Wikipedia talk:Moving files to Commons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikipedia Help Project (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.
Start-Class article Start  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discontinuing manual methods of file transfers?[edit]

Are there any plans to discontinue older manual methods, where a user manually or semi-automatically re-uploads the file to Commons (without preserving history)? With the FileExporter now live, it is a shame we are still loosing precious old history when doing these manual transfers... Rehman 07:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I plan on updating this page to encourage the use of FileExporter, and discourage the use of other options. Please see this thread. Your comments for/against this move are most welcome. Pings: Magnus Manske, Magog the Ogre, This, that and the other, Multichill, Fastily, Johanna Strodt (WMDE). Rehman 14:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm generally opposed to this, because a) there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the current methods of transfer and b) mw:Extension:FileImporter is still in beta. If/When the extension leaves beta, I'd be open to revisiting the matter. -FASTILY 01:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback, Fastily. I was initially having the same thoughts as well but the issue is, as we speak, more and more files are being moved to Commons manually, loosing a lot of valuable edit history in the process. There are also no known plans to "rescue" those lost history in the future. While we don't know when it will move from beta, I believe we can agree that the FileExporter already supersedes all other tools in terms of quality and efficiency. An example from the village pump:
My initial wording may sound a bit drastic, but what I meant is, to mention FileExplorer as the suggested transfer method, and have a separate section outlining alternative options. What do you think? Rehman 03:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Nothing is simple here. I want to find one recommended tool to use? I don't want to try out multiples. Where is FileExporter? Broichmore (talk) 11:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)