Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive392

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noticeboard archives

Contents

User:Foxhound03 reported by User:Wikaviani (Result: 2 weeks)[edit]

Page: Iranian peoples (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Foxhound03 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [1]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [2]
  2. [3]
  3. [4]
  4. [5]
  5. [6]
  6. [7]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [8] (first one), [9] (second one).

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [10] (link provided, since many editors have so far disagreed with the reported user's changes)

Comments:

The reported user has been already blocked for disrupting the same article. So far, he has engaged in edit warring against at least 3 editors with the addition of WP:OR and WP:TENDENTIOUS unsourced content. He also has proved to have a WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality and is actually failing to get the point, Administrative actions are requested since the editor does not stop his disruption while having been already warned by several editors. Thanks.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 12:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Update : Already blocked at ANI.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 12:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

User:זור987 reported by User:Dorian Gray Wild (Result: Warned)[edit]

Page: Alex Fridman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: זור987 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Reverting Senior baron by זור987

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. Reverting Senior baron by זור987
  2. Reverting Dorian Gray Wild by זור987
  3. Reverting Dorian Gray Wild by זור987
  4. Removing a massive text by זור987

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

  1. Reverting Senior baron by זור987
  2. Reverting Dorian Gray Wild by זור987
  3. Warning זור987 in his user talk page

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

  1. Discussing the issue in the talk page. זור987 did not participate for 12 days, but reverted Senior baron after 15 minutes on June 24, 2019.
  2. Reverting זור987 by another user.
  3. In the talk page of the article in the Hebrew Wikipedia, זור987 wrote:

"The English Wikipedia may include content that is considered in Israel as advertising / marketing content, public relations, trivia, and fan content, as well as the use of generic names such as Xenon, for example, to describe the front lights of a vehicle. See, for example, my discussions on the Pitfall talk page where I had problems when I tried to delete a trivia from the value that has no online support for the game at the top of the Billboard parade."

The replies which זור987 received in the talk page in the English Wikipedia were: "The material is cited to a reliable source, which is all Wikipedia requires. Your ignorance of video game history is not grounds to remove material. That will be treated as vandalism and dealt with accordingly." as well as: "Now please stop vandalizing the article." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorian Gray Wild (talkcontribs) 15:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments:

Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned. Mostly stale. Please refer to your dispute resolution resources. Please also sign your username. A warning about slow edit warring is also due. Note that I am in the midst of reading the Hebrew Wikipedia entry's talk page, but I'm not sure how much bearing it will have on this dispute, here on the English Wikipedia. El_C 15:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Actually it was quite informative, especially in so far as identifying some single purpose accounts. El_C 15:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the warning.
I did not sign, because other applicants in this page did not sign neither.
My user is not SPA. I wrote Alex Fridman from zero, and wrote also other articles.
El_C, please see זור987 words in his user talk page. He wrote the opposite than his former words. His former words were: "The English Wikipedia may include content that is considered in Israel as advertising / marketing content, public relations, trivia, and fan content, as well as the use of generic names such as Xenon, for example, to describe the front lights of a vehicle." Now his words were: "Lots of things that conventional in the Hebrew Wikipedia, aren't considered conventional in the English Wikipedia (Like using generic names as part of the article like xenon, writing trivia information like Pitfall! appeared #1 on the Billiboard Charts, and non important/PR awards)."
It seems that he has to be blocked due to his whole reply, which was mainly: "You won't have any ownership on this article anymore". In other words he told me: You should not edit this article any longer. Dgw (talk) 16:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
This is a content dispute, so you have to use dispute resolution. I've already suggested what you should do on the article talk page. Unless you can show misbehaviour, administrative intervention is unlikely. Letting you know that you do not own the article does not rise to that level. El_C 17:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Veritasveritas666 reported by User:Almy (Result: Protected)[edit]

Page
Ross Levinsohn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Veritasveritas666 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 17:18, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903266475 by Almy (talk)"
  2. 14:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  3. 06:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 17:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Message re. Ross Levinsohn (HG) (3.4.8)"
  2. 17:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Not adhering to neutral point of view on Ross Levinsohn. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected. Please figure this out on the article talk page. El_C 17:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Fan4Life reported by User:MaranoFan (Result: No violation)[edit]

Page
Ariana Grande (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Fan4Life (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 20:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 902661989 by Vistadan (talk)"
  2. 20:42, 23 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 902651705 by Roselle Charles (talk)"
  3. 20:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 902635248 by Roselle Charles (talk) It’s well known that she lives there."
  4. 13:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Discography"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:
  • 4 reverts on the same page in less than 24 hours constitute a blatant WP:3RR violation. Contribution history also shows three reverts within 24 hours recently at another page, Sweetener World Tour. This user has been brought to this noticeboard countless times before and has proven that he won’t learn until he gets blocked.—NØ 19:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting x.svg No violation. That uninterrupted set of edits only counts as one revert, actually. They could have done it in one edit, if they so chose. I also note that you have left enough mandatory fields blank to the point of almost rendering this report malformed. El_C 19:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

No violation? Those are 4 reverts within 24 hours. The 3 reverts on the Sweetener World Tour article are also within a 24 hour period. I guess the next stop is ANI since the admins who moderate this page are giving this user a pass for their battleground and rule violating behaviour.—NØ 19:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
The edits are uninterrupted so it doesn't count. El_C 19:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
That also does not respond to the three mandatory fields being blank. El_C 19:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

User:72.143.111.18 reported by User:TitanSymphony (Result: semi one week)[edit]

Page: People's Party of Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 72.143.111.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [11]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [12]
  2. [13]
  3. [14]
  4. [15]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [16]

Comments:

The topic of the edit war is over whether the "disruptive edits" of User:Heinvan5, a suspected Sockpuppet of User:Soulspinr, should stay in place or get deleted. TitanSymphony (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Heinvan5 is a "possible" sockpuppet, per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soulspinr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TitanSymphony (talkcontribs) 21:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This is my first time on this account reporting a user here, so please forgive me if I make any mistakes. TitanSymphony (talk) 21:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm not siding with Heinvan5 or anything, all I'm doing is making sure we don't edit war on Wikipedia. TitanSymphony (talk) 21:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected. No 3RR warning listed. Went back to the status quo ante version, for now, in part due to sock concerns. Semi for one week. Please figure this out on the article talk page. Thanks. El_C 21:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Hopscootchica reported by User:Objective3000 (Result: Blocked for disruptive editing)[edit]

Page: Nazi gun control argument (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Hopscootchica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)


Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [17]
  2. [18]
  3. [19]
  4. [20]
  5. [21]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

See UTP for many warnings.[22]

Thread attempting to resolve dispute on article talk page: [23]

Comments:

I'm not involved. Just noticed this getting out of control. Better here than ANI as per BITE. Although likely to end up elsewhere. O3000 (talk) 00:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

No reverts since my warning, but there are other problems with user conduct that I'm watching. Acroterion (talk) 00:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

this user told me that I should "self delete"

I have had a close family member commit suicide recently and ii find this type of behavior disturbing and offensive

Hopscootchica (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

O3000 has not said anything of the sort. Acroterion (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Hopscootchica, please realize when someone is doing you a favor. I haven't even read this article. I saw the pileup of warnings and thought I'd take this to a noticeboard known for leniency in an attempt to preempt a block -- which is where you were heading. O3000 (talk) 00:50, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

oh but he did, just look on this page my friend. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Carl_Benjamin#Jess_Phillips_Laughing_at_male_suicide

would you please gander at the unbelievable

I find this offensive, I do not know if you know what it is like to go throuhg a suicide in the family but it is one of the worst things ever, slightly above heartbreak. And to be told to do so makes me shocked at that behavior.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics Hopscootchica (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

I apologize if you took the term "self-delete" as committing suicide. It means delete the edit you just made and was made, again, to help you avoid difficulties here. I suggest you take a break from editing WP, particularly since you are editing controversial articles. O3000 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
"Self-revert" is the more usual term in Wikipedia context. In any case, it is clearly not meant as an attack or a suggestion of harm. I strongly suggest that you stop trying to escalate every interaction with another editor into an argument. Acroterion (talk) 01:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Hopscootchica is not editing in good faith. They they've started trying to manufacture out-rage in the way that alt-right tolls commonly do, except Hopscootchica is hilariously inept at it. ApLundell (talk) 01:10, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

I've blocked them for disruptive editing - they blew through three reverts, but hadn't been directly warned, However, their subsequent behavior has exhausted the benefit of the doubt. . Please don't answer tit-for-tat. Acroterion (talk) 01:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Kriliokonc reported by User:Finngall (Result: indef)[edit]

Page
Theta Persei (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Kriliokonc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 00:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Added content"
  2. 23:23, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Added content"
  3. 21:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Added content"
  4. 20:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Added"
  5. 16:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Added content"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 22:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Theta Persei. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. Discussion on User talk:Finngall
  2. Discussion on User talk:Lithopsian
Comments:

Kriliokonc claims to have named this star via a star registry service, and wishes this info to be included in the article, with a link to the registry and a reference number. As with most of these "services", this is not a reliable source, which has been explained multiple times. The addition has been reverted by no fewer than four different editors. --Finngall talk 01:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola.svg Blocked indefinitely. Already indeffed. El_C 02:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:82.219.28.103 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)[edit]

Page
Copyright (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
82.219.28.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 09:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  2. 09:22, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  3. 09:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  4. Consecutive edits made from 09:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC) to 09:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
    1. 09:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ""
    2. 09:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ""
    3. 09:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  5. Consecutive edits made from 09:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC) to 09:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
    1. 09:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC) ""
    2. 09:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 09:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Copyright. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Repeated violation of edit war policy. Vandalising after being blocked (see the user's talk page). Request a longer block. WikiAviator (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks Mz7 (talk) 09:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:2001:A61:58D:6201:74F9:9848:AA84:86AB reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: No violation)[edit]

Page
Copyright (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
2001:A61:58D:6201:74F9:9848:AA84:86AB (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 09:22, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903370106 by 82.219.28.103 (talk)"
  2. 09:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  3. 09:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903369658 by 82.219.28.103 (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 09:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Edit warring. WikiAviator (talk) 09:26, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

I merely reverted vandalism.2001:A61:58D:6201:74F9:9848:AA84:86AB (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Silmedia reported by User:The Grid (Result: Blocked)[edit]

Page
Fort Myers, Florida (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Silmedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 17:20, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903343925 by The Grid (talk)"
  2. 02:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903249179 by The Grid (talk)"
  3. 14:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 902707376 by The Grid (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 04:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Fort Myers, Florida. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 13:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "/* 1927 Lynching */ new section"
Comments:

I presented level headed discussion with wishing to engage in discussion. No attempt has been made for discussion even with a ping and a start of a discussion on the talk page. – The Grid (talk) 17:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of one week.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Netoholic reported by User:Jamez42 (Result: Warned)[edit]

Page: Steven Crowder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Carlos Maza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Netoholic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. Steven Crowder: [24][25][26][27]
  2. Carlos Maza: [28]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [29][30]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [31][32][33][34]

Comments:
User:Netoholic broke the three reverts rule in the Steven Crowder article after the recent dispute between Carlos Maza and Crowder, arguing that WP:3RRNO applies since the content is reportedly violates WP:BLP. User also reverted content in Maza's article, [35][36], which was protected because of edit warring and vandalism. Jamez42 (talk) 15:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Before I start, some background on this topic: Crowder is known for making video rebuttals of Vox Media content, some of which included slurs about one of the Vox presenters, Carlos Maza, who then reported it to YouTube, which determined that the videos did not themselves violate their policies. The quoted line which I've WP:BLPREMOVE'd is from another Vox Media website called The Verge. Clearly, there is a conflict of interest both from Vox (because of Crowder's rebuttals) and from the author of this specific article, who is writing in defense of his co-worker. In other words, Vox Media WP:SOURCES are not WP:INDEPENDENT enough of this topic to satisfy WP:Verifiability, and the WP:BURDEN is on those seeking inclusion to address this (simple solution would be just to find alternative sources which are truly independent). Additionally, the quoted line from the article's prose (Crowder's videos "routinely contain egregious violations of YouTube's policies against cyberbullying") is defamatory to this BLP because it is factually incorrect - YouTube has stated the videos did not violate their policies. Admins have a responsibility to enforce likely BLP removals, and should instead look at those impatient editors that are seeking to re-add this contentious material.Jamez42 in particular seems to be trying to bait some kind of action here by knowingly reverting to re-add this challenged line even while discussion is taking place on the talk page about it. For some reason, his bad report here also includes unrelated edits to the Carlos Maza article which were for completely different reasons than this BLPREMOVal. Since this report has been made, though, I'll state I have no intention to further remove this line from the article or otherwise revert - I'll ask instead that the admins enforce the removal. -- Netoholic @ 16:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)


  • 3RRNO allows for 3RR exemptions for "Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to our biographies of living persons (BLP) policy. What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption." Arguing that a source is not independent (when that source is otherwise generally reliable) is not a clear allowance within this exemption. A single BOLD to remove once if the material is in doubt is fine, but further removals need discussion. --Masem (t) 16:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
    @Masem: As I said above, the line is indeed libelous because it is factually incorrect. Its also not independent and potentially biased because Vox Media has a financial interest in getting Crowder's video rebuttals of Vox's content removed. -- Netoholic @ 16:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
    The line is about the videos, not the BLP. There are some BLP concerns but nowhere close to being obvious to take exception to 3RR over. --Masem (t) 16:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
    @Masem: That's kind of an odd conclusion - the videos are of Crowder's spoken commentary, and the Verge source is directly addressing that. -- Netoholic @ 17:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned. BLP invoked but probably does not apply. I simply fail to see any immediate BLP issues that rise to the level of BLPREMOVE. Reaching a consensus (or lack thereof) at BLPN is now the next step. El_C 18:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Jsalzillo1 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Page
Center for Immigration Studies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
Jsalzillo1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 17:20, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903429521 by Jorm (talk) This is inline with RfC"
  2. 15:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903402529 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) anti immigration is already in lede. Don't change placement without consensus esp. on first sentence."
  3. 18:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903273251 by Snooganssnoogans (talk) this is your third undo, dont edit war. This is a real case of pot calling kettle black"
  4. 17:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903266935 by Snooganssnoogans (talk) rfc is about other part of lede--intro sentence is different"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 18:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "/* 3RR */ new section"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 15:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "/* First sentence */"
Comments:

Clear-cut violation. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

I have created a separate discussion on the COI noticeboard about this user.[37] Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. AP2 DS (1RR) applied. El_C 21:35, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Magitroopa reported by User:SchroCat (Result: )[edit]

Page: Etika (streamer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Magitroopa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [38] This one at 23:30, 25 June 2019‎
  2. [39]
  3. [40]
  4. [41]
  5. [42]
  6. [43]
  7. [44]
  8. [45]
  9. [46]
  10. [47]
  11. [48]
  12. [49]
  13. [50]
  14. [51]
  15. [52]
  16. [53]
  17. [54]
  18. [55]
  19. [56]
  20. [57] (this one at 20:18, 25 June 2019‎


Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [58]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: I have not been involved in any reverting on the page - and reverts have been across the board on a number of points in the article. While there are some reverts of vandalism, in the large part, that isn't the case. - SchroCat (talk) 22:35, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments:

  • 20RR(!!) within three hours
WP:3RRNO- Numbers 4 and 5 would mainly apply here, as many of the reverts were actually vandalism, reverting of incorrect information, as well as other issues such as MOS:OVERLINK. Many of the reverts were also prior to the page being protected, AKA, when many IPs were vandalizing the page. Magitroopa (talk) 22:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Reverting overlinking and the choice of image does not fall under 3RRNO - and neither do more than half your reversions. - SchroCat (talk) 22:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Some more- #68 is a revert of an image someone claims to be their own work, yet is not and is up for speedy deletion (Yes, more than, "choice of image"); #69 is incorrect, especially as June 26 hasn't even happened in NY yet; #70 is not the day he died; #71 is the same reasoning as #68; #72 is the same reasoning as #70; #73-75 is information that currently remains unconfirmed/unofficial; #78 is the incorrect location; #79-83 is vandalism, opinions, incorrect information, etc. Magitroopa (talk) 22:50, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
I see a rationale for removing non-free content as an exemption to the 3RR rule, but what exemption do you claim for the others? Dumuzid (talk) 23:09, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
(edit conflict) So content disputes, with a small number that come under 3RRNO. You are at 4RR alone with [59] this ridiculous back-and-forth on where the date should go!
I'm off to bed and will leave it to an Admin, but at least this will allow others to edit the article without being automatically reverted. - SchroCat (talk) 23:10, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
@Magitroopa: While I get that a lot of your other reverts were intended to undo poorly sourced info on a high-traffic, recent-death page, I'm having trouble seeing how [60] [61] or [62] could even remotely be considered vandalism or any other 3RR exception. Please review what is vandalism vs. what is not vandalism (as well as the guideline on assuming good faith) before continuing to make reverts anywhere, and I'd strongly recommend taking a break from that page for 24 hours, as any further reverts that aren't obviously exempt from 3RR will likely result in a block. --slakrtalk / 23:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

User:182.0.178.107 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: 31 hours)[edit]

Page
Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/About (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
182.0.178.107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 00:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  2. 00:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  3. 00:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  4. 00:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  5. 00:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  6. 00:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 00:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/About. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Pure vandalism of page, being repeatedly reverted by another user. Request indef block. WikiAviator (talk) 00:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 31 hours. Already blocked. El_C 01:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:111.220.222.2 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: one week)[edit]

Page
Australian Independents (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
111.220.222.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 01:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid vandalism by previous contributor"
  2. 00:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid unconstructive vandalism by 49.199.225.74
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 01:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Edit Dispute */ new section"
  2. 01:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Edit Dispute */ new section"
Comments:

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of one week. El_C 01:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:49.199.225.74 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: 72 hours)[edit]

Page
Australian Independents (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
49.199.225.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Reverted to more relevant, and accurately sourced information."
  2. 00:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Reverted to more relevant and sourced information. This is not vandalism - please engage on my talk page if you disagree."
  3. 23:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Restored to previous version. All information is accurate and sourced."
  4. 23:38, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Restored edits to be more relevant and accurately sourced. Note that attempt to engage on talk pages deleted by other user."
  5. 23:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Restored to more relevant and sourced information."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 01:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Edit Dispute */ new section"
  2. 01:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Edit Dispute */ new section"
Comments:

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 72 hours. El_C 01:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:82.223.108.106 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: Blocked 24hours )[edit]

Page
Dan Vs. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
82.223.108.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 01:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  2. 01:24, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  3. 01:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  4. 01:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  5. 01:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  6. Consecutive edits made from 01:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC) to 01:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
    1. 01:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
    2. 01:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* External links */"
  7. 01:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 01:18, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Dan Vs.. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:
  • Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. although please do not report here and at WP:AIV. Choose a forum. In this case, this is likely the most appropriate. I see another user made the AIV report Thanks N.J.A. | talk 01:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:50.21.176.89 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: 2 weeks)[edit]

Page
Dan Vs. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
50.21.176.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 02:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  2. 02:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  3. 02:30, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  4. 02:29, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  5. 02:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Urbanoc failed"
  6. 02:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  7. 02:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  8. 02:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Crboyer is motherf*cker and failed to revert this edit."
  9. 02:24, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Crboyer failed."
  10. 02:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  11. 02:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  12. 02:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  13. 02:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  14. 02:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  15. 02:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  16. 02:18, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  17. 02:18, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "This is coming back"
  18. 02:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  19. 02:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  20. 02:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  21. 02:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  22. 02:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  23. 02:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  24. 02:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  25. 02:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  26. 02:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  27. 02:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  28. 02:11, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  29. 02:11, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  30. 02:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  31. 02:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  32. 02:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  33. 02:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  34. 02:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  35. 02:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  36. 02:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  37. 02:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  38. 02:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  39. 02:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  40. 02:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  41. 02:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  42. 02:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  43. 02:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  44. Consecutive edits made from 01:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC) to 02:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
    1. 01:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
    2. 01:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
    3. 02:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* External links */"
    4. 02:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* External links */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 02:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Dan Vs.. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 02:34, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Vandalism Reverts */ new section"
Comments:

Use of vulgar in edit summary, an overwhelming number of reverts!!! Request indef block. WikiAviator (talk) 02:38, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

IP is a sock of the problematic, and long-blocked Gabucho181 (talk · contribs), who's had a long history of making unsourced, and most assuredly untrue claims before, especially about Dan Vs..Crboyer (talk) 02:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks. We don't indef IPs. El_C 02:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:94.69.61.55 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: semi 6 months)[edit]

Page
Annapurna Pictures (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
94.69.61.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 02:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "undefined"
  2. 02:46, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "undefined"
  3. 02:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "undefined"
  4. 02:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "undefined"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 02:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Annapurna Pictures. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 02:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Nonconstructive Reverting */ new section"
Comments:

Persistent reverting, request longer block. WikiAviator (talk) 02:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

This user seems to be violating his ban. He was blocked on a different IP (174.18.78.210) yesterday. Nigos (t@lk Contribs) 02:58, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected. El_C 03:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:41.218.217.218 reported by User:WikiAviator (Result: already blocked, pages already protected)[edit]

Page
Entertainment Studios (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
41.218.217.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 02:58, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "undefined"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 03:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Only warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Freestyle Releasing. (TW)"
  2. 03:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Usage of multiple IPs on Freestyle Releasing. (TW)"
  3. 03:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppeteering. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

He is a sockpuppet of 94.69.61.55. See investigation of 94.69.61.55. WikiAviator (talk) 03:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC) He is essentially the same person, block both indef.WikiAviator (talk) 03:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Note: Already blocked, pages already protected. Again, we don't indef IPs. El_C 03:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Dontmwt? reported by User:Viewmont Viking (Result: Indeffed)[edit]

Page: Eric Francis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Dontmwt? (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [63]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [64]
  2. [65]
  3. [66]
  4. [67]
  5. [68]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [69]

  • Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:183.90.36.200 reported by User:Galobtter (Result: Semi-protected)[edit]

Page
Edzard Ernst (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
183.90.36.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 07:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Retired officially. Department unit had since been closed down and now defunct. No more exist. Extincted."
  2. 06:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "WP:LEDE"
  3. 05:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Retired."
  4. 07:09, 26 June 2019‎ (UTC) "Got it."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 06:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

IP continuing to edit war on Edzard Ernst after page protection expired. See User talk:183.90.36.169 for previous warnings (and a block), and previous AN3 report at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RRArchive386#User:183.90.36.169_reported_by_User:Girth_Summit_(Result:_Semi). Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:11, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring is continuing. I'm going to leave it now to avoid going past 3RR, but this looks like outright trolling. GirthSummit (blether) 07:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I've reapplied semi-protection, this time for six months.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Georgia guy reported by User:Rockstone35 (Result: protected)[edit]

Page: List of the verified oldest people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Georgia guy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [70]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

  1. [71]
  2. [72]
  3. [73]
  4. [74]
  5. [75]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [76]

Comments:
So far it's just going around and around in circles, and the user is just demonstrating an unwillingness to respect consensus, namely, that there is no reliable source indicating that Jeanne Calment's true age at death is under dispute. Rockstonetalk to me! 17:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support.svg Page protected. El_C 18:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:195.230.46.4 reported by User:Jasper Deng (Result: 24 hours)[edit]

Page
Viola concerto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
195.230.46.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. 18:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC) ""
  2. 18:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Selected list of concertos and concertante works */"
  3. 17:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Selected list of concertos and concertante works */"
  4. 17:50, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Selected list of concertos and concertante works */"
  5. 13:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Selected list of concertos and concertante works */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 18:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Viola concerto. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


Comments:

Clearly not willing to listen at all. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. El_C 20:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

User:UberVegan reported by User:Orville1974 (Result: warned)[edit]

Page
Ami Horowitz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported
UberVegan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to
Diffs of the user's reverts
  1. Consecutive edits made from 23:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC) to 00:18, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
    1. 23:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903481310 by Orville1974 (talk) sorry about wp:pa. did not say that it was a wp:cv; considering the numerous quotations on the single paragraph, these two sentences seem MOS:QUOTE"
    2. 00:18, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "again, mos:quote and your quotation edit (style, not content) is not improving the project, but not worth talk discussion."
  2. 23:26, 25 June 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 903474431 by Orville1974 (talk) yes, direct quote, but you can't be lazy and simply make edits by placing quotation marks on copyrighted material. the previous edit was WP:OR"
  3. 22:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC) "/* ISIS flag at UC Berkeley */ rm edits not supported by sources."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
  1. 00:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Ami Horowitz. (TW)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
  1. 00:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC) "/* Video of outfit change */"
Comments:

Editor continues to blank content from multiple editors that is validly sourced with WP:LAWYER-type excuses. Editor's fourth edit was to keep the content blanked by maintaining their revert and replying via edit summary "again, mos:quote and your quotation edit (style, not content) is not improving the project, but not worth talk discussion". Orville1974talk 00:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

I will respond tomorrow. UberVegan🌾 01:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned. Only 3 reverts are listed — you need four to violate 3RR. But three reverts at Michael Moore are also a problem. Please engage the respective article talk pages, instead, and stop edit warring so much. El_C 01:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi El_C. I did open the discussion on the talk page, but the editor responded by saving a blank edit (keeping their blanking of the content I had added in place) with the edit summary of "but not worth talk discussion". The editor claims it's not about content, but regardless of how the information is inserted, they have an excuse for blanking it (didn't match source--it did, copyvio--it wasn't, overquoting . . .). I haven't hit 3 yet (I think I may have once, if ever?), and have never hit 4, nor do I intend to. Orville1974talk 01:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks El_C. I'm hoping that's all it takes to get them to open up a dialogue when they disagree. Orville1974talk
    • Given the newness of UberVegan, warning seems sufficient for now, but I'm hoping the mop-wielders that follow this board will add both pages to their watchlists. At least on Moore, this editor seems to be pushing a POV.