Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa May

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Lisa May[edit]

Lisa May (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Looks like a promotional article rather than a Wikipedia entry. None of the source establish notability. Clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO. — 1997kB 05:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 07:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 07:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Not seeing anything that would help this musician meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. The entry lists several references but there is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete - after all the socking, tantrums and name calling of the recent edit war, nothing has emerged even remotely close to notability. Almost all refs are simple sales listings. The nearest to notability is a blog style post about an interview where the interviewee is a fitness coach. Not quite WP:GNG. Very evidently a piece of pure promotion with no place on Wikipedia.  Velella  Velella Talk   03:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete - As noticed by Velella above, see the article's history in which someone called Lisamaymgt has fought pretty hard to keep the article alive with little regard for community collaboration or WP procedures. Meanwhile, the singer herself certainly has a quantity of song listings, stream links, and very brief introductions, but significant coverage has not happened. Also note that the singer's common name makes searching a bit of a challenge. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

deletion review)