Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:207.195.254.141 reported by User: (aeropagitica)   (talk)  (Result:24 hours (already blocked))[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Controversy over racial characteristics of Ancient Egyptians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 207.195.254.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 21:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments
  • I had begun to revert this user when I saw his massive blankings through RC patrolling in the IRC channels, when I looked through the history of the page it appears that this user had removed several sections in the past, and is "attacking" the article, because he feels that there is not a neutral point of view being expressed (an Afrocentric vs. Eurocentric view of the controversy). However, his edits have gone past any sort of "I'm making this article a neutral POV" when it appears he is trying to eliminate the other POV in this cituation. I endorse the block that aero imposed on this user, and possibly a longer block for consistent blankings of the page. Ryūlóng 21:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It appears you've already blocked him for this, aeropagitica?i'm fine with that, for one.--heah 21:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Asbl reported by User:Lou Sander (Result:no block)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Ann Coulter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Asbl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Asbl made many changes to this section, undoing the edits of others, changing them, etc. As I read WP:3RR, these are "complex partial reverts."


Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: Lou Sander 20:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: After Asbl made these reverts, another editor posted a comment about 3RR on User talk:Asbl. Asbl dismissed it. A similar dismissive attitude exists, in my opinion, throughout Asbl's talk page and Edit summaries, and in Asbl's contributions to Talk:Ann Coulter, when other editors, acting with reasoned good faith, disagree with Ashl.

No Block.These don't seem to me to qualify as "complex partial reverts."the majority are simple edits; some may violate npov, but that doesn't mean they are reverts.work it out, find a mediator if you have to.(If another admin cares to review, please feel more than welcome to do so.)--heah 21:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. For the record, Lou is misrepresenting my edits. The first diff contains edits that 2 other editors made. One of the edits was by Lou himself. This is further proof that this was a frivolous report. --Asbl 23:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Kachik reported by User:Khoikhoi (Result:12 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Turkish Navy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Kachik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: 00:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • I have been accused as sockpuppet of lasson and -Inanna- by Khoikhoi many times, and even vandalized [1]. I guess, he accuses everyone as a sockpuppet of a blocked user who thinks different than his POV. However, I don't think to make a complaint about him. Kachik 01:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • My apologies for not posting this earlier. My internet connection failed. I'm blocking for 12 hours for 3RR violations. alphaChimp laudare 02:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

User:SomeHuman reported by User:TewfikTalk (Result: 12 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Military and economic aid in the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). SomeHuman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • I have blocked the user for 12 hours per WP:3RR. I'd like to stress that this block has absolutely nothing to do with my personal opinion on this content dispute. alphaChimp laudare 04:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Welsh4ever76 reported by User:Heimstern Läufer (Result: 72 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Thomas Jefferson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Welsh4ever76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 03:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User has already been blocked twice for 3RR on this article.

User:Myxamea reported by User:BhaiSaab talk (Result:48 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Islam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Myxamea (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 05:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User may also be a sockpuppet of Mohmd. BhaiSaab talk 05:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Already blocked for 48 hours, by another admin.--heah 08:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Burak18 reported by User:Ugur Basak (Result:24 horus)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Galatasaray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Burak18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: 08:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

Also, this 3RR event occured just after the article is semi-protected. Before that semi-protection 2 ips are reverting this page to same version and both edit in same edit patter. If applicable, they seem to be obvious sock puppets. They are: User:82.168.59.236 and User:82.92.94.108, if need ed their similar reverts on Galatasaray article, 22:56, 26 August 2006 and 21:32, 26 August 2006.
was warned after all reverts.no block; if he continues come back.--heah 08:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Allways this guy comes when i'm offline:) As you say, he came back and revert the article 3 times as seen on history of the article. Also as i report previously those ip's edit pattern (reverting to same version), they can be blocked as obvious sockpuppets. --Ugur Basak 20:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Someone must stop this guy --Ugur Basak 21:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
24 hours for continued reverts.--heah 01:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Lear 21 reported by User:Angr (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Berlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Lear_21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: 10:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Several different editors agreed with the anon that the E.U. should not be listed as the a country in which Berlin is located, and have expressed themselves on this fact on Talk:Berlin. Only Lear 21 wants it to be kept, despite consensus running against him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Angr (talkcontribs). 10:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The EU is currently listed next to Germany as a country not as the only one. Substantial arguments for this statement haven't been countered. all the best Lear 21 11:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Regardless, you were informed about the 3RR and you reverted again. Blocked for 24 hours. Extraordinary Machine 14:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Edipedia reported by User:Aran|heru|nar (Result:48h block)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Han Chinese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Edipedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

The above warning is given by another user, HongQiGong. The user talk page of Edipedia, including this warning, is repeatedly blanked by himself.

Time report made: 15:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

4th block - will make it 48 hours. --Robdurbar 16:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Note: User:Edipedia is currently using sockpuppets to edit war. Two of his sockpuppets have broken the 3RR again. Aran|heru|nar 02:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Theschoolbully reported by User:Rkevins82 (Result:Indef Blocked)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on University of Akron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Theschoolbully (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 17:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: he can't believe that off-site game servers do not merit inclusion in university article. Oh, already blocked. Rkevins82 17:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

  • It was a vandalism only account and indef blocked. alphaChimp laudare 18:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


User:Pjacobi reported by User:Pjacobi[edit]

In Natascha Kampusch I've reverted at least four time in the last 24h to give the year of birth only. I consider this to fall under the exception of WP:BLP, but I may be alone with my judgement. --Pjacobi 18:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

You are completely in the right. No worries. --Woohookitty(meow) 11:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

User:72.68.184.205 reported by User:Fram (Result:)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on The Smurfs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 72.68.184.205 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

  • Previous version reverted to:[4]
  • 1st revert: [5]
  • 2nd revert: [6]
  • 3rd revert: [7]
  • 4th revert: [8]
  • 5th revert: [9]
  • 6th revert: [10]

User changed then from User:72.68.172.205 to User:72.68.184.205 and continued the same changes

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 19:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: This has been going on for quite a while, both as user pvcblue and as anonimous IP's. This has been discussed at the talk page, and a suspected sockpuppet case has been opened and closed as well. The user has been reverted by multiple editors, but keeps on adding the link to his own site. I would propose to block pvcblue as well, but I have n o proof that the IPs and this user are the same person (only string suspicions). The two IPs involved and a few others from further back in the editing history are clearly the same users though. 8 edits in 24 hours is clearly enough to break the 3RR, and two warnings have been given today.

User:Juro reported by User:Khoikhoi (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Slovakization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Juro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: 19:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Given the history of 3RR blocking, warning, and personal attacks, I have blocked the user for 24 hours. alphaChimp laudare 20:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

User:AaronS reported by User:DTC (Result:48 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Anarchism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). AaronS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):


Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 20:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: general edit warring

  • Blocked user for 48 hours. 3rd offense in just over a month. --Woohookitty(meow) 10:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Good job on playing into DTC's games. It's a good thing that you're incapable of error; otherwise, I might have disagreed with your actions. --AaronS 13:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Gabi S. reported by User:Bertilvidet (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Ze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Gabi_S. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: Bertilvidet 15:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


Comments: I have not warned the user about the 3RR. However, this edit makes it clear that they are familiar with the rule. Bertilvidet 15:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

  • I have blocked the user for 24 hours per WP:3RR. I am warning Bertilvidet. Although he did not technically violate 3RR, he came quite close. alphaChimp laudare 01:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Barefact reported by User:Ali doostzadeh (Result:24h)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on {{Scythians}}[Scythians http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians]. Barefact (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

The user barefact has been warned about 3RR rule and understands it well (see the warning in his user page where he understands it well and the rule is mentioned and he was warned by the administrator) and yet he continues to revert this article to push hisPOV.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scythia&action=history

  • 1st revert: [18]21:05, 28 August 2006
  • 2nd revert: [19] 22:12, 28 August
  • 3rd revert: [20]23:59, 28 August 2006
  • 4th revert: [21] 14:20, 29 August 2006
  • 5th revert: [22] 15:42, 29 August 2006
  • 6th revert: [23]17:04, 29 August 2006

Time report made: 17:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Also the user is making false allegations and claiming three other different people as my sockpuppet!See here: [24] This is not the first time the user has tried to manipulate and game the system.--alidoostzadeh 01:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Also some other users have commented on his disrputive behavior here: [25].--alidoostzadeh 02:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:67.66.203.21 reported by User:DuoDeathscyther 02 (Result:)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Dennis Stamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Lex Luger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 67.66.203.21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Dennis Stamp:

Lex Luger:

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 17:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User was blocked for 72 hours for vandalism. That makes this sort of moot. --Woohookitty(meow) 10:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Editor 1 reported by User:Nat Krause(Talk!) (Result: 4 days)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Chinese people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Editor_1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: 19:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

  • I have blocked the user for 4 days per WP:3RR. Block calculated as follows: 24 Hours (3RR Violation) + 72 hours (removal of 3RR report/personal attacks). This block is being made without regard to the sockpuppet allegation, which I was unable to find in WP:ANI. I'd welcome other admins to revisit this decision if interested. alphaChimp laudare 03:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:131.156.238.75 reported by User:Ckessler (Result:)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Aerosmith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 131.156.238.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

User continues to add statement attributed to non-reliable sources, despite a suggestion to read WP:RS and being warned about 3RR.

  • Please report diffs and use the standard format. Thanks. alphaChimp laudare 01:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:69.170.35.211 reported by User:HongQiGong (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Eurasian (mixed ancestry) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 69.170.35.211 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):


Comments:

User:DonIncognito reported by User:DonIncognitoCar Pix (Result:)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on {{Article|Image:1999 Pontiac Sunfire.jpg}. DonIncognito (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):


Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 02:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User vandalized the photo, then kept re-uploading the same version after it was reverted to the original.

  • To render a decision (personally, not for other admins) I need diffs in the standard format presented below. alphaChimp laudare 03:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
    • There doesn't seem to be any difs for the page, but he is reverting the image. Car Pix 14:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Objection to my editing of image being called vandalism. The image in question is that of an automobile, intended to illustrate an automobile article. I had cropped the image in order to better frame the automobile, as the surroundings were irrelevant to the subject at hand. User:Car Pix seemed to be miffed that I edited his image and reverted my edit, while at the same time calling me a vandal on my talk page. I submit that my edits to the image improved the image for its purposes on Wikipedia. I also suggest that User:Car Pix better familiarize himself with the definitions of "vandalism" and "public domain." DonIncognito 17:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Furthermore, Car Pix's objection came several months after my first edit of the image. Prior to his objection (which was probably based on his poorly conceived assumption that no one Wikipedia has the right to edit his images) there was absolutely no problems whatsoever with my edit of the image. Car Pix is reverting the image to a poorer state, and therefore I submit that it is he who is in fact violating the 3RR rule. DonIncognito 17:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Shyhiloguy31 reported by User:Grendel (Result:no block)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Ex-gay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Shyhiloguy31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

User has been warned:

Time report made: 08:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Vandal is participating in a reversion war to push a personal agenda.

two days old, no edits to that page since the 28th.no block.--heah 15:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Burak18 reported by User:Ugur Basak (Result:48 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Galatasaray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Burak18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :


Time report made: 17:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

Note that his 3RR rule block just expired today, and he again started revertwarring. Above you can see his other 3rr notice. --Ugur Basak 17:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
48 hours for second vio in as many days.--heah 19:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Liftarn reported by User:Mantanmoreland (Result:6 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Liftarn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) : Not applicable -- user previously blocked for 3RR [36]


Time report made: 18:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Revert warring in Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. User has been previously blocked 24 hrs for 3RR just three weeks ago, so a longer than 24-hour block is warranted.

User was blocked for 3rr one year and 3 weeks ago, but not three weeks ago.Liftarn seems to beleive that he is editing in good faith according to WP:BLP policy, which states that removing libelous content from a blp article does not count for 3rr, so just 6 hours for now, and maybe we can work this out on Liftarn's talk page??--heah 19:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, got the date wrong. It's been talked to death on the talk page already. I think the BLP tag is being inappropriately used as a cover for reverts in a content dispute.--Mantanmoreland 19:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Vezaso reported by User:ChrisO (Result:12 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Kosovo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Vezaso (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: 19:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

User had already been warned for 3RR but continued reverting regardless through the course of today.

12 hours for first offense.--heah 19:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Ohnoitsjamie reported by User:TheTruth2 (Result:No block)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on User talk:TheTruth2 (edit | [[Talk:User talk:TheTruth2|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

  • 05:34, 29 August 2006 TheTruth2


Time report made: 20:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • This is a frivolous report by a previously just-blocked user against an admin who reverted the user's talk page after the removal of legitimate warnings. This user was warned several times but persisted anyway. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This is a legit report she vandalized my page and violated the 3RR rule as well.She abused her power and should be diciplined.TheTruth2 20:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
With all respect, could you please fix the mangled sections of code in this report so we can see what you're talking about? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Summaries for the above links, with the presumed permission of admins and the parties involved:
1. Not a revert.
2, 3, 4, 6. The reverts in question, which were preceded by obvious warnings.
5. Not a revert.
7. Again, not a revert.
At worst, Ohnoitsjamie went one over while restoring warnings being removed by a user who had not been blocked for even a day before deleting them. Also in his defense (yes, it's a he, not a she), I feel this is a clear case of wikilawyering revenge in lieu of learning from mistakes. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • So what is the result going one over?TheTruth2 21:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No block, as removing valid warnings are considered vandalism, best way is to archive the warnings, but don't remove them completely. Jaranda wat's sup 21:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No block?not suitable.It was even stated she went one overTheTruth2 21:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Pentb reported by User:The hobgoblin (Result:24 hours)[edit]

Three revert rule violation on Mulatto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Pentb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) : Not applicable. But user previously blocked for 3RR


Time report made: 20:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

User previously blocked for 3RR 01:22, 19 July 2006

Blocked by me again, 24 hours Jaranda