Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive291

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:Mberez reported by User:Andy Dingley (Result: Stale)[edit]

Page: Planck angle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mberez (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

New editor, their only edits have been to create an article from scratch, last September (with LaTeX markup too). This sat quietly unnoticed, until a thread on the physics project page Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Planck_angle. The reaction to this article was "not positive".

I am no expert here, but I'd heard the term before. So I added the obvious reference for it. Maschen rewrote it. This changed the conclusions of the article substantially. It is still not a good article, but it begins to make progress.

Mberez returned rapidly from their dormancy since a year ago and reverted the article. They have now 4RReverted it. With some comments on their user talk:.

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]

This is simple bright line edit warring. The new article might continue as is, might be merged to Planck length, might be deleted altogether. However it's not staying with Mberez' version. There is no support for that from other editors. "Gobbledegook" was one deserved comment.

Mberez is welcome to explain the virtues of their version on the physics project talk: page (probably best, as that's where it has begun) or, if blocked, through their own user talk:. But they need to start showing some sources and explanation, and cut it with the reverts. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

We have also asked why Mberez's version is better, but the editor simply keeps insisting it should stay, and the better cited one to remain deleted. The fact that a paper is being deleted in favour of WP:OR is a clear sign the editor is not here to be productive. M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 23:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I agree with the above comments. I found this article while fixing disambiguation links, and since it was basically a single fairly impenetrable line, I brought it to the project. There was quickly a clear consensus that the one-line version of the article required substantial improvement. I would recommend merging the revised version into Planck length, and making this title into an edit-protected redirect. bd2412 T 00:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
That needs a separate merge discussion. I'd oppose it (at present) because it's simply too early. None of us are familiar with the Planck angle and the level of attention paid to it in the relevant media. Although a merge to Planck dimensions has merit, it's also quite possible that the angle justifies itself separately because of the implications for astronomy. Protecting the page title would prevent other editors working on that, which would be an unwarranted over reaction. So far a group of editors have collaborated quite successfully on producing a viable article from prior confusion. Problems with one editor shouldn't be left to disrupt that. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting oppose.svg Stale, user has not reverted in over 24 hours. Swarm 00:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Nain tushar 991 reported by User:AKS.9955 (Result: Blocked indef)[edit]

Page
Tushar NAIN (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Nain tushar 991 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 08:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  2. 08:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 08:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Tushar nain. (TW)"
  2. 08:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Tushar NAIN. (TW)"
  3. 08:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Tushar NAIN. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:
Comment, user deleted CSD tag from his account. After I placed the tag again, presumably he deleted the tag from IP 103.27.8.43. (belongs to IIT Delhi). I have also reported his username here. Lastly, user also tampered with the AfD placement. Please block user and salt the page-name. Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:07, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet. I have also initiated a Sockpuppet investigation here against this user. FYIP. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola.svg Blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. Swarm 01:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Hyperclassic reported by User:Materialscientist (Result: Blocked 24 hours)[edit]

Page: Template:Infobox nickel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Hyperclassic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Edit warring on addition of image of impure nickel against past consensus at WP:ELEMENTS on

  1. [5] Template:Infobox nickel and
  2. [6] Nickel. Plus repeated copyvios on
  3. [7] polonium

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Swarm 01:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:96.229.32.26 reported by User:Binksternet (Result: Page protected)[edit]

Page: Now That's What I Call Music! 50 (U.S. series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 96.229.32.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [8]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [9] 01:25, August 17, 2015
  2. [10] 02:47, August 17, 2015
  3. [11] 04:42, August 17, 2015
  4. [12] 13:58, August 17, 2015
  5. [13] 18:19, August 17, 2015

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [14]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [15]

Comments:

IP 96.229.32.26 from Barstow, California, has been edit warring to introduce a second "deluxe" CD to the May 2014 compilation release called Now That's What I Call Music! 50. There is no reference to support a second CD, nor a reference discussing the supposed tracklist. Binksternet (talk) 14:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Zefr reported by User:Falconjh (Result: Declined)[edit]

Page: Ginkgo biloba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Zefr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ginkgo_biloba&oldid=675665195]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [16]
  2. [17]
  3. [18]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zefr&oldid=676522573

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGinkgo_biloba&type=revision&diff=675674532&oldid=645499088


Comments:
fpacifica is the one that Zefr was warring with and fpacifica attempted to take it to the talk page, Zefr did not respond but continue to revert, even while saying to take it to the talk page.

Falconjh (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Page: Rubus chamaemorus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Zefr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rubus_chamaemorus&oldid=676282024

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [19]
  2. [20]
  3. [21]
  4. [22]
  5. [23] Falconjh (talk) 15:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zefr&oldid=676522573

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARubus_chamaemorus&type=revision&diff=676464132&oldid=676421425 Falconjh (talk) 15:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


Comments:
User Zefr has multiple edit wars on going.

Page: Berry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Zefr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Berry&oldid=676517305

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [24]
  2. [25]
  3. [26]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zefr&oldid=676522573

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABerry&type=revision&diff=676545598&oldid=676320076


Comments:


Falconjh (talk) 15:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined. I get where you're coming from, but I don't see any ongoing behavior that reaches the level of warranting admin intervention at this point. Yes, slow motion edit wars are just as disruptive as rapid ones, but this is a stretch. Swarm 01:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Mickharris reported by User:DN-boards1 (Result: Blocked indef)[edit]

Page: Mick Harris (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mickharris (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [27]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [28]
  2. [29]
  3. [30]
  4. [31]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [32]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [33]

Comments:


User continually vandalizes the Mick Harris page, has also attacked User:Serols's page. User is currently also in ANI. DN-boards1 (talk) 15:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

User:50.47.2.186 reported by User:trackinfo (Result: Blocked one week)[edit]

Page: Bree Newsome (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 50.47.2.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Starting with this edit on August 6 this IP user has only made the same repeated edit, removing a sourced quote I had originally inserted. Three editors have restored the content removed by this IP six times. It is their only activity. One of the other users has warned them twice, but almost two weeks later, they are still at it. Trackinfo (talk) 22:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of one week Swarm 01:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Bakebread reported by User:46.251.117.205 (Result: )[edit]

Page
Mahallebi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Bakebread (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahallebi&diff=676917982&oldid=676888236

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahallebi&diff=676879072&oldid=676878362

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahallebi&diff=676875054&oldid=676874684

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahallebi&diff=676403999&oldid=676061494

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 19:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "/* 3rr */ new section"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mahallebi&diff=676978208&oldid=676978110

Comments:

It seems the issue is also regarding some nationalistic, ethnic or political emotions, that do not contribute to the spirit of Wikipedia. This is an international dessert, it is present all over the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Europe so I tried to stop its place of origin being edited. I have been perfectly clear in my comments on the edits but there has been no engagement in the talk page and everything was reverted without reasonable explanation. I also expanded the article a little and that was also repeatedly reverted without explanation. Even the source says the origin is different, but that was also reverted.

User:Faizan reported by User:Human3015 (Result: Page protected)[edit]

Page
Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Faizan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
[34]
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 18:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "source misrepresentation, "On a recent evening, police officers screened visitors at a checkpoint near his house" - does not mean that "police guards him""
  2. 19:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Reverted good faith edits by Human3015: The source says: "On a recent evening, police officers screened visitors at a checkpoint near his house" - it does not mean that "police guards him". (TW)"
  3. 19:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Reverted good faith edits by Human3015: It's not - - That again refers to that event on a recent evening and does not mean police does it regularly. "On a recent evening, police officers screened visitors at a checkpoint near his house........"
  4. 19:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Reverted good faith edits by Human3015 (talk): You have already made three reverts, WP:GAMING? (TW)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 19:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "/* 3rr */ new section"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 19:35, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "/* pOLICE */ new section"
Comments:

Clear case of WP:IDLI, blanket revert of sourced content, not assuming good faith. You can read his last edit summary, talking about number of reverts, not about content. Human3015Send WikiLove  19:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

  • In my defence

It is not a case of 3RR violation as I made three reverts and not four reverts. The first diff given was my first edit on that article in which I removed the case of source misrepresentation. And the rest of three diffs are my reverts. Human3015 has also made 3 reverts on that article- 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Human3015 is hounding me on several other article. Examples: British Pakistanis, 2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes, both of which were fully-protected. He made no attempt to resolve the dispute on talk or my talk prior to blanket-reverting me and reporting me here. I have added a "disputed-inline" tag and have started a talk-page thread, where I would expect further discussion. Faizan (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The reporter is now not replying on the discussion, Anyway, article requested to be protected, Compromise solution proposed. Faizan (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: Reported editor has not self-reverted even after request. --Human3015Send WikiLove  21:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected for one week. You may request early unprotection if you resolve the dispute before then. You both breached 3RR however and were both subject to a block. Swarm 01:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
@Swarm: I think you are right, I was always ready for WP:BOOMERANG. I think we both need WikiBreak. It is not the only page where we both are involved in some kind of dispute or edit war. This is becoming hurtning. You can see in my request to him on article's talk page that I already assumed that I will also get blocked. I will request you to be a strong admin. If you think that "we both subject to block" then feel free to implement it. Thank you. --Human3015Send WikiLove  03:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Pgtl 100 reported by User:Stickee (Result: Warned user)[edit]

Page
Eliot Higgins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Pgtl 100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
  1. [35]
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 04:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676618890 by Stickee (talk)"
  2. 03:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Reception */ Added criticism of Higgins from weapons experts."
  3. 03:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Reception */ Added criticism of Higgins from weapons experts."
  4. 03:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Reception */ It appears criticism about Eliot Higgins was deleted from the page. The additions added create a balance critique of Eliot Higgins' work rather than an advertisement. Both Ted Postol and Richard Lloyd are credible weapons experts."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 03:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Eliot Higgins. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 23:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "/* RfC: Is MIT Professor and former UN weapons inspector's opinion on Higgins' weapons analysis admissible? */ adjust my comment"
Comments:

This discussion is ludicrous. The moderators of the Eliot Higgins page are attempting to force their point of view praising Eliot Higgins while denying any criticism of the man to be published. The moderators are hiding under the idea that they do not want the Higgins' article to show both good and bad things about Eliot Higgins. However their solution is to cross out any criticism of Eliot Higgins and only publish his praises.

Another article on Christopher Busby shows both criticism and praise of Busby's work. The moderators for Eliot Higgins' article seem to think that praise and criticism cannot be placed in the same article despite precedence in the Busby article.

Furthermore the criticism comes from Theodore Postol and Richard Lloyd located in the London Review of Books. The source is valid and the criticism comes from actual weapons experts and is not a random person's opinion. The criticism for Higgins was previously placed in the article and now seems to be removed in order to sanitize Higgins' image.Pgtl 100 (talk) 04:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned Pgtl about edit warring and dispute resolution per WP:BITE; page protected for 24 hours as well. Let's please try to be welcoming to new users and attempt communication rather than slapping them with warning templates and AN reports. Thanks. Swarm 07:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:FreeatlastChitchat reported by User:Human3015 (Result: Page protected)[edit]

Page
Siachen Glacier (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
FreeatlastChitchat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
diff
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 07:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "BOLD edit"
  2. 03:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "BOLD edit"
  3. 03:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676616104 by Human3015 (talk)"
  4. 03:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676617316 by Human3015 (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 03:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* 3rr */ new section"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 08:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Discussion */ it is geographical term"
  2. 08:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Discussion */ further"
  3. 03:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Discussion */ reply"
  4. 03:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Discussion */ reply"
  5. 03:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Discussion */ reply"
  6. 03:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Discussion */ ce"
Comments:

Editor is involved in edit war even after RfC on same issue is going on and no final decision is made regarding this. Even after explaining all policy guidelines on talk page, editor is involved in edit war that too without giving any edit summary. Thank you. Human3015Send WikiLove  03:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Boomerang

This should be Crystal CLEAR case of at least a 48 hour block for Human who has been trying to game the system. You can look at the previuos Report he launched against Fauzan and tried to game the system but he was caught. SWARM called him out and told him that he too had breached the 3revert rule and was subject to a block.This kind of warring 5 hours after recieving a reprimand should be punished to be frank. Lets see what the diffs are about.

  1. 07:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "BOLD edit"

This is when I added unsourced material and was reverted my Human. The three revert rule does not apply here as I did not revert Anyone I just made an edit which I considred BOLD. Adding this here in a report is the utmost height of bad faith and gaming the system.

  1. 03:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "BOLD edit"

I added sources to my edit which were lacking and which had led to its revrt. Even though one would have been enough I added FOUR sources for one single line. And these two are my reverts

  1. 03:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676616104 by Human3015 (talk)"
  2. 03:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676617316 by Human3015 (talk)"

Anyone going to the RFC discussion will see that FOUR editors AGREE with the addition of material and ONLY human and one other editor(Who has less than 500 edits and almost 75% of his edits are on the page in question) disagree with the addition of this text. What is an aeditor supposed to DO here? BEG Human to grant him access to editing?FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected for one week. Human, looking at the discussion, you seem to be misrepresenting the situation. The previous RfC did yield a consensus "that in some way the infobox should recognise the region is disputed".[36] You're reverting based on claims that "there is "no consesnus" to add it to infobox" and that he should "let the ongoing RfC on same issue be closed".[37] On its face this seems to be nothing less than a flagrant misrepresentation of the situation, as the current RfC is a follow up to determine how exactly the infobox should say it, not on whether it can be added to begin with. Furthermore, your argument that AlbinoFerret's RfC close is somehow invalid because he's not an administrator and/or because he interpreted a "rough consensus". This is simply wrong. As an uninvolved editor in good standing, he was completely and entirely within his rights to close the RfC, and misrepresenting consensus in an edit war is nothing short of disruptive. Yes, WP:BRD is the appropriate means of going about having one's edit reverted, but I honestly can't see any legitimate reasoning being given for the revert aside from a false procedural concern. I'm not sure what you're doing Human, but stop. Let me further clarify, since you apparently aren't particularly deterred by the threat of a block (based on your above comment): yes, your opponents may absolutely be blocked alongside you in some of these situations, but given your prior and current incidents of edit warring it's difficult not to see a problematic behavioral pattern on your part, and the next block you receive will be substantially lengthier, especially given the leniency I've opted for regarding these last two reports. Stop edit warring. Last warning from me before the consequences start getting serious. Swarm 06:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
@Swarm: At least one can see that RfC is going on "how it should be written", without making final decision how one can directly write it in infobox that too at wrong place, "status" section is for geographical status. I will take care next time, but I always want to be neutral and sensible, thanks for not blocking me on several occasions. But I done edit protect request there before reading your comment, I saw your this comment after I done edit request there. Anyway, I wanted to contribute to Tourism project and I was working on it without touching these Indo-Pak topics for long time, but since 2-3 days some biased(according to me) editing going on British Pakistanis, Hafeez Saeed, 2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes‎, Siachen conflict etc. which made me to enter in this arena again but working on these topics is always hurtning and a headache. I will take care next time. Thanks. --Human3015Send WikiLove  07:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Spshu reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: Page protected)[edit]

Page
Disney Channel (Canada) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Spshu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 16:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676530697 by ViperSnake151 (talk) to effect further reversals"
  2. 13:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676432362 by ViperSnake151 (talk) again comply with primary source"
  3. 20:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676408309 by Mdrnpndr (talk) what? I just separated out BG from history & removed speculation"
  4. 20:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676407891 by Mdrnpndr (talk) No content was removed except speculation about what was taking over for TTRetro EN"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 23:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC) "/* La chaîne Disney */"
Comments:

Multi-user content dispute on Disney Channel (Canada). Although the content issues with this edit war have been resolved through compromises by me, Spshu's abuse of reversions, including at least four within a 24-hour period, is still a blatant violation of 3RR.

Spshu has had a history of conflicts on articles related to children's television. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:35, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

It is improper for you to bring up any other conflicts. As you are known to for a "history of conflicts on articles" related to cable TV and not even wanting to discuss the matter.

By the way his so called warning is not warning just ViperSnake151 arguing over sourcing not any type of 3RR warning. And arguing against wp:primary source. Spshu (talk) 20:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

User:ViperSnake151 & User:Mdrnpndr reported by User:Spshu (Result: )[edit]

This is a base and false complaint, which par for the course. I made the mistake involving ViperSnake151 to have him explain better why the French language article Disney La Chaîne should be a renamed Télétoon Rétro (french language) or at Disney Channel CA since we had a dispute handle on the talk page of the article which he did not even want to have. This was to help end the disruptive editing and wp:OWN exhibited by Mdrnpndr.

I warn them hat their actions were distruptive edit on my talk page and they have responded, so they are aware they were warned.

Diffs of edit warring / disruptive editing warning
"WP:DISRUPTSIGNS, go read this as both of you need to see that your actions in removing reliable news sources are disruptive. 'An example is repeated deletion of reliable sources posted by other editors.'"
  • Note: that I am only reporting it here as it its entangled in the above issue.

Disney Channel (Canada) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)[edit]

User being reported
ViperSnake151 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), Mdrnpndr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) for edit warring and disruptive editing
  • explain edit to which they objected to. This edit was post setting up a redirect from La chaîne Disney as that article at the time was total primary sourced. And it did have an explanatory summary: "citing shut down of Teletoon Retro en & fr". It also created a "Background" section. No content was removed, just sources, primary (Corus PR) or difficult to verify (cartt.ca subscription & per its about page a 1 man show).

1. 20:11, 16 August 2015‎ Mdrnpndr (Undid revision 676407496 by Spshu (talk) Reverting unexplained content removal)

  • 20:12, 16 August 2015‎ Spshu (Undid revision 676407891 by Mdrnpndr (talk) No content was removed except speculation about what was taking over for TTRetro EN)

2.20:11, 16 August 2015‎ Mdrnpndr (Undid revision 676407496 by Spshu (talk) Reverting unexplained content removal)

  • 20:12, 16 August 2015‎ Spshu (Undid revision 676407891 by Mdrnpndr (talk) No content was removed except speculation about what was taking over for TTRetro EN)

3.20:14, 16 August 2015‎ Mdrnpndr (Undid revision 676408103 by Spshu (talk) You are removing valuable sources as well as content based on them!)

  • 20:16, 16 August 2015‎ Spshu (Undid revision 676408309 by Mdrnpndr (talk) what? I just separated out BG from history & removed speculation
  • 20:38, 16 August 2015 Spshu (ubl sister ch., nonprimary src. for Fr. lang. ch., 2nd src. programming) - another edit with an unbullet list for sister channels & adding French language channel that was primary sourced only thus not notable separately.

4/A1. 23:36, 16 August 2015‎ ViperSnake151 (rv; subsequent edits downgraded sources (replacing a media publication with a wire service article that contradicts), clean up coverage of French version.) -There was no contradiction, TTR EN closure was unexplained while wire service indicating TTR FR was being replaced by Disney Channel CA French.

5/A2. 15:56, 17 August 2015‎ ViperSnake151 (Undid revision 676509356 by Spshu (talk) incompletely explained removal of sourced content)

  • 15:59, 17 August 2015‎ ViperSnake151 (-999)‎ . . (rm content sourced to disputed site) - finally recognizing CARTT.CA's problem, but still keeping wp:primary source issue unaddressed
  • (reported above as 1.) 16:04, 17 August 2015‎ Spshu (talk | contribs)‎ . . (9,124 bytes) (+999)‎ . . (Undid revision 676530697 by ViperSnake151 (talk) to effect further reversals) - the intermidate edit make it direct impossible to return by reverting, since my version removes CARTT, this should be no harm no foul
  • 16:05, 17 August 2015‎ Spshu (Undid revision 676530226 by ViperSnake151 (talk) again NO REMOVAL OF CONTENT OCCURED, a Background § was created & reliable src. replaced primary src.)

6. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disney_Channel_%28Canada%29&direction=next&oldid=676531632 16:14, 17 August 2015‎ ViperSnake151 (partial rv; Your wording is literally the exact same information but less concise. Though I did keep the CP source. And stop owning this article.) gee, a personal attack, how is getting a reliable source in the article attempting to own it?

As edit summary will hold out that my changes to comply with WP:PRIMARY by replacing primary sources with mainstream reliable sources were met with "Reverting unexplained content removal". Making false claims isn't a good reason for reversal nor for edit warring on their side. These were basically disruptive edits by definition. Spshu (talk) 20:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Warring and disruptive editing across related articles[edit]

Now to get to the beginning of the matter. The conflict goes back to La chaîne Disney, which based on the fact it was only primarily sourced at the time

  • reverts to: 15:40, 16 August 2015‎ Mdrnpndr (talk | contribs)‎ (Undid revision 676358190 by 99.236.180.6 (talk) We go by the source, which clearly identifies it as being replaced.
  1. 15:40, 16 August 2015‎ Mdrnpndr (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,689 bytes) (+63)‎ . . (Undid revision 676358190 by 99.236.180.6 (talk) We go by the source, which clearly identifies it as being replaced.)
  • Since it is by source a continuation of Teletoon Retro French CA (TTR FR), per discussion held at Talk:FYI_(U.S._TV_channel)#Merge_discussion which included ViperSnake151, who was the vocal proponent of keeping such a change as one article (no change in ownership, genre, etc. "Typically, re-brandings of this nature do not get separate articles unless there is a major ownership change with a complete change in scope that is significant and detailed enough for its own article (i.e. Al Jazeera America), or the new network is technically and legally distinct from the previous one") Disney Channel CA-FR would be covered in TTR FR then renamed as Disney Channel CA-FR (just for discussion).
  • To which Mdrnpndr via a template asked for reason.
  • 19:04, 16 August 2015‎ Spshu (Undid revision 676398300 by Mdrnpndr (talk) currently only sourced by primary source & is currently Télétoon Rétro) - reason given.

2. 19:10, 16 August 2015 Mdrnpndr (secondary source now found; revert redirect due to potential confusion as well as continuing expansion of article)

  • Try a different tack, a Redirect to Disney Channel (Canada)

3. 00:06, 17 August 2015 ViperSnake151 (talk | contribs) - unexplained revert 4. 00:07, 17 August 2015 ViperSnake151 (ViperSnake151 moved page La chaîne Disney to Disney La Chaîne: The logo seems to contradict; perhaps they changed it to make the logo still work, so now its "Disney, the Channel" instead of "The Channel of Disney") - original research as source indicate La chaîne Disney, La chaîne Disney per Corus PR.

Others[edit]

User being reported
Mdrnpndr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) for edit warring and disruptive editing

Mdrnpndr continues this edit & disruptive editing across a few more articles:

Page
Télétoon Rétro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1. [ 19:11, 16 August 2015‎] Mdrnpndr (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (10,964 bytes) (+825)‎ . . (Undid revision 676399483 by Spshu (talk) Reverting unexplained content removal) - again a edit that was explained (→‎History: rmv. primary src.)

Again revert the same source as the rest.
Page
Template:Corus Entertainment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

1.20:54, 16 August 2015‎ Mdrnpndr (talk | contribs)‎ . . (2,924 bytes) (-18)‎ . . (Undid revision 676411473 by Spshu (talk) corporate structure at that point not yet known)

Seem to be total retaliatory as 20:11, 16 August 2015 that reorganization was place in the Corus Entertainment article.
Repeated misuse of template warning.
Page
User talk:Spshu (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  1. 16 August 2015 uw-delete2 for a redirect that has or should have the same source information, Télétoon Rétro
  2. 19:13, 16 August 2015 Template:uw-delete3 for me telling him that La chaîne Disney currently do not met notability and that the source are primary sources which he make clear in his next post
  3. 19:21, 16 August 2015
  4. 19:26, 16 August 2015 uw-delete3, calls following WP:primary sources as disruptive editing
  5. 20:11, 16 August 2015 uw-delete4 for supposedly blanking Disney Channel (Canada) which did not happen (see above)


  • Note that I filed for [RfPP] on all the articles given ViperSnake151 taking up Mdrnpndr's torch to force it into discussion.

So the report by ViperSnake151 and his and Mdrnpndr other action amounts to Wikipedia:Gaming, I don't like it and Wikipedia:Disruptive editing by example - WP:DISRUPTSIGNS: "An example is repeated deletion of reliable sources posted by other editors."

Sorry that it so long, responding administrator, but that is the only way you will see the full pictures. I request that they cooperated. Spshu (talk) 20:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your retaliatory actions here further prove that you are simply asserting ownership over the articles in question. I had actually only read your concerns about Cartt after the "unexplained content removal" edit, which led to the "rm content sourced to disputed site" edit. Going by the definition on 3RR, I stopped after my third formal "reversion", which was simply to restore some of your replacement sourcing and copyedit, and have remained in compliance with the related policies. Why you are indirectly making me responsible for actions performed by other editors in this dispute is uncalled for. Plus, as I mentioned, you continue to strictly interpret WP:PRIMARY as a strict ban on the use of primary sources, which it is not. Primary sources can be used for straightforward statements, but more advanced interpretations require a secondary source. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
I am not making you responsible for edits made by others, but you where informed that your action in stopping a reliable secondary news source taking the place of a primary source is straight out disruptive editing, per the WP:DISRUPTSIGNS example, which you join in on. You are not be called on the carpet for misuse of template warning or the expanding the warring to other pages. I am leaving it up to the responding administrator if it is a "tag team" attempt at 3RR. Which is not as you attempt to misclaim that I am miss interpreting PRIMARY. Since, a secondary source can take the primary source's place then you should/must use the secondary source per PRIMARY. Attempt to place the preferred source type in an article is not an attempt at asserting ownership that is just asserting rights as an editor to follow PRIMARY. Spshu (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Biblicalprofphd (WP:SCRUTINY-evasion of User:Biblestudyprof) reported by User:Ian.thomson (Result: Sock indef blocked, master blocked 1 week)[edit]

Page: Whore of Babylon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Biblicalprofphd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [38] - User warned
  2. [39] - User had already shown they are aware of the warning

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [40]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Whore_of_Babylon#America_the_Whore

Comments:
User is not even a full day out of a block for the same edits as last time. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola.svg Blocked indefinitely Master account blocked for a week. Acroterion (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:187.56.161.224 reported by User:GoddersUK (Result: blocked, 24h)[edit]

Page
Copa União (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
187.56.161.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. Consecutive edits made from 14:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676683743 by 193.212.51.164 (talk)"
    2. 14:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676683656 by 193.212.51.164 (talk)"
    3. 14:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676683610 by 193.212.51.164 (talk)"
  2. Consecutive edits made from 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682919 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    2. 14:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682893 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
  3. 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682632 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
  4. Consecutive edits made from 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682708 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    2. 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682787 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    3. 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682659 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
  5. Consecutive edits made from 14:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682449 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    2. 14:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682351 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    3. 14:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  6. 14:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676680024 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
  7. Consecutive edits made from 14:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676680207 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    2. 14:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676680173 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    3. 14:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676680043 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
  8. Consecutive edits made from 13:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 13:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 13:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676516913 by 193.212.51.164 (talk)"
    2. 13:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676516887 by 193.212.51.164 (talk)"
    3. 13:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "1987=sport"
    4. 13:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Champion */"
    5. 13:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Champion */"
    6. 13:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  9. Consecutive edits made from 13:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 13:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 13:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "1987=Sport union Cup"
    2. 13:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "1987=Sport"
    3. 13:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676516948 by 193.212.51.164 (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 14:23, 18 August 2015 ""
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Edit warring warning was given by a different editor, TW doesn't make it easy for me to add this to the report but I will try to do so manually after. GoddersUK (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)(EDIT:Now done)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Both IPs involved in the edit war have been blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 17:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:179.218.115.47 reported by User:GoddersUK (Result: blocked, 24h)[edit]

Page
Copa União (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
179.218.115.47 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 14:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  2. Consecutive edits made from 14:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676683987 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    2. 14:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676683941 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    3. 14:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676684432 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
    4. 14:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  3. Consecutive edits made from 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682863 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    2. 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682886 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
  4. 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682833 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
  5. Consecutive edits made from 14:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
    2. 14:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682520 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    3. 14:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682586 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    4. 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  6. Consecutive edits made from 14:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682290 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    2. 14:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682097 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
  7. 14:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682245 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
  8. Consecutive edits made from 14:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676679567 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    2. 14:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676677200 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    3. 14:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676677019 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    4. 14:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676676858 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    5. 14:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676676779 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    6. 14:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676676739 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    7. 14:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676676737 by GoddersUK (talk)"
    8. 14:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676676687 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    9. 14:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676680104 by 179.218.115.47 (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 14:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Warning was given by another editor. I can't add it in TW but will add it to the report manually after I have posted. GoddersUK (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Is that AnomieBOT draw your attention when Substing templates:uw-3rr. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info?-Gmaildamn (talk) 14:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Gmaildamn, I'd edited the page earlier, so it was on my watchlist. When I saw the editing pattern I went to leave a warning, but you'd already done so. Given that they were still reverting I brought it here. Hope that was appropriate! GoddersUK (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Both IPs in the edit war have been blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 17:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Die death1 reported by User:Jytdog (Result: blocked, 24h)[edit]

Page: The National Society of Leadership and Success (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Die death1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. diff (as IP)
  2. diff as IP
  3. diff as "Die Death" (as are the rest)
  4. diff
  5. diff
  6. diff


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: link

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [41]

Comments:
New user of the worst kind, who has come here for one reason - and that is to advocate for something or other and will not use the talk pages. Please at least lock the article. I recognize that I have been edit warring right beside them. So frustrating when new editors will not talk.


Doesn't seem to want to discuss. User angrily demanded that everyone, I guess, but maybe just directed at me, stop posting on "his" page. [42] Brianhe (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Blocked by MusikAnimal for disruptive editing. —C.Fred (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:193.212.51.164 reported by User:GoddersUK (Result: blocked, 24h)[edit]

Page
Copa União (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
193.212.51.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 15:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Final Results */"
  2. 14:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676687334 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
  3. 14:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  4. Consecutive edits made from 14:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Finals */"
    2. 14:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Champion */"
    3. 14:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Champion */"
    4. 14:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  5. Consecutive edits made from 14:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Champion */"
    2. 14:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Champion */"
    3. 14:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "/* Champion */"
    4. 14:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  6. Consecutive edits made from 14:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676685252 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    2. 14:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676685137 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
  7. Consecutive edits made from 14:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676684770 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    2. 14:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676684709 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
  8. Consecutive edits made from 14:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682996 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    2. 14:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676682966 by 187.56.161.224 (talk)"
    3. 14:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
  9. Consecutive edits made from 14:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC) to 14:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
    1. 14:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676271234 by 179.98.185.161 (talk)"
    2. 14:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676271172 by 179.98.185.161 (talk)"
    3. 14:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 676271124 by 179.98.185.161 (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 18 August 2015 (UTC) ""
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Will edit to add warning info to report in a moment. (EDIT: Now done. GoddersUK (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC))

Also warring on other pages, inc: List of Brazilian football champions, Campeonato Brasileiro Série A, 1992 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A GoddersUK (talk) 15:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. Another IP in the Brazilian football edit-war blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 17:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

User:50.152.50.83 reported by User:Andy Dingley (Result: protected)[edit]

Page: Brazil (1985 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 50.152.50.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
2601:281:8101:9743:2dbc:f49e:559e:ff50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
2601:281:8101:9743:3153:7610:C3D:7586 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. The producer, distrubuter and director of this film were all American, so this film is therefore American. In no way is it a British production. (50.152.50.83)