Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive32

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives


Contents

User:Pmanderson reported by User:Skyemoor (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Democratic-Republican_Party_(United_States) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Pmanderson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Most changes are compound changes, seemingly also intended to elude detection, so the references below are for the last change in each compound change set:


Time report made: Skyemoor 02:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments:There have been several points at which we had arrived at a consensus with Pmanderson|Septentrionalis, though invariably each time he returned to his original point. He has set others up for 3RR in the past (myself included), but immediately afterwards pretends to agree with a new consensus until his 4RRs become 'stale', then it's back to his same old tricks, at which he is quite accomplished. As he has set up others in edit wars, posted 4RR notices, and escaped unscathed, it is only fair that he face the same music himself and wear the badge he foists upon others. Then perhaps he will truly participate in collaborative editing, instead of drawing us (and yes, I am to blame too) into senseless lameness.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR"

I'm afraid this seems stale to me. If its continuing, you'll need to update it William M. Connolley 09:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

User:68.149.170.50 reported by User:joey2923 (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Kevin_Taft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) by annon user 68.149.170.50 reported by User:Joey2923

user has deleted notated information from page four times, each time without explanation. It has been put back up by me each time, with edit summaries attaching reasons for the information.

Joey2923 17:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


User:Room218 reported by User:Jjok (Result: prot)[edit]

Extensive three-revert rule violations on Kofun period (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Joseon Dynasty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and Korea under Japanese rule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and attempts of 3RR avoidance by editing from ip. User:Room218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) and his ip addresses (see detail: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Room218):

Kofun period (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Joseon Dynasty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Korea under Japanese rule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Time report made: 04:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

2006-11-12T20:17:48 Steel359 (Talk | contribs | block) m (Protected Kofun period: Edit warring [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) William M. Connolley 09:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Constantzeanu reported by User:Khoikhoi (Result:96 hours)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Romanians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Constantzeanu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 08:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments:
Please check his block log. Khoikhoi 19:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

96 hours.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Petervonpauer/User:207.181.10.71 reported by User:TodorBozhinov (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Georgi_Parvanov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Petervonpauer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 13:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

Fmt; Why is the IP the same? William M. Connolley 14:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean? It should be different perphaps? Also, please note two further Petervonpauer reverts: 17:27 and 18:28. The guy's now been blocked for over a month, so I guess this report doesn't really matter now, but we could have prevented the reverts earlier :) TodorBozhinov 18:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I mean, why is the IP the same person? How do I know? But as you say: 2006-11-13T15:35:38 Shreshth91 (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Petervonpauer (contribs)" with an expiry time of 1.34252 months (vandal - only) William M. Connolley 18:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I see, I had misunderstood you :) Well, it's an obvious sockpuppet — why would anyone else insert the same POV external links again and again? Possibly I should've brought this to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or somewhere else as it involves sockpuppetry, but anyway, it's been solved already. TodorBozhinov 19:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

User:68.219.13.28 reported by User:Xiliquiern (Result: 24h)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Association for Renaissance Martial Arts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 68.219.13.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 14:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: This article has been the frequent target of (ocassionally persistant) anonymous IP vandals who do nothing but revert the page. A long process of criticism citation and removal has been taking place on the talk page, and has been archived for viewing. Regardless of invitation, many IP vandals continue to make edits, but this is the first to knowingly break 3RR (see the user's talk page - they were invited to discuss the changes in the talk page and well warned of further reverts). The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts remains in its current vandalised state because further editing from myself will break my 3RR. However, I believe I may do so without persecution per WP:BLP, is that the case?

24h. Its better not to re-revert it yourself: is there really no-one else interested? William M. Connolley 15:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

  • There are a couple others, but they usually have relatively busy daily lives and only stop by once a day at most. I'll leave it for them. Also, do you think it may be worth semi-protecting the page? I would hate to do so, but I think only 1/20 anons do anything to improve the page. Thanks. - xiliquiernTalk 15:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

User:BenGibson reported by User:JereKrischel (Result:24h)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Arthur Jensen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). BenGibson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 18:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Blocked for 24 hours. Sasquatch t|c 02:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Anarcho-capitalism reported by User:Donnachadelong (Result:12h)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Mutualism (economic theory) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Anarcho-capitalism (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 20:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Not simply 3RR, but reverting to Original Research and POV-pushing. Request for Comment already opened.

  • 12 hour block, I don't see any earlier warnings (dealing strictly with the 3RR, the OR and POV is a diffferent issue). Sasquatch t|c 02:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
    • This was an improper block. Look at the claimed 4th revert. That was insertion of new content and was sourced. It was in the same general location so it looked like a revert if one didn't look closely, but it wasn't. How can I appeal this?Anarcho-capitalism 15:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Rottentomatoe reported by User:999 (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Rudolf Steiner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Rottentomatoe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):


Time report made: 20:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The 3rd "revert" was simply me trying to add something in. I was editing something I agreed with, yet adding alot of extra information. I was making an edit in the 3rd "revert" then it didn't come out like I intended, so I posted it differently.

The 4th "revert" was actually an attempt at a compromise. User Pete K, who originally made the addition I wanted to delete, told me to remove the information I agreed with and he'd consent to remove the information that I didn't agree with. User 999, who never made an original contribution to the article, then reverted.

The 6th "revert" is laughable. Again, there were several sentences on antisemitism that I agreed with, but only took it out because user Pete K said that he'd agree to have a long quote on "Jewry" taken out if I took out the sentences on antisemitism. Then the two meatpuppets put the Jewry quote back in. So I put the antisemitism sentences back in (since I was originally the person who took them out).

It may take a bit of investigation, but I think you'll clearly find that I only made 3 reverts.

Furthermore I would like to say that I never would have even made 3 reverts if I wasn't "pushed to the limit" from an obvious tag-teaming effort. I don't know if this is the place to do this, but I'd like to complain about user 999 and his partner in crime, Hanuman Das. They are obviously teaming up (I saw that they have a history of this) to circumvent the 3RR. Rottentomatoe 02:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Astrotrain reported by User:Calgacus (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Royal_Bank_of_Scotland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Astrotrain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

  • User is hostile to the Gaelic language of Scotland (e.g. "no need to use a foreign language" [1]), and the user is reverting on this page on the issue of the Gaelic name of the Bank. He wants either the Gaelic name out or a dispute tag if it's in, and was reverting to either of these two goals. Considers himself an experienced user, as you can see here, but the user has already been blocked 3 times for violations of 3RR, last time little more than a month ago. I am now one of three users he's been reverting; I had previously offered to him to pull out of the dispute, on two occassions, here and even on his talk page, but he ignored my offer in order to continue being a revert-warrior. I can't see what else can be done?! Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 21:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Time report made: 21:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Calmheads and his IP sock User:68.82.82.248 and his new sock User:Captkangaroo reported by User:JBKramer (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Free Republic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Calmheads (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)&68.82.82.248 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)&Captkangaroo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

3rr Warning --> [2]

Time report made: 22:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: After brokering an uneasy truce on the article, revertwarrior redlink shows up to revert to his preferred version, which violates NOR, NPOV, and RS. Wouldn't you know, that after warning revertwarrior redlink, some IP address favors his version also? JBKramer 22:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Melmoththewanderer reported by User:Interestingstuffadder (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Wellesley College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Melmoththewanderer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

3rr Warning --> [3]

Time report made: 23:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User just violated the three revert rule. Although she accused me of violating this rule, I did not. I had only 3 edits within 24 hour period.

User:Clamster5 reported by User:CyberGhostface (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on The_End_(A_Series_of_Unfortunate_Events) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Clamster5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 23:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User has frequently been reverting on this article for the last couple of days now.

Please provide diffs not versions. ViridaeTalk 21:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

User:163.221.125.141 reported by User:Reuben (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Dokdo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 163.221.125.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

User warned about 3RR: 22:15, 13 November 2006, continues reverting.

Time report made: 06:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Imposing Japanese POV in naming dispute, contrary to consensus.

User:Alyeska reported by User:Calton (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on User:Alyeska/Battlefield_2_Ranks (edit | [[Talk:User:Alyeska/Battlefield_2_Ranks|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Alyeska (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 06:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User is removing an MFD tag, calling it "reverting vandalism" and "Reverting unwanted edits of my PERSONAL PAGE." User is certainly aware of 3RR, given his last edit summary of 3rr doesn't apply to reverting vandalism. Of course it would be interesting to see the voice of the defense silenced by blocking them. A clear violation of any attempt at due process)

User:SlimVirgin reported by User:Kiyosaki (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Allegations of Israeli Apartheid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). SlimVirgin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Removal of Desmond Tutu information from the article. Mass revert erroneously titled "copy edit" when it involved significant content deletions of others' contributions.

  • 1st revert: [5]
  • 2nd revert: [6]
  • 3rd revert: [7]
  • 4th revert: [8]

Comment: This user appears hostile (as the violation is only one example) to presenting reliable sources to create the basis for the article, and seeks via POV to focus on critics instead to be the basis of the article. Whether or not this is deliberate is to be reviewed. However, I cannot believe that a mass revert of content can be called a "copyedit" because WP:copyedit does not refer to covering content reverts.

Time report made: 06:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The above was one edit and three reverts made on October 24. Kiyosaki has made this report because he has just violated 3RR himself and is trying to distract people's attention. SlimVirgin (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Diffs for the sake of clarity:

  • 1st edit (copy edit, which included moving a Desmond Tutu section) 09:54 Oct 24
  • Ist revert 20:10 Oct 24
  • 2nd revert 20:19 Oct 24
  • 3rd revert 20:23 Oct 24
  • My next edit restored the Tutu material that Kiyosaki complained had been moved during the three reverts. It was therefore a partial self-revert, not another revert. Kiyosaki has had this explained to him already several times, including in the edit summary. 22:17 Oct 24.

User:Kiyosaki report by SlimVirgin (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

3RR violation on Jewish lobby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) by Kiyosaki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Comments

Kiyosaki is a suspected sockpuppet who edits disruptively on a number of articles, and who has been warned about 3RR before and blocked for it once on November 9. [9] His attempt to report me for an October 24 3RR (which was one edit and three reverts) above, because he knew he had just violated 3RR himself, is his characteristic behavior. SlimVirgin (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

You are disruptive and you are deceptive in most of your edits. I am still learing about 3RR, and still maintain that my "revert" was an "edit", and you like to play games to hurt people. Please do not accuse others until you review your own conduct first. You flat out removed info about Desmond Tutu that I spent hours on including (with reiable sources/footnotes), and you removed it 4 times in 11 hours, because you are hostile and disruptive. Your actions above, speak for themselves and they continue. Thanks.Kiyosaki 07:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Before he created user:Kiyosaki, the same person made a few edits as Kyosaki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) without the i. One of his first edits, on October 22, was to warn another user about 3RR, [10] so he knows very well what it is. SlimVirgin (talk) 07:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Eleemosynary reported by User:Caper13 (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Rush Limbaugh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Eleemosynary (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Eleemosynary has been warned on their talk page multiple times in the past about the 3RR Rule (and has been blocked for 3rr violations in the past. Additionally they were warned today about Edit Warring and the 3RR rule on the Rush Limbaugh Talk page. [11] You can check their block log here [12]

Time report made: 07:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Here is typical entry on the talk page this person is making. Your stonewalling continues to be ridiculous. Your attempts to game the system and throw up procedural firewalls are laughable. That you ignore every reasoned argument is not the fault of your fellow editors. No one owes you further explanations. Eleemosynary 04:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC) This user continues to revert entries and has begin blanking other sections of the article they feel are objectionable as well.

Caper13 is, true to form, dissembling. Please note the above "11 reverts" are, in most cases, for different edits. The quote he has posted for me above needs to be considered in response to his behavior on the Rush Limbaugh Talk Page, in which he has displayed bad faith editing, obnoxious cheerleading, many attempts to "game the system," and many, many 3RR violations of his own (judging by his standard). He has also chosen to "pile on" on my Talk Page (in violation of WP:DICK), after I had been warned, politely, by Allen3. I have removed his troll bait from my page, and welcome an admin's thorough examination of this matter. Eleemosynary 02:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
This is the type of personal attack and distortion we are having to deal with. My only entry on her talk page was to inform Eleemosynary (as is is advised to do on this page) that I had reported her for 3RR violation. My entry to her talk page (which she reverted calling it troll bait) is here [13]. Eleseemosynary continues to revert entries on the page, having just made her 12'th edit in addition to those previously listed above. Can someone please address this ongoing issue. I would also welcome any Admin who wanted to examine this matter. Caper13 04:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
My latest edit was only after responding on the Talk Page, and was a different edit than my previous ones. Caper13 is dissembling once again. Caper13 has also shown a stubborn adversion to ANY input on the Talk Page which aims to include sourced criticism of Rush Limbaugh, or remove cheerleading. When she is called on it, she simply accuses others of "personal attacks." Not an uncommon event on political pages. Eleemosynary 04:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not going to fan the flames by defending myself point by point. I simply invite the Admin deciding this to examine all my statements and all of Eleseemosynary's statements on the Rush Limbaugh Talk Board and you can make up your own mind about what is going on there. [14] Caper13 04:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
By all means, take a look at what's going on at that Talk Page. And please note the "12th revert" listed above took place a day and a half after the supposed "1st revert." Eleemosynary 04:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Eleemosynary spent yesterday making WP:POINT edits to Rush Limbaugh. I reverted him a few times but he seems unreasonable and determined to make whatever point he is trying to make. --Tbeatty 04:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Please see Tbeatty's edit history on the Limbaugh page for further perspective. You may want to check out his Talk Page. It's one of the few pages on Wikipedia that is actually more contentious than my own. Tbeatty is logrolling here for Caper13. Such activity is common for ardent Limbaugh fans currently erasing all balance from the article page. Eleemosynary 14:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Jiang reported by User:Alan (Result: no block)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Pescadores (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Jiang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 07:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: This is not the first time this guy violates the 3RR rule. But because he himself is an admin, he kind of got out of it every time. Anyway, this time he clearly violated the 3RR rule. Furthermore, deleting things without discussion is a kind of vandalism, but he doesn't care.

You've forgotten the pre-version; but more importantly the 4th R is well outsied 24h William M. Connolley 09:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Mujeerkhan reported by User:Hkelkar (Result: 24h)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Tipu Sultan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Mujeerkhan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 10:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: The user is an abusive sock puppet master and has used his sockpuppets to violate 3RR on this article before. Checkuser is here.User has been trying to push a fanatic POV (for months) and is disrupting the scholarly efforts of several users to improve the article.Hkelkar 10:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

fmt properly please William M. Connolley 13:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. Dunno why this keeps happening. Hkelkar 14:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

24h William M. Connolley 20:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Rrfayette reported by User:Milo H Minderbinder (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Wikipedia:Notability (web) (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Notability (web)|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Rrfayette (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):


Time report made: 14:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User continues to revert to his edits, even though he's been warned multiple times not to engage in edit wars. This guideline has undergone major revisions, mostly at the hands of one new editor and with no regard for consensus.

User:68.9.116.87 reported by User:IronDuke (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Mel Gibson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 68.9.116.87 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

User:62.56.125.22 reported by User:DWaterson (Result:)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on University of Bedfordshire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 62.56.125.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 22:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments:


User:CyberGhostface reported by User:Clamster5 (Result: protection)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on The End (A Series of Unfortunate Events) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). User:CyberGhostface (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 23:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: A number of these edits don't follow the 3RR rules. Some of them are different edits, and one is simply reverting vandalism. Sorry. Also, Clamster5 has made several reversions as well if you check the history on the page.--CyberGhostface 23:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

They're all reverts, although one is to revert unrelated vandalism. Not counting that one, it still leaves 5. All the others are reverts of my edits to the page that are not vandalism. Clamster5 23:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

So in other words you falsely added an unrelated revert? And what, your reverts don't count? Surely you've broken the 3RR twice now, hmmm?--CyberGhostface 23:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I broke the rule. But that doesn't mean you didn't. I'll remove the revert that wasn't idential to the others. Happy? Clamster5 23:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Theres number 6. Clamster5 23:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC) and number 7. Clamster5 23:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

And another one for you. You can almost smell the hypocrisy.--CyberGhostface 23:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
You are aware that you've also broken it as well and that you have every chance that I do of getting blocked?--CyberGhostface 23:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Number 8. Clamster5 23:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Well done children: 2006-11-14T23:57:38 Steel359 (Talk | contribs | block) m (Protected The End (A Series of Unfortunate Events): Edit warring [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) William M. Connolley 09:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Thebee reported by User:Hanuman Das (Result: 8h)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Rudolf Steiner's views on race and ethnicity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Thebee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Time report made: 01:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

User:Eleemosynary reported by User:Allen3 (Result: 24h)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on Rush Limbaugh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Eleemosynary (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log):

Please note the "fourth revert" is an entirely different edit from the first three, and took place nearly 22 hours after the first one. Eleemosynary 15:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


Time report made: 04:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User has also received a warning about the 3RR rule [16]. --Allen3 talk 04:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Carbonate reported by User:IronDuke (Result: 8h)[edit]

Three-revert rule violation on List of concentration and internment camps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |