CLIN 19 Review Form

Paper: .....

EVALUATION

Please evaluate the paper according to the criteria below. Scores
range from 1 (bad) to 5 (good). Please add comments, especially 
if you give a score lower than 3. 

Please send your to e.f.tjong.kim.sang@rug.nl by 31 May 2009.

1. APPROPRIATENESS (1-5): Is the paper relevant for CLIN?

   Score: 
   Comment:

2. ORIGINALITY / INNOVATIVENESS (1-5): How original is the approach? 
   Does the paper present results which are based on innovative ideas?

   Score: 
   Comment:

3. CORRECTNESS / SOUNDNESS (1-5): Is the approach sound? Are the
   reported claims and results correct and valid?

   Score: 
   Comment:

4. CLARITY OF PRESENTATION (1-5): Does the paper clearly present what
   was done? Is it well-written and well-structured?

   Score: 
   Comment:

5. REFERENCES / COMPARISON WITH PRIOR WORK (1-5): Do the authors make
   clear where their paper sits with respect to existing literature?
   Is relevant literature mentioned?

   Score: 
   Comment:

6. OVERALL SCORE RECOMMENDATION (1-5): Should the paper be accepted?
   (1 = definitely not; 5 = definitely yes)

   Score:
   Comment:

7. REVIEWER CONFIDENCE (1-5):
   (1 = not my area; 5 = very familiar with the area)

   Score:
   Comment:

Recommendations for the author(s):