Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive323

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:TheTruthiness reported by User:Volunteer Marek (Result: Warned)[edit]

Page: Milo Yiannopoulos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TheTruthiness (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [1]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [2]
  2. [3]
  3. [4]
  4. [5]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [6]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [7]

Comments:

Straight forward 3RR violation, despite warning, with failure to engage in discussion talk. Related edit warring (also a 3RR vio) going on Ghostbusters (2016 film): [8], [9], [10], [11].Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned No reverts since last warning. Tell me if you see them do it again. John (talk) 13:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

User:195.128.1.28 reported by User:331dot (Result: Blocked 72 hours)[edit]

Page
Raphael Douady (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
195.128.1.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 10:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 732521872 by Melcous (talk)"
  2. 14:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 731943439 by Denisarona (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

This IP user has edit warred over maintenance tags, twice today, and more times on July 28th according to the page history. They have previously stated an intention to edit war after I made a general request for discussion on the dispute. 331dot (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 72 hours Katietalk 20:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

User:AcidSnow reported by User:Richard0048 (Result: No action)[edit]

Page: East Africa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: AcidSnow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [12]
  2. [13]
  3. [14]
  4. [15]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [16]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [17]

Comments:

The four reverts occurred during a period over more than 24 hours, but I do nonetheless apologize for it. I immediately recognized my mistake and completed a self revert. AcidSnow (talk) 22:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Can we assume discussion is now underway and edit warring has ceased? I'd rather not have to block anyone. --Laser brain (talk) 01:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The user has created a 3RR case in order to divert attention towards me. See my response to the alligations below in that case. The problem with the user is that this has been going on for a while now. The user AcidSnow has reverted my changes twice in another article within hours [18],[19]. Making it adding up to total 6 reverts within 24 hours. Therefore I think it would be appropriate in blocking the user with regard to the breach of the 3RR and overall behaviour. This a clear breach of the 3RR. Richard0048 (talk) 01:05, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
I am not diverting attention from myself as there would be no point in doing so since you have no case. Anyways, I do apologize and I have completed a self-revert on the article, as such I haven't broken 3RR per here: WP:3RRNO. Not only that, but the five (not six since one is actually removed through a self-revert which I also apologized for) reverts are on separate articles and occurred over a period of more than 24 hours. These reverts have also received support from multiple users. You, on the other hand, have not received any support for your changes on both articles, yet insist that you have (see here: [20]). By the way Laser brain, I am sure if spoke with any of the other users involved in this dispute that you'll get a strikingly different depiction of me. If you believe that's it's best for both parties to drop their reports, then let it be so. Please also see my statements below. AcidSnow (talk) 01:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Again this is about the incident of you breaching the 3RR. Regarding the dispute where you broke the 3RR, you did not dicuss why you reverted at first and there were only us two involved. In regard to the other dispute and article I created a case in the dispute resolutionboard and searched for outside opinions. You on the other hand might have been engaging in tag-team editing. Ofcourse the person who agrees with you wont say anything bad about you, leave that up to admins or impartial users. Richard0048 (talk) 02:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
I stated from the very beginning that "they are" in Eastern Africa (Egypt and Sudan). All these false accusations don't hurt me, but rather backfire on you, so kindly stop. Anyways, I have already shown you that I haven't broken 3RR (please above), so you have no case. There are other users that disagree with your definition of "East/ern Africa" (see here: Talk:Eritrea#Content_dispute) so don't claim that it's "only us two". As for your character assassination of Soupforone and the other users, it was highly uncalled for since they have done nothing wrong. AcidSnow (talk) 03:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Jessicat830 reported by User:Andrewbubba (Result: Malformed)[edit]

Page: Wallace Huo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jessicat830 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [21]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wallace_Huo&oldid=732195715
  2. 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wallace_Huo&oldid=732199647
  3. 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wallace_Huo&oldid=732060505
  4. 4 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wallace_Huo&oldid=732008253
  5. 5 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wallace_Huo&oldid=732532384
  6. 6 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wallace_Huo&oldid=732730123

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
Reverting changes made by different users who have made improvements to the article. Insisting that her version of the information is correct without support.

2404:E800:E60F:409:A5E3:9AD5:31F0:665F (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Andrewbubba -->
  • Result: No action. This report is malformed, since it is filed by an IP, but under the name of User:Andrewbubba. The filer should submit under their own name. Also there is no evidence that User:Jessicat830 was ever warned of 3RR or notified of this report. EdJohnston (talk) 04:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Richard0048 reported by User:AcidSnow (Result: Warned)[edit]

If this discussion needs to continue, it should do so elsewhere. EdJohnston (talk) 16:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Page: Eritrea (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page: East Africa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Richard0048 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

On Eritrea:
  1. Revision as of 13:46, 2 August 2016
On East Africa:
  1. Revision as of 22:11, 2 August 2016

Diffs of the user's reverts:

On Eritrea:
Today:
  1. Revision as of 11:13, 2 August 2016
  2. Revision as of 16:00, 2 August 2016
  3. Revision as of 16:32, 2 August 2016
28 July, 2016:
  1. Revision as of 10:54, 28 July 2016
25 July, 2016:
  1. Revision as of 11:14, 25 July 2016
16 July, 2016:
  1. Revision as of 07:16, 16 July 2016
  2. Revision as of 07:43, 15 July 2016
On East Africa:
Today:
  1. Revision as of 20:20, 2 August 2016
  2. Revision as of 21:04, 2 August 2016
  3. Revision as of 22:09, 2 August 2016

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: User Talk Page

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Eritrea Talk Page and East Africa Talk Page

Comments:

Although Richard0048 has not broken 3RR, they have yet to receive any support for their changes and are edit warring on both articles. Oddly enough, the user insist that he has received support. This user also has along standing issue in accepting consensus as shown in his prior reverts from throughout the month of July. They were previously blocked on 18 July by admin SilkTork for this exact reason. They also choose to forgo SilkTorks advice when told not make any edits before they received support. AcidSnow (talk) 23:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

I suggested that AcidSnow behaviour be looked upon, with regard to AcidSnow breaking the 3RR. This can be observed in the section above where I have created a case above and explained the breach of the 3RR by AcidSnow according to instructions for this template [22]. This is the users respons in diverting the attention towards me. Regarding the accusation I have in both articles engaged in discussion [23],[24], I have taken instructions from mentioned admin which can be seen in on the talk page[25], and also opened up a case in the dispute resolution noticeboard [26] where user AcidSnow has not been engaged in ( besides agreeing to what another user has written). I have also asked for outside opinions from a user [27] and a admin [28] in relation to the dispute AcidSnow is referring to, that has been going in for a month. In that period of time the user AcidSnow has been engaged in reverting my edits without discussing the reverting. In the second article the user AcidSnow has reverted changes twice within hours [29],[30]. Making it adding up to total 6 reverts within 24 hours. Richard0048 (talk) 01:05, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
I have discussed all my reverts (please see the respective talk pages: Talk:Eritrea and Talk:East Africa), so kindly stop with these false accusations. Not only that, but the five (not six since one is actually removed through a self-revert which I also apologized for, see here: [31]) reverts are on separate articles and occurred over a period of more than 24 hours. These reverts have also received support from multiple users. It's also not surprising that you choose not to respond to how you haven't accepted consensus on either article (which other users have told you) since you can't dispute it! Also, watch out for WP:FORUMSHOPING since it's exactly what you have been doing for over a month. These discussions have been ongoing for quiet sometime Laser brain; it's just that Richard0048 has refused to accept consensus and was previously blocked by an admin for it (see here: [32]). AcidSnow (talk) 01:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

───────────────────────── Richard, as AcidSnow correctly points out, SilkTork already asked you politely to desist with the personal attacks. He also indeed clearly instructed you to confine your editing to the talk page [33], which you have been reluctant to do. Please at least try and respect the website policy. Soupforone (talk) 03:06, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Given the information I provided EdJohnston should consider in warning the other part aswell, that type of behaviour should not be overlooked. I have engaged in discussion as you mentioned. AcidSnow should also be encouraged to discuss instead of just disagreeing with my edits. User soupforone and AcisSnow should stop the possible tag-teaming. Bad behaviour should not be supported. .Richard0048 (talk) 09:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

───────────────────────── Richard, SilkTork specifically instructed you to desist from personal attacks and confine your editing to the talk page, neither of which you did. And that's after he had already blocked you and given you a second chance. So don't blame myself, AcidSnow or EdJohnston for taking umbrage at that. Soupforone (talk) 15:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Although I have done nothing wrong, we can't say the same about you (see the replies above). Plus I have been involved in all these discussions, so once again kindly stop with these false accusations. Unless you have any supporting diffs for your claims of "tag-teaming", it's best that you drop it. Anyways, this discussion has already been closed, so please wait for the Archive Bot to move it. I do hope to see you at Talk:Eritrea as well. AcidSnow (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:121.154.39.153 reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Page
Red Bull (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
121.154.39.153 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 10:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Endorsements */"
  2. 09:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Endorsements */ no athletic ability and is not a sport"
  3. 09:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Endorsements */ not a legitimate sport because it requires no athletic ability like Hockey, Football, or Soccer"
  4. 09:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Endorsements */ not a legitimate sport"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 09:56, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Red Bull. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Continual removal of sourced material, supported only by opinion, and in the face of other editors' advice. Muffled Pocketed 10:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

There was an identical edit on 21 July with the same edit summary here. I (and others) have attempted to engage the IP at his talk-page but despite various explanations, removals have continued Eagleash (talk) 10:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Dictionary.com definitions are not "opinions", they are verified facts. 121.154.39.153 (talk) 10:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment It is listed under 'endorsements' not 'sports'. The dictionary definition is not being used in the correct context & to justify POV. Eagleash (talk) 11:13, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. Straight-forward 3RR, was warned prior. Kuru (talk) 11:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Elitropia reported by User:Ilovetopaint (Result: Blocked 24 hours)[edit]

Page: List of psychedelic rock artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Elitropia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [34]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. diff
  2. diff
  3. diff
  4. diff

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: link

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: diff

Comments:

  • Continuous edits from Elitropia that infringe upon WP:SYNTH and WP:RS. Many artists on the page are sourced to user-generated sites, which goes against WP:ALBUM/SOURCE. For artists who are properly sourced, most of them fail to use the terms "psychedelic rock" or "neo-psychedelia". Some of them say that an artist is "psychedelic"... but that's not "psychedelic rock" or "neo-psychedelia". I had already addressed this a month ago in the talk page after I added {{cite-check}} (the edit warring only began today).--Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Further discussion with editor shows that he/she has no understanding of WP:VERIFY [35]--Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours - Also per WP:ROLLBACK, this edit was found to be an improper use of the tool; I have therefore revoked the editor's privileges until they request them at a point 6 months or more from now. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Rodionos reported by User:HighKing (Result: Three-revert rule not applicable)[edit]

Page: Time series database (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Rodionos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [36]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [37]
  2. [38]
  3. [39]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [40]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: There is no discussion on the article Talk page. See comments below.

Comments:

I haven't discussed this on the article Talk page, but I have tried to engage with this editor several times on their own Talk page to no avail. By way of background, the editor appears to have taken exception at my removal of mentions of non-notable companies from this article, one of which was Axibase. An article on Axibase was CSD'd by me previously and removed by an admin. In response, this editor is now trying to remove all the edits they made previously to this article. -- HighKing++ 18:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Formation1234 reported by User:GetSomeUtah (Result: No violation)[edit]

Page: Petra Marklund (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Formation1234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [diff]https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petra_Marklund&diff=732672732&oldid=725969458
  2. [diff]https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petra_Marklund&diff=prev&oldid=732376318
  3. [diff]
  4. [diff]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Formation1234#Edit_Warring_on_Petra_Marklund_.28aka_September.29

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Petra_Marklund#Intro_to_Article_.2F.2F_Edit-warring

As noted in the guidelines, the 3R's don't need to be invoked for action. Formation1234 has a well-established pattern of edit-warring at this point.

Best regards,

GetSomeUtah (talk) 01:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

User:AKJatt reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: Blocked 31 hours by Jayron32 )[edit]

Page
Inter-Services Intelligence (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
AKJatt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 11:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC) "Let the Administrators decide, thankstalk User:AKJatt"
  2. 10:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC) "information you need"
  3. 05:08, 5 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 732944039 by SantiLak (talk)"
  4. 07:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 732926026 by Spartacus! (talk)"
  5. 05:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 13:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Inter-Services Intelligence. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Repeatedly reintroducing WP:OR. No discussion despite advice / warning fromm multiple editors. It may well be possible to incorporate elements of the material, but, obviously this is not the way to do it. He has been told that not only was he edit-warring , but editing disruptively, to little avail. Note, a discussion also took place on my talk-page, where he was advised in a similar manner by an uninvolved editor. Muffled Pocketed 10:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

LOL, no worries DatGuy! Muffled Pocketed 11:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Edit Warrior attempted to remove this report. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Blocked 31 hours. --Jayron32 12:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Mr.User200 reported by User:EkoGraf (Result: )[edit]

Page: Aleppo offensive (June–August 2016) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mr.User200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [43]
  2. [44]

Diff of edit warring / 1RR warning: [45]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: There were both attempts at the article's talk page [46] and his own talk page [47].

Comments:
The Aleppo offensive (June–August 2016) is under a general 1RR policy for all Syrian civil war-related articles. User Mr.User200 made two reverts of my edits (including removal of sources I added twice). As seen in the link I provided above ([48]) I warned him he broke 1RR. In addition, I asked him to discuss the issue instead of edit warring (also tried talking about the issue at the article's talk page as well) and I also asked him to cancel his second revert of me so we could discuss the issue, instead he said I should report his violation and showed no signs of regret for violating 1RR, implying he would do as many reverts as necessary so the article would be in accordance with his POV. PS The editor in question was already blocked once recently for edit warring and violating 3RR at another article. EkoGraf (talk) 21:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

User:45.116.182.59 reported by User:Junior5a (Result: IP and TJH2018 blocked)[edit]

Page
Women's Institutes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
45.116.182.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 02:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "revert unexplained edit that added trivia, most of which is unreferenced"
  2. 02:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "revert unhelpful and unexplained edit"
  3. 02:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "please stop adding such trivia, the bulk of which is unsupported"
  4. 02:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "again, please stop adding unreferenced trivia"
  5. 02:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "please stop adding unreferenced content, most of which is trivia"
  6. 02:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "please stop adding unreferenced content"
  7. 02:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "revert addition of unreferenced content. The apparent 'references' to not support the content"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 02:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Women's Institutes. (TW)"
  2. 02:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Women's Institutes. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

As the main editor involved here, I would like to state that this is an Indian IP, so a general understanding of enwiki and its policies are unlikely at this point in time. I mean, come on. It's just getting stupid at this point...TJH2018talk 02:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Please note that user TJH2018 is repeatedly adding trivia, of which the bulk is unreferenced. They have also made personal attacks & abuse, see [49] & [50]. And as you can see above is now making anti-Indian comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.116.182.59 (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
  • I do not believe that Indian IPs come with a stamp in their Wikipassport that acknowledges they don't know the rules. I might add that it takes two to edit-war, and that the content removed by the IP was indeed chatty, unverified, promotional, etc. I don't know which one of these two should be blocked by the next passing admin, but I do know that the one is not necessarily worse than the other for being an Indian IP. Drmies (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
I also know that Indian IP's come with a history of complications, and I came into this with an open view. No bias intended. TJH2018talk 03:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours Both parties were enthusiastically edit warring, with TJH2018 aggravating the problem by assuming that Indian IPs don't deserve the same consideration as everybody else. Acroterion (talk) 03:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

User:500ГОДИНИСТИГАТ reported by User:Crovata (Result: )[edit]

Page: Kutrigurs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 500ГОДИНИСТИГАТ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [51]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 3 August - user created new short section titled "Origin"
  2. 5 August - 1st revert
  3. 5 August - 2nd revert, threatens due my sanction
  4. 5 August - 3rd revert, disruptive edit by which the sourced information was removed from the appropriate section, reference style, to the initial revision on 3 August
  5. 6 August - 4th revert, according to the talk page, while it is exactly opposite of what was said on the talk page

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Kutrigurs#Origin

Comments:The article is under protection since 5 April 2016 until 5 April 2018 due to persistent disruptive editing by sock-puppets by User:PavelStaykov (investigation archive). The same information was written on the talk page on 12 July by IP 84.40.95.172. The information pattern is the same as of the previous socks - WP:FRINGE, WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. However, as the IP could not edit the article due to protection, most probably the new account is in relation to the previously mentioned IP. The edit information by the account, as I explained on the talk page, is wrongly cited, placed in the wrong section, and includes a typical example of SYNTH, while in the same time ignoring the actual mention of the subject in the source. In the end, for the first time found out the existence of both etymological theories, implying their very minor consideration in the mainstream scholarship, meaning the account edit violates the WP:WEIGHT. However, although the information was properly edited and included in the article, it was reverted. As can be seen from the account reaction on my replies (and his removal of my comment), there's some hidden intention behind the account edits. I won't revert the current revision to mine revision due to the fear of being blocked per 1RR arbitration enforcement sanction.--Crovata (talk) 05:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


User:Vaza12 reported by User:Messiaindarain (Result: )[edit]

Page: Bengali Muslims (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Vaza12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [diff]https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bengali_Muslims&type=revision&diff=732957015&oldid=732942593

Previous diffs:

  1. [diff]https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bengali_Muslims&type=revision&diff=732488315&oldid=732463259


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bengali_Muslims&type=revision&diff=732637465&oldid=732624396

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVaza12&type=revision&diff=732641334&oldid=732619435

Comments:

I have tried to contact and settle the issue with the user on his/her talk page, but he/she has not responded to the requests. Rather he/she has used unprofessional language to revert my edits. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVaza12&type=revision&diff=732641334&oldid=732619435). Note how he uses a flowery language (without any links) to push a possible POV agenda:

"Sufi spiritual traditions are central to the Bengali Muslim way of life. The most common Sufi ritual is the Dhikr, the practice of repeating the names of God after prayers. Sufi teachings regard the Prophet Muhammad as the primary perfect man who exemplifies the morality of God. Sufism is regarded as the individual internalization and intensification of the Islamic faith and practice. The Sufis played a vital role in developing Bengali Muslim society during the medieval period."

See more at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bengali_Muslims&type=revision&diff=732957015&oldid=732942593. Frankly this is too much jargon for one editor to manage.

His/her previous mass removal of content has disturbed the structure of the article. In my opinion, he/she should be blocked from further edits for at least 3 months if not a year.Messiaindarain (talk) 05:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC) -->

User:Sangavitamilmani reported by User:Kailash29792 (Result: )[edit]

Page
Vazhkai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Sangavitamilmani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. Consecutive edits made from 12:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC) to 12:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
    1. 12:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 12:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC) ""
    3. 12:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC) ""
  2. 06:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 08:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC) "Notification: speedy deletion nomination of File:Vazhkai 1949 Film Poster .jpg. (TW)"
  2. 10:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC) "Notification: speedy deletion nomination of File:Vazhkai 1949 Release Poster .jpg. (TW)"
  3. 10:04, 5 August 2016 (UTC) "Notification: speedy deletion nomination of File:Vidivelli Release Poster .jpg. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Keeps uploading an improperly licensed version of Vazhkai 1949.jpg and never communicates. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

User:86.186.73.141 reported by User:ThePlatypusofDoom (Result: Blocked 31 hours)[edit]

Page
Talk:Electronic harassment (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
86.186.73.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 12:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733246795 by ThePlatypusofDoom (talk)"
  2. 12:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733246726 by ThePlatypusofDoom (talk)"
  3. 12:57, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733246511 by ThePlatypusofDoom (talk)"
  4. 12:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733246264 by Sro23 (talk)"
  5. 12:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733242494 by GB fan (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 12:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 12:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by 86.186.73.141 (talk): Ignore the WP:PROFRINGE editor, please. (TW)"
  2. 12:57, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by 86.186.73.141 (talk): Let's ignore the conspiracy theorist. (TW)"
  3. 12:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by 86.186.73.141 (talk) to last revision by ThePlatypusofDoom. (TW)"
Comments:
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 31 hoursfoxj 13:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

User:92.0.27.29 reported by User:71.35.131.7 (Result: Page protected)[edit]

Page: Galkayo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 92.0.27.29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [52]
  2. [53]
  3. [54]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [55]

Comments:

He is putting a false claim on Wikipedia. This is the false claim: The city is divided into two zones, where the main portion forms part of Galmudug state, the Suusacley (Israac) district is governed by the Puntland administration.[1][2]

The source he provided was checked and it did not contain his claim. He is putting false information on Wikipedia.

References

  1. ^ Abdul Latif Dahir, Suleiman Abdullahi (3 April 2011). "Galkayo: A peaceful island in Somalia". Africa Review. Retrieved 9 June 2013.
  2. ^ "Somalia: Puntland businessman elected new Galkayo mayor". Garowe Online. 27 August 2009. Retrieved 9 June 2013.
  • Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected Both IPs warned before I saw this report. NeilN talk to me 18:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

User:50.183.99.254 reported by User:Feinoha (Result: 48 hours)[edit]

Page
Bexar County, Texas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
50.183.99.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 19:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733430500 by Feinoha (talk)"
  2. 19:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733429640 by Gus Polly (talk)"
  3. 19:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733425957 by Gus Polly (talk)"
  4. 18:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 733023915 by Gus Polly (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 19:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Bexar County, Texas. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Keeps removing the pronunciation of this without discussion. Has been both asked to discuss and warned. Feinoha Talk 19:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 48 hours. Simple 3RR, was warned. Likely long term editing warring as well. Kuru (talk) 19:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Yaysmay15 reported by User:TagaSanPedroAko (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: 2013 in the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Yaysmay15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [56]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [57]
  2. [58]
  3. [59]
  4. [60]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [61]

Comments:
The article 2013 in the Philippines is subject to edit-warring by Yaysmay15 repeatedly because of reverting removals of non-notable, redundant, routine, and "over-hyped" events. Hariboneagle927 keeps on reverting Yaysmay15's edits, but one reverted, he reverts them again. Hariboneagle927 even warned him on this diff, but still continued to come back reverting his removals, as in this diff.

Yaysmay15 has also other edit-warring cases, mostly on years in the Philippines articles, like 2014 in the Philippines articles. But no one reported that user for edit-warring with other users on those articles.-TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I attest to this. I've been warning the user and asked the user to explain his edits but did not listen to such request after all or don't even bother to comment in anyway where I could have any hint on their position on their edits. I can only guess why they keep on insisting on reverting problematic edits, that they want to include any widely-covered events nationally (in the Philippines), no matter how it is WP:ROUTINE or overhyped silly season (such as the case of the "mystery death" of Nicole Ella during the New Year's Eve; which is caused by a stray bullet and its not uncommon to have stray-bullet deaths in the country during this period.)Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
I agree, as His edits are primarily targeted on "XXXX in the Philippines " articles, and the user doesn't even place edit summaries to explain the edits, and the events he has been adding/re-adding, once reverted, is beyond the consensus of the Tambayan Philippines community that events in XXXX in the Philippines articles should be notable enough or not routine. User:Hariboneagle927 is very serious about this matter, but Yaysmay15 would not listen to any warning by other users, like him. He has been edit-warring with Hariboneagle927 and seems to be reverting his edits in violation of WP:3RR, and seems to be making "XXXX in the Philippines" articles a summary of nationally-covered events, whether routine or non-notable (in violation of WP:NOTNEWS, WP:ROUTINE and WP:NOTABLE). I suppose Yaysmay15 should be blocked for a week or a month to stop those editing behaviors, that seems to violate those mentioned policies.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 06:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Although the user has been temporarily blocked for 48 hours which I assume is related to this case. A new user with a similar name has continued to make similar edits. Yays Falcunitin which has a strikingly similar name to blocked user, Vince daryl falcunitin who has a similar editing history. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vince daryl falcunitin.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Mauro Lanari reported by User:PeterTheFourth (Result: Stale)[edit]

Page: Red pill and blue pill (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mauro Lanari (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [62]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. reinserting content after removal no. 1
  2. no. 2
  3. no. 3
  4. no. 4

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [63]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [64]

Comments:

Mauro Lanari has also been inserting this content on The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (2013 film) and attempting to edit war for it to remain there. Pinging Gothicfilm and Grayfell, who have been dealing with this editor. PeterTheFourth (talk) 06:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Correct diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [65] --Mauro Lanari (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting oppose.svg Stale and seems to be a non-issue now. Conversation occurred and agreement was reached. Laser brain (talk) 16:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

User:198.200.64.245 reported by User:PGWG (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page
Yuliya Yefimova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
198.200.64.245 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 16:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Doping scandals */"
  2. 15:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Doping scandals */"
  3. 15:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "/* 2016 Olympics controversy */"
  4. 15:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "/* 2016 Olympics controversy */"
  5. 15:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Doping scandals */"
  6. 15:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Doping scandals */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 15:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Yuliya Yefimova. (TW)"
  2. 15:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Yuliya Yefimova. (TW)"
  3. 15:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Final warning notice on Yuliya Yefimova. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 15:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "/* Doping controversy */ new section"
Comments:

Initially looked like simple vandalism/using main article as a talk page/soapbox, however continues to add the same material despite reversion from a number of editors. PGWG (talk) 16:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

User:LouisAragon reported by User:HyeSK (Result: Filer Warned)[edit]

Page: Yerevan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: LouisAragon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [66]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [67]
  2. [68]
  3. [diff]
  4. [diff]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [69]

Comments:

  • Likely WP:BOOMERANG here, I've already reported the filer for edit warring and he's reported the user reverting his edits here. I don't see any violation here. Class455fan1 (talk) 00:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • HyeSK, take note. NeilN talk to me 23:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned NeilN talk to me 23:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

User:HyeSK reported by User:Class455 (Result: HyeSK is warned per another report)[edit]

Page
Yerevan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
HyeSK (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. [70] 8 August 2016
  2. [71] 8 August 2016
  3. 15:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Reverted back to Western Armenian. I have also had another agree with me on this change and I backed it with solid arguments."
  4. 22:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC) "Changed back to Western Armenian"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 16:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three revert rule on Yerevan. (TW)
  2. 16:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Yerevan. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Still edit warring with different users despite being previously warned without reaching a consensus with other users (even though he claims one person agrees with him).This time, it's on Yerevan. It's clear to see that this user hasn't learned from his previous warning, therefore he's being reported again. Class455fan1 (talk) 16:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

It's not a claim, wiseguy. Look in the edit history and you will see a user clearly telling Yerevantsi he agrees with me. HyeSK (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK

HyeSK is a single-purpose user. His response to my calls to discuss the matter in the talk page was: "I will be reverting them back". He should be blocked for edit-warring. His editing is simply disruptive. --Երևանցի talk 08:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

I am not at all a single purpose user. I am here to put in place the truth and to improve Wikipedia. One of those improvements involves providing information to increase knowledge, specifically on Armenian articles. Armenian includes two primary dialects of Eastern and Western Armenian. Pages referring only to one dialect as "Armenian" are misleading, as that portrays only one dialect as the sole dialect of the language. If we are here to improve Wikipedia, denying this fact only hinders that cause. HyeSK (talk) 09:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK

@HyeSK: This is not the place for you to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. You have to work together with other editors in a civil fashion. Muffled Pocketed 09:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: - Forgive me, but how is me stating their are two major dialects "RIGHTGREATWRONGS"? It's simply a fact.HyeSK (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
If you're here to improve Wikipedia, why don't you stop edit warring and bring this dispute to a talk page. Even though there is one, you're still edit warring! You have to realise edit warring is highly disruptive and because you continue to do so, you find yourself being brought here again, HyeSK. Class455fan1 (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

The one edit warring is the one who reverted my edits. Yerevantsi was warned about edit warring a month ago for the same reverts. The information I added only adds to the quality of the article. I have added this to the talk page on Yerevan's article:

Armenian language The Armenian language has two primary dialects - Eastern and Western. Eastern Armenian is spoken primarily in Armenia, Russia, Georgia, and Iran. The other major populations of Armenians around the world are speakers of the Western dialect. These nations include the U.S., France, UK, Germany, Brasil, and Argentina among many others. In the current day and age, the two dialects use different spellings for various words, and many times completely different words for the same topic. Eastern Armenian has been highly permeated by the Russian language while Western Armenian and Krapar (Classic Armenian) have not. Also, the Eastern Armenian alphabet has been modified at various times under Russian and Soviet rule, with various letters being modified or completely removed to "Russify" the language.

I, on various wikipages, have added the Western Armenian spelling to the pages, as it is relevant to proper understanding of the Armenian language. Listing only one dialect (Eastern) as the language Armenian (hy) is dishonest and disingenuous. It provides an incorrect understanding of the language. My edits are providing a greater understanding - is this not what we are all here to do?

The arguments from two wikiusers are that Western Armenian is not the official language of Armenia (neither is Eastern Armenian - Armenian is the official language) or that Eastern is more widely spoken (which is in fact false). Since when do either of these reasons negate the relevance of a language? And, since when do false arguments hold weight? HyeSK (talk) 09:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyeSK (talkcontribs)

This user had no understanding of Wikipedia policies. Instead of reaching a consensus on the talk page he prefers edit warring. He has one mission here: to make Western Armenian relevant in places where it isn't. Furthermore, he does not seem to be competent in the matter as he confuses different spellings of Armenian with its standardizes forms/dialects. --Երևանցի talk 09:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


Yerevansti - It is clear you do not have a solid grasp of the Armenian language or it's history. There are two (2) standardized forms of the Armenian language - Western and Eastern. This is a fact which anyone is able to easily find. Your arguments are false and have no weight. And, how is Western Armenian "not relevant" when writing in forms of the Armenian language? Please, explain this. I have entered a section in on the talk page of the article, which is posted above.HyeSK (talk) 09:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK

And you don't seem to understand that Երեւան is not the "Western Armenian spelling" but the spelling in the classical/traditional orthography. Iranian Armenians speak Eastern Armenian, but use the aforementioned spelling. Is it really that hard to understand that Western Armenian ≠ classical spelling. --Երևանցի talk 22:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Ajax1995 reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: Page protected)[edit]

Page
Kanye West (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Ajax1995 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  • Please note: Reverts 1 and 2 occurred after edit-warring user was warned about this report.
  1. 17:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "(Almost 200, 000 bites to explain a bunch of irrelevant facts, The Beatles article has much less content that this, filled up with 6 million quotes. Wikipedia is not his Diary Book)"
  2. 16:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Wikipedia no needs for that kind of improperly content, that nothing adds to an ENCYCLOPEDIA, we are not his fan site or the Kanye West Official Website, the removed content are fan TRIVIA, Stop!)"
  3. 16:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "What's wrong with this guy, please, build your own Kanye West fan site, you can add all those twitter feuds, misogynist offenses, non-sense behaviours and all of that USELESS content."
  4. 16:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Stop your SARCASTIC behaviour and stop your irresponsible editings. I do not have the enough free time to revert again and again such irresponsible editions by this kind of person. Build your own West fan site. Stop vandalism an Encyclopedia"
  5. 15:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Basta, Stop relocating this oversourced bad content "I'm a vessel, and God has chosen me to be the voice and the connector." "Taylor might still have sex/Why?/I made that bitch famous" it is ANNOYING"
  6. 15:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision by this person, STOP vandalizing and relocating UNENCYCLOPEDIC, IMPROPERLY, BAD WRITING, REDUNDANT AND FANDOM CONTENT! WHICH which noboy cares but you!"
  7. Consecutive edits made from 13:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC) to 15:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
    1. 13:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Reverting addition of stupid content by some jerk fan, "I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex/Why?/I made that bitch famous" Stop adding this kind of shit! Wikipedia in not your fan site"
    2. 13:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Reverting addition of stupid content by some jerk fan, "I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex/Why?/I made that bitch famous" Stop adding this kind of shit! Wikipedia in not your fan site"
    3. 14:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Trim the associated acts, not according to Wikipedia´s policy"
    4. 14:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "More stupid content added by this West fan"
    5. 14:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Improperly/fan content in the Lead / excessive detail"
    6. 14:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "This article is filled up with irrelevant /peacock quotes, please add this chit chat to your West fan page or Wikiquote, SERIOUSLY"
    7. 14:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "And again this guy oversourcing this RIDICULOUS AND IMPROPERLY content "I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex/ Why? I made that bitch famous.""
    8. 14:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "This article needs a detailed clean up, it is filled up "AD NAUSEAM". Wikipedia is a serious online Encyclopedia, formal content, competent administrators. no need for this shameful "sourced" stuff"
    9. 14:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "Shameful Never-ending Twitter feuds, which nobody cares but the fandom. Intricate detail for a single fact. OVERSOURCING/OVERDETAILING multiple irrelevant felony charges"
    10. 15:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "STOP! relocating this NON-SENSES "I'm a vessel, and God has chosen me to be the voice and the connector.""
    11. 15:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC) "UNACCEPTABLE in Wikipedia. Advertising, promotional chit chat. My new high-top boots line has a glow in the dark sole....... blah, blah, blah.....This is already becoming ridiculous."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Repeated mass removals of sourced content. Massive edit-warring. Attacking edit-summaries. Will not stop. Dr. K. 16:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes to the above, I've directed the user to the Talk page several times to no avail. GentleCollapse16 (talk) 16:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

  • I was going to report both users myself - Both users have taken up the entire history with this pathetic warring, Both users have been here since 2011 and 2012 respectively so therefore should know better and should know edit summaries don't count as a talkpage!, Both haven't discussed it at all and therefore should be blocked. –Davey2010Talk 17:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • I was thinking about that point myself but then I chose not to report the second user since s/he was restoring a large chunk o