This section lists the results for word graphs. In table 3 we list the results in terms of string accuracy, semantic accuracy and the computational resources required to complete the test.
|
The total amount of CPU-time is somewhat misleading because typically many word graphs can be treated very efficiently, whereas only a few word graphs require very much CPU-time. In table 4 we indicate the semantic accuracy (concept accuracy) that is obtained if a time-out is assumed (in such cases we assume that the system does not provide an update).
|
We also present the results for test sentences (rather than word graphs). Such a test indicates what the results are if the speech recogniser would perform perfectly. Obviously, it does not make sense to measure string accuracy in such a set-up. Semantic accuracy and computational resources is presented in table 5. Because the average sentence length is very small, we present the results for concept accuracy versus the length of the input sentence in table 6.
|
|