Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive326

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:Rupaulisgreat reported by User:CCamp2013 (Result: Blocked 24 hours)[edit]

Page: RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Rupaulisgreat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [1]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [2]
  2. [3]
  3. [4]
  4. [5]
  5. [6]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [7]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [8]

Comments:
The user also replied on the talk page here. Chase (talk) 00:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Hopefully time enough to change their attitude. NeilN talk to me 00:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Starbucks6789 reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: Blocked 24 hours)[edit]

Page
Bad Girls Club (season 16) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Starbucks6789 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. Consecutive edits made from 02:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC) to 02:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 02:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 02:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Duration of cast */"
  2. Consecutive edits made from 00:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC) to 00:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 00:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 00:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Original Bad Girls */"
  3. 23:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  4. Consecutive edits made from 20:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC) to 20:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 20:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Original Bad Girls */"
    2. 20:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Duration of cast */"
  5. Consecutive edits made from 12:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC) to 12:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 12:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 12:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Original Bad Girls */"
  6. Consecutive edits made from 22:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC) to 22:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 22:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Original Bad Girls */"
    2. 22:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Duration of cast */"
  7. Consecutive edits made from 19:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC) to 19:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 19:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Original Bad Girls */"
    2. 19:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Duration of cast */"
  8. Consecutive edits made from 19:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC) to 19:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 19:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Original Bad Girls */"
    2. 19:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Duration of cast */"
    3. 19:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Duration of cast */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 01:08, 12 September 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Bad Girls Club (season 16). (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 23:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Page needs to have full names. */"
  2. 00:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Page needs to have full names. */"
  3. 01:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Page needs to have full names. */"
Comments:

Edit warring over spelling of Adryan/Ad'Ryan. User was warned and claimed they'd continue to edit war anyway ([9]).

The Bad Girls Club pages are plagued with tendentious editors and socks (which is why all seasons but 16 are indefinitely semi protected). EvergreenFir (talk) 05:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours EvergreenFir, you made me watch a trailer for this show. That's almost block-worthy. NeilN talk to me 05:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Kintetsubuffalo reported by User:GWFrog (Result: Malformed report)[edit]

Page

User being reported

On 28 July I posted an edit to the Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps article that, after 89 years of continuous activity,the corps had not taken the field in 2016. No ref cite was added because, at that time, nothing had been published about this. My intent was to add a cite as soon as one was available.

On 30 July [[[User:Kintetsubuffalo]] reverted my edit with only the comment, "last clean edit"... I did not notice the edit on my Watchlist until 19 August, when I reverted his edit with the comment "reverted to my prior"...

About 2 hours later, User:Kintetsubuffalo reverted my edit with the comment, "not without citation", finally giving a rationale for his reversions... He then proceeded to make a series of improper edits on the page (capitalizing all words in section headings) so that his reversion was buried under several other edits.

On that same day, in the August 19, 2016 issue of Drum Corps World, the first published mention was made of the Racine Scouts' inactivity, with the magazine's publisher lamenting the corps' demise... I went to the Wiki-page to add the ref cite and found User:Kintetsubuffalo's multiple edits. As soon as I began reverting the improper edits with the comment "reverted intermediate edit to get to earlier edit", ppUser:Kintetsubuffalo]] did another revert, commenting "as I said, find a cite. until then, I am watching this". Since my intent was to add said cite, I continued, leaving an edit stating that, "In the Summer of 2016, after eighty-nine years of continuous activity, the Racine Scouts quietly went inactive." To this I added the reference [1] along with the edit comment "added ref cite".

On 8 September User:Racine1927 edited my statement to read, "In 2016. the Racine Scouts decided to not to participate in DCI Summer Music Games." User:Racine1927 left my ref cite in place and made the edit comment "We have not folded. Correcting". To verify that the corps has not folded, I visited the corps' website and saw that there has been recent activity after it had sat idle for the previous year. In order to bring the text and the ref cite more-or-less into agreement, I reworded the text to "In 2016.after eighty-nine years of continuous activity, the Racine Scouts did not take the field." This made no unsupported claims while giving the known facts.

On 11 September, User:Kintetsubuffalo once again reverted my edit to User:Racine1927's edit, while still leaving my ref cite. His edit comment was " I _knew_ you were full of it!"

I then left the edit comment, "reverted to neutral statement as per ref cite" and posted the following on User talk:Kintetsubuffalo: Would you care to explain how my making a neutral-toned factual edit with a reference citation makes me "...full of it..."? I stated that "...after eighty-nine years of continuous activity, the Racine Scouts did not take the field." This is the facts as they are known. The corps has made no comment as to why it did not field. So little has been said about the corps not fielding that Steve Vickers, the editor and publisher of Drum Corps World lamented the corps' passing in an editorial. That editorial is the reference that I cited to back up my statement. You left my cite in place for your claim that "...the Racine Scouts decided to not to participate in DCI Summer Music Games...". a claim not supported by the reference, which states simply that "...We lost two corps -- the Racine Scouts and the Blue Saints..." Like the Scouts, the Blue Saints made no comment about their not fielding, but it has since stated that the corps has been unable to find a new director, so the organization is using the time to solidify their finances. Whatever the case is for the Racine Scouts is, however, the group has made no statement about its inactivity, and, until very recently, the corps' webpage had not been updated in the last year--- it now states that information on the 2017 Production and 2017 Staff are "Coming Soon"... The Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and all statements in it should be neutral in tone, factual, and supported by evidence that can be cited as proof. My edit was neutral, factual, and supported, so how dies that make me "...full of it..."? While you consider that, also please consider how your calling me "...full of it..." jibes with your understanding of the Scout Law... GWFrog (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Apparently, User:Kintetsubuffalo has no desire to be reasonable, but wants to do things as he wants to do them. He again reverted my edit, with the comment "the straight text from the actual member is better than your prosaic bullshit, and you owe him an apology for undoing his factual change to your conjecture". Additionally, he went on a rent on Talk:Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps accusing me of wanting an edit war.

Before I then left the edit comment, "reverted to neutral statement as per ref cite" and posted the following on both User talk:Kintetsubuffalo and Talk:Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps: I am going to, one more time, revert your edit to the factually supported text. If you revert it again, I will file a Wikipedia:Dispute resolution request concerning your actively edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. I tried to be nice, politely explaining to you in detail how my edit was the correct one, but you started swearing in the edit summary and ranting on Talk:Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps. I am not out to engage in an edit war; I am only trying to edit in the proper manner. If you cannot do the same, we will take this situation to the administrators. GWFrog (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Kintetsubuffalo'sedit comment on his latest reversion was "previous editor's change was factual and to the point without the purple prose, and you owe him an apology. If you want to bring in an admin, let's do that".

So the ball is now in your court... Thank you for your attention... GWFrog (talk) 08:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ "From the publisher". Drum Corps World. Sights & sounds, Inc. August 2016. Retrieved 19 August 2016.
  • Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Katietalk 13:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Mlang.Finn reported by User:Elektrik Fanne (Result: No violation)[edit]

Active shutter 3D system: Active shutter 3D system (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Mlang.Finn: Mlang.Finn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [10]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [11]
  2. [12]
  3. [13]
  4. [14]
  5. [15]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [16]& [17]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Active shutter 3D system#Disadvantages of active shutter systems

Comments:

Mlang.Finn has not actually breached the three revert rule, but there is persistent slow motion revertion of disruptive editing. In the section of the article for 'advantages', Mlang.Finn persistently inserts a feature of some cheap TV sets as though it is disadvantage of the article subject (which, of course, it isn't). Despite several requests, he continues to refuse to provide a reference that the feature of the cheap televisions is somehow a disadvantage of the active shutter 3D system, even though he keeps disruptively inserting into the advantages section. He also has the cheek to accuse me of disruptive editing despite the fact that I am not inserting anything let alone anything unreferenced (Edit Summary:reverted disruptive editing). --Elektrik Fanne 12:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation. This is a content dispute that so far has not mushroomed into an edit war by both editors.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

User:86.174.240.73 reported by User:KGirlTrucker81 (Result: Semi)[edit]

Page
The Shawshank Redemption (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
86.174.240.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. Consecutive edits made from 22:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC) to 22:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 22:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 22:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  2. 21:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  3. Consecutive edits made from 16:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC) to 16:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 16:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 16:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  4. 16:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "I have attempted to discuss this MANY times but nobody has bothered to enter the conversation. Don't bother saying "go to the talk page" if nobody answers."
  5. 15:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC) "Was told to take it to the talk section, no one responded. So I'm going to keep editing this. It's correct, deal with it."
  6. 19:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  7. 19:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC) "I'm ending the 1990s/all time debate by removing the sentence. It ends now."
  8. 15:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

This IP tries to reslove but no response has given, and contiuesly removing "best film of 1990's". KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 22:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: Semiprotected six months. See the protection log for the past problems. EdJohnston (talk) 17:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Muboshgu reported by SaintAviator (Result: Declined)[edit]

Page: Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 User being reported: Muboshgu


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [18]
  2. [19]
  3. [20]


Comments:
1RR violation SaintAviator lets talk 07:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Tendentious report. This was a BLP revert, dealing with an editor who just tried to add the same disputed, fringe-y content three times to an article under community sanctions. The reporting editor, after making this report, just added it again.[21] Please remove this content or give clearance to remove it again, as this represents process gaming and is a BLP concern. Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

NeilN he appears to be ignoring your warning around which he replied to around 15.00 hrs then after that in the same 24 hr period, as before, broke 1RR twice. Its causing more edit wars [22] [23] SaintAviator lets talk 23:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Muboshgu has voluntarily agreed to refrain from editing the article for the next three days. --NeilN talk to me 01:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined There were two editors who broke WP:1RR. I warned the other one to be careful. Muboshgu gets the same warning, tempered by the fact the addition contained some wording that was very questionable from a BLP standpoint. NeilN talk to me 08:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Mirazaliullah reported by User:842U (Result: Blocked 72 hours)[edit]

Page: Orb (optics) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mirazaliullah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [24]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [25]
  2. [26]
  3. [27]
  4. [28]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [29]

Comments:

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 72 hours For edit warring and disruptive editing. NeilN talk to me 01:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

User:202.159.166.64 reported by User:Jim1138 (Result: Semi)[edit]

Page: Budd Hopkins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 202.159.166.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: diff

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [30]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [31]

(user's talk page) [32]

Comments:
This is a wp:BLP and a wp:fringe topic. Jim1138 (talk) 02:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Result: Semiprotected two months. The IP violated 3RR and seems to be here on Wikipedia to impart great truth. Please use the talk page to get consensus for your proposed changes and try to avoid the use of unreliable sources. EdJohnston (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Krimuk90 reported by User:John (Result: Warned)[edit]

Page: Catherine Zeta-Jones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Krimuk90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [33]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [34]
  2. [35]
  3. [36]
  4. [37]
  5. [38]
  6. [39]
  7. [40]
  8. [41]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [42]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [43]

Comments:
Highly unfortunate that this article seems to have made it through FAR with poorly-sourced material relating to a BLP. User Krimuk90 has tenaciously restored the offending material against the BLP policy and against two editors who have tried to discuss with him; he's at 8rr just now, and shows no sign of understanding what he is doing wrong. John (talk) 10:31, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, yes. I'm an awful person. Block me, delist the article from FA, and have a good night's sleep. Krimuk|90 (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Result: Warned. This is the editor who nominated the article for FA, but he seems to have lost his composure for the moment due to a dispute about sources. See his talk page and my message. Any renewal of this revert war may lead to a block. EdJohnston (talk) 22:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Timothyjosephwood reported by User:SaintAviator (Result: No violation)[edit]

Page: Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 User being reported: User:Timothyjosephwood

  1. [44]
  2. [45]

Comments:
1RR violation, getting out of hand SaintAviator lets talk 23:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

The diffs provided show consecutive edits which, according to WP:3RR, count as a single revert. clpo13(talk) 23:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting x.svg No violation See your talk page NeilN talk to me 23:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Got it, Good faith learning curve SaintAviator lets talk 23:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

User:85.96.56.233 reported by User:Lalichii (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: Self-coup (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 85.96.56.233 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [46]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [47]
  2. [48]
  3. [49]
  4. [50]
  5. [51]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [52]

Comments:
By now it is plain disruptive editing. The IP does not engage in meaningful discussion but keeps removing sourced content, his edits claim I am a "Gulenist manipulator" but the source he uses to back up his claims specifically states "The case against Gulen is not shut and dried". He says my sources are false and has now editted the entry to agree with him however even if his claim was true it would not belong in the article he is stating it in (he claims the turkish coup is not a self coup and was instead a just a failed coup by Fethullah Gülen however that would mean it was unsuitable for the list and should have been removed instead of being ammended to state this). Lalichii (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 31 hours.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Fuortu reported by User:1.39.98.34 (Result: Different IP blocked)[edit]

Page: Dead Man's Cards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Fuortu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [53]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [54]
  2. [55]
  3. [56]
  4. [57]
  5. [58]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [59]

Comments:

  • making multiple unexplained edits. (See [60])
  • making unconstructive edits by reverting tidy up edits. (See [61])
  • is breaching 3RR. (See [62])

Please could an admin intervene. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.98.34 (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  • And I suppose that you are the IP that was blocked for disruptive editing by @Widr:? Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

User:1.39.98.34 reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: )[edit]

Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 15:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "same message as previous"
  2. 15:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "please stop this. Your edits and unexplained and unconstructive. Note you are close to breaching 3RR"
  3. 15:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "roll back of unexplained and unconstructive edit"
  4. 15:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "rollback of unexplained edit"
  5. 15:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "De-red link & rmv. dead link"
  • Note to closing administrator Related to the above.
IP, you are the disruptive element at that article- all your edits were either unnecessary delinking, messing up the spelling, and changing the content. Your attempt to incriminate Fuortu compounds your ofence as that is a severe personal attack. Muffled Pocketed 16:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • @DatGuy: preferred it as it was- the IP's report is both malformed and unjustified. This is *heh* 'the ony report in town' Muffled Pocketed 16:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Result: 117.247.154.136 (talk · contribs) was the actual IP reverting against User:Fuortu. That IP has now been blocked 31 hours by User:Widr. It is hard to figure out the motivation for the IP to repeatedly delink the names used in the article. This activity had better not continue unless some explanation is given. It looks to be disruptive editing. EdJohnston (talk) 00:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Chriscross619 reported by User:Dohvahkiin (Result: Warned user(s))[edit]

Page: The Usos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Chriscross619 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [63]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [64]
  2. [65]
  3. [66]
  4. [67]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [68]

Comments:
User keeps providing false information, first under an IP address, then under an actual username. I've been trying to keep the page from being misinformitive, but the user keeps reverting any edit I make, to the one he originally made which provides false informationDohvahkiin (talk) 05:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned by Dennis Brown, and then again by NeilN; no disruption since that last warning. I will saw, though, that User:Chriscross619 is skating on very thin ice here, and any further disruption might be met with an immediate block. Vanamonde (talk) 10:04, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:65.158.118.254 reported by User:Feinoha (Result: Blocked 6 months)[edit]

Page
Kent Hovind (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
65.158.118.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 19:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739277882 by Clpo13 (talk) The verses were up LONG before you showed up. Stop lying to the people."
  2. 19:43, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739249176 by NeilN (talk) So do it, hypocrite."
  3. 16:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739247102 by NeilN (talk) They can read later on that that's what he is. Otherwise you better claim that he's a drivers license holder too. Not everyone subscribes to your liberal bias."
  4. 16:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "Please talk about the fact that he's "known as a tax protester" on the article's talk page. The fact that Kent Hovind was indicted on various charges has already been laid out and that is not how most people come to know him, but rather, later on."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Warning given here. Also is using personal attacks on their user talk page. Feinoha Talk 19:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Look's like they've been blocked already so I guess we can close this report as resolved. Feinoha Talk 20:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 6 months Per (my) ANI report. NeilN talk to me 10:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:129.62.125.9 reported by User:The Banner (Result: Semi)[edit]

Page: Baylor University (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 129.62.125.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [69]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [70]
  2. [71]
  3. [72]
  4. [73]
  5. [74]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [75], [76]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [77]

Comments:
By now it is plain disruptive editing. The IP does not engage in meaningful discussion but keeps removing sourced content. See Talk:Baylor University#Why a ranking of 701+ is not a useful ranking. IP claims a prior discussion came to consensus, but such a discussion is nowhere to be found. He (I assume) also claims that ten of thousands of universities have the 701+ ranking. But it is already the given sources that proves that it is a false claim. This won't stop unless the article is protected (or the IP blocked).

Please note that is is possible that a range must be blocked, as earlier there was another IP removing the sourced info: 129.62.65.1. The Banner talk 17:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Result: Semiprotected two months. Use the talk page to get agreement on this point. EdJohnston (talk) 12:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Geves08 reported by User:Frankam12 (Result: Protected)[edit]

Page: John Faso (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Geves08 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [78]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [79]
  2. [80]
  3. [81]
  4. [82]
  5. [83]
  6. [84]
  7. [85]
  8. [86]
  9. [87]
  10. [88]
  11. [89]
  12. [90]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [91]

Comments:

Additionally, it appears History518 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) and 72.0.130.82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) may be linked to User:Geves08. User:History518 appears to be a single-purpose, unconfirmed account with the purpose of reverting edits and commenting on the talk page, in an effort to avoid addressing the COI allegations on the talk page by User:SPECIFICO. User:72.0.130.82 has the IP 72.0.130.82 registered to a law firm in upstate NY, where the subject of the entry's family member is employed: http://www.woh.com/attorneys/nicolas-j-faso/ which is an obvious COI issue. They are also engaged in the recent edit warring.

Reverts by History518 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

  1. [92]
  2. [93]
  3. [94]

Reverts by 72.0.130.82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

  1. [95]
  2. [96]
  3. [97]

Also suspicious that the IP user recently scrubbed the talk page of John Faso (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) of User:History518's edit, and then re-edited it back in:

  1. [98]

I've made quite a few reverts on that page in good faith to enforce WP:BLP, and I encouraged the new users to discuss on the talk page and referred them to relevant Wikipedia policies. User:Geves08 appears to have already been warned in August by User:SPECIFICO about the 3RR on his/her talk page: [99] Frankam12 (talk) 19:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected – 5 days. Please use the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 13:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Anonymous427 reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: Warned user(s))[edit]

Page
Australian federal election, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Anonymous427 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 10:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  2. 09:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  3. 08:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  4. 08:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  5. 08:43, 13 September 2016 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 08:57, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Australian federal election, 2016. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 09:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC) "Please discuss, stop edit warring"
Comments:

Anonymous427 continues to add a duplicate description in the infobox of Australian federal election, 2016, despite two editors so far disputing Anonymous' edits. I had asked the editor twice to discuss their edit. They continue, instead, to edit war and offer no explanations for their edits whatsoever. —MelbourneStartalk 10:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  • I'm not sure why this was not acted upon yesterday; there was certainly a 3RR violation here. Nonetheless, a block at this time would be punitive. Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned Vanamonde (talk) 13:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Mark Raj Rics reported by User:RunnyAmiga (Result: Blocked 31 hours)[edit]

Page: Madison Renee Gabriel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mark Raj Rics (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to: [100]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [101]
  2. [102]
  3. [103]
  4. [104]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [105]


No link to any discussion because no, I'm not going to try to find compromise via some back-and-forth when several users think an AFD note has to stay and another, the page's creator, keeps removing it. This unhelpful, condescending language ("If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too") ought to go.

Comments:

RunnyAmigatalk 17:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 31 hours Widr (talk) 18:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Gonzales John reported by User:FyzixFighter (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page
Jesus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Gonzales John (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 21:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC) "again consensus first, then remove. Please stop violating policies and trying to make it sound like I am edit warring, when in reality I am just reverting your policy-defying removal."
  2. 21:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC) "Nothing should be done to stuff before consensus has been reached. StAnselm, unfortunately defied this because of his bias, and by saying that it should be removed, when in fact the rules state that it should be left untouched till consensus."
  3. 13:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC) "Please refute my explanations and arguments, instead of spouting rehashed tendentious crap."
  4. 07:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC) "You shouldn't remove sentences when the "statement" you argue against is not the sentence's actual statement."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

User recently (~4 days) returned from a 24 hr block for edit warring over the same material on the same article. It appears the user misunderstands WP:CONSENSUS and WP:ONUS. FyzixFighter (talk) 00:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 72 hours.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Syafiqshahalam reported by User:Aero777 (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page: Proton Persona (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page: Proton Persona (CM) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page: Proton Persona (BH) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Syafiqshahalam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Previous version reverted to:
[106]
[107]
[108]


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [109]
  2. [110]
  3. [111]
  1. [112]
  2. [113]
  3. [114]
  1. [115]
  2. [116]
  3. [117]


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [118]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [119]

Comments:
This user appears to be editing in good faith. However, I can no longer give him the benefit of doubt, because even after I've written an extensive explanation on his talk page, he has failed to reply and simply reverted the pages again. Worse still, he even blanked my own user page. It is clear now that the user has no intentions of resolving the situation in the appropriate manner.

*Result: User talk:Syafiqshahalam is warned they may be blocked if they make any more reverts about the Proton cars without first getting a consensus in their favor on a talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 23:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Noted, with thanks. I will restore the three pages to their original state. Should the user reverted again without any explanation(s), I will refile the complaint accordingly. Best regards, Aero777 (talk) 01:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Update - Once again, the user has reverted all three pages without any explanations. He has not responded to the warning on his talk page either. Aero777 (talk) 02:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 3 days due to renewed edit warring after the original closure. EdJohnston (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

User:2601:647:4701:4D10:842B:DEF:5534:7FF9 reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: Blocked 31 hours)[edit]

Page
Scratchpad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
2601:647:4701:4D10:842B:DEF:5534:7FF9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 09:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739546879 by 77.60.75.237 (talk) - same IP address like on 129.162.108.109 from Pete the Cat"
  2. 09:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739546609 by MelbourneStar (talk) - later on, rmv two articles like on talk:snake rattle 'n' roll and talk:list of top cat characters"
  3. 09:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739546472 by MelbourneStar (talk)"
  4. 09:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739545952 by MelbourneStar (talk)"
  5. 09:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739545274 by Dewritech (talk) - restoring vhs and did openings"
  6. 09:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 737003933 by Geraldo Perez (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 09:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 09:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Disambiguation */ new section"
Comments:

IP continues a long-line of disruptive editing on this disambiguation page; continues to add irrelevant content to said page -- despite warnings, 3RR warning - and half a dozen other editors disputing these edits. —MelbourneStartalk 09:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 31 hours Widr (talk) 09:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

User:2601:240:C901:FD00:5459:89C:81CA:CFE4 reported by User:CCamp2013 (Result: Withdrawn)[edit]

Page
America's Got Talent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
2601:240:C901:FD00:5459:89C:81CA:CFE4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 19:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739611291 by CCamp2013 (talk) There was no consensus decision present on the Talk page before it was added the first time. YOU talk about it before removing it again!"
  2. 19:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739609750 by CCamp2013 (talk)Justification added to Talk page. Deleting the table DELETES INFORMATION"
  3. 19:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 738401653 by CCamp2013 (talk) This provides information nowhere else in the article; the judges are repeated in THEIR golden buzzer table; why not Guest Judges?"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 19:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on America's Got Talent. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 19:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Duplicate guest judges table */ reply"
Comments:
  • NAC Comment - This should be closed as they're both discussing it, The IP has been adding content and CC's been reverting however I've reverted and asked both to discuss[120] which they are so at this present time this report is premature and it's only going to rile the IP up, The IP (as well as CC) have been given the options of either RFC or 30) so as I said at the moment whilst they're discussing this there's no need for blocks (unless you or the IP plays silly buggers which I'm hoping you's won't), Ofcourse if the IP does revert I would personally just go to RFPP however everyone's discussing and hopefully everyone will come to some sort of agreement without any admin intervention, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment I filed this before seeing Davey2010's reply and the IP only starting discussing after I filed this. Chase (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC) I am willing to withdraw pending the IPs behavior. Chase (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • CCamp2013 - I thought you and CC were completely different editors ... turns out you're the same person! Face-grin.svg, Anyway I had wondered if you never saw the reply, Ofcourse if the IP does revert then I'd happily support blocks & the report but for now it's perhaps best to let the discussions continue :), Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 20:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Lysimachi reported by User:Lemongirl942 (Result: Already blocked)[edit]

Page
Han Chinese (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Lysimachi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 15:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable."
  2. 14:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC) ""
  3. 21:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC) "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 15:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Han Chinese. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 15:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Recent mass addition of tags */ reply"
Comments:

User is constantly POV pushing and editing against consensus. Has been previously warned but is continuing the behaviour. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

With repeated reverts ([121], [122], [123], [124]) User Lemongirl942 consistently added back unsourced materials (which have been tagged by citation needed for over a month), added unsourced information ("Some sources refer to Han Chinese as "Chinese" or group them with other Chinese peoples."), and remove citation needed tags for questionable sources. For example, as shown in the discussion on the article talk page, Lemongirl942 did not propose any source for "655,377" Han Chinese in Japan, but Lemongirl942 kept removing the citation needed tag for that number. Lysimachi (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Just to let you know that others have reverted Lysimachi's edits as well [125], [126]. Lysimachi has a different understanding of policies than others. The problem here is not the content but the behaviour: a refusal to understand what WP:CONSENSUS is and total lack of disregard for WP:BRD. This is disruptive and sucks up a lot of time. I'm honestly sick and tired of it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Verifiability and No original research are the core policies of Wikipedia. What kind of behaviour is it to repeatedly remove citation needed tags, preventing others from improving the article, and to repeatedly add unsourced materials without any consensus, showing at the same time total disregard of WP:BRD (which by the way is not even a policy or guideline)? Lysimachi (talk) 19:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been told to stop reverting. What you are doing is blatant WP:OWN behavior. What part of WP:CONSENSUS don't you understand? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Already blocked, so I guess this particular report can be closed. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 48 hours by User:Ymblanter. EdJohnston (talk) 12:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Bgc7676 reported by User:CCamp2013 (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page
Big Brother 15 (U.S.) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Bgc7676 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 19:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Voting history */"
  2. Consecutive edits made from 19:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC) to 19:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 19:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Voting history */"
    2. 19:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Voting history */"
    3. 19:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Voting history */"
  3. 18:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Voting history */"
  4. 21:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Voting history */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 18:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Big Brother 15 (U.S.). (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 18:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC) ""
Comments:
  • Comment There is an ongoing adding and deleting of information by the same user on the article as well. Chase (talk) 20:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – 48 hours. This behavior looks similar to what was reported in an earlier 3RR report which was closed in August with a warning. User has 416 edits but hardly ever posts on talk pages. Many of these edits are puzzling, which is why talking would help. EdJohnston (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

User:77.58.11.198 reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: No action)[edit]

Page
Davos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
77.58.11.198 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)やや
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 01:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC) "The edit was is not mine. *Harry Clarke, 1819-1931, Illustrator and stained artist, resident of Davoa 1929-1931, tuberculosis patient, president of Irish Society of Davos."
  2. 01:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 739645846 by ZH8000 (talk) Please note- Harry Clarke was president of Irish Society of Davos - resided in Davos for approximately two years."
  3. Consecutive edits made from 00:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC) to 00:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    1. 00:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC) "*Harry Clarke, 1889–1931, Irish illustrator and stained glass, tuberculosis patient, lived in Davos intermittently 1929-1931."
    2. 00:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC) "Added entry about Harry Clarke."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 01:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Davos. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 01:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Davos */ new section"
  2. 01:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC) "/* Davos */"
Comments: