other pages related to Microsoft products (see contributions and talk page). Left multiple messages on my talk page incorrectly claiming I was asserting ownership of articles, abusing warning templates, not assuming good faith, and attacking other editors. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

This user has not even attempted to resolve this at the article's talk page - and many, if not all, of this user's complaints about me are a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black.
As for the messages I left at your talk page, your message above itself demonstrates much of, if not all of, my reasoning for leaving them. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 21:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I would now like to draw attention to the edit made to the "[d]iff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page" above. This section at the talk page was started after my response above, and certainly after this case was opened. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 21:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Mark Arsten (talk) 21:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

User:BlackJack reported by User:Jbmurray (Result: Warned)[edit]

Editors warned and discussion will continue ONLY at WP:ANI.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:42, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Page: History of cricket (1726–1740) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: BlackJack (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [119]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [120]
  2. [121]
  3. [122]
  4. [123]
  5. [124]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

There's been much discussion, but see particularly Talk:History_of_cricket_to_1725#Theories_of_origin_-_Celtic_origins, Wikipedia:RS/N#Globalizing_Cricket, Wikipedia_talk:Englishness_and_Cricket#Credible_sources, among others.

Comments:

--jbmurray (talkcontribs) 19:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

The person who should be reported here is jbmurray. A series of edits were made to History_of_cricket_(1726–1740) by members of a college assignment group who are here temporarily to learn about English cricket. They are using a source that is dubious to say the least. I am the main author of the article and others like it as I am a subject matter expert and away from Wikipedia I have written widely on the early history of cricket. I have no objection to anyone editing an article as long as they do so using credible sources. There are serious doubts about the credibility and reliability of this particular source which have been discussed at length elsewhere.

Seeing the numerous edits to the article I immediately spotted one statement re a set of rules drawn up for a match in 1727 and I knew immediately that the information was false. I have pointed this out to Murray during his edit war but he has, as usual, ignored the advice. Some of the other statements also seem dubious but I have not had time to check them in detail and I decided the best thing to do was to revert the article back to its last credible version. I did this in good faith to maintain the article's accuracy for the benefit of the readers. Murray is somehow involved in the college assignment (see Wikipedia:Englishness and Cricket) and he is trying to prove a WP:POINT about this source book they are using. As a result, he has repeatedly reverted my removsal of the false and misleading information in this article and refused to take notice of my advice to that effect. He is therefore carrying on an edit war by trying to justify use of an unrecognised source against the advice of subject experts.

As the article is still "in development", I considered its future earlier today and decided that, when complete, it will be too long so I reduced its scope and moved it. I then made a number of appropriate changes to reflect the revised scope. Much of the misleading information is now out of scope in any case but Murray has ignored this too and has reinserted it, again showing no regard at all for the readers. The article is one that I have in my list to attend to. It is the sequel to History of cricket to 1725, a WP:GA which has also been subject to interference by Murray's group and was put under a form of protection yesterday to prevent their incursions, again using the same dubious source book.

If anyone wants more details, please drop me a line. ----Jack | talk page 20:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

For what it's worth, what BlackJack says here is simply untrue. It's quite clear that I kept all the changes that reflect the revised scope of the article, with which I have no problems at all.
Nor is this in any sense "Murray's group." --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 20:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
And regarding the "credibility and reliability of this particular source," I opened a query at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, so as to resolve that matter. Unfortunately, BlackJack has declined to contribute. --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 20:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
He clearly does not understand the word "scope". The article is now about the years 1726 to 1740 and he has reinserted stuff relative to years following 1740 which are therefore out of scope (and also dubious). No, I did not go to the reliable source page. Why should I? Three subject experts in CRIC have agreed that this book is unreliable and we have set about removing dubious content taken from that book by people new to WP and with no prior knowledge of the subject. The accuracy and integrity of the articles take priority over any WP:POINT you wish to make. ----Jack | talk page 20:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)