Dear participants,

I've put your questions up on the course web site, see 
   http://www.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/teach/rema-stats-meth-seminar/

Some of them required a good deal of cleaning up, for which my
thanks to Peter Kleiweg.  Since I'd like to repeat this exercise 
for regression techniques, please note this.  For example, 
converting from .rtf introduced lots of problems.

For Tues. please do the following:

First, please try the questions out, noting where you find problems.

Second, react in a more detailed way to the questions of the "next group".
So if you're in group n, react to the questions of group n+1 (and, yes, 
this works like a clock, so 4+1=1).

Here are the groups:

1. Oscar Strik, J.F. Schuurman, Conny Lahmann, Ruggero Montalto, Martin Boros
2. Simon Suster, Mona Timmermeister, Caitlin Mignella and Tran Man Ke
3. Laura S. Bos, Ljuobomir Zlatkov, Jet Vonk and Kristel Uiboaed
4. Laura Handojo, Ihor Tytyk, Vincenzo Tabacco and Jelke Bloem

It might be handy for your to have the input file for this, which is
    http://www.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/teach/rema-stats-meth-seminar/quizzes/quizvragen2.yaml

Ask for example, whether there the question and answer are clear 
and correct, whether the explanation is correct and helpful, whether the
reference to the book is optimal.  And please criticize the questions from the 
point of view of the student who uses the software at 
    http://www.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/teach/rema-stats-meth-seminar/
So ask, for example, too whether the background explanation is
sufficient.  Finally, you might ask whether the mix of questions is
likely to show a good mix of scores -- so that some questions are
not too tough, and a few are.

Finally, suggest how the questions might be improved by editing
the input file.

We probably won't be able to discuss too much of this on Tues.,
but it would be helpful if one group were really ready.  May I
therefore pick on group 4 to be ready to talk about group 1's 
questions?

Regards,

John Nerbonne, Instructor, Stats Seminar