Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive309

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:GoodDay reported by User:Miesianiacal (Result: Everyone had a nice cup of tea and a sit down )[edit]

Page: Monarchy of Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: GoodDay (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: 01:57, 1 March 2016

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 04:37, 1 March 2016
  2. 04:49, 1 March 2016
  3. 04:53, 1 March 2016
  4. 05:02, 1 March 2016

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: On article talk page. Notice of AN/3RR posting.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Monarchy of Canada#Perth Agreement

Comments:
User is not a new editor. As can be seen at the talk page, he deflects from explaining or justifying his actions by attacking his own irrelevant bad faith accusations and repetitiously enforcing an expectation that others will do so for him. He has made a technical breach of 3RR, but, the most disruptive aspect of this is the obstructionism. It is not a newly developed habit. -- MIESIANIACAL 05:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

The editor having self-reverted the fourth revert neither rectifies nor excuses the continuing stonewalling. Indeed, the he admits he self-reverted only to avoid a block, rather than as an act of cooperation. It appears to be at least a matter of an editor "refus[ing] to work collaboratively or heed[ing] the information given to them..." (from WP:EW). -- MIESIANIACAL 05:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't want any animosity to grow between us. Therefore, I've restored an earlier edit of yours, which began our little disagreement. Now, let's continue to discuss your changes, keeping in mind that you & I shall allow others to weigh in :) GoodDay (talk) 05:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I've reversed my 'last' revert (which wasn't a breach, btw) & restored the reporter's preferred version. I hope he'll attempt to get a consensus there (via talkpage), for what he wants :) GoodDay (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

PS: I hereby request that Miesianiacal withdraw his report :) GoodDay (talk) 05:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

PPS: Again, I'm requesting that Miesianiacal withdraw his report, with a promise that I will remain away from the discussion-in-question at Monarchy of Canada. -- :) GoodDay (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I think an admin should examine Miesianical'a behavior for incivility and bullying. 209.171.88.32 (talk) 07:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC) 209.171.88.32 (talk) 07:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Having thought it over further. I think it's best that I stay away from Monarchy of Canada, all together :( GoodDay (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

GoodDay reversed his 4th edit before the report was filed, so it is best forgotten. Best if we discuss the differences on the talk page and come to a consensus. TFD (talk) 07:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation GoodDay has self-reverted and apologised, so I am happy to close the matter. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Ritchie333 :) GoodDay (talk) 12:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Hengistmate reported by User:Andy Dingley (Result: blocked)[edit]

Page
Talk:Plasticine (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Hengistmate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

This has been running since December Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Trolling_again_from_Hengistmate, without any effective intervention.

Hengistmate has past blocks for socking and trolling in a similar manner Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hengistmate/Archive and there's a current SPI open too: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hengistmate.

Today Hengistmate decided to switch to simple edit-warring at the talk page, hitting 4RR against two other editors. This was the blanking of already-hatted content on a talk: page for being off-topic. Now that's maybe an arguable point, but WP:TPO is against such blanking, the content was already hatted and this is simple EW regardless. His edits over here [1] (look at the article authors) are also far more about trolling a particular editor than about content.

Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. [2]
  2. [3]
  3. [4]
  4. [5]
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. [6]
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

This is exhaustively discussed at the ANI report linked above. 86.153.133.193 (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments:

Any discussion of this belongs at the overall ANI thread.

And Hengistmate has the cheek to accuse me of edit warring with this edit summary in spite of the fact that I have only reverted the deleted discussion once. 86.153.133.193 (talk) 14:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This "Using Wikipedia rules as weapon. Removed troll" is pretty unimpressive too, as an edit summary when blanking a legit 3RR warning from an uninvolved editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

His edit-warring has now moved back to an old favourite article of his, Mark V tank, and a tactic he has been using on Plasticine, that of simply denying sources that disagree with his truth

(Same edits in 2014)

Last time this came up at the article talk: page Talk:Mark_V_tank#Dates_of_Service. he took to editing my comments there to ridicule me. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Stale is irrelevant. 4RR within 24 hours is a bright line offence, which should result in an automatic block (at least that is what it says at WP:3RR). The point about WP:DR also makes no sense as the issue has been exhaustively discussed on the article talk page. However, it is impossible to hold any form of meaningful discussion or dispute resolution when the principle protagonists resort to misrepresenting the sources that they are attempting to use to support their position against a clear consensus for the correct version.
I have been watching this pan out with interest observing complete inaction toward the problem. I have to assume from the failure to take action over this incident that the administrators are condoning edit warring exceeding 3RR in 24 hours; using sockpuppetry to support the incorrect version against consensus and introducing incorrect material into an article by altering quoted references to support their preferred version. 212.183.128.158 (talk) 11:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Blocked 48 hours. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
I saw this report yesterday and was thinking of closing it as "stale". As Hengistmate hasn't touched the talk page in nearly 2 days, a 48 hour block sounds awfully punitive. The three revert rule does not say an administrator must block anyone the minute they are caught doing 4 reverts within 24 hours; I didn't block anyone for this, for example. As for why I was procrastinating, it was simply because I wanted to take half an hour or so to sit down and digest what the actual dispute was about, rather than wading in with a size-9 banhammer, and I didn't get time. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The violation is clear, although I agree it would have been better if we had acted more quickly. My only hesitation was about whether Hengistmate had been sufficiently warned. I decided that an editor of several years' experience could not help but be aware of the 3RR rule. Anyway I have no problem to reducing the block to time served if he/she makes a request which shows awareness of the problem. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:ANI#Trolling again from Hengistmate and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hengistmate — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I should also point out that the IP editor who tried to close this down as 'stale' comes rom the same ISP and the same IP range as the Hengistmate sock currently reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hengistmate. 86.153.133.193 (talk) 13:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Matthewjoule reported by User:Theroadislong (Result: No violation )[edit]

Page: Mansfield Town F.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Matthewjoule (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [11]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [12]
  2. [13]
  3. [14]
  4. [diff]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [15] [16] [17]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:

  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria.. The edits look like good faith to me, and there is no talk page discussion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

User:100.43.29.68 reported by User:Jess (Result: blocked)[edit]

Page
William Lane Craig (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
100.43.29.68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 21:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talkpage. Stop edit warring."
  2. 21:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talkpage. Stop edit warring."
  3. 21:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talkpage. Stop edit warring."
  4. 06:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talk. Do not edit war."
  5. 05:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 707273685 by Jess (talk)"
  6. 3:59, 27 February 2016 "see talk"
  7. 00:31, 27 February 2016 "Please see Talkpage. Two people in favor of this edit. One against. Many sources were posted in favor of this edit. Stop edit waring and place discuss the issue at the Talkpage. Thank you."
  8. 21:49, 26 February 2016 "This has been discussed on the Talkpage. I see two people are who are for this edit and one against. There are also numerous citations in favor of Craig being labeled a Philosopher first and foremost"
  9. 06:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 706228630 by Jess (talk)"
  10. 04:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 706197407 by Jess (talk)"
  11. 23:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 706081604 by Theroadislong (talk)"
  12. 07:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC) "Craig is as much of a philosopher as Plantinga or Dennett. Go look at Dennett's article and notice how he isn't referred to as an "Atheist Philosopher". Look at Plantinga's article and notice how he isn't referred to as a "Christian Philosopher"."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 05:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on William Lane Craig. (TW)"
  2. 07:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "+violation of WP:3RR warning"


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 22:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC) "/* What's a " Christian Analytic philosopher"? & The Ordering of The Lead Revisited */ Reply"
  2. 01:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "/* What's an "analytic Christian Philosopher"? */ Reply"
Comments:

Editor will not stop edit warring. IP appears to be static. He broke 3rr on Feb 22, but the page was protected instead of issuing a block. As soon as page came off protection, he began edit warring again. Page was protected again for 2 days. As soon as it came off protection, he's at it again. We either need a longer semi protection, or a block to show the ip that he is not allowed to edit war.

Incidentally, note the content being reverted has been extensively discussed over the last several years. See, for example, this edit and the talk page.   — Jess· Δ 14:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Note, ip is now at 5 reverts in 24 hours. He has been edit warring on this nonstop since Feb 22nd. Either a block, or longer-term semi protection will be necessary to stop the disruption.   — Jess· Δ 21:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Also they have reverted three different editors. --Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 21:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
6 actually. Jess, Ebyabe, Anaxial, Epipelagic, Boomer Vial, Theroadislong.   — Jess· Δ 01:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 31 hours --slakrtalk / 04:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

User:71.174.127.111 reported by User:RolandR (Result: protected)[edit]

Page
Jewish Bolshevism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
71.174.127.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts


  1. 16:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "As previosly pointed out it is hard to get consensus when the material on the talk page gets deleted. and one more time - The new Churchill material is from the same source as the Churchill material already in the article."
  2. 16:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "As previosly pointed out it is hard to get consensus when the material on the talk page gets deleted."
  3. 16:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "New Churchill material is from the same source as the previously included Churchill material - I'd be a bit more receptive to your complaint if so much material was not being deleted from the talk pagel"
  4. 16:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "New Churchill material is from the same source a previously included Churchill material"
  5. 16:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "New Churchill material is from the same source a previously included Churchill material"
  6. 16:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Then YOU link it to the wiki duplicate already used as a cite."
  7. 15:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Now sourced with a link to the actual article - not to some wiki duplicate which can be vandalized"
  8. 15:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Not unsourced - its from the same source as the already existing Churchill material"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Here


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

IP edit-warring with at least four established editors to add antisemitic material sourced to utterly unreliable fringe and Nazi sources RolandR (talk) 16:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected by another admin --slakrtalk / 04:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Mariasfixing reported by User:331dot (Result:Blocked )[edit]

Page
Charlene McMann (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Mariasfixing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 19:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Felony Conviction */"
  2. 19:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Felony Conviction */ information already put on before. This woman is suicidal, her husband is a lawyer, he will need to contact you if anything happens to her has reports from Dr's, her lawyer. She worked 18 years helping cancer patients volunteering"
  3. 19:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Chicago Sun Times is a political hack for Chicago Politics and damaged Ms McMann on person. This is not a joke! She is suicidal. Her husband is a attorney and this press is effecting her mental and physical status.psychiatrist evalue says she was suicidal"
  4. 18:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Felony Conviction */ the sources not reliable. Her attorney put a press release saying she was politically targeted if it was held where she lives no charges would have been filed. She has mental - physical health issues and was suicidal cause of this"
  5. 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "The sources are not reliable and there was a press release from attorney stating she was politically targeted and if it held in her county twould not be any charges filed and would have been dismissed. He said she is mentally and physically to"
  6. 18:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "reputation destruction. Woman is under mental and physical stress which can cause hareful results to her health. Her lawyer had a press release saying she was politically targeted the county were she lives would be no charges filed dismissed"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 19:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Charlene McMann. (TW)"
  2. 19:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Charlene McMann. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 19:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Dispute */ new section"
Comments:

Edit war seems to be over mentioning a criminal conviction in the article. Mariasfixing has not replied on talk page to post their concerns(aside from a few edit summaries) 331dot (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I have blocked for 12 hours. -- John Reaves 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The person has returned and has resumed edit warring. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected @Coffee: has protected the article for 1 week. I have removed the content in contention as I believe our protection policy suggests to err on the side of exclusion in a BLP dispute. (Note: I have no particular opinion on whether the content should stay or go; I am simply doing what I believe policy should say I ought to do). I am extremely concerned about this edit summary and have emailed emergency about it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Aniseseed reported by User:JJMC89 (Result: Blocked 48 hours)[edit]

Page
Ferdinand Marcos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Aniseseed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 07:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  2. 06:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  3. 22:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  4. 21:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  5. 15:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  6. 14:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 06:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Ferdinand Marcos. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Katietalk 16:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Dean1997 reported by User:Rebbing (Result: Warned)[edit]

Page
Cara Delevingne (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Dean1997 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 707646391
  2. 706000510
  3. 705030925
  4. 705029804
  5. 705027252
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 706028706
  2. 705483553
Comments:

This user has been persistently disruptive in adding a specific piece of information to this article against consensus and refuses to discuss the matter on the talk page despite repeated, specific warnings on his page. (He's also abused the minor edit flag in an apparent attempt to evade scrutiny.)  Rebbing  talk  02:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Interestingly, he left me an apology on my talk page this morning.  Rebbing  talk  14:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Result: User:Dean1997 is warned to get consensus on the talk page before trying yet again to add 'partner' information to Cara Delevingne's article. EdJohnston (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

User:2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC reported by User:忍者ポップ (Result: Both blocked)[edit]

Page: Doubutsu Sentai Zyuohger (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. Undid revision 708025006 by 忍者ポップ (talk) These terms aren't needed on this page anymore. Please stop reverting me.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
Pages. --忍者ポップ (talk) 04:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

忍者ポップ was reverting me without explaining why. I kept trying to talk to him but he removed all of my messages and would not leave a reason why he was reverting.--2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC (talk) 04:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Japanese user not block, IP block. --忍者ポップ (talk) 04:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
You started it. You did not explain why you reverted me when I have left multiple explanations for my edits.--2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC (talk) 04:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Both editors blocked – 24 hours. User:忍者ポップ speaks in sentence fragments that make little sense, though he identifies with the en-3 user box ('advanced knowledge of English'). He should reflect on how effective he can be here, especially in negotiating contested matters. EdJohnston (talk) 05:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

User:68.231.26.111 reported by User:Spirit Ethanol (Result: Both blocked )[edit]

Page
Portal:Current events/2016 February 26 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
68.231.26.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 00:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 707941008 by Spirit Ethanol (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
Comments:

Highly destructive editor. Continuously removing U.S. election news on several pages such as here here (January 28) here (March 1) here (March 2), and then reverting re-additions (Much more than three...). Refusing to communicate. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

my defence is as follows - how many stupid admins exist at wiki? - one after another after another - the above user is a sockpuppet created just last Nov 2015 - I am almost certain it is just more of this sockpuppet in one of all his hundreds of block evasion activities creating endless accounts to war at wiki - he is as follows: ((WP:BLOCK EVASION edits removed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Spliff_Joint_Blunt/Archive)) - as usual he expects that some idiot admin will fall for it again and again and again - and guess what?, it works every time!!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 09:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Both editors blocked - Spirit Ethanol for 24 hours, IP for 1 month. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Kordestani reported by User:Tradedia (Result: Protected)[edit]

Page: Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Kordestani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Breaking 1RR:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [18]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War#ISIS offensive against SDF in north countryside of Raqqa & Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War#Vandalism,Unreliable sources,Misinterpreation of sources,Breaking the rules of editing

Comments:
The article on which the edit warring occurred is subject to Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. And the user being reported has been placed on notice of the remedies in place. After a 1 week block for edit warring by admin EdJohnston, this user found nothing better than to come back and edit war some more on the module, breaking 1RR. Moreover, you can notice that one day before he engaged in the 1RR violation, an edit warring template was left on his talk page by admin Lectonar concerning a different article. Tradediatalk 09:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Comment: He did break 3RR (or 1RR)? but his edits were based on sources, so I wouldn't call it unconstructive, though it is disruptive. He's a relatively new user and is doing some good stuff keeping Module:Turkish Insurgency Detailed Map (where he has actually been quite neutral despite frequent Turkish POV vandalism) in order. Anyway, I firmly believe he's here to build an encylopedia, and I'd attribute the rule-breaking to inexperience or impulsiveness (though I guess I'm a bit biased towards sympathy in that respect considering my own foibles). --Monochrome_Monitor 12:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected – 5 days. EdJohnston (talk) 20:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Electricburst1996 reported by User:Cebr1979[edit]

Page
Plushophilia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Electricburst1996 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Though it started before that with these other reverts as well:

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [19]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [20]

Comments:

This user feels strongly about an image but, regardless of having been shown/told why the image is there, they are resorting to edit warring to get their way... despite knowing full well that edit warring is wrong: 1, 2, 3, 4.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

A notice was placed on their talk page but, immediately removed so am @Electricburst1996: pinging them here now.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
...and now they have removed this whole notice from this very board!Cebr1979 (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
This case involves more than two editors. Four editors were involved, actually. Oh, and may I mention that Cebr1979 has a long-term history of personal attacks against other users? ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 23:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
The number of editors has nothing to do with anything. We're talking about the number of editors who have broken the very serious 3RR rule... and that's only you. I have never issued a personal attack towards you so I'm not sure why you brought that up, it has nothing to do with anything either. However, you deleting posts by others in order to suit your needs does have something to do with something because... you've done that before and have been told it's wrong: 1, 2.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I'd like to note that the diff provided for dispute resolution doesn't tell the entire story. The current diff for resolution could also be considered as this under the RfC heading. Electricburst1996 has agreed to consider a compromise, which is showing a willingness to work with other editors. He's also agreed to leave the existing image and article alone in good faith while I look for a more suitable image. Any punishment from this seems like it would just be punitive, since discussion appears to have yielded positive results. Note: This comment is saying nothing about his removal of this report or behavior outside of the article and associated talk page, but I believe those issues are better handled elsewhere. --Lithorien TalkChanges 01:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Huh? Your diff for resolution didn't even exist when I filed this report (and there's no way you couldn't have known that when you came here since you had only made it 11 minutes prior). "He's also agreed to leave the existing image and article alone in good faith" is not good faith since he only agreed to that after being notified on his talk page of this very notice (and responded with a personal attack, I might add... an accusation he is quick to constantly throw at others). In regards to everything else, none of that happened until after this was filed either! As for the deleting, that can/maybe will go to ANI later, ya. It wasn't part of the case (nor did I imply it was), I was merely pointing it out/reminding the user of it so as to prevent him attempting it again. While it's great you notified this board of the outcome, your post really is bizarre.Cebr1979 (talk) 02:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
...and I hadn't even noticed until now that Bjelleklang just recently blocked the reported user for edit warring as well.Cebr1979 (talk) 02:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Just an outside comment: "just recently" = over 13 months ago. only (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Oh, right! Didn't notice the year. Have stricken, thank you!Cebr1979 (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

User:79.27.106.92 reported by User:Binksternet (Result: )[edit]

Page: Santo & Johnny (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 79.27.106.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [21]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [22] – 19:13, 3 March. Restoring Nikka Costa after being reverted.
  2. [23] – 06:52, 4 March. Restoring Nikka Costa.
  3. [24] – 07:37, 4 March. Restoring Nikka Costa.
  4. [25] – 08:41, 4 March. Restoring Nikka Costa.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [26]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: None.

Comments:

With this edit on 1 March, Catania IP 82.53.45.90 began inserting Nikka Costa into this article. The Catania person changed to IP 79.27.106.92 on 3 March. Both IPs are promoting Nikka Costa, and the more recent one has inserted hoax material at the Nikka Costa biography, saying that her father was shot to death by a famous killer (rather than dying of chronic heart problems.) The hoaxing, the excessive promotion and the edit warring make this person disruptive to Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Mambojazz1 reported by User:Mscuthbert (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page
Isaiah Richardson Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Mambojazz1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 17:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "Again. Please READ THE ACTUAL ARTICLES!!!! Isaiah Richardson Jr's music has absolutely no relation to tourists. He has studied languages his entire life and grew up in Asia part of his life. He has been playing Jewish music since age 13 at Juilliard!"
  2. 16:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "missing information as well as false information"
  3. 16:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "added pertinate information. Still much missing"
  4. 19:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "Lies"
  5. 19:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "Lies"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 17:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "User warning for unconstructive editing found using STiki"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Reversion after User:Voceditenore gave final warning on user page. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

  • I am tempted to punt on this right now thanks to Voceditenore's fixes that have made a nice, readable stub. I'll leave the report open and if Mambojazz1 reverts it all back before the end of the day, I think a block could be considered. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 31 hours by User:Jayron32. EdJohnston (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

User:103.27.235.22, 103.27.235.24, 103.27.235.25 reported by User:Crovata (Result: Semi)[edit]

Page: Oghur languages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 103.27.235.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), 103.27.235.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), 103.27.235.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [27]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [28] - add of the pseudoscientific theory Sun Language Theory, IP 103.27.235.22
  2. [29] - same, but now IP 103.27.235.24
  3. [30] - same, but now IP 103.27.235.25
  4. [31] - 4th revert by IP 103.27.235.24
  5. [32] - placed speedy deletion template IP 103.27.235.24
  6. [33] - reverted template IP 103.27.235.25
  7. [34] - reverted template IP 103.27.235.22
  8. [35] - extended template IP 103.27.235.22
  9. [36] - 4th revert by IP 103.27.235.22
  10. [37] - 17th edit overall by IPs

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: none, only through edit summary, due to resemblance to a previous sockpuppets

Comments:There are used intentionally three different IPs so could evade block because of 3RR, and continue doing disruptive edits, like Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PavelStaykov#13 February 2016. The connections with a pseudoscientific theory, although are a real branch of Turkic languages, are based on OR and that Hunnic wasn't Turkic (similar POV like PavelStaykov socks).

User:Spirot67 reported by User:Ymblanter (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: The Daily Beast (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Spirot67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [38]
  2. [39]
  3. [40]
  4. [41]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [42], [43]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [44]
Crystal clear case of 3RR.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Comments:

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 24 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Macaque123 reported by User:Volunteer Marek (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Macaque123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [45]
  2. [46]

This article is under a 1RR restriction. When you click "edit this page" a big warning shows up which explicitly states "Editors are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction when reverting logged-in users on all pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. When in doubt, assume it is related, and don't revert." So the user is well aware of the restriction. They are also well aware of it because they've been notified [47].

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [48]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [49] and [50]. Five days, two threads, no response on talk.

Comments:

I'm also having trouble understanding the user's edit summaries which are close to being incomprehensible. In addition, the actual text changes and reverts, also mangle the grammar in the process.Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 24 hours for WP:1RR violation. This editor seems to be limited in their use of English, and this can make it hard for others to understand them. EdJohnston (talk) 21:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

User:71.174.132.60 reported by User:81.88.60.72 (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: Talk:Jewish Bolshevism (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 71.174.132.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. Editing talk pages. 81.88.60.72 (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
  2. [diff]
  3. [diff]
  4. [diff]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 3 days. I've also semiprotected Jewish Bolshevism and its talk page. Since this editor is hopping IPs in the range 71.174.0.0/16, a rangeblock may be needed. See discussion of a rangeblock at ANI. Some people have referred to this IP as an antisemitic troll, so whenever he reappears my guess is that most admins would consider his edits revertable on sight. (He has used the website of the holocaust-denier David Irving as a source for references). Besides the IP address reported here, he has also used 71.174.130.100 and 71.174.127.111. Let me know if you think the problem is continuing. EdJohnston (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


User:Driplivia reported by User:Uncle Milty (Result: )[edit]

Page
Aubrey McClendon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Driplivia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 17:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  2. 17:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  3. 17:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  4. 16:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 708438620 by ClueBot NG (talk)"
  5. 16:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "Revert vandalism"
  6. 16:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 708438159 by Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 17:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Aubrey McClendon. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

User:Ashur4ever reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: Indef)[edit]

Page
Kirkuk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Ashur4ever (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 04:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  2. 04:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  3. Consecutive edits made from 02:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) to 03:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 02:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Demographics */"
    2. 03:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    3. 03:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    4. 03:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    5. 03:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    6. 03:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    7. 03:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    8. 03:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    9. 03:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  4. Consecutive edits made from 23:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) to 23:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 23:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 23:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  5. Consecutive edits made from 23:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC) to 23:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 23:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Demographics */"
    2. 23:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    3. 23:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Demographics */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 04:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Kirkuk. (TWTW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

SPA POV edits on Kirkuk. Blanking, apparent vandalism, removal of sources. Will not stop. Dr. K. 04:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola.svg Blocked indefinitely – by User:Coffee per WP:NOTHERE. Unfortunately this verdict seems correct. The account seems to have been created for the purpose of ethnic edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


User:VanEman reported by User:Apriestofgix (Result: Warned)[edit]

Page
Frederick Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
VanEman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. Consecutive edits made from 00:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC) to 00:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 00:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 708143556 by Apriestofgix (talk) birth name usually mentioned in first line of early life."
    2. 00:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Early life */ Correct punctuation"
  2. 21:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Early life */ birth name Trumpf"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 00:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Frederick Trump */"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 00:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Trumpf */"
Comments:

User continues to make edits that have been discussed on the Talk page and not adopted due to a lack of sources, or conflicting sources that have resulted in not adding that content to the main article. Apriestofgix (talk) 00:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Apriestofgix has deleted referenced information about Trump when there was no agreement at all on the talk page. He has deleted information from the "career" section that was referenced and had to do with Trump's career. VanEman (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

User:152.208.64.38 reported by User:FA9295 (Result: )[edit]

Page
Untitled Unmastered (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
152.208.64.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 19:28, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
  2. 19:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  3. 19:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
  4. Consecutive edits made from 19:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC) to 19:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 19:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 19:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  5. 19:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Music and recording */"
  6. 19:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  7. 19:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
  8. Consecutive edits made from 19:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC) to 19:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 19:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
    2. 19:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
  9. Consecutive edits made from 19:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC) to 19:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 19:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 19:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    3. 19:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    4. 19:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Notes */"
  10. 19:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  11. Consecutive edits made from 18:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC) to 19:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 18:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Notes */"
    2. 18:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Notes */"
    3. 19:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  12. Consecutive edits made from 18:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC) to 18:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 18:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
    2. 18:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  13. Consecutive edits made from 18:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC) to 18:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 18:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 18:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    3. 18:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
    4. 18:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
  14. Consecutive edits made from 17:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC) to 17:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    1. 17:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 17:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Track listing */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Long list of edit warring/edit reverting that is currently sparking an edit war at Untitled Unmastered. Persistent addition of poorly sourced or unsourced content. Please note that the editor (IP) has been notified, but the warnings are not selected because they were warned by another user (so I can't select them). FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 19:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Comment: as the other editor involved, I've also reported the IP editor at WP:AIV. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 19:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Bangla1234 reported by User:Barek (Result: )[edit]

Page: Brahmanbaria District (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Bangla1234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 21:59, 5 March 2016‎ - Undid revision 708486195 by JJMC89
  2. 21:52, 5 March 2016‎ - Undid revision 708484240 by Barek
  3. 21:41, 5 March 2016‎ - ..
  4. 08:37, 5 March 2016‎ - Undid revision 708385473 by Oshwah
  5. 03:03, 5 March 2016‎ - Undid revision 708350942 by Yamaguchi先生

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Comments:

User engaged in edit warring over poorly sourced content. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Bleckter reported by User:Chueco23456 (Result: Both blocked 24h)[edit]

Page
White Latin Americans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Bleckter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [51]
  2. [52]
  3. [53]
  4. [54]
  5. [55]
  6. [56]
  7. [57]
  8. [58]
  9. [59]
  10. [60]
  11. [61]
  12. [62]
  13. [63]
  14. [64]
  15. [65]
  16. [66]
  17. [67]
  18. [68]
  19. [69]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [70]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [71]

[72]

Comments: the user is not only changing this but everything remotly related to white people in latin america

I did edit more than three times but because this guy is doing whatever he want, if i was wrong please ban me too

Comment: The diffs are from 2015 and the user was a sockpuppet. I put two warnings in his talk page and he ignored the first one. --Bleckter (talk) 01:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Comment: whatever you wanna say. you didnt aswer any of my concerns in the talk section or your talk section, but you still have time to warn me, anyhow the fists diffs are from 2015 those are the first ones you did, the last one are from this day, you change every article, " white argentine, white colombian, white mexican, argentine of european descent,..." remotly related to a white person living in latin america and you do not explain anything in the talk section, and the 3 reference that you use are from the same study, that is doubtfully serious because it say:"56% amerindian or european and amerindian, 44% completely european, where are the blacks? where are the asians?. and he or she deletes every other reference that prove him/her wrong --Chueco23456 (talk) 01:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
You didn't answer me in the talk page. --Bleckter (talk) 02:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours. I see no evidence that either user is a sock puppet. All I see is an edit war. Although some of the listed diffs are from 2015, there are many from now. The Talk page comments by both users were unhelpful.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Jrotismyhero reported by User:忍者ポップ (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: The 100 (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: